Adenine base editing in an adult mouse model of tyrosinaemia
Open accessAbstract
In contrast to traditional CRISPR-Cas9 homology-directed repair, base editing can correct point mutations without supplying a DNA-repair template. Here we show in a mouse model of tyrosinaemia that hydrodynamic tail-vein injection of plasmid DNA encoding the adenine base editor (ABE) and a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) can correct an A>G splice-site mutation. ABE treatment partially restored splicing, generated fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH)-positive hepatocytes in the liver, and rescued weight loss in mice. We also generated FAH+ hepatocytes in the liver via lipid-nanoparticle-mediated delivery of a chemically modified sgRNA and an mRNA of a codon-optimized base editor that displayed higher base-editing efficiency than the standard ABEs. Our findings suggest that adenine base editing can be used for the correction of genetic diseases in adult animals.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Hydrodynamic tail-vein delivery of an adenine base editor and sgRNA corrected an A>G splice-site mutation in Fahmut/mut mice, restoring splicing, generating Fah-positive hepatocytes, and rescuing weight loss. A codon-optimized RA6.3 improved editing, and lipid-nanoparticle delivery of RA6.3 mRNA/sgRNA also produced Fah-positive hepatocytes, though at low efficiency.
Key findings
- ABE6.3 plus Fah sgRNA rescued weight loss in all five treated Fahmut/mut mice, whereas control PBS or ABE6.3 alone rapidly lost 20% of total body weight; two remaining ABE-treated mice were viable with normal body weight at 106 days without NTBC.
- Amplicon deep sequencing showed A9-to-G correction of 9.5±4.0% (n=6), A6-to-G editing of 1.9±0.9%, and low indels (0.05% ABE vs 0.03% control); RT-PCR showed both 305 bp mutant and 405 bp wild-type-sized bands, and sequencing confirmed the corrected G at A9.
- Codon-optimized RA6.3 increased A-to-G conversion in HEK293T cells by an average of 2.1±0.9 fold at site 1 and 4.8±1.8 fold at site 2; compared with HDR (site 1: 1.7±1.1%; site 2: 1.8±0.8%), ABE6.3 gave site 1: 30±6.3% and site 2: 7.3±1.6%, while RA6.3 gave site 1: 61±6.3% and site 2: 34±3.2%. In vivo, RA6.3 generated more Fah-positive hepatocytes than ABE6.3 (p<0.05).
- LNP delivery of RA6.3 mRNA and chemically modified sgRNA produced 0.44%±0.28% edited hepatocytes, while control PBS showed none; Guide-Seq detected only the Fah target site and one off-target site (GOT1), with no increased A-to-G editing at GOT1 (n=4, p>0.05) or at four predicted top-ranking off-target sites (n=6, all rates <0.1%).
Methods
- Proof-of-concept in vivo base editing in the Fahmut/mut hereditary tyrosinemia type I mouse model, using hydrodynamic tail-vein plasmid injection of ABE6.3 or RA6.3 plus Fah sgRNA, or LNP delivery of RA6.3 mRNA and modified sgRNA.
- Mice were 8–10 week old Fahmut/mut mice kept on NTBC water; NTBC was withdrawn 6 days after hydrodynamic injection, and LNP-treated mice received 1 mg/kg RA6.3 mRNA plus 0.5 mg/kg Fah sgRNA in 3–4 doses every 3 days and were harvested 5 days after the last injection.
- Analyses included Fah immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR spanning exons 5–9, amplicon deep sequencing for editing and indels, and Guide-Seq in Hepa1–6 cells followed by targeted deep sequencing in mouse livers.
Limitations
- Stated: the in vivo ABE efficacy in this proof-of-concept study may not suffice for genetic disorders requiring higher correction and lacking selective proliferation of corrected cells; detecting off-target effects is difficult because on-target ABE efficiency is relatively low; LNP delivery was low efficiency, and ABE mRNA is longer than Cas9 mRNA (5.2 kb vs 4.1 kb), possibly reducing delivery or translation.
- Evident from the text: sample sizes were small (n=5 for weight rescue, n=6 for editing/off-target sequencing, n=4 for GOT1), off-target assessment combined in vitro Guide-Seq with selected in vivo sites rather than comprehensive in vivo genome-wide profiling, and editing rates were low (A9 9.5±4.0%; LNP 0.44%±0.28%), limiting generalization.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The A6 to G editing rate in livers was 1.9±0.9%.
“We detected 1.9±0.9% A6 to G editing in livers (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fahmut/mut mice injected with control PBS or ABE6.3 alone rapidly lost 20% of total body weight.
“As shown in Fig. 1c, Fahmut/mut mice injected with control PBS or ABE6.3 alone rapidly lost 20% of total body weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The selected Fah sgRNA is the only sgRNA position holding the necessary NGG PAM and targeting the mutation A within the ABE editing window.
“This selected sgRNA is the only sgRNA position holding the necessary “NGG” PAM and targeting the mutation “A” within the ABE editing window.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sequencing of the 405 bp bands in ABE-treated mice confirmed the presence of the corrected G at position A9.
“Sequencing of the 405 bp bands in ABE-treated mice confirmed the presence of the corrected “G” at position A9. (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ABE-treated Fahmut/mut mice, both 305 and 405 bp PCR bands were observed, indicating that exon 8 to exon 9 splicing was restored in a subset of hepatocytes.
“In ABE-treated Fahmut/mut mice (post NTBC withdrawal and hepatocyte expansion), we observed both 305 and 405 bp PCR bands, indicating that the exon 8 to exon 9 splicing was restored in a subset of hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
ABE-treated mice showed improved liver histology compared to control Fahmut/mut mice off NTBC water.
“Concordantly, ABE-treated mice showed improved liver histology compared to the liver damage in control Fahmut/mut mice off NTBC water (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
ABE6.3 resulted in the highest A>G base editing efficiency at position A9 in Fah mutant mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (6.9 ± 2.0% with 2 μg ABE6.3).
“Consistent with the literature1, ABE6.3 resulted in the highest A>G base editing efficiency at position A9 (6.9 ± 2.0%,2 µg ABE6.3) (Supplementary Fig. 1) and editing efficiency was dependent of the ABE enzyme concentration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
The disease associated point mutation is located at position 9 (A9).
“The disease associated point mutation is located at position 9 (A9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The A9 to G correction rate was 9.5±4.0% (n = 6).
“We observed that the A9 to G correction rate was 9.5±4.0%, (n = 6, Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ABE6.3 and FAH sgRNA rescued weight loss in all five treated Fahmut/mut mice.
“In contrast, ABE6.3 and FAH sgRNA rescued weight loss in all five mice (Fig.1c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Editing efficiency was dependent on the ABE enzyme concentration.
“Consistent with the literature1, ABE6.3 resulted in the highest A>G base editing efficiency at position A9 (6.9 ± 2.0%,2 µg ABE6.3) (Supplementary Fig. 1) and editing efficiency was dependent of the ABE enzyme concentration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ABE generated widespread patches of Fah+ hepatocytes in Fahmut/mut livers.
“As shown in Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 2, ABE generated widespread patches of Fah+ hepatocytes in the Fahmut/mut livers due to the expansion of corrected hepatocytes14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two remaining ABE-treated mice were viable with normal body weight at 106 days without NTBC treatment.
“Two remaining ABE-treated mice were viable with normal body weight at 106 days without NTBC treatment (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 4), demonstrating the long-term viability and functionality of ABE treated hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fahmut/mut mice injected with control PBS by IHC did not show any edited hepatocytes.
“As shown in Supplementary Fig. 9b, Fahmut/mut mice injected with control PBS by IHC did not show any edited hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No increased A•T to G•C editing at GOT1 was detected in ABE-treated livers compared to controls (n=4 mice, p>0.05).
“We did not detect increased A•T to G•C editing at GOT1 in ABE-treated livers compared to controls (n=4 mice, p>0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ABE6.3 mediated substantially higher A•T to G•C conversion rates than HDR using short homologous arms at two genomic sites in HEK293T cells.
“Compared with HDR using short homologous arms (site1:1.7±1.1%; site2: 1.8±0.8%), ABE6.3 mediated substantially higher A•T to G•C conversion rates at targeted sites (site1: 30±6.3%; site2: 7.3±1.6%), while RA6.3 further increased base editing efficiency (site1: 61±6.3%; site2: 34±3.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deep sequencing showed an increase in base editing efficiency at all adenine positions (including A9) with use of codon optimized ABE RA6.3.
“Deep sequencing showed an increase in base editing efficiency at all adenine positions (including A9) with use of our codon optimized ABE RA6.3 (Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RA6.3 increased A-to-G conversion rate at all editable A sites within the editing window by an average of 2.1±0.9 fold (site1) and 4.8±1.8 fold (site2).
“Our optimized RA6.3 increased A-to-G conversion rate at all the editable “A” sites within the editing window by an average of 2.1±0.9 fold (site1) and 4.8±1.8 fold (site2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Non-viral LNP delivery of ABE mRNA and sgRNA does generate FAH-positive hepatocytes in vivo, albeit with low efficiency.
“As an initial delivery vehicle, our study also showed that non-viral LNP delivery of ABE mRNA and sgRNA does generate FAH-positive hepatocytes in vivo, albeit with low efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RA6.3 increased base editing at a second mouse genomic site in vivo compared to ABE6.3.
“In addition, RA6.3 increased base editing at a second mouse genomic site in vivo compared to ABE6.3 (Supplementary Fig. 8b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The detected indel rate was very low (0.05% ABE and 0.03% control) even after expansion of the edited hepatocytes.
“The detected indel rate was very low (0.05% ABE and 0.03% control) even after expansion of the edited hepatocytes (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The overall on-target ABE efficiency in the in vivo study is relatively low.
“As the overall on-target ABE efficiency in our in vivo study is relatively low, detecting off-target effects is difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In vitro Guide-Seq detected only the Fah target site and one off-target site (GOT1).
“Using the standard Guide-seq protocol, we detected only the Fah target site and one off-target site (defined as Guide-seq off-target site 1, or GOT1) (Supplementary Data Set 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Yin, H. et al. Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 328–333 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
We reported the first codon-optimized ABE6.3.
“We reported the first codon-optimized ABE6.3 and showed that in vivo delivery of ABE was able to correct the Fah mutation in vivo without inducing high-level indels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
RA6.3 had substantially higher expression compared to ABE6.3 when transiently transfected in cells.
“When transiently transfected in cells, our optimized base editor, RA6.3, had substantially higher expression compared to ABE6.3 (Supplementary Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RA6.3 generated more Fah-positive hepatocytes than ABE6.3 in vivo.
“IHC staining showed that RA6.3 generated more Fah-positive hepatocytes than ABE6.3 (Fig. 5b–c, p<0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RA6.3 mRNA and FAH sgRNA showed 0.44% ± 0.28% edited hepatocytes.
“In contrast, RA6.3 mRNA and FAH sgRNA showed 0.44% ± 0.28% edited hepatocytes (Supplementary Fig. 9c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RA6.3 further increased base editing efficiency compared to ABE6.3 at two genomic sites in HEK293T cells.
“Compared with HDR using short homologous arms (site1:1.7±1.1%; site2: 1.8±0.8%), ABE6.3 mediated substantially higher A•T to G•C conversion rates at targeted sites (site1: 30±6.3%; site2: 7.3±1.6%), while RA6.3 further increased base editing efficiency (site1: 61±6.3%; site2: 34±3.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The expansion of corrected hepatocytes caused the widespread patches of Fah+ hepatocytes.
“As shown in Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 2, ABE generated widespread patches of Fah+ hepatocytes in the Fahmut/mut livers due to the expansion of corrected hepatocytes14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The Fahmut/mut mouse model harbors a homozygous G•C to A•T point mutation in the last nucleotide of exon 8, resulting in exon skipping and loss of FAH protein.
“The Fahmut/mut mouse model14, 15 harbors a homozygous G•C to A•T point mutation in the last nucleotide of exon 8, resulting in exon skipping and loss of FAH protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Aponte, J. L. et al. Point mutations in the murine fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase gene: animal models for the human genetic disorder hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 641–645 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In vivo delivery of ABE generates functional exon 8-containing Fah mRNA.
“These data indicate that in vivo delivery of ABE corrects the G•C to T•A mutation in a subset of liver cells and generates the functional exon 8-containing Fah mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Fahmut/mut mouse model is particularly suitable for testing ABE.
“Thus, this mouse model is particularly suitable for testing ABE13, 15.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Azuma, H. et al. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah −/−/Rag2 −/−/Il2rg −/− mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 903–910 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Aponte, J. L. et al. Point mutations in the murine fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase gene: animal models for the human genetic disorder hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 641–645 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
ABE-mediated editing at position A6 will not restore splicing.
“Notably, ABE-mediated editing at position A6 will change a serine codon into alanine (S235A), but this edit will not restore splicing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Base editing does not require homology-directed repair donors for gene repair.
“A new-generation of genome editing tool, Base Editing (BE) system, enables precise base changes (reviewed in 4, 5), does not induce a high-level of DSBs, and finally does not require HDR donors for gene repair 4, 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Hess, G. T., Tycko, J., Yao, D. & Bassik, M. C. Methods and applications of CRISPR-mediated base editing in eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Cell 68, 26–43 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet.19, 770–788 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Following correction by CRISPR, liver cells expressing the Fah enzyme expand and repopulate the liver through their selective advantage.
“Following correction by CRISPR, liver cells expressing the Fah enzyme, through their selective advantage, expand and repopulate the liver14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Fahmut/mut mice need to be kept alive on NTBC-supplemented water to prevent toxin buildup and liver damage.
“Fahmut/mut mice need to be kept alive on NTBC-supplemented water to prevent toxin buildup and liver damage14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In vivo delivery of ABE corrects the G•C to T•A mutation in a subset of liver cells.
“These data indicate that in vivo delivery of ABE corrects the G•C to T•A mutation in a subset of liver cells and generates the functional exon 8-containing Fah mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The rapid expansion of Fah+ hepatocytes in the Fahmut/mut liver contributed to the rescue of weight loss in ABE-treated mice.
“Consistent with published literature14, 15, the rapid expansion of Fah+ hepatocytes in the Fahmut/mut liver contributed to the rescue of weight loss in mice treated with ABE14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Aponte, J. L. et al. Point mutations in the murine fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase gene: animal models for the human genetic disorder hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 641–645 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Base editing does not induce a high level of double-stranded DNA breaks.
“A new-generation of genome editing tool, Base Editing (BE) system, enables precise base changes (reviewed in 4, 5), does not induce a high-level of DSBs, and finally does not require HDR donors for gene repair 4, 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Hess, G. T., Tycko, J., Yao, D. & Bassik, M. C. Methods and applications of CRISPR-mediated base editing in eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Cell 68, 26–43 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet.19, 770–788 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
ABE-mediated editing at position A6 changes a serine codon into alanine (S235A).
“Notably, ABE-mediated editing at position A6 will change a serine codon into alanine (S235A), but this edit will not restore splicing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
ABE rescues the Fah disease phenotype in vivo.
“These data indicate that ABE rescues the Fah disease phenotype in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
HTI is caused by loss-of-function of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH).
“HTI is caused by loss-of-function of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH), a key enzyme of the tyrosine catabolic pathway 13, 14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Azuma, H. et al. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah −/−/Rag2 −/−/Il2rg −/− mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 903–910 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The ABE editing window occupies positions ~4-9 with the 1st, 5' nucleotide of the candidate sgRNA counted as position 1.
“The ABE editing window occupies positions ~4–9 with the 1st, 5’ nucleotide (nt) of the candidate sgRNA counted as position 1 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
NTBC is an inhibitor of the tyrosine catabolic pathway upstream of FAH.
“2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione (NTBC)14 is an inhibitor of the tyrosine catabolic pathway upstream of FAH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Editing position A6 to G changes a serine codon into alanine (S235A) in the FAH enzyme.
“Editing position A6 to G will change a serine codon into alanine (S235A) in the FAH enzyme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The in vivo detection of relatively lower A6G editing is likely due to re-population of A9G edited healthy cells in the liver rather than to an in vivo preference to A9 editing.
“Compared to in vitro editing in MEFs (Supplementary Fig. 1), the in vivo detection of relatively lower A6G editing is likely due to re-population of A9G edited healthy cells in the liver rather than to an in vivo preference to A9 editing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Detecting off-target effects is difficult because overall on-target ABE efficiency is relatively low.
“As the overall on-target ABE efficiency in our in vivo study is relatively low, detecting off-target effects is difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The in vivo ABE efficacy in this proof-of-concept study may not suffice to treat other genetic disorders that require higher levels of correction and that do not selectively proliferate corrected cells.
“While we show phenotypic rescue in our FAH mice, the in vivo ABE efficacy in our proof-of-concept study may not suffice to treat other genetic disorders that require higher levels of correction and that do not selectively proliferate corrected cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Non-viral delivery of ABE is possible in the adult mouse liver.
“The data suggest that non-viral delivery of ABE is possible in the adult mouse liver and indicate the need to improve ABE mRNA stability and delivery vehicles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Fah sgRNA used in this study is not associated with a large number of strong off-target sites.
“These data suggest that the Fah sgRNA used in this study is not associated with a large number of strong off-target sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The relatively low rate of indel formation is one notable advantage of ABE-mediated gene correction compared to Cas9-mediated HDR.
“The relatively low rate of indel formation is one notable advantage of ABE-mediated gene correction compared to Cas9-mediated HDR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The optimized ABE6.3 variant improves editing efficiency in cultured cells.
“These results confirm that the optimized ABE6.3 variant improves editing efficiency in cultured cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This study demonstrates the potential application of ABE to correct disease genes with G•C to T•A point mutations in adult mammalian models.
“This study demonstrates the potential application of ABE to correct disease genes with G•C to T•A point mutations in adult mammalian models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWild-type liver had a 405 bp PCR band containing exon 8 and Fahmut/mut liver had a 305 bp PCR band corresponding with truncated Fah mRNA lacking exon 8.
“As shown in Fig. 2a, we found that wild-type liver had a 405 bp PCR band containing exon 8 and Fahmut/mut liver had a 305 bp PCR band corresponding with truncated Fah mRNA lacking exon 8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe rate of both A6 to G and A9 to G editing is low (~0.1%).
“The rate of both A6 to G and A9 to G editing (Fig. 2c) is low (~0.1%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataNo A•T to G•C editing above background was detected at four predicted top-ranking off-target sites in ABE-treated livers (n=6; all rates <0.1%).
“To expand our analysis, we sequenced four predicted top-ranking off-target sites in ABE-treated livers (n=6), and did not detect A•T to G•C editing above the background level in a control liver (all rates are <0.1%) (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdenine base editors comprise an evolved Escherichia coli TadA and Cas9 nickase and mediate A•T to G•C substitutions.
“Adenine BEs comprise an evolved Escherichia coli TadA (ecTadA*, a tRNA adenosine deaminase evolved to accept DNA substrate) and Cas9 nickase, and mediate A•T to G•C substitutions1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLocal delivery of ABE by intramuscular injection of trans-splicing AAV has been reported.
“Local delivery of ABE by intramuscular injection of trans-splicing AAV was recently reported12; however, systemic delivery of ABE for correction of liver disease in adult animals has not been investigated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Ryu, S. M. et al. Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 536–539 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPoint mutations are a frequent cause of genetic disease, and approximately 50% of disease point mutations are G:C>A:T.
“Point mutations are a frequent cause of genetic disease, with ~50% of disease point mutations being G:C>A:T 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFAH deficiency leads to accumulation of toxic metabolic intermediates, causing apoptosis of mutant hepatocytes and severe liver damage.
“FAH deficiency leads to accumulation of toxic metabolic intermediates, causing apoptosis of mutant hepatocytes and severe liver damage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Azuma, H. et al. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah −/−/Rag2 −/−/Il2rg −/− mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 903–910 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Paulk, N. K. et al. Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200–1208 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCRISPR can correct the Fah mutation through homology-directed repair or allelic exchange.
“We and others recently reported that CRISPR can correct this Fah mutation through HDR16–18 or allelic exchange19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16] Yin, H. et al. Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 328–333 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Song, C. Q. & Xue, W. CRISPR–Cas-related technologies in basic and translational liver research. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 251–252 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Shao, Y. et al. Cas9-nickase-mediated genome editing corrects hereditary tyrosinemia in rats. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 6883–6892 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Wang, D. et al. Cas9-mediated allelic exchange repairs compound heterozygous recessive mutations in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 839–842 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBase editing enables precise base changes.
“A new-generation of genome editing tool, Base Editing (BE) system, enables precise base changes (reviewed in 4, 5), does not induce a high-level of DSBs, and finally does not require HDR donors for gene repair 4, 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Hess, G. T., Tycko, J., Yao, D. & Bassik, M. C. Methods and applications of CRISPR-mediated base editing in eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Cell 68, 26–43 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet.19, 770–788 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTransient delivery of ABE and sgRNA by non-viral hydrodynamic injection is sufficient to generate Fah+ hepatocytes and rescue the phenotypic weight loss of Fah mutant mice.
“In summary, our results demonstrate that transient delivery of ABE and sgRNA by non-viral hydrodynamic injection is sufficient to generate Fah+ hepatocytes and rescue the phenotypic weight loss of Fah mutant mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOptimized cytosine BEs and ABE7.10 have been reported.
“Optimized cytosine BEs and ABE7.10 have been reported 26, 27 but ABE6.3 has not been developed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Zafra, M. P. et al. Optimized base editors enable efficient editing in cells, organoids and mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 888–893 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Koblan, L. W. et al. Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 843–846 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataABE can directly correct the Fah mutation without causing a high level of indel mutations.
“These data suggest that ABE can directly correct the Fah mutation without causing a high level of indel mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEfficiency of base editing can be improved with codon optimization of the Cas9 nickase and inclusion of an N-terminal nuclear localization sequence (NLS).
“New reports have indicated that efficiency of base editing can be improved with codon optimization of the Cas9 nickase and inclusion of an N-terminal nuclear localization sequence (NLS) 26, 27.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Zafra, M. P. et al. Optimized base editors enable efficient editing in cells, organoids and mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 888–893 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Koblan, L. W. et al. Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 843–846 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn vivo delivery of ABE was able to correct the Fah mutation in vivo without inducing high-level indels.
“We reported the first codon-optimized ABE6.3 and showed that in vivo delivery of ABE was able to correct the Fah mutation in vivo without inducing high-level indels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal study protocols were approved by the UMass IACUC.
“All animal study protocols were approved by the UMass IACUC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMice with more than 20% weight loss were humanely euthanized according to guidelines.
“Mice with more than 20% weight loss were humanely euthanized according to guidelines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataABE-treated hepatocytes have long-term viability and functionality.
“Two remaining ABE-treated mice were viable with normal body weight at 106 days without NTBC treatment (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 4), demonstrating the long-term viability and functionality of ABE treated hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRA6.3 is a robust base editor in mammalian cells and in the mouse liver.
“Our combined in vitro and in vivo results indicate that RA6.3 is a robust base editor in mammalian cells and in the mouse liver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBecause S235 is near the active site of the Fah enzyme, the A6G/A9G allele may compromise enzyme activity and impede functional rescue of edited hepatocytes.
“Because S235 is near the active site of the Fah enzyme22, the A6G/A9G allele may compromise enzyme activity and impede functional rescue of edited hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Bateman, R. L. et al. Mechanistic inferences from the crystal structure of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase with a bound phosphorus-based inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15284–15291 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Systemic delivery of ABE for correction of liver disease in adult animals has not been investigated.
“Local delivery of ABE by intramuscular injection of trans-splicing AAV was recently reported12; however, systemic delivery of ABE for correction of liver disease in adult animals has not been investigated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ABE6.3 has not been developed as a codon-optimized editor.
“Optimized cytosine BEs and ABE7.10 have been reported 26, 27 but ABE6.3 has not been developed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ABE mRNA is longer than Cas9 mRNA (5.2 kb vs 4.1 kb).
“Because ABE mRNA is longer than Cas9 mRNA (5.2 kb vs 4.1 kb), it is possible that the delivery or translation of ABE mRNA is less efficient than Cas9 mRNA.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral delivery platform for mRNA nanomedicines and have been used to deliver siRNA and CRISPR-based gene editing therapies to the liver in postnatal mouse, non-human primate, and clinical studies with encouraging results.
“Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral delivery platform for mRNA nanomedicines (13, 14) that have been used to deliver siRNA and CRISPR-based gene editing therapies to the liver in postnatal mouse, non-human primate, and clinical studies with encouraging results (15–18).”
From Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Base Editing of Congenital Brain Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGene-editing components can be delivered by lipid nanoparticle-mRNA formulations to treat genetic diseases, including hereditary tyrosinaemia type I, hypercholesterolaemia, lipoprotein metabolism disorders and transthyretin amyloidosis, as demonstrated in preclinical studies.
“Gene-editing components can be delivered by lipid nanoparticle–mRNA formulations to treat genetic diseases, including HTI92,238, hypercholesterolaemia81,96,105,239, lipoprotein metabolism disorders85 and transthyretin amyloidosis239,240, which has been demonstrated in preclinical studies.”
From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [238]
Cites
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339 · see citing works
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210 · see citing works
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A., & Liu, D. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17946 · Cited by 5,437 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741 · see citing works
Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
Gaudelli, N. M., Komor, A. C., Rees, H. A., Packer, M. S., Badran, A. H., Bryson, D. I., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24644 · Cited by 4,184 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganoid Models and Applications in Biomedical Research
Xinaris, C., Brizi, V., & Remuzzi, G. (2015) · The Nephron journals/Nephron journals · doi:10.1159/000433566 · Cited by 3,517 · see citing works
Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas
Xue, W., Zender, L., Miething, C., Dickins, R. A., Hernando, E., Krizhanovsky, V., Cordon-Cardo, C., & Lowe, S. W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05529 · Cited by 2,473 · see citing works
Self-citationGUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases
Tsai, S. Q., Zheng, Z., Nguyen, N. T., Liebers, M., Topkar, V. V., Thapar, V., Wyvekens, N., Khayter, C., Iafrate, A. J., Le, L. P., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3117 · Cited by 2,268 · see citing works
Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA
Liu, F., Song, Y. K., & Liu, D. (1999) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300947 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
Self-citationBase editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells
Rees, H. A., & Liu, D. R. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1 · Cited by 1,675 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype
Yin, H., Xue, W., Chen, S., Bogorad, R. L., Benedetti, E., Grompe, M., Koteliansky, V., Sharp, P. A., Jacks, T., & Anderson, D. G. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2884 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction
Koblan, L. W., Doman, J. L., Wilson, C., Levy, J. M., Tay, T., Newby, G. A., Maianti, J. P., Raguram, A., & Liu, D. R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4172 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
Self-citationYin, H., Song, C.-Q., Dorkin, J. R., Zhu, L. J., Li, Y., Wu, Q., Park, A., Yang, J., Suresh, S., Bizhanova, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3471 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Self-citationPrecise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion
Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Li, C., Zhang, R., Chen, K., Ran, Y., Qiu, J., Wang, D., & Gao, C. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3811 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah−/−/Rag2−/−/Il2rg−/− mice
Azuma, H., Paulk, N., Ranade, A., Dorrell, C., Al-Dhalimy, M., Ellis, E., Strom, S., Kay, M. A., Finegold, M., & Grompe, M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1326 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Structure-guided chemical modification of guide RNA enables potent non-viral in vivo genome editing
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Suresh, S., Wu, Q., Walsh, S., Rhym, L. H., Mintzer, E., Bolukbasi, M. F., Zhu, L. J., Kauffman, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4005 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Self-citationAdenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Ryu, S.-M., Koo, T., Kim, K., Lim, K., Baek, G., Kim, S., Kim, H. S., Kim, D.-E., Lee, H., Chung, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4148 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Treatment of a metabolic liver disease by in vivo genome base editing in adult mice
Villiger, L., Grisch‐Chan, H. M., Lindsay, H. A., Ringnalda, F. C. A. S., Pogliano, C. B., Allegri, G., Fingerhut, R., Häberle, J., Matos, J., Robinson, M. D., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0209-1 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos
Kim, K., Ryu, S.-M., Kim, S., Baek, G., Kim, D., Lim, K., Chung, E., Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3816 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Optimized base editors enable efficient editing in cells, organoids and mice
Zafra, M. P., Schatoff, E. M., Katti, A., Foronda, M., Breinig, M., Schweitzer, A. Y., Simon, A., Han, T., Goswami, S., Montgomery, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4194 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Self-citationPartial DNA-guided Cas9 enables genome editing with reduced off-target activity
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Suresh, S., Kwan, S.-Y., Wu, Q., Walsh, S., Ding, J., Bogorad, R. L., Zhu, L. J., Wolfe, S. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2559 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationMethods and Applications of CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing in Eukaryotic Genomes
Hess, G. T., Tycko, J., Yao, D., & Bassik, M. C. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.029 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Chadwick, A. C., Wang, X., & Musunuru, K. (2017) · Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.117.309881 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
In utero CRISPR-mediated therapeutic editing of metabolic genes
Rossidis, A. C., Stratigis, J. D., Chadwick, A. C., Hartman, H. A., Ahn, N. J., Li, H., Singh, K., Coons, B. E., Li, L., Lv, W., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0184-6 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Genome-wide profiling of adenine base editor specificity by EndoV-seq
Liang, P., Xie, X., Zhi, S., Sun, H., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Xiong, Y., Ma, W., Liu, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07988-z · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationAdeno‐associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo†‡
Paulk, N. K., Wursthorn, K., Wang, Z., Finegold, M. J., Kay, M. A., & Grompe, M. (2010) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.23481 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Response and Resistance to NF-κB Inhibitors in Mouse Models of Lung Adenocarcinoma
Xue, W., Meylan, E., Oliver, T. G., Feldser, D. M., Winslow, M. M., Bronson, R. T., & Jacks, T. (2011) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0073 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeting fidelity of adenine and cytosine base editors in mouse embryos
Lee, H., Willi, M., Miller, S. M., Kim, S., Liu, C., Liu, D. R., & Hennighausen, L. G. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07322-7 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationCas9-nickase–mediated genome editing corrects hereditary tyrosinemia in rats
Shao, Y., Wang, L., Guo, N., Wang, S., Yang, L., Li, Y., Wang, M., Yin, S., Han, H., Zeng, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra117.000347 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Aponte, J. L., Sega, G. A., Hauser, L. J., Dhar, M. S., Withrow, C. M., Carpenter, D. A., Rinchik, E. M., Culiat, C. T., & Johnson, D. K. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.641 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Bateman, R. L., Bhanumoorthy, P., Witte, J. F., McClard, R. W., Grompe, M., & Timm, D. E. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m007621200 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cas9-mediated allelic exchange repairs compound heterozygous recessive mutations in mice
Wang, D., Li, J., Song, C., Tran, K., Mou, H., Wu, P., Tai, P. W. L., Mendonca, C. A., Ren, L., Wang, B. Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4219 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationGUIDEseq: a bioconductor package to analyze GUIDE-Seq datasets for CRISPR-Cas nucleases
Zhu, L. J., Lawrence, M., Gupta, A., Pagès, H., Küçükural, A., Garber, M. G., & Wolfe, S. A. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3746-y · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPR–Cas-related technologies in basic and translational liver research
Song, C., & Xue, W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2018.11 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery
Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R., & Dong, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0 · Cited by 4,076 · see citing works
Richter, M. F., Zhao, K. T., Eton, E., Lapinaite, A., Newby, G. A., Thuronyi, B. W., Wilson, C., Koblan, L. W., Zeng, J., Bauer, D. E., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z · Cited by 1,020 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo CRISPR base editing of PCSK9 durably lowers cholesterol in primates
Musunuru, K., Chadwick, A. C., Mizoguchi, T., Garcia, S. P., DeNizio, J. E., Reiss, C. W., Wang, K., Iyer, S., Dutta, C., Clendaniel, V., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03534-y · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells
Huang, T. P., Newby, G. A., & Liu, D. R. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00450-9 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh-purity production and precise editing of DNA base editing ribonucleoproteins
Jang, H.-K., Jo, D. H., Lee, S.-N., Cho, C. S., Jeong, Y. K., Jung, Y., Yu, J., Kim, J. H., Woo, J.-S., & Bae, S. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg2661 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Base Editing of Congenital Brain Disease
Palanki, R., Bose, S. K., Dave, A., White, B. M., Berkowitz, C., Luks, V., Yaqoob, F., Han, E., Swingle, K. L., Menon, P., et al. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c02268 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Design of efficacious somatic cell genome editing strategies for recessive and polygenic diseases
Carlson-Stevermer, J., Das, A., Abdeen, A. A., Fiflis, D., Grindel, B. I., Saxena, S., Akcan, T., Alam, T., Kletzien, H., Kohlenberg, L., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20065-8 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Song, C.-Q., Jiang, T., Richter, M., Rhym, L. H., Koblan, L. W., Zafra, M. P., Schatoff, E. M., Doman, J. L., Cao, Y., Dow, L. E., Zhu, L. J., Anderson, D. G., Liu, D. R., Yin, H., & Xue, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, David R.
- Yin, Hao
- Xue, Wen
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2019-02-25
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-130
- ISSN
- 2157-846X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6986236
- OpenAlex
- W2918145920
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL131471, DP2HL137167, UG3HL147367)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (RM1HG009490)
- National Cancer Institute (K22CA181280, R01CA195787, T32CA203702, F31CA224800, P30CA014051)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM095450, R35GM118062)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI142756)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022376)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- adenine base editing, tyrosinaemia, fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase, splice site mutation, single guide RNA, hydrodynamic injection, lipid nanoparticle delivery, hepatocytes, weight loss
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Adenine, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Hydrolases, Liver, RNA, Point Mutation, Tyrosinemias, Hepatocytes, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review