Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo
Open accessAbstract
The combination of Cas9, guide RNA and repair template DNA can induce precise gene editing and the correction of genetic diseases in adult mammals. However, clinical implementation of this technology requires safe and effective delivery of all of these components into the nuclei of the target tissue. Here, we combine lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with adeno-associated viruses encoding a sgRNA and a repair template to induce repair of a disease gene in adult animals. We applied our delivery strategy to a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia and show that the treatment generated fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (Fah)-positive hepatocytes by correcting the causative Fah-splicing mutation. Treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage. The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application, suggesting potential utility of Cas9-based therapeutic genome editing for a range of diseases.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study combined lipid nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV-delivered sgRNA and an HDR template to correct the Fah mutation in a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia type I. A single treatment corrected >6% of hepatocytes, restored Fah splicing, and rescued weight loss and liver damage.
Key findings
- In Fahmut/mut mice, combined nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR treatment yielded 6.2% ± 1.0% Fah-positive hepatocytes by immunohistochemistry after a single application (n = 4 mice), with correction correlating with nano.Cas9 and AAV-HDR dose.
- Treated mice had 9.5% restored FAH mRNA without selection, 24.1% average indels at the sgRNA target region, and 0.81% ± 0.08% corrected “G-CC” sequence in total liver DNA by deep sequencing.
- Treatment completely prevented body weight loss after NTBC withdrawal, all nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR mice survived 30 days, and serum AST, ALT, and bilirubin indicated substantially reduced liver damage compared with controls.
- Off-target editing was low at assayed sites: <0.3% indels at three top predicted off-target sites, and in vivo OT1/GOT sites were not substantially higher than background (P > 0.05); transient mRNA Cas9 also reduced off-target editing versus long-term lentiviral Cas9 in cells.
Methods
- Fahmut/mut mice (8–10 weeks old, male and female) were injected via tail vein with AAV2/8-HDR (6 × 10^11 or 1.2 × 10^12 genome copies) and nano.Cas9 (1 or 2 mg/kg); in the efficacy experiment, AAV-HDR was given at day −14, nano.Cas9 at day −7, and NTBC water was withdrawn at day 0.
- Cas9 mRNA was chemically modified and formulated with C12-200, cholesterol, C14PEG2000, DOPE, and arachidonic acid in lipid nanoparticles; AAV-HDR encoded U6-sgRNA and a 1.7-kb HDR template designed to correct the mutant “A” to wild-type “G” and introduce a “CC” PAM motif.
- Analyses included liver immunohistochemistry, serum biomarkers, qRT-PCR, Sanger sequencing, Illumina deep sequencing, GUIDE-Seq in Hepa1-6 cells, and statistics by Student’s t-tests and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.
Limitations
- Stated: non-viral delivery of DNA into the nucleus in vivo with high efficiency and low toxicity remains difficult, and further improvement of HDR efficacy may require optimizing HDR template design and inhibiting the NHEJ pathway.
- Stated: the stringent “G-CC” pattern counting may underestimate HDR events, and an alternative explanation for the observed data is partial gene conversion; off-target analysis was limited to predicted and assayed sites.
- Evident from the text: efficacy was shown only in the Fahmut/mut mouse model, with small group sizes (n = 3–4 mice) and 30-day follow-up, so long-term durability, AAV immunogenicity, and human translation are not established.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Deep sequencing confirmed a corrected 'G-CC' pattern at the Fah locus in 0.81% ± 0.08% of the total liver DNA, in contrast to the AAV-HDR alone group, which contained no detectable 'G-CC' sequences.
“The analysis of deep sequencing data confirmed a corrected “G-CC” pattern at the Fah locus in 0.81% ± 0.08% of the total liver DNA, in contrast to the AAV-HDR alone group, which contained no detectable “G-CC” sequences (Fig. 3g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Systemic delivery of Cas9 mRNA by lipid nanoparticles and sgRNA/HDR template by AAV can efficiently cure Fahmut/mut mice.
“Here we report that systemic delivery of Cas9 mRNA by lipid nanoparticles and sgRNA/HDR template by AAV can efficiently cure Fahmut/mut mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deep sequencing of the GFP provirus region from genomic DNA (n = 4) observed insertional or deletional mutations surrounding the Cas9 cleavage site.
“We observed insertional or deletional mutations (indels) surrounding the Cas9 cleavage site (Fig. 1c–e and Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of Fah-positive hepatocytes correlated with the dose of nano.Cas9 and AAV-HDR.
“The number of Fah-positive hepatocytes correlated with the dose of nano.Cas9 and AAV-HDR (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cas9 protein in total liver lysates was detected by immunoblot after intravenous injection of nano.Cas9 (1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg).
“To determine whether lipid nanoparticles can deliver Cas9 mRNA, nano.Cas9 (1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg) was injected intravenously, and Cas9 protein in total liver lysates was detected by immunoblot (Supplementary Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
GUIDE-Seq in cultured mouse liver cells (Hepa1-6) with pX330.sgFah observed only the Fah target site and one other site (OT1) that passed stringent criteria for potential nuclease cleavage sites.
“We observed a number of GUIDE-Seq oligonucleotide integration sites within the genome (Supplementary Table 7) but only the Fah target site and one other site (OT1, which is also the computationally predicted off-target site with the fewest mismatches in the genome; Supplementary Fig. 7) passed our stringent criteria for potential nuclease cleavage sites (Supplementary Table 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At least for Ctnnb1, all-viral Cas9 delivery did not significantly increase the HDR rate compared to mRNA delivery.
“Thus, at least for Ctnnb1, the all-viral Cas9 delivery did not significantly increase the HDR rate compared to mRNA delivery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 30 d after NTBC water withdrawal, serum biomarkers (AST, ALT and bilirubin) indicated that liver damage was substantially reduced in nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR-treated mice compared to control mice.
“At 30 d after NTBC water withdrawal, serum biomarkers (AST, ALT and bilirubin) indicated that liver damage was substantially reduced in nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR–treated mice compared to control mice (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deep sequencing of the Fah locus in total liver genomic DNA observed an average of 24.1% indels at the predicted sgRNA target region in the nano.Cas9 (2 mg/kg) + AAV-HDR group (1.2 × 10^12) (n = 4 mice).
“We observed an average of 24.1% indels at predicted sgRNA target region within nano.Cas9 (2 mg/kg) + AAV-HDR group (1.2 × 1012) (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Table 5) (n = 4 mice).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All mice in the nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR group survived 30 d after NTBC withdrawal.
“All the mice in the nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR group survived 30 d after NTBC withdrawal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combining lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with adeno-associated viruses encoding a sgRNA and a repair template induces repair of a disease gene in adult animals.
“Here, we combine lipid nanoparticle–mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with adeno-associated viruses encoding a sgRNA and a repair template to induce repair of a disease gene in adult animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical implementation of CRISPR genome editing requires safe and effective delivery of all components into the nuclei of the target tissue.
- Findingown data
Transient Cas9 expression by mRNA delivery can substantially reduce off-target genome editing in cells compared with long-term viral Cas9 expression.
“Using a VEGFA sgRNA with well-characterized off-target sites24, we observed that transient Cas9 expression by mRNA delivery can substantially reduce off-target genome editing in cells (Fig. 1f–h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822–826 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Immunohistochemistry staining detected widespread patches of Fah-positive hepatocytes in treated mice.
“Immunohistochemistry staining detected widespread patches of Fah-positive hepatocytes (Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The combined treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage in the tyrosinemia mouse model.
“Treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR treatment completely prevented body weight loss upon NTBC water withdrawal, whereas control mice rapidly lost 20% body weight and had to be euthanized (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Nano.Cas9 (2 mg/kg) is well tolerated in animals, as indicated by intact liver histology, normal serum biochemistry and cytokine levels in plasma.
“Nano.Cas9 (2 mg/kg) is well tolerated in animals, as indicated by intact liver histology, normal serum biochemistry and cytokine levels in plasma (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fah splicing was restored: 9.5% FAH mRNA expression was restored without selection.
“To investigate whether Fah splicing is restored in the liver, we performed qRT-PCR using primers spanning Fah exons 8 and 9 and observed that 9.5% FAH mRNA expression was restored without selection (Fig. 3d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
293T cells incubated with 0.4 μg/ml nano.Cas9 became 77.1 ± 2.6% GFP-negative after 5 d (n = 3).
“293T cells were incubated with 0.4 μg/ml nano.Cas9 and GFP signal was measured by FACS at 5 d. 77.1 ± 2.6% of cells (n = 3) became GFP-negative after nano.Cas9 treatment, suggesting that nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 mRNA can mediate genome editing in cells (Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sanger sequencing of the RT-PCR bands in nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR-treated mice confirmed that the corrected G nucleotide is present at the end of exon 8.
“Sanger sequencing of the RT-PCR bands in nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR–treated mice confirmed that the corrected G nucleotide is present at the end of exon 8 (Fig. 3e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia, the combined treatment generated Fah-positive hepatocytes by correcting the causative Fah-splicing mutation.
“We applied our delivery strategy to a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia and show that the treatment generated fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (Fah)-positive hepatocytes by correcting the causative Fah-splicing mutation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
This number is higher than our report using mRNA delivery (~24%).
“This number is higher than our report using mRNA delivery (∼24%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We consistently observed higher 'CC' reads (about 2-4%) than 'G' reads (about 1%) in treated samples.
“We consistently observed higher “CC” reads (about 2–4%) than “G” reads (about 1%) in treated samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AAV2/8 serotype can target hepatocytes.
“Vectors were packaged using an AAV2/8 serotype, which can target the hepatocytes8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Paulk, N.K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
These data suggest that there are likely not a large number of strong off-target sites for Cas9 programmed with the Fah sgRNA.
“These data suggest that there are likely not a large number of strong off-target sites for Cas9 programmed with the Fah sgRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Systemically delivered combinations of viral and nonviral CRISPR constructs may have utility for the treatment of a range of diseases.
“suggesting that systemically delivered combinations of viral and nonviral CRISPR constructs may have utility for the treatment of a range of diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The in vivo off-target lesion rate is low for sgFah in conjunction with mRNA delivery of Cas9.
“Our data, in particular the absence of significant lesions at the OT1 locus, indicate that the in vivo off-target lesion rate is low for sgFah in conjunction with mRNA delivery of Cas9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
HTI is a particularly suitable model for gene repair-based therapy because repaired hepatocytes will expand and repopulate the liver.
“The liver disease hereditary tyrosinemia type I (HTI) is a particularly suitable model for gene repair-based therapy because the repaired hepatocytes will expand and repopulate the liver6,7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Aponte, J.L. et al. Point mutations in the murine fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase gene: animal models for the human genetic disorder hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 641–645 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Azuma, H. et al. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah-/-/Rag2-/-/Il2rg-/- mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 903–910 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Lipid nanoparticles can effectively deliver Cas9 mRNA into cultured cells.
“These data indicate that lipid nanoparticles can effectively deliver Cas9 mRNA into cultured cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several groups have demonstrated in vitro correction of genetic disease genes including CFTR, Crygc and DMD in organoids or mouse zygotes.
“Several groups have also demonstrated in vitro correction of genetic disease genes including CFTR (cystic fibrosis)9, Crygc (cataracts)10 and DMD (Duchenne muscular dystrophy)11 in organoids or mouse zygotes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Schwank, G. et al. Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR-Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell 13, 653–658 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Wu, Y. et al. Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 13, 659–662 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Long, C. et al. Prevention of muscular dystrophy in mice by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing of germline DNA. Science 345, 1184–1188 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A repair template will require a second AAV vector.
“However, a repair template will require a second AAV vector.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cas9 mRNA delivery has minimal off-target effects at assayed sites for Fah sgRNA.
“indicating that Cas9 mRNA delivery has minimal off-target effects at assayed sites for Fah sgRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Concerns regarding potential for DNA damage remain if Cas9 is present for an extended period of time.
“Moreover, concerns regarding potential for DNA damage remain if Cas9 is present for an extended period of time14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Zuris, J.A. et al. Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 73–80 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Fahmut/mut mice possess the same G→A mutation in exon 8 as the common form of human HTI.
“These mice possess the same G→A mutation in exon 8 as the common form of this human disease8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Paulk, N.K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adenovirus or AAV-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 delivery has been successfully applied to knockout genes in the mouse brain and liver.
“Adenovirus or adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 delivery has been successfully applied to knockout genes in the mouse brain and liver12,13.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Ran, F.A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Swiech, L. et al. In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 102–106 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Hydrodynamic injection of CRISPR-Cas9 DNA and a short single-stranded DNA HDR template can correct the Fah mutation in the mouse liver.
“Previously, our groups have shown that hydrodynamic injection of CRISPR-Cas9 DNA and a short single-stranded DNA HDR template can correct the Fah mutation in the mouse liver16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Yin, H. et al. Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 551–553 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Our data suggest a model that only one corrected allele per polyploid hepatocyte cell is sufficient to yield a Fah+ corrected cell.
“Our data suggest a model that only one corrected allele per polyploidy hepatocyte cell is sufficient to yield a Fah+ corrected cell, as suggested by the following calculation: 6% hepatocytes × 0.6 (fraction of hepatocytes in the liver)/4 (estimated average ploidy of hepatocytes) = 0.9% estimated DNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In vivo delivery of Cas9 by mRNA may be suitable in both local and systemic situations for the treatment of disease.
“In vivo delivery of Cas9 by mRNA may be suitable in both local and systemic situations for the treatment of disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Non-viral delivery of DNA into the nucleus in vivo with high efficiency and low toxicity remains difficult.
“Especially the non-viral delivery of DNA into the nucleus in vivo with high efficiency and low toxicity remains difficult19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Yin, H. et al. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 541–555 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The efficiency of gene editing depends on the dose of Cas9 mRNA as well as sgRNA.
“Our data suggest the efficiency of gene editing depends on the dose of Cas9 mRNA as well as sgRNA (Fig. 3f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The AAV dose used is ∼5- to 15-fold lower than the highest AAV dose approved for systemic gene therapy in humans (3.3 × 10^14/kg, RAC Protocol 1210-1189).
“This AAV dose is ∼5- to 15-fold lower than the highest AAV dose approved for systemic gene therapy in human (3.3 × 1014/kg, RAC Protocol 1210-1189).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RAC Protocol 1210-1189
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Considering the mixture of nonparenchymal cells (30-40% of total cells) and the polyploidy of hepatocytes in the mouse liver, the deep sequencing data may be consistent with Fah+ hepatocytes.
“Nevertheless, considering the mixture of nonparenchymal cells (30–40% of total cells) and the polyploidy of hepatocytes in the mouse liver35, the deep sequencing data may be consistent with Fah+ hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Chen, H.Z. et al. Canonical and atypical E2Fs regulate the mammalian endocycle. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1192–1202 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
- May combine two claims. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe mean particle diameter of nano.Cas9 is about 120 nm as determined by dynamic light scattering.
“The mean particle diameter of nano.Cas9 is about 120 nm as determined by dynamic light scattering (Supplementary Fig. 1c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to indels at the on-target Fah site, <0.3% indels were detected at the assayed off-target sites in nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR-treated mice, and these numbers were comparable with AAV-HDR-treated control mice.
“Compared to indels at the on-target Fah site (Fig. 3f), <0.3% indels were detected at the assayed off-target sites in nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR–treated mice, and these numbers were comparable with AAV-HDR–treated control mice (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 6), indicating that Cas9 mRNA delivery has minimal off-target effects at assayed sites for Fah sgRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn vivo, OT1 and several other assayed sites had modest indel rates, and none of these sites were substantially higher than the background indel rate in untreated livers (P > 0.05).
“OT1 and several other assayed sites had modest indel rates, and none of these sites were substantially higher than the background indel rate in untreated livers (P > 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 8b and Supplementary Table 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-injection of an adenovirus encoding Cas9 with AAV-HDR for Ctnnb1 produced ∼24% indels and ∼1.2% beta-Catenin-positive hepatocytes in vivo.
“We observed ∼24% indels and ∼1.2% beta-Catenin–positive hepatocytes in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA PCR approach observed a clear band in livers of nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR-treated animals, but not in control animals, and sequencing identified that the corrected sequence ('G-CC' pattern) is integrated.
“We observed a clear band in livers of nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR–treated animals, but not in control animals (Supplementary Fig. 5b). We sequenced the band and identified that the corrected sequence (“G-CC” pattern) is integrated (Supplementary Fig. 5c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTargeted deep sequencing on nuclease-treated Hepa1-6 cells detected 2.4% and 1.8% indels at OT1 in two replicates, consistent with OT1 being a Cas9:sgFah off-target site in transformed cells in vitro.
“These additional sites did not meet our peak calling criteria, but we detected 2.4% and 1.8% indels at OT1 in two replicates (Supplementary Fig. 8a and Supplementary Table 9), consistent with OT1 being a Cas9:sgFah off-target site in transformed cells in vitro.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCas9 mRNA was present in the liver at 4 h and 14 h but was significantly diminished at 24 h (P < 0.05), consistent with transient expression.
“The Cas9 mRNA was present in the liver at 4 h and 14 h but was significantly diminished at 24 h (P < 0.05), consistent with transient expression (Supplementary Fig. 2e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datasgRNA was already expressed at day 3 after AAV-HDR injection, but its levels were more than tenfold higher at day 7 and day 14.
“We found sgRNA was already expressed at day 3, but its levels were more than tenfold higher at day 7 and day 14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe efficiency of Fah correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application, with up to 6.2% ± 1.0% hepatocytes staining positive for Fah protein in treated animals.
“The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application, suggesting potential utility of Cas9-based therapeutic genome editing for a range of diseases.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Up to 6.2% ± 1.0% hepatocytes stained positive for the Fah protein by immunohistochemistry in nano.Cas9 plus AAV-HDR–treated animals (Fig. 3b,c; n = 4 mice; see Supplementary Table 4 for percentage of Fah-positive cells, age and gender of each mouse).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe particle size of nano.Cas9 was the same on day 0, 7, 11 and 18, indicating these particles are stable for at least 18 d in PBS.
“The particle size of nano.Cas9 was the same on day 0, 7, 11 and 18 (Supplementary Fig. 1d,e), indicating these particles are stable for at least 18 d in PBS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataβ-gal protein was detected in the mouse liver by immunoblot at 14 h after administration of a single dose (1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg), and the amount of protein expressed correlated with the dose of mRNA.
“β-gal protein was detected in the mouse liver by immunoblot at 14 h after administration of a single dose (1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg), and the amount of protein expressed correlated with the dose of mRNA (Supplementary Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost indels are frameshift (e.g., 1 nt and 2 nt) mutations, which potentially cause loss of function of the GFP reporter.
“Most indels are frameshift (e.g., 1 nt and 2 nt) mutations (Fig. 1e), which potentially cause loss of function of the GFP reporter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSystemic delivery of Cas9 mRNA by lipid nanoparticles, and sgRNA/HDR template by AAV, corrected a Fah mutation and restored Fah splicing in more than 6% of hepatocytes in the adult mouse liver, an order of magnitude improvement over high-pressure injection of DNA.
“Systemic delivery of Cas9 mRNA by lipid nanoparticles, and sgRNA/HDR template by AAV, corrected a Fah mutation and restored Fah splicing in more than 6% of hepatocytes in the adult mouse liver, an order of magnitude improvement over that previously generated using high-pressure injection of DNA16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Yin, H. et al. Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 551–553 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis treatment is well-tolerated in mice and fully rescued body weight loss and liver damage in tyrosinemia mice.
“This treatment is well-tolerated in mice and fully rescued body weight loss and liver damage in tyrosinemia mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe majority of the cells in liver sections stained positive in a β-gal activity assay, indicating systemic delivery of mRNA to most of the cells in the mouse liver.
“The majority of the cells in liver sections stained positive in a β-gal activity assay (Supplementary Fig. 2c), indicating systemic delivery of mRNA to most of the cells in the mouse liver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn HTI patients, mutation of FAH leads to accumulation of toxic metabolites and severe liver damage.
“In HTI patients, mutation of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH), the last enzyme catalyzing the tyrosine catabolic pathway, leads to accumulation of toxic metabolites and severe liver damage8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Paulk, N.K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Fahmut/mut mouse model is caused by a G→A point mutation in the last nucleotide of exon 8, which causes skipping of exon 8 and truncated Fah mRNA.
“The Fahmut/mut mouse model6,8 is caused by a G→A point mutation in the last nucleotide of exon 8. This causes skipping of exon 8 and truncated Fah mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Aponte, J.L. et al. Point mutations in the murine fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase gene: animal models for the human genetic disorder hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 641–645 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Paulk, N.K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNon-viral delivery of Cas9 mRNA allows for short-term expression and, eventually, complete removal of the nuclease from the body.
“An alternative approach is the non-viral delivery of Cas9 mRNA, which would allow for short-term expression and, eventually, complete removal of the nuclease from the body.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAll of these delivery studies have reported gene knockout rather than gene repair, a less efficient process requiring a DNA repair template.
“However, all of these delivery studies have reported gene knockout rather than gene repair, a less efficient process requiring a DNA repair template15.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Chu, V.T., Weber, T. & Wefers, B. Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 543–548 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCas9:sgRNA recognizes the PAM sequence and a complementary 20-nucleotide genomic sequence and induces double-strand DNA breaks, which are repaired by error-prone NHEJ or precise HDR.
“Cas9:sgRNA recognizes the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence and a complementary 20-nucleotide genomic sequence and induces double-strand DNA breaks, which are repaired by error-prone nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or precise homology-directed repair (HDR)2,5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Doudna, J.A. & Charpentier, E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Sander, J.D. & Joung, J.K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 347–355 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA smaller form of Cas9 was developed and shown capable of packing and delivery with sgRNA by AAV in vivo.
“Recently, a smaller form of Cas9 was developed, and shown capable of packing and delivery with sgRNA by AAV in vivo12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Ran, F.A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLipid and lipid-like formulations have shown great promise as delivery agents for siRNA in a range of species, including humans.
“Lipid and lipid-like formulations have shown great promise as delivery agents for siRNA in a range of species, including humans19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Yin, H. et al. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 541–555 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHydrodynamic injection yielded a low correction rate of 0.4% of hepatocytes and has been tested in only one human clinical trial.
“Nevertheless, hydrodynamic injection yielded a low correction rate of 0.4% of hepatocytes, and this method has been tested in only one human clinical trial17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Yin, H. et al. Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 551–553 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Khorsandi, S.E. et al. Minimally invasive and selective hydrodynamic gene therapy of liver segments in the pig and human. Cancer Gene Ther. 15, 225–230 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAAV has a loading capacity size of approximately 4.7 kb, and the most commonly used S. pyogenes Cas9 is difficult to fit in typical AAV constructs with efficient promoters.
“However, AAV has a loading capacity size of approximately 4.7 kb, and the most commonly used form of Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes is difficult to fit in typical AAV constructs with efficient promoters13.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Swiech, L. et al. In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 102–106 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFahmut/mut mice can be treated with NTBC, an inhibitor of an enzyme upstream of Fah, to prevent toxin accumulation in hepatocytes.
“These mice can be treated with 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione (NTBC), an inhibitor of an enzyme upstream of Fah, to prevent toxin accumulation in hepatocytes8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Paulk, N.K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe AAV dose used (up to 1.2 × 10^12 genome copies/mouse) is a standard dose described in the literature.
“To express sgRNA, we treated animals with up to 1.2 × 1012 AAV genome copies/mouse, a standard dose described in the literature28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Barzel, A. et al. Promoterless gene targeting without nucleases ameliorates haemophilia B in mice. Nature 517, 360–364 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCombining non-viral delivery of Cas9 mRNA and an AAV vector with a sgRNA expression cassette and an HDR template allowed for short-term expression of the Cas9 nuclease, which provided efficient on-target genome editing, while potentially reducing off-target editing.
“This allowed for short-term expression of the Cas9 nuclease, which provided efficient on-target genome editing, while potentially reducing off-target editing (Fig. 1h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA smaller form of Cas9 (S. aureus Cas9) fits into AAV vectors and has been used to knockout genes by NHEJ in the mouse liver, with more than 40% indel formations in the Pcsk9 locus reported.
“A smaller form of Cas9 (Staphylococcus aureus Cas9), which fits into AAV vectors, has been recently used to knockout genes by NHEJ in the mouse liver. More than 40% indel formations in Pcsk9 locus was reported12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Ran, F.A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal experiments were performed under the guideline of the MIT Animal Care and Use Committee.
“All animal experiments were performed under the guideline of the MIT Animal Care and Use Committee.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe calculation 6% hepatocytes × 0.6/4 = 0.9% estimated DNA is consistent with the 0.81% corrected 'G-CC' sequence pattern observed by deep sequencing.
“This estimation is consistent with the 0.81% corrected “G-CC” sequence pattern observed by deep sequencing in treated liver samples (Fig. 3g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChemical modification of sgRNA improved gene editing in vitro when co-delivered with Cas9 mRNA.
“A recent study demonstrated that the chemical modification of sgRNA improved gene editing in vitro when co-delivered with Cas9 mRNA32.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Hendel, A. et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 985–989 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTransient expression of the nuclease Cas9 through delivery of mRNA allowed for sufficient exposure to the nuclease for gene repair and reduced concerns associated with long-term nuclease exposure.
“A key feature of our system is the transient expression of the nuclease Cas9, through delivery of mRNA. This allowed for sufficient exposure to the nuclease for gene repair and reduced concerns associated with long-term nuclease exposure34.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Wu, X. et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 670–676 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCRISPR systems have potential advantages over ZFNs, most importantly their flexibility and ease in adjusting target site.
“The CRISPR systems have a number of potential advantages over ZFNs, most importantly their flexibility and ease in adjusting target site4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Mali, P., Esvelt, K.M. & Church, G.M. Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology. Nat. Methods 10, 957–963 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCorrection of 6% of hepatocytes following a single round of treatment without selection suggests that this approach may be suitable for the treatment of a range of metabolic liver diseases and hemophilia, where restoration of 3-7% normal functional protein can be therapeutic.
“However, correction of 6% of hepatocytes following a single round of treatment without selection suggests that this approach may be suitable for the treatment of a range of metabolic liver diseases and hemophilia, where restoration of 3–7% normal functional protein can be therapeutic39.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Cox, D.B., Platt, R.J. & Zhang, F. Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat. Med. 21, 121–131 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationAn alternative explanation for this observation is partial gene conversion in spite of 'G' and 'CC' single-nucleotide polymorphisms equidistant to the Cas9 cutting site.
“An alternative explanation for this observation is partial gene conversion in spite of “G” and “CC” single-nucleotide polymorphisms equidistant to the Cas9 cutting site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [36] Elliott, B., Richardson, C., Winderbaum, J., Nickoloff, J.A. & Jasin, M. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 93–101 (1998). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Goldberg, A.D. et al. Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell 140, 678–691 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Findlay, G.M., Boyle, E.A., Hause, R.J., Klein, J.C. & Shendure, J. Saturation editing of genomic regions by multiplex homology-directed repair. Nature 513, 120–123 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious work has reported on the use of zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) for in vivo gene correction.
“Previous work has reported on the use of zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) for in vivo gene correction31,33.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] Mahiny, A.J. et al. In vivo genome editing using nuclease-encoding mRNA corrects SP-B deficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 584–586 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Li, H. et al. In vivo genome editing restores haemostasis in a mouse model of haemophilia. Nature 475, 217–221 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataIt is possible that our stringent 'G-CC' pattern counting underestimated the HDR event.
“It is possible that our stringent “G-CC” pattern counting underestimated the HDR event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlthough NHEJ has been reported using AAV-mediated Cas9 delivery, HDR using viral delivery in vivo has not been reported.
“Although NHEJ has been reported using AAV-mediated Cas9 delivery, HDR using viral delivery in vivo has not been reported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCells were tested by MIT core facility for mycoplasma contamination by an ELISA-based assay, and confirmed negative.
“Cells were tested by MIT core facility for mycoplasma contamination by an ELISA-based assay, and confirmed negative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLess than 10% indels at the Apob locus in the mouse liver was reported in the same study.
“For example, less than 10% indels at the Apob locus in the mouse liver was reported in the same study12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Ran, F.A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical implementation of CRISPR genome editing requires safe and effective delivery of all components into the nuclei of the target tissue.
“However, clinical implementation of this technology requires safe and effective delivery of all of these components into the nuclei of the target tissue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Improvements to CRISPR delivery methods and HDR efficiency are required for therapeutic application of genome editing for disease gene correction.
“However, improvements to CRISPR delivery methods and HDR efficiency are required for therapeutic application of genome editing for disease gene correction.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gene-editing components can be delivered by lipid nanoparticle-mRNA formulations to treat genetic diseases, including hereditary tyrosinaemia type I, hypercholesterolaemia, lipoprotein metabolism disorders and transthyretin amyloidosis, as demonstrated in preclinical studies.
“Gene-editing components can be delivered by lipid nanoparticle–mRNA formulations to treat genetic diseases, including HTI92,238, hypercholesterolaemia81,96,105,239, lipoprotein metabolism disorders85 and transthyretin amyloidosis239,240, which has been demonstrated in preclinical studies.”
From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [92]
CRISPR can correct the Fah mutation through homology-directed repair or allelic exchange.
“We and others recently reported that CRISPR can correct this Fah mutation through HDR16–18 or allelic exchange19.”
From Adenine base editing in an adult mouse model of tyrosinaemia (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
In vitro Guide-Seq detected only the Fah target site and one off-target site (GOT1).
“Using the standard Guide-seq protocol, we detected only the Fah target site and one off-target site (defined as Guide-seq off-target site 1, or GOT1) (Supplementary Data Set 1).”
From Adenine base editing in an adult mouse model of tyrosinaemia (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
After a single treatment with C12-200 LNPs delivering Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA and AAV DNA donor, FAH expression in more than 6% of hepatocytes was repaired and symptoms of hepatic damage were prevented in the following 30 days in Fah knockout mice.
“After a single treatment, the FAH expression in more than 6% of hepatocytes was repaired and the symptoms of hepatic damage were prevented in the following 30 days.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [141]
Yin et al.'s lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV encoding sgRNAs and donor templates repaired FAH gene in a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia, with correction efficiency >6% of hepatocytes after a single application and rescued disease symptoms.
“Yin et al. combined lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV encoding sgRNAs and donor templates to repair FAH gene in a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia. The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application and the treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage [112].”
From Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [112]
Cites
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339 · see citing works
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210 · see citing works
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062 · see citing works
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes
Gilbert, L. A., Larson, M. H., Morsut, L., Liu, Z., Brar, G. A., Torres, S. E., Stern-Ginossar, N., Brandman, O., Whitehead, E. H., Doudna, J. A., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044 · Cited by 3,696 · see citing works
Organoid Models and Applications in Biomedical Research
Xinaris, C., Brizi, V., & Remuzzi, G. (2015) · The Nephron journals/Nephron journals · doi:10.1159/000433566 · Cited by 3,517 · see citing works
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153 · see citing works
Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy
Yin, H., Kanasty, R. L., Eltoukhy, A. A., Vegas, A. J., Dorkin, J. R., & Anderson, D. G. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3763 · Cited by 3,123 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
Ran, F. A., Cong, L., Yan, W. X., Scott, D. A., Gootenberg, J. S., Kriz, A. J., Zetsche, B., Shalem, O., Wu, X., Makarova, K. S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14299 · Cited by 2,687 · see citing works
GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases
Tsai, S. Q., Zheng, Z., Nguyen, N. T., Liebers, M., Topkar, V. V., Thapar, V., Wyvekens, N., Khayter, C., Iafrate, A. J., Le, L. P., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3117 · Cited by 2,268 · see citing works
Rational design of cationic lipids for siRNA delivery
Semple, S. C., Akinc, A., Chen, J., Sandhu, A. P., Mui, B. L., Cho, C. K., Sah, D. W. Y., Stebbing, D., Crosley, E. J., Yaworski, E., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1602 · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
Self-citationZuris, J. A., Thompson, D. B., Shu, Y., Guilinger, J. P., Bessen, J. L., Hu, J. H., Maeder, M. L., Joung, J. K., Chen, Z.-Y., & Liu, D. R. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3081 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
Schwank, G., Koo, B.-K., Sasselli, V., Dekkers, J. F., Heo, I., Demircan, T., Sasaki, N., Boymans, S., Cuppen, E., van der Ent, C. K., et al. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.002 · Cited by 1,424 · see citing works
Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges
Cox, D. B. T., Platt, R. J., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3793 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Distinct Factors Control Histone Variant H3.3 Localization at Specific Genomic Regions
Goldberg, A. D., Banaszynski, L. A., Noh, K., Lewis, P. W., Elsässer, S. J., Stadler, S. C., Dewell, S. B., Law, M. J., Guo, X., Li, X., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Chu, V. T., Weber, T., Wefers, B., Wurst, W., Sander, S., Rajewsky, K., & Kühn, R. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3198 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology
Mali, P., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2649 · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data
Zhu, L., Gazin, C., Lawson, N., Pagès, H., Lin, S. M., Lapointe, D. S., & Green, M. R. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-237 · Cited by 1,144 · see citing works
Self-citationChemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells
Hendel, A., Bak, R. O., Clark, J. T., Kennedy, A. B., Ryan, D. E., Roy, S., Steinfeld, I., Lunstad, B. D., Kaiser, R. J., Wilkens, A. B., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3290 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Lipid-like materials for low-dose, in vivo gene silencing
Love, K. T., Mahon, K. P., Levins, C. G., Whitehead, K. A., Querbes, W., Dorkin, J. R., Qin, J., Cantley, W., Qin, L. L., Racie, T., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910603106 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype
Yin, H., Xue, W., Chen, S., Bogorad, R. L., Benedetti, E., Grompe, M., Koteliansky, V., Sharp, P. A., Jacks, T., & Anderson, D. G. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2884 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells
Wu, X., Scott, D. A., Kriz, A. J., Chiu, A. C., Hsu, P. D., Dadon, D. B., Cheng, A. W., Trevino, A. E., Konermann, S., Chen, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2889 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah−/−/Rag2−/−/Il2rg−/− mice
Azuma, H., Paulk, N., Ranade, A., Dorrell, C., Al-Dhalimy, M., Ellis, E., Strom, S., Kay, M. A., Finegold, M., & Grompe, M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1326 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Kauffman, K. J., Dorkin, J. R., Yang, J. H., Heartlein, M. W., DeRosa, F., Mir, F. F., Fenton, O. S., & Anderson, D. G. (2015) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02497 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPR-mediated direct mutation of cancer genes in the mouse liver
Xue, W., Chen, S., Yin, H., Tammela, T., Papagiannakopoulos, T., Joshi, N. S., Cai, W., Yang, G., Bronson, R., Crowley, D. G., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13589 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9
Swiech, L., Heidenreich, M., Banerjee, A., Habib, N., Li, Y., Trombetta, J., Sur, M., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3055 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Self-citationExpression of therapeutic proteins after delivery of chemically modified mRNA in mice
Kormann, M. S. D., Hasenpusch, G., Aneja, M. K., Nica, G., Flemmer, A. W., Herber-Jonat, S., Huppmann, M., Mays, L. E., Illenyi, M., Schams, A., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1733 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Prevention of muscular dystrophy in mice by CRISPR/Cas9–mediated editing of germline DNA
Long, C., McAnally, J. R., Shelton, J. M., Mireault, A. A., Bassel-Duby, R., & Olson, E. N. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254445 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
State-of-the-art gene-based therapies: the road ahead
Kay, M. A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2971 · Cited by 672 · see citing works
Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9
Wu, Y., Liang, D., Wang, Y., Bai, M., Tang, W., Bao, S., Yan, Z., Li, D., & Li, J. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.016 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
In vivo genome editing restores haemostasis in a mouse model of haemophilia
Li, H., Haurigot, V., Doyon, Y., Li, T., Wong, S. Y., Bhagwat, A. S., Malani, N., Anguela, X. M., Sharma, R., Ivanciu, L., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10177 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Chen, D. L., Love, K. T., Chen, Y., Eltoukhy, A. A., Kastrup, C. J., Sahay, G., Jeon, A., Dong, Y., Whitehead, K. A., & Anderson, D. G. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja301621z · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Self-citationSaturation editing of genomic regions by multiplex homology-directed repair
Findlay, G. M., Boyle, E. A., Hause, R. J., Klein, J. C., & Shendure, J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13695 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Gene Conversion Tracts from Double-Strand Break Repair in Mammalian Cells
Elliott, B., Richardson, C. A., Winderbaum, J., Nickoloff, J. A., & Jasin, M. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.1.93 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
A Co-CRISPR Strategy for Efficient Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans
Kim, H., Ishidate, T., Ghanta, K. S., Seth, M., Conte, D., Shirayama, M., & Mello, C. C. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.166389 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Promoterless gene targeting without nucleases ameliorates haemophilia B in mice
Barzel, A., Paulk, N. K., Shi, Y., Huang, Y., Chu, K. C., Zhang, F., Valdmanis, P. N., Spector, L. P., Porteus, M. H., Gaensler, K. M. L., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13864 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Zhu, L. J., Holmes, B. R., D, N. A. M., & Brodsky, M. H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108424 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationCanonical and atypical E2Fs regulate the mammalian endocycle
Chen, H.-Z., Ouseph, M. M., Li, J., Pécot, T., Chokshi, V., Kent, L., Bae, S., Byrne, M., Duran, C., Comstock, G., et al. (2012) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2595 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
In vivo genome editing using nuclease-encoding mRNA corrects SP-B deficiency
Mahiny, A. J., Dewerth, A., Mays, L. E., Alkhaled, M., Mothes, B., Malaeksefat, E., Loretz, B., Rottenberger, J., Brosch, D. M., Reautschnig, P., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3241 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Adeno‐associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo†‡
Paulk, N. K., Wursthorn, K., Wang, Z., Finegold, M. J., Kay, M. A., & Grompe, M. (2010) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.23481 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
DNA-binding-domain fusions enhance the targeting range and precision of Cas9
Bolukbasi, M. F., Gupta, A., Oikemus, S., Derr, A. G., Garber, M. G., Brodsky, M. H., Zhu, L. J., & Wolfe, S. A. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3624 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationMfge8 Is Critical for Mammary Gland Remodeling during Involution
Atabai, K., Fernandez, R. J., Huang, X., Ueki, I. F., Kline, A., Li, Y., Sadatmansoori, S., Smith-Steinhart, C., Zhu, W., Pytela, R., et al. (2005) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e05-02-0128 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationMinimally invasive and selective hydrodynamic gene therapy of liver segments in the pig and human
Khorsandi, S. E., Bachellier, P., Weber, J. C., Greget, M., Jaeck, D., Zacharoulis, D., Rountas, C., Helmy, S. M., Helmy, A. S., Al-Waracky, M., et al. (2008) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.cgt.7701119 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Aponte, J. L., Sega, G. A., Hauser, L. J., Dhar, M. S., Withrow, C. M., Carpenter, D. A., Rinchik, E. M., Culiat, C. T., & Johnson, D. K. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.641 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Overview of guide RNA design tools for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology
Zhu, L. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Biology · doi:10.1007/s11515-015-1366-y · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationA fast and sensitive alternative for β-galactosidase detection in mouse embryos
Sundararajan, S. K., Wakamiya, M., Behringer, R. R., & Rivera‐Pérez, J. A. (2012) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.078790 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery
Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R., & Dong, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0 · Cited by 4,076 · see citing works
Self-citationAdeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery
Wang, D., Tai, P. W. L., & Gao, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0012-9 · Cited by 2,444 · see citing works
Self-citationCheng, Q., Wei, T., Farbiak, L., Johnson, L. T., Dilliard, S. A., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0669-6 · Cited by 2,383 · see citing works
Drug delivery systems for RNA therapeutics
Paunovska, K., Loughrey, D., & Dahlman, J. E. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00439-4 · Cited by 1,349 · see citing works
Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines
Manzari, M. T., Shamay, Y., Kiguchi, H., Rosen, N. X., Scaltriti, M., & Heller, D. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00269-6 · Cited by 1,201 · see citing works
Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches
Lino, C. A., Harper, J. C., Carney, J. P., & Timlin, J. A. (2018) · Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964 · Cited by 1,185 · see citing works
Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics
Dowdy, S. F. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3802 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery
Kowalski, P. S., Rudra, A., Miao, L., & Anderson, D. G. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.012 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of preexisting adaptive immunity to Cas9 proteins in humans
Charlesworth, C. T., Deshpande, P. S., Dever, D. P., Camarena, J., Lemgart, V. T., Cromer, M. K., Vakulskas, C. A., Collingwood, M. A., Zhang, L., Bode, N. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0326-x · Cited by 1,093 · see citing works
CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes
Komor, A. C., Badran, A. H., & Liu, D. R. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Emerging issues in AAV-mediated in vivo gene therapy
Colella, P., Ronzitti, G., & Mingozzi, F. (2018) · Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2017.11.007 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
Finn, J. D., Smith, A. R., Patel, M. C., Shaw, L., Youniss, M. R., van Heteren, J., Dirstine, T., Ciullo, C., Lescarbeau, R., Seitzer, J., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.014 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration
Gaharwar, A. K., Singh, I., & Khademhosseini, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery
Fenton, O. S., Olafson, K. N., Pillai, P. S., Mitchell, M. J., & Langer, R. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705328 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Self-citationTools for translation: non-viral materials for therapeutic mRNA delivery
Hajj, K. A., & Whitehead, K. A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.56 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Lee, K., Conboy, M., Park, H. M., Jiang, F., Kim, H. J., Dewitt, M. A., Mackley, V. A., Chang, K., Rao, A., Skinner, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0137-2 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticle Assisted mRNA Delivery for Potent Cancer Immunotherapy
Oberli, M. A., Reichmuth, A. M., Dorkin, J. R., Mitchell, M. J., Fenton, O. S., Jaklenec, A., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R., & Blankschtein, D. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03329 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells
Kleinstiver, B. P., Tsai, S. Q., Prew, M. S., Nguyen, N. T., Welch, M. M., Lopez, J. M., McCaw, Z. R., Aryee, M. J., & Joung, J. K. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3620 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Advances in the delivery of RNA therapeutics: from concept to clinical reality
Kaczmarek, J. C., Kowalski, P. S., & Anderson, D. G. (2017) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0450-0 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Self-citationExosome–Liposome Hybrid Nanoparticles Deliver CRISPR/Cas9 System in MSCs
Lin, Y., Wu, J., Gu, W., Huang, Y., Tong, Z., Huang, L., & Tan, J. (2018) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201700611 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
A Multifunctional AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 and Its Host Response
Chew, W. L., Tabebordbar, M., Cheng, J. K. W., Mali, P., Wu, E. Y., Ng, A. H. M., Zhu, K., Wagers, A. J., & Church, G. M. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3993 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing using targeted lipid nanoparticles for cancer therapy
Rosenblum, D., Gutkin, A., Kedmi, R., Ramishetti, S., Veiga, N., Jacobi, A. M., Schubert, M. S., Friedmann-Morvinski, D., Cohen, Z. R., Behlke, M. A., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc9450 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Delivery strategies of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system for therapeutic applications
Liu, C., Zhang, L., Liu, H., & Cheng, K. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.012 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Delivery technologies for genome editing
Yin, H., Kauffman, K. J., & Anderson, D. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.280 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, H.-X., Li, M., Lee, C. M., Chakraborty, S., Kim, H.-W., Bao, G., & Leong, K. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00799 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Treatment of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of genome editing agents
Gao, X., Tao, Y., Lamas, V., Huang, M., Yeh, W.-H., Pan, B., Hu, Y.-J., Hu, J. H., Thompson, D. B., Shu, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25164 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Self-citationTherapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents
Raguram, A., Banskota, S., & Liu, D. R. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.045 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
CRISPR-Based Therapeutic Genome Editing: Strategies and In Vivo Delivery by AAV Vectors
Wang, D., Zhang, F., & Gao, G. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.023 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure-guided chemical modification of guide RNA enables potent non-viral in vivo genome editing
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Suresh, S., Wu, Q., Walsh, S., Rhym, L. H., Mintzer, E., Bolukbasi, M. F., Zhu, L. J., Kauffman, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4005 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Self-citationA highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast
Casini, A., Olivieri, M., Petris, G., Montagna, C., Reginato, G., Maule, G., Lorenzin, F., Prandi, D., Romanel, A., Demichelis, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4066 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities
Porto, E. M., Komor, A. C., Slaymaker, I. M., & Yeo, G. W.-M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0084-6 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Treatment of a metabolic liver disease by in vivo genome base editing in adult mice
Villiger, L., Grisch‐Chan, H. M., Lindsay, H. A., Ringnalda, F. C. A. S., Pogliano, C. B., Allegri, G., Fingerhut, R., Häberle, J., Matos, J., Robinson, M. D., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0209-1 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Nanoparticle elasticity directs tumor uptake
Guo, P., Liu, D., Subramanyam, K. S., Wang, B., Yang, J., Huang, J., Auguste, D. T., & Moses, M. A. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02588-9 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-Editing Technologies: Principles and ApplicationsPreprint
Gaj, T., Sirk, S. J., Shui, S., & Liu, J. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a023754 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Xu, Y., & Li, Z. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.031 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
The challenge and prospect of mRNA therapeutics landscape
Weng, Y., Li, C., Yang, T., Hu, B., Zhang, M., Guo, S., Xiao, H., Liang, X.-J., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107534 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities
Li, L., Hu, S., & Chen, X. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.031 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
RNA Drugs and RNA Targets for Small Molecules: Principles, Progress, and Challenges
Yu, A., Choi, Y. H., & Tu, M. (2020) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.120.019554 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Nanoparticle Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Genome Editing
Duan, L., Ouyang, K., Xu, X. G., Xu, L., Wen, C., Zhou, X., Qin, Z., Xu, Z., Sun, W., & Liang, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.673286 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Nanotechnologies in delivery of mRNA therapeutics using nonviral vector-based delivery systems
Guan, S., & Rosenecker, J. (2017) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2017.5 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Interplay between materials and microfluidics
Hou, X., Zhang, Y. S., Santiago, G. T., Álvarez, M. M., Ribas, J., Jonas, S. J., Weiss, P. S., Andrews, A. M., Aizenberg, J., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.16 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Liu, J., Chang, J., Jiang, Y., Meng, X., Sun, T., Mao, L., Xu, Q., & Wang, M. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902575 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Cheng, G., Li, W., Ha, L., Han, X., Hao, S., Wan, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, F., Zou, X., Mao, Y., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03584 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Advancement of the emerging field of RNA nanotechnology
Jasinski, D., Haque, F., Binzel, D. W., & Guo, P. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b05737 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Microfluidic technologies and devices for lipid nanoparticle-based RNA delivery
Maeki, M., Uno, S., Niwa, A., Okada, Y., & Tokeshi, M. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.02.017 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Mangeot, P. E., Risson, V., Fusil, F., Marnef, A., Laurent, E., Blin, J., Mournetas, V., Massouridès, E., Sohier, T. J. M., Corbin, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07845-z · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Engineering the delivery system for CRISPR-based genome editing
Glass, Z., Lee, M., Li, Y., & Xu, Q. (2018) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.11.006 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Self-citationSynergistic lipid compositions for albumin receptor mediated delivery of mRNA to the liver
Miao, L., Lin, J., Huang, Y., Li, L., Delcassian, D., Ge, Y., Shi, Y., & Anderson, D. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16248-y · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Self-citationEvers, M. J. W., Kulkarni, J. A., van der Meel, R., Cullis, P. R., Vader, P., & Schiffelers, R. M. (2018) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.201700375 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Maeki, M., Kimura, N., Sato, Y., Harashima, H., & Tokeshi, M. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.008 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Scalable mRNA and siRNA Lipid Nanoparticle Production Using a Parallelized Microfluidic Device
Shepherd, S. J., Warzecha, C. C., Yadavali, S., El-Mayta, R. D., Alameh, M., Wang, L., Weissman, D., Wilson, J. M., Issadore, D., & Mitchell, M. J. (2021) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01353 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations
Akçakaya, P., Bobbin, M. L., Guo, J. A., Malagon-Lopez, J., Clement, K., Garcia, S. P., Fellows, M. D., Porritt, M. J., Firth, M. A., Carreras, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0500-9 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Delivery Aspects of CRISPR/Cas for in Vivo Genome Editing
Wilbie, D., Walther, J., & Mastrobattista, E. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00106 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Tailoring Nanomaterials for Targeting Tumor‐Associated Macrophages
Ovais, M., Guo, M., & Chen, C. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201808303 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
In Vivo Excision of HIV-1 Provirus by saCas9 and Multiplex Single-Guide RNAs in Animal Models
Yin, C., Zhang, T., Qu, X., Zhang, Y., Putatunda, R., Xiao, X., Li, F., Xiao, W., Zhao, H., Dai, S., et al. (2017) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.012 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
A non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system for therapeutically targeting HBV DNA and pcsk9 in vivo
Jiang, C., Mei, M., Li, B., Zhu, X., Zu, W., Tian, Y., Wang, Q., Guo, Y., Dong, Y., & Tan, X. (2017) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2017.16 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Self-citationCombinatorial design of nanoparticles for pulmonary mRNA delivery and genome editing
Li, B., Manan, R. S., Liang, S., Gordon, A. G. R., Jiang, A. Y., Varley, A., Gao, G., Langer, R., Xue, W., & Anderson, D. G. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01679-x · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Self-citationMcKinlay, C. J., Vargas, J. R., Blake, T. R., Hardy, J. W., Kanada, M., Contag, C. H., Wender, P. A., & Waymouth, R. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614193114 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
The delivery challenge: fulfilling the promise of therapeutic genome editing
van Haasteren, J., Li, J., Scheideler, O. J., Murthy, N., & Schaffer, D. V. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0565-5 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Wang, H.-X., Song, Z., Lao, Y.-H., Xu, X., Gong, J., Cheng, D., Chakraborty, S., Park, J. S., Li, M., Huang, D., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1712963115 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Park, H., Oh, J., Shim, G., Cho, B., Chang, Y., Kim, S., Baek, S., Kim, H., Shin, J., Choi, H. G., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0352-0 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice
Liu, P., Liang, S.-Q., Zheng, C., Mintzer, E., Zhao, Y. G., Ponnienselvan, K., Mir, A., Sontheimer, E. J., Gao, G., Flotte, T. R., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22295-w · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPR-Cas9 for cancer therapy: Opportunities and challenges
Chen, M., Mao, A., Xu, M., Weng, Q., Mao, J., & Ji, J. (2019) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2019.01.017 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Nrl knockdown by AAV-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 prevents retinal degeneration in mice
Yu, W., Mookherjee, S., Chaitankar, V., Hiriyanna, S., Kim, J.-W., Brooks, M., Ataeijannati, Y., Sun, X., Dong, L., Li, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14716 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing as a Therapeutic Approach for Leber Congenital Amaurosis 10
Ruan, G.-X., Barry, E., Yu, D., Lukason, M., Cheng, S. H., & Scaria, A. (2017) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.12.006 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Glutathione-Responsive Prodrug Nanoparticles for Effective Drug Delivery and Cancer Therapy
Ling, X., Tu, J., Wang, J., Shajii, A., Kong, N., Feng, C., Zhang, Y., Yu, M., Xie, T., Bharwani, Z., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b06400 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future
Obrador, E., Moreno-Murciano, P., Oriol‐Caballo, M., López‐Blanch, R., Pineda, B., Gutiérrez-Arroyo, J., Loras, A., Bonet, L. G. G., Martínez‐Cadenas, C., Estrela, J. M., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25052529 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Lipid nanoparticles for delivery of messenger RNA to the back of the eye
Patel, S., Ryals, R. C., Weller, K. K., Pennesi, M. E., & Sahay, G. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.015 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Genome Editing with mRNA Encoding ZFN, TALEN, and Cas9
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Yin, H. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.01.014 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationRefining strategies to translate genome editing to the clinic
Cornu, T. I., Mussolino, C., & Cathomen, T. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4313 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Partial DNA-guided Cas9 enables genome editing with reduced off-target activity
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Suresh, S., Kwan, S.-Y., Wu, Q., Walsh, S., Ding, J., Bogorad, R. L., Zhu, L. J., Wolfe, S. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2559 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhanced Endosomal Escape by Light-Fueled Liquid-Metal Transformer
Lü, Y., Lin, Y., Chen, Z., Hu, Q., Liu, Y., Yu, S., Gao, W., Dickey, M. D., & Gu, Z. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04346 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Methods and Applications of CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing in Eukaryotic Genomes
Hess, G. T., Tycko, J., Yao, D., & Bassik, M. C. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.029 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
AAV-CRISPR Gene Editing Is Negated by Pre-existing Immunity to Cas9
Li, A., Tanner, M. R., Lee, C. M., Hurley, A. E., De Giorgi, M., Jarrett, K. E., Davis, T. H., Doerfler, A. M., Bao, G., Beeton, C., et al. (2020) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.04.017 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Designing nanomedicine for immuno-oncology
Jiang, W., Roemeling, C. A. V., Chen, Y., Qie, Y., Liu, X., Chen, J., & Kim, B. Y. S. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0029 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Zou, Y., Sun, X., Yang, Q., Zheng, M., Shimoni, O., Ruan, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Yin, J., Huang, X., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm8011 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Principles, Applications, and Biosafety of Plant Genome Editing Using CRISPR-Cas9
El‐Mounadi, K., Morales-Floriano, M. L., & García-Ruíz, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00056 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Cheng, Q., Wei, T., Jia, Y., Farbiak, L., Zhou, K., Zhang, S., Wei, Y., Zhu, H., & Siegwart, D. J. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201805308 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Kaczmarek, J. C., Kauffman, K. J., Fenton, O. S., Sadtler, K., Patel, A. K., Heartlein, M. W., DeRosa, F., & Anderson, D. G. (2018) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02917 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationChadwick, A. C., Wang, X., & Musunuru, K. (2017) · Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.117.309881 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
In utero CRISPR-mediated therapeutic editing of metabolic genes
Rossidis, A. C., Stratigis, J. D., Chadwick, A. C., Hartman, H. A., Ahn, N. J., Li, H., Singh, K., Coons, B. E., Li, L., Lv, W., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0184-6 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Liang, C., Li, F., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., He, B., Li, J., Chen, Z., Shaikh, A. B., Liu, J., et al. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.015 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Zhao, H., Li, Y., He, L., Pu, W., Yu, W., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Xu, C., Wei, Y., Ding, Q., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.042476 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationKang, Y. K., Kwon, K., Ryu, J. S., Lee, H. N., Park, C., & Chung, H. J. (2017) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00676 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Various Aspects of a Gene Editing System—CRISPR–Cas9
Janik, E., Niemcewicz, M., Ceremuga, M., Krzowski, Ł., Saluk, J., & Bijak, M. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21249604 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Engineered materials for in vivo delivery of genome-editing machinery
Tong, S., Moyo, B., Lee, C. M., Leong, K. W., & Bao, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0145-9 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Adenine base editing in an adult mouse model of tyrosinaemia
Song, C.-Q., Jiang, T., Richter, M., Rhym, L. H., Koblan, L. W., Zafra, M. P., Schatoff, E. M., Doman, J. L., Cao, Y., Dow, L. E., et al. (2019) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0357-8 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citationPrime editing: advances and therapeutic applications
Zhao, Z., Shang, P., Mohanraju, P., & Geijsen, N. (2023) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.03.004 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Targeting of NLRP3 inflammasome with gene editing for the amelioration of inflammatory diseases
Xu, C., Lu, Z.-D., Luo, Y., Liu, Y., Cao, Z., Shen, S., Li, H., Liu, J., Chen, K., Chen, Z., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06522-5 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
In vivo prime editing of a metabolic liver disease in mice
Böck, D., Rothgangl, T., Villiger, L., Schmidheini, L., Matsushita, M., Mathis, N., Ioannidi, E. I., Rimann, N., Grisch‐Chan, H. M., Kreutzer, S., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abl9238 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Strategies for nonviral nanoparticle‐based delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics
Chen, F., Alphonse, M., & Liu, Q. (2020) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1609 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Maeki, M., Fujishima, Y., Sato, Y., Yasui, T., Kaji, N., Ishida, A., Tani, H., Baba, Y., Harashima, H., & Tokeshi, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187962 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing
Newby, G. A., & Liu, D. R. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.002 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
On the Origin of CRISPR-Cas Technology: From Prokaryotes to Mammals
Mojica, F. J. M., & Montoliu, L. (2016) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.005 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Liu, Q., Zhao, K., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Zheng, C., Zhao, Y., Zheng, Y., Liu, C., An, Y., Shi, L., et al. (2018) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201801423 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Organelle-level precision with next-generation targeting technologies
Saminathan, A., Zajac, M. A., Anees, P., & Krishnan, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00396-8 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Bost, J., Barriga, H. M. G., Holme, M. N., Gallud, A., Maugeri, M., Gupta, D., Lehto, T., Valadi, H., Esbjörner, E. K., Stevens, M. M., et al. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c05099 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
In vivo genome editing improves motor function and extends survival in a mouse model of ALS
Gaj, T., Ojala, D. S., Ekman, F. K., Byrne, L. C., Limsirichai, P., & Schaffer, D. V. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar3952 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Rational designs of in vivo CRISPR-Cas delivery systems
Xu, C., Chen, G., Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, G., Lu, Z.-D., Czarna, A., Gu, Z., & Wang, J. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.005 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Dorkin, J. R., Zhu, L. J., Li, Y., Wu, Q., Park, A., Yang, J., Suresh, S., Bizhanova, A., Gupta, A., Bolukbasi, M. F., Walsh, S., Bogorad, R. L., Gao, G., Weng, Z., Dong, Y., Koteliansky, V., Wolfe, S. A., Langer, R., Xue, W., & Anderson, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Tongji University (CN)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xue, Wen
- Anderson, Daniel G
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2016-02-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 328-333
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC5423356
- OpenAlex
- W2260024370
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 46
- FWCI
- 67.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1f32eb017625-01)
- National Eye Institute (P30EY012196)
- National Cancer Institute (5‑U54‑CA151884‑04, U54CA151884, R00CA169512, P30CA014051, P30-CA-14051)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (1F32EB017625, F32 EB017625)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- therapeutic genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, lipid nanoparticle delivery, adeno-associated virus vectors, hereditary tyrosinemia, fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Lipids, Mutation, Viruses, Genome, Human, RNA Editing, Gene Transfer Techniques, Tyrosinemias, Mice, Nanoparticles, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review