Cited by 153Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action at the Shh locus

Open access
Kane, Lauren, Williamson, Iain, Flyamer, Ilya M., Kumar, Yatendra, Hill, Robert E., Lettice, Laura A., Bickmore, Wendy A.·2022·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

The regulatory landscapes of developmental genes in mammals can be complex, with enhancers spread over many hundreds of kilobases. It has been suggested that three-dimensional genome organization, particularly topologically associating domains formed by cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, is important for enhancers to act over such large genomic distances. By coupling acute protein degradation with synthetic activation by targeted transcription factor recruitment, here we show that cohesin, but not CTCF, is required for activation of the target gene Shh by distant enhancers in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cohesin is not required for activation directly at the promoter or by an enhancer located closer to the Shh gene. Our findings support the hypothesis that chromatin compaction via cohesin-mediated loop extrusion allows for genes to be activated by enhancers that are located many hundreds of kilobases away in the linear genome and suggests that cohesin is dispensable for enhancers located more proximally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-022-00821-8

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reliance on cohesin can arise at much shorter genomic separation than previously appreciated from synthetic loci or artificial enhancer activation systems.

    “Our observations also clarify that reliance on cohesin can arise at much shorter genomic separation than previously appreciated from synthetic loci or artificial enhancer activation systems (19, 20).”

    From Synergy between regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Discussion reports that cohesin is required for Shh activation from enhancers more than 400 kb away, but dispensable for an enhancer 100 kb away; the Introduction identifies the study as using synthetic transcriptional activators. The paper therefore supports an example of cohesin reliance at a specified separation, but does not establish the claim’s comparison that this is much shorter than previously appreciated from synthetic loci or artificial activation systems. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [8]Lupiáñez DG Spielmann M Mundlos S Breaking TADs: How Alterations of Chromatin Domains Result in Disease Trends Genet 2016 32 225 237 26862051
  2. [9]Symmons O The Shh Topological Domain Facilitates the Action of Remote Enhancers by Reducing the Effects of Genomic Distances Dev Cell 2016 39 529 543 27867070 PMC5142843
  3. [11]Moore JM Loss of Maternal CTCF Is Associated with Peri-Implantation Lethality of Ctcf Null Embryos PLoS One 2012 7 e34915 22532833 PMC3332108
  4. [12]Soshnikova N Montavon T Leleu M Galjart N Duboule D Functional Analysis of CTCF During Mammalian Limb Development Dev Cell 2010 19 819 830 21145498
  5. [13]Merkenschlager M Ege A Nora P CTCF and Cohesin in Genome Folding and Transcriptional Gene Regulation Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2016 17 17 43 27089971
  6. [14]Cuartero S Control of inducible gene expression links cohesin to hematopoietic progenitor self-renewal and differentiation Nat Immunol 2018 19 932 941 30127433 PMC6195188
  7. [15]Calderon L Cohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length Elife 2022 11 e76539 35471149 PMC9106336
  8. [17]Anderson E Devenney PS Hill RE Lettice LA Mapping the Shh long-range regulatory domain Development 2014 141 3934 3943 25252942 PMC4197689
  9. [18]Williamson I Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations Development 2019 146 dev179523 31511252 PMC7212092
  10. [20]Sagai T Elimination of a long-range cis-regulatory module causes complete loss of limb-specific Shh expression and truncation of the mouse limb Development 2005 132 797 803 15677727
  11. [22]Benabdallah NS Decreased Enhancer-Promoter Proximity Accompanying Enhancer Activation Mol Cell 2019 76 473 484 e7 31494034 PMC6838673
  12. [23]Paliou C Preformed chromatin topology assists transcriptional robustness of Shh during limb development Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019 116 12390 12399 31147463 PMC6589666
  13. [24]Luan J Distinct properties and functions of CTCF revealed by a rapidly inducible degron system Cell Rep 2021 34 108783 33626344 PMC7999233
  14. [26]Benabdallah NS SBE6: a novel long-range enhancer involved in driving sonic hedgehog expression in neural progenitor cells Open Biol 2016 6 160197 27852806 PMC5133441
  15. [27]Despang A Functional dissection of the Sox9-Kcnj2 locus identifies nonessential and instructive roles of TAD architecture Nat Genet 2019 51 1263 1271 31358994
  16. [30]Boyle S A central role for canonical PRC1 in shaping the 3D nuclear landscape Genes Dev 2020 34 931 949 32439634 PMC7328521
  17. [31]Lim B Levine MS Enhancer-promoter communication: hubs or loops? Curr Opin Genet Dev 2021 67 5 9 33202367 PMC8653970
  18. [32]Karr JP Ferrie JJ Tjian R Darzacq X The transcription factor activity gradient (TAG) model: contemplating a contact-independent mechanism for enhancer-promoter communication Genes Dev 2022 36 7 16 34969825 PMC8763055
  19. [34]Therizols P Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear re-organization in embryonic stem cells Science 2014 346 1238 1242 25477464 PMC6529354

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kane, L., Williamson, I., Flyamer, I. M., Kumar, Y., Hill, R. E., Lettice, L. A., & Bickmore, W. A.
Affiliations
Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
Corresponding author
Bickmore, Wendy A.
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2022-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
891-897
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W4295509862
Cited by
153
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00007/8, MC_UU_00007/2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
cohesin, long-range enhancers, Sonic hedgehog, loop extrusion, topologically associating domains, 3D genome organization, enhancer-promoter interactions, CTCF, chromatin condensation, mouse embryonic stem cells, enhancer activation
MeSH terms
CCCTC-Binding Factor, Cohesins, Animals, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Mammals, Transcription Factors, Cell Cycle Proteins, Mice, Hedgehog Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review