Cited by 4Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Reimagining cancer treatments in the era of generative AI

Open access
Derbal, Youcef·2025·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Significant advances in the treatment of cancer have been achieved as reflected by the ever-expanding space of cancer therapeutics being available to cancer patients. Often, however, it is not clear which patient would respond to which drug and what combination of drugs will improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, while many of these drugs are initially effective, therapeutic resistance is often inevitable due to the evolving nature of cancer. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) powered by the increasingly large amount of accumulating clinical, molecular, and radiomics data about cancer patients and their treatments may serve as the kernel of rapid learning decision-support systems that could enable personalized cancer treatments to counter therapeutic resistance and overcome the shortcomings of the current standard of care. This perspective is explored in the context of current advances of AI applications in oncology and the potential of GenAI learning and inferencing capabilities to support patient-tailored dynamic cancer treatments. A discussion of this vision is elaborated with respect to issues pertinent to GenAI use in real-world clinical settings, including clinical validation, data curation, and sharing, large language model hallucinations as well as ethical concerns and considerations such as privacy, bias, transparency, and accountability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20552076251394631

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [3]Anderson A Gillies R Gatenby R. Cancer is complex and dynamic—ergo, dose optimization calls for mathematical modeling. The Cancer Letter 2022; 48(19): 1– 2.
  2. [12]Nazi ZA Peng W. Informatics 2024; 11(3): 57.
  3. [13]Peng B Narayanan S Papadimitriou C. On Limitations of the Transformer Architecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:240208164 2024.
  4. [20]Hegde A Khalil M. Management of acquired resistance to ALK inhibitors: repeat biopsy to characterize mechanisms of resistance significantly impacts clinical outcomes. Precision Cancer Medicine 2021; 7(2): 763– 783.
  5. [70]Touvron H Martin L Stone K, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:230709288 2023.
  6. [78]Sastry S Bodson M. Adaptive control: stability, convergence, and robustness. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, 1990.
  7. [85]Xu Z Jain S Kankanhalli M. Hallucination is inevitable: An innate limitation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:240111817 2024.
  8. [86]Kang H Ni J Yao H. Ever: Mitigating hallucination in large language models through real-time verification and rectification. arXiv preprint arXiv:231109114 2023.
  9. [89]Barez F Wu T-Y Arcuschin I, et al. Chain-of-thought is not explainability. Preprint, alphaXiv 2025: v2.
  10. [103]Tonmoy S Zaman S Jain V, et al. A comprehensive survey of hallucination mitigation techniques in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:240101313 2024.
  11. [104]Cohen IG. Informed consent and medical artificial intelligence: what to tell the patient? Geo LJ 2019; 108: 1425.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derbal, Y.
Affiliations
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Derbal, Youcef
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2025-05
Volume
11
Pages
20552076251394631-20552076251394631
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415818745
Cited by
4
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
generative AI, cancer therapy, personalized medicine, treatment resistance, decision support system, large language models, hallucinations, clinical validation, AI ethics, privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency and accountability, radiomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review