Cited by 867Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender

Fleming, Stephen J., Chaffin, Mark D., Arduini, Alessandro, Akkad, Amer-Denis, Banks, Eric, Marioni, John C., Philippakis, Anthony A., Ellinor, Patrick T. +1 more·2023·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Droplet-based single-cell assays, including single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) and cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq), generate considerable background noise counts, the hallmark of which is nonzero counts in cell-free droplets and off-target gene expression in unexpected cell types. Such systematic background noise can lead to batch effects and spurious differential gene expression results. Here we develop a deep generative model based on the phenomenology of noise generation in droplet-based assays. The proposed model accurately distinguishes cell-containing droplets from cell-free droplets, learns the background noise profile and provides noise-free quantification in an end-to-end fashion. We implement this approach in the scalable and robust open-source software package CellBender. Analysis of simulated data demonstrates that CellBender operates near the theoretically optimal denoising limit. Extensive evaluations using real datasets and experimental benchmarks highlight enhanced concordance between droplet-based single-cell data and established gene expression patterns, while the learned background noise profile provides evidence of degraded or uncaptured cell types.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-023-01943-7

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleming, S. J., Chaffin, M. D., Arduini, A., Akkad, A.-D., Banks, E., Marioni, J. C., Philippakis, A. A., Ellinor, P. T., & Babadi, M.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Fleming, Stephen J.
  • Babadi, Mehrtash
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2023-08-07
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1323-1335
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W4385638791
Cited by
867
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 329 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 1
FWCI
77.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
background noise suppression, deep generative models, single-cell RNA sequencing, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, CITE-seq, batch effects, noise reduction, unsupervised denoising
MeSH terms
RNA, Small Nuclear, Software, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review