Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated gene-to-outcome multimodal database for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Kendall, Timothy J., Jimenez-Ramos, Maria, Turner, Frances, Ramachandran, Prakash, Minnier, Jessica, McColgan, Michael D., Alam, Masood, Ellis, Harriet, Dunbar, Donald R., Kohnen, Gabriele, Konanahalli, Prakash, Oien, Karin A., Bandiera, Lucia, Menolascina, Filippo, Juncker-Jensen, Anna, Alexander, Douglas, Mayor, Charlie, Guha, Indra Neil, Fallowfield, Jonathan A.·2023·Nature Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the commonest cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and represents an unmet precision medicine challenge. We established a retrospective national cohort of 940 histologically defined patients (55.4% men, 44.6% women; median body mass index 31.3; 32% with type 2 diabetes) covering the complete MASLD severity spectrum, and created a secure, searchable, open resource (SteatoSITE). In 668 cases and 39 controls, we generated hepatic bulk RNA sequencing data and performed differential gene expression and pathway analysis, including exploration of gender-specific differences. A web-based gene browser was also developed. We integrated histopathological assessments, transcriptomic data and 5.67 million days of time-stamped longitudinal electronic health record data to define disease-stage-specific gene expression signatures, pathogenic hepatic cell subpopulations and master regulator networks associated with adverse outcomes in MASLD. We constructed a 15-gene transcriptional risk score to predict future hepatic decompensation events (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86, 0.81 and 0.83 for 1-, 3- and 5-year risk, respectively). Additionally, thyroid hormone receptor beta regulon activity was identified as a critical suppressor of disease progression. SteatoSITE supports rational biomarker and drug development and facilitates precision medicine approaches for patients with MASLD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-023-02602-2

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Lazarus, J. V. et al. The global NAFLD policy review and preparedness index: are countries ready to address this silent public health challenge? J. Hepatol. 76, 771–780 (2022). · DOI
  2. Le, M. H. et al. Forecasted 2040 global prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using hierarchical Bayesian approach. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 28, 841–850 (2022). · DOI
  3. Anstee, Q. M. et al. Genome-wide association study of non-alcoholic fatty liver and steatohepatitis in a histologically characterised cohort. J. Hepatol. 73, 505–515 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Loomba, R. et al. Gut microbiome-based metagenomic signature for non-invasive detection of advanced fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 25, 1054–1062.e5 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Angulo, P. et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 149, 389–397.e10 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Vilar-Gomez, E. et al. Fibrosis severity as a determinant of cause-specific mortality in patients with advanced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a multi-national cohort study. Gastroenterology 155, 443–457.e17 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rowe, I. A. & Parker, R. The placebo response in randomized trials in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis simply explained. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20, e564–e572 (2022). · DOI
  8. Ratziu, V. & Friedman, S. L. Why do so many nonalcoholic steatohepatitis trials fail? Gastroenterology https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.046 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chopra, H., Baig, A. A., Gautam, R. K. & Kamal, M. A. Application of artificial intelligence in drug discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612828666220608141049 (2022). · DOI
  10. Asiimwe, R. et al. From biobank and data silos into a data commons: convergence to support translational medicine. J. Transl. Med. 19, 493 (2021). · DOI
  11. Kleiner, D. E. et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 41, 1313–1321 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Jung, E. S. et al. Interobserver agreement on pathologic features of liver biopsy tissue in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 50, 190–196 (2016). · DOI
  13. Villanueva, N. M., Sestelo, M. & Meira-Machado, L. A method for determining groups in multiple survival curves. Stat. Med. 38, 866–877 (2019). · DOI
  14. Hagström, H. et al. Administrative coding in electronic health care record-based research of NAFLD: an expert panel consensus statement. Hepatology 74, 474–482 (2021). · DOI
  15. Innes, H. et al. Performance of routine risk scores for predicting cirrhosis-related morbidity in the community. J. Hepatol. 77, 365–376 (2022). · DOI
  16. Suppli, M. P. et al. Hepatic transcriptome signatures in patients with varying degrees of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared with healthy normal-weight individuals. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 316, G462–G472 (2019). · DOI
  17. Holmer, M. et al. Effect of common genetic variants on the risk of cirrhosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease during 20 years of follow-up. Liver Int. 42, 2769–2780 (2022). · DOI
  18. Ramachandran, P. et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature 575, 512–518 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hu, X. et al. Polygenic transcriptome risk scores for COPD and lung function improve cross-ethnic portability of prediction in the NHLBI TOPMed program. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 109, 857–870 (2022). · DOI
  20. Liang, Y. et al. Polygenic transcriptome risk scores (PTRS) can improve portability of polygenic risk scores across ancestries. Genome Biol. 23, 23 (2022). · DOI
  21. Lambert, S. A. et al. The human transcription factors. Cell 172, 650–665 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Carro, M. S. et al. The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours. Nature 463, 318–325 (2010). · DOI
  23. Sanyal, A. J. et al. Diagnostic performance of circulating biomarkers for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02539-6 (2023). · DOI
  24. Ng, C. H. et al. Mortality outcomes by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.014 (2023). · DOI
  25. Burra, P. et al. Clinical impact of sexual dimorphism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver Int. 41, 1713–1733 (2021). · DOI
  26. Chu, A. L., Schilling, J. D., King, K. R. & Feldstein, A. E. The power of single-cell analysis for the study of liver pathobiology. Hepatology 73, 437–448 (2021). · DOI
  27. Wallace, S. J., Tacke, F., Schwabe, R. F. & Henderson, N. C. Understanding the cellular interactome of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. JHEP Rep. 4, 100524 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Buisseret, L. et al. Clinical significance of CD73 in triple-negative breast cancer: multiplex analysis of a phase III clinical trial. Ann. Oncol. 29, 1056–1062 (2018). · DOI
  29. Bosisio, F. M. et al. Next-generation pathology using multiplexed immunohistochemistry: mapping tissue architecture at single-cell level. Front. Oncol. 12, 918900 (2022). · DOI
  30. Ilie, M. et al. Automated chromogenic multiplexed immunohistochemistry assay for diagnosis and predictive biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 124, 90–94 (2018). · DOI
  31. D’Amico, G., Garcia-Tsao, G. & Pagliaro, L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J. Hepatol. 44, 217–231 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  32. De Vincentis, A. et al. A polygenic risk score to refine risk stratification and prediction for severe liver disease by clinical fibrosis scores. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20, 658–673 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Marigorta, U. M. et al. Transcriptional risk scores link GWAS to eQTLs and predict complications in Crohn’s disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 1517–1521 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Wu, I. & Moses, M. A. BNF-1, a novel gene encoding a putative extracellular matrix protein, is overexpressed in tumor tissues. Gene 311, 105–110 (2003). · DOI
  35. Huang, G. & Brigstock, D. R. Regulation of hepatic stellate cells by connective tissue growth factor. Front. Biosci. 17, 2495–2507 (2012). · DOI
  36. Chan, K. K.-S. et al. Stanniocalcin 1 is a serum biomarker and potential therapeutic target for HBV-associated liver fibrosis. J. Pathol. 257, 227–238 (2022). · DOI
  37. Tao, L. et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) mediates hepatic stellate cell activation via ALK5/Smad signalling. Gut 68, 2214–2227 (2019). · DOI
  38. Liu, Z. et al. Wnt-TCF7-SOX9 axis promotes cholangiocarcinoma proliferation and pemigatinib resistance in a FGF7-FGFR2 autocrine pathway. Oncogene 41, 2885–2896 (2022). · DOI
  39. Gerhard, G. S. et al. AEBP1 expression increases with severity of fibrosis in NASH and is regulated by glucose, palmitate, and miR-372-3p. PLoS ONE 14, e0219764 (2019). · DOI
  40. Bobowski-Gerard, M. et al. Functional genomics uncovers the transcription factor BNC2 as required for myofibroblastic activation in fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 13, 5324 (2022). · DOI
  41. Wirth, E. K., Puengel, T., Spranger, J. & Tacke, F. Thyroid hormones as a disease modifier and therapeutic target in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 17, 425–434 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  42. Harrison, S. A. et al. Effects of resmetirom on noninvasive endpoints in a 36-week phase 2 active treatment extension study in patients with NASH. Hepatol. Commun. 5, 573–588 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Harrison, S. A. et al. Resmetirom for nonalcoholic fattyliver disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled phase 3 trial. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02603-1 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Shearer, J. E. et al. Systematic review: development of a consensus code set to identify cirrhosis in electronic health records. Aliment. Pharm. Ther. 55, 645–657 (2022). · DOI
  45. Staufer, K. et al. Ethyl glucuronide in hair detects a high rate of harmful alcohol consumption in presumed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 77, 918–930 (2022). · DOI
  46. Carlessi, R. et al. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing of pre-malignant liver reveals disease-associated hepatocyte state with HCC prognostic potential. Cell Genom. 3, 100301 (2023). · DOI
  47. Allan, C. et al. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat. Methods 9, 245–253 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Bedossa, P. et al. Histopathological algorithm and scoring system for evaluation of liver lesions in morbidly obese patients. Hepatology 56, 1751–1759 (2012). · DOI
  49. McDonald, N. et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for quantitation of liver disease: a two-centre cross-sectional observational study. Sci. Rep. 8, 9189 (2018). · DOI
  50. Latouche, A., Allignol, A., Beyersmann, J., Labopin, M. & Fine, J. P. A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66, 648–653 (2013). · DOI
  51. Gerdes, M. J. et al. Highly multiplexed single-cell analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cancer tissue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11982–11987 (2013). · DOI
  52. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Robinson, M. D. & Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2, 100141 (2021).
  58. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016). · DOI
  59. Wang, X., Park, J., Susztak, K., Zhang, N. R. & Li, M. Bulk tissue cell type deconvolution with multi-subject single-cell expression reference. Nat. Commun. 10, 380 (2019). · DOI
  60. Castro, M. A. A. et al. Regulators of genetic risk of breast cancer identified by integrative network analysis. Nat. Genet. 48, 12–21 (2016). · DOI
  61. Margolin, A. A. et al. Reverse engineering cellular networks. Nat. Protoc. 1, 662–671 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  62. Schwämmle, V. & Jensen, O. N. A simple and fast method to determine the parameters for fuzzy c–means cluster analysis. Bioinformatics 26, 2841–2848 (2010). · DOI
  63. Groeneveld, C. S. et al. RTNsurvival: an R/Bioconductor package for regulatory network survival analysis. Bioinformatics 35, 4488–4489 (2019). · DOI
  64. Nelson, J. W., Sklenar, J., Barnes, A. P. & Minnier, J. The START app: a web-based RNAseq analysis and visualization resource. Bioinformatics 33, 447–449 (2017). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kendall, T. J., Jimenez-Ramos, M., Turner, F., Ramachandran, P., Minnier, J., McColgan, M. D., Alam, M., Ellis, H., Dunbar, D. R., Kohnen, G., Konanahalli, P., Oien, K. A., Bandiera, L., Menolascina, F., Juncker-Jensen, A., Alexander, D., Mayor, C., Guha, I. N., & Fallowfield, J. A.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-10-30
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
2939-2953
ISSN
  • 1078-8956
  • 1546-170X
Cited by
92
References
17
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review