Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 707

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study

Open access
Sicklick, Jason K., Kato, Shumei, Okamura, Ryosuke, Schwaederle, Maria, Hahn, Michael E., Williams, Casey B., De, Pradip, Krie, Amy, Piccioni, David E., Miller, Vincent A., Ross, Jeffrey S., Benson, Adam, Webster, Jennifer, Stephens, Philip J., Lee, J. Jack, Fanta, Paul T., Lippman, Scott M., Leyland-Jones, Brian, Kurzrock, Razelle·2019·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Cancer treatments have evolved from indiscriminate cytotoxic agents to selective genome- and immune-targeted drugs that have transformed the outcomes of some malignancies1. Tumor complexity and heterogeneity suggest that the ‘precision medicine’ paradigm of cancer therapy requires treatment to be personalized to the individual patient2–6. To date, precision oncology trials have been based on molecular matching with predetermined monotherapies7–14. Several of these trials have been hindered by very low matching rates, often in the 5–10% range15, and low response rates. Low matching rates may be due to the use of limited gene panels, restrictive molecular matching algorithms, lack of drug availability, or the deterioration and death of end-stage patients before therapy can be implemented. We hypothesized that personalized treatment with combination therapies would improve outcomes in patients with refractory malignancies. As a first test of this concept, we implemented a cross-institutional prospective study (I-PREDICT, NCT02534675) that used tumor DNA sequencing and timely recommendations for individualized treatment with combination therapies. We found that administration of customized multidrug regimens was feasible, with 49% of consented patients receiving personalized treatment. Targeting of a larger fraction of identified molecular alterations, yielding a higher ‘matching score’, was correlated with significantly improved disease control rates, as well as longer progression-free and overall survival rates, compared to targeting of fewer somatic alterations. Our findings suggest that the current clinical trial paradigm for precision oncology, which pairs one driver mutation with one drug, may be optimized by treating molecularly complex and heterogeneous cancers with combinations of customized agents. A prospective clinical study of cancer patients (I-PREDICT) demonstrated the feasibility of matching genomic alterations found in tumors to combined drug treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 707

Metadata

Authors
Sicklick, J. K., Kato, S., Okamura, R., Schwaederle, M., Hahn, M. E., Williams, C. B., De, P., Krie, A., Piccioni, D. E., Miller, V. A., Ross, J. S., Benson, A., Webster, J., Stephens, P. J., Lee, J. J., Fanta, P. T., Lippman, S. M., Leyland-Jones, B., & Kurzrock, R.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2019-04-22
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
744-750
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2938206352
Cited by
707
References
8
FWCI
24.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5
The paper
Sicklick, J. K., Kato, S., Okamura, R., Schwaederle, M., Hahn, M. E., Williams, C. B., De, P., Krie, A., Piccioni, D. E., Miller, V. A., Ross, J. S., Benson, A., Webster, J., Stephens, P. J., Lee, J. J., Fanta, P. T., Lippman, S. M., Leyland-Jones, B., & Kurzrock, R. (2019). Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.