The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension
Open accessAbstract
The spatial organization of chromosomes influences many nuclear processes including gene expression. The cohesin complex shapes the 3D genome by looping together CTCF sites along chromosomes. We show here that chromatin loop size can be increased and that the duration with which cohesin embraces DNA determines the degree to which loops are enlarged. Cohesin's DNA release factor WAPL restricts this loop extension and also prevents looping between incorrectly oriented CTCF sites. We reveal that the SCC2/SCC4 complex promotes the extension of chromatin loops and the formation of topologically associated domains (TADs). Our data support the model that cohesin structures chromosomes through the processive enlargement of loops and that TADs reflect polyclonal collections of loops in the making. Finally, we find that whereas cohesin promotes chromosomal looping, it rather limits nuclear compartmentalization. We conclude that the balanced activity of SCC2/SCC4 and WAPL enables cohesin to correctly structure chromosomes.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In HAP1 cells, WAPL loss stabilizes cohesin on DNA and extends chromatin loops (median 575 kb versus 370 kb in wild-type), while SCC2/SCC4 promotes loop extension; WAPL also enforces convergent CTCF looping and limits nuclear compartmentalization. The authors conclude that cohesin structures chromosomes by processive loop enlargement, balanced by WAPL and SCC2/SCC4.
Key findings
- WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension: ΔWAPL cells showed a median loop length increase of more than 200 kb (575 kb versus 370 kb in wild-type), increased inter-TAD contacts, and pronounced TAD corner peaks; SMC1 ChIP-seq peaks increased from 18,462 to 45,479.
- WAPL enforces the CTCF directionality rule: wild-type HAP1 cells almost exclusively looped convergent CTCF sites, whereas ΔWAPL cells formed loops between tandem-oriented CTCF sites, including at the NCAM2 locus by 4C-seq.
- SCC2/SCC4 promotes loop extension and TAD boundaries: ΔSCC4 cells had shorter loops, reduced cohesin binding sites (18,462 to 5,974), and diffuse TAD boundaries with decreased directionality index; ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells restored loop length and wild-type-like contact maps. The C-terminal part of SCC2 was required for vermicelli cohesin staining.
- Cohesin limits nuclear compartmentalization: ΔWAPL cells had reduced far-cis (>10 Mb) contacts, less strict A/B compartment segregation, and fragmented lamina-associated domains; ΔSCC4 cells had increased far-cis contacts; ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 resembled wild-type. B-to-A switches covered 46.0 Mb versus 22.8 Mb for A-to-B, and 1,009 genes were differentially expressed.
Methods
- HAP1 cells were used to generate CRISPR knockouts of WAPL, SCC4, and WAPL/SCC4, plus SCC2 truncation mutants; a haploid gene-trap synthetic viability screen compared control and ΔWAPL HAP1 cells.
- Chromosome organization was assayed by high-resolution Hi-C, 4C-seq, CTCF and SMC1 ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, Lamin B1 DamID, FRAP, immunofluorescence, and proliferation/colony-formation assays.
- Computational analyses included HiC-Pro, HICCUPS loop calling, HiCseg TAD calling, directionality index, aggregate peak analysis, PCA-based compartment scoring, and rank-product statistics.
Limitations
- The paper states that it remains unresolved how WAPL-mediated cohesin release enforces CTCF loop specificity, how WAPL/SCC2/SCC4/cohesin modulate specific gene expression changes, and whether SMC complexes provide topological anchors or directly extrude DNA. It also notes that illegally oriented loops remain relatively rare even in ΔWAPL cells.
- The paper states that SCC4 deletion causes near-complete loss of SCC2, so SCC4-deficient cells could not fully separate SCC4 from SCC2 function; SCC2 itself could not be knocked out even in a ΔWAPL background.
- Evident from the text: the work relies on HAP1 cells, which are haploid, p53-mutant, and cancer-derived, and WAPL-null proliferation was attributed to impaired p53 function; the loop-extrusion conclusion is inferred from Hi-C/4C/ChIP/FRAP data rather than direct single-molecule visualization, and only ∼1,000 genes changed expression despite genome-wide loop changes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
ΔWAPL cells often develop pronounced corner-peaks at the intersection of the 5′ and 3′ boundaries of TADs.
“Importantly, we often found TADs that developed pronounced corner-peaks, i.e., peaks at the intersection of the 5′ and 3′ boundary of a TAD, in ΔWAPL cells (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
ΔSCC4 cells display severely reduced SCC2 levels.
“Notably, ΔSCC4 cells displayed severely reduced SCC2 levels (Figure 3C), presumably due to reduced SCC2 stability in the absence of its binding partner (Hinshaw et al., 2015, Watrin et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
The median loop length increased by more than 200 kb in ΔWAPL cells compared to wild-type (575 kb versus 370 kb).
“When we performed systematic loop calling on the full-genome contact maps (Rao et al., 2014), we found that the median loop length increased by more than 200 kb in the ΔWAPL cells compared to the wild-type (575 kb versus 370 kb).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The number of SMC1 peaks increased from 18,462 to 45,479 following WAPL knockout.
“Our results show a strong increase in the number of SMC1 peaks following stabilization (from 18,462 to 45,479).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ΔWAPL cells only tolerated disruptive insertions up to and including the tenth exon of SCC2.
“We found that ΔWAPL cells only tolerated disruptive insertions up to and including the tenth exon of SCC2 (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The truncated SCC2 product lacking the N-terminal region was highly abundant.
“Importantly, this truncated SCC2 product was highly abundant, which would indicate that the deleted N-terminal region harbors a sequence that, when unbound to SCC4, destabilizes SCC2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TADs containing differentially expressed genes show significantly stronger interactions in ΔWAPL cells.
“However, those TADs that contained differentially expressed genes showed significantly stronger interactions (Figure 1D), suggesting that the aberrant interaction between TADs can affect the expression of genes within these domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
WAPL deficiency affects loop length genome-wide.
“We should note that even though WAPL deficiency affects loop length genome-wide, only ∼1,000 genes are differentially expressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SCC4 deficiency caused a reduction in contact frequency between loop anchors identified in wild-type cells.
“In addition, we found that SCC4 deficiency caused a reduction in contact frequency between loop anchors identified in wild-type cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Extended loops are found genome-wide in ΔWAPL cells.
“We do find extended loops genome-wide in ΔWAPL cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Illegally oriented loops remain relatively rare, even in the absence of WAPL.
“We should emphasize that illegally oriented loops remain relatively rare, even in the absence of WAPL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Only ∼1,000 genes are differentially expressed in WAPL deficiency.
“We should note that even though WAPL deficiency affects loop length genome-wide, only ∼1,000 genes are differentially expressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Removing SCC4 is sufficient to affect chromosome topology on a global scale, through formation of shorter loops.
“We now find that removing either WAPL or SCC4 is sufficient to affect chromosome topology on a global scale, be it through the formation of longer or shorter loops, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ΔWAPL cells, chromatin loops can extend beyond CTCF sites.
“The fact that in ΔWAPL cells loops can extend beyond CTCF sites indicates that CTCF boundaries are not absolute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Removing WAPL is sufficient to affect chromosome topology on a global scale, through formation of longer loops.
“We now find that removing either WAPL or SCC4 is sufficient to affect chromosome topology on a global scale, be it through the formation of longer or shorter loops, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Large lamina-associated domains (LADs) are fragmented into smaller LADs in ΔWAPL cells.
“As a result, large lamina-associated domains (LADs) are fragmented into smaller LADs (Figures 6D and S4H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
WAPL deficiency leads to the formation or maintenance of loops between incorrectly oriented CTCF sites.
“Our finding that WAPL deficiency also leads to the formation or maintenance of loops between incorrectly oriented CTCF sites indicates that WAPL not only restricts chromatin loop extension, but also enforces the “CTCF directionality looping rule.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In ΔWAPL cells, CTCF binding to DNA is not evidently affected.
“In ΔWAPL cells, however, CTCF’s binding to DNA is not evidently affected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The length of chromatin loops is under control of WAPL.
“As the length of chromatin loops turns out to be under control of WAPL, this allows for the scenario that cohesin complexes in some instances are protected against WAPL to allow either the stabilization of loops or the further enlargement of loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Contact maps of ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells were very similar to those of wild-type cells.
“Remarkably, contact maps of ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells were very similar to those of wild-type cells (Figures 6A and 6B), indicating the SCC2/SCC4 complex and WAPL balance out each other’s functions regarding macro-scale chromosome organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The macro-scale architecture of WAPL-deficient vermicelli chromosomes has a striking similarity to that of mitotic chromosomes.
“The macro-scale architecture of WAPL-deficient vermicelli chromosomes has a striking similarity to that of mitotic chromosomes (Figure 6A and Naumova et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Naumova et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Cohesin acts through the processive enlargement of chromatin loops.
“We now provide experimental evidence that cohesin indeed acts through the processive enlargement of chromatin loops, which in turn raises important questions regarding the mode of action of the condensin complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
DNA release from cohesin is driven by WAPL.
“Cohesin is loaded onto DNA by the SCC2/SCC4 complex (also known as NIPBL and MAU2, respectively), and DNA release is driven by cohesin’s antagonist WAPL (Ciosk et al., 2000, Gandhi et al., 2006, Kueng et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The deleted N-terminal region of SCC2 harbors a sequence that destabilizes SCC2 when unbound to SCC4.
“Importantly, this truncated SCC2 product was highly abundant, which would indicate that the deleted N-terminal region harbors a sequence that, when unbound to SCC4, destabilizes SCC2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The duration with which cohesin embraces DNA determines the degree to which loops are enlarged.
“The size of chromatin loops apparently can be increased, and the duration with which cohesin embraces DNA determines the degree to which loops are enlarged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
WAPL-deficient interphase cells display a distinct nuclear thread-like cohesin distribution called vermicelli.
“WAPL-deficient interphase cells harbor an unusual granular DNA staining pattern and display a distinct nuclear thread-like cohesin distribution referred to as “vermicelli” (Tedeschi et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tedeschi et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
SCC4 is required for the formation of vermicelli.
“Apparently, SCC4 is required for the formation of vermicelli.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gene expression differences are not a global explanation for the increase in loop length in ΔWAPL cells.
“However, when we looked at regions that harbor no differentially expressed genes we found that also in these regions loop length is increased (Figures S3A and S3B), showing that gene expression differences are not a global explanation for the increase in loop length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Chromatin loops are formed through the processive enlargement of smaller loops.
“Together, our results support the model that chromatin loops are formed through the processive enlargement of smaller loops, and indeed, TADs reflect polyclonal populations of loops in the making between two given CTCF sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
WAPL-mediated cohesin release allows TADs to remain dynamic.
“We suggest that WAPL-mediated cohesin release allows TADs to remain dynamic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SCC4 is not strictly required for cohesin loading in vivo.
“Our finding that SCC4 is not strictly required for cohesin loading in vivo is surprising, as Scc4 is essential for loading and viability in budding yeast.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TADs reflect polyclonal populations of loops in the making between two given CTCF sites.
“Together, our results support the model that chromatin loops are formed through the processive enlargement of smaller loops, and indeed, TADs reflect polyclonal populations of loops in the making between two given CTCF sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Aberrant interaction between TADs can affect the expression of genes within these domains.
“However, those TADs that contained differentially expressed genes showed significantly stronger interactions (Figure 1D), suggesting that the aberrant interaction between TADs can affect the expression of genes within these domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The region containing exons 11-47 of SCC2 remains essential even in ΔWAPL cells.
“This would indicate that the region containing exons 11–47 remains essential even in ΔWAPL cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Both SCC2 and SCC4 are less stable when they cannot form a heterodimer.
“This presumably indicates that both SCC2 and SCC4 are less stable when they cannot form a heterodimer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The SCC2/SCC4 complex and WAPL are involved in a balancing act that controls chromosome architecture at many levels, from extension of loops to macro-scale interphase chromosome architecture.
“It turns out that the SCC2/SCC4 complex and WAPL are involved in a balancing act that controls chromosome architecture at many levels, from the extension of loops to macro-scale interphase chromosome architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CTCF boundaries are not absolute.
“The fact that in ΔWAPL cells loops can extend beyond CTCF sites indicates that CTCF boundaries are not absolute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The preferential B to A switch suggests that the active compartment is dominant over the inactive compartment.
“Notably, the preferential B to A switch suggests that the active compartment is dominant over the inactive compartment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cohesin restricts the flexibility of chromosomes.
“As SCC4-deficient cells have less cohesin on chromatin, this result, together with the inverse phenotype of ΔWAPL cells, would suggest that cohesin restricts the flexibility of chromosomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
WAPL deficiency does not affect CTCF boundaries.
“Therefore, we favor the model that the boundary is not affected by WAPL deficiency, but rather that the number of attempts at passage by cohesin is larger in the absence of WAPL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The formation of chromatin loops involves a processive mechanism.
“Our findings indicate that the formation of chromatin loops involves a processive mechanism, and the duration with which cohesin embraces DNA determines the degree to which loops are enlarged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CTCF sites are pausing sites for cohesin during the loop enlargement process.
“In both cases, CTCF sites merely are pausing sites for cohesin during the loop enlargement process (Figure 7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
High levels of cohesin stably associated with DNA counteract compartmentalization.
“Our data are in correspondence with this report, and we would suggest that high levels of cohesin stably associated with DNA actually counteract compartmentalization, and WAPL-mediated cohesin turnover provides the necessary chromosomal flexibility for nuclear compartmentalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The extended loops phenotype is unlikely to be caused by the illegal loops phenotype.
“The latter phenotype, therefore, is unlikely to be caused by the former.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The SCC2/SCC4 complex promotes loop extension.
“Whereas WAPL restricts the extension of loops, the SCC2/SCC4 complex apparently promotes loop extension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The formation of vermicelli chromosomes requires the function of the C-terminal part of SCC2.
“This result indicates that the formation of vermicelli chromosomes requires the function of the C-terminal part of SCC2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The SCC2/SCC4 complex and WAPL balance out each other's functions regarding macro-scale chromosome organization.
“Remarkably, contact maps of ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells were very similar to those of wild-type cells (Figures 6A and 6B), indicating the SCC2/SCC4 complex and WAPL balance out each other’s functions regarding macro-scale chromosome organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the absence of WAPL, the number of attempts at passage by cohesin is larger.
“Therefore, we favor the model that the boundary is not affected by WAPL deficiency, but rather that the number of attempts at passage by cohesin is larger in the absence of WAPL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The SCC2/SCC4 complex contributes to the extension of DNA loops.
“Together, these findings indicate that the SCC2/SCC4 complex contributes to the extension of DNA loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cohesin entraps a small loop in its lumen that is processively enlarged by cohesin's sliding down the base of the loop.
“Based on these different aspects, we favor the model that cohesin entraps a small loop in its lumen that is processively enlarged by cohesin’s sliding down the base of the loop (Figure 7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The effect of SCC4 deletion on cohesin loading is not due to an inherent function of SCC4 but is a consequence of the severely reduced levels of SCC2 in ΔSCC4 cells.
“It also indicates that the effect of SCC4 deletion on cohesin loading is not due to an inherent function of SCC4, but rather is a consequence of the severely reduced levels of SCC2 in ΔSCC4 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
WAPL-mediated cohesin turnover provides the necessary chromosomal flexibility for nuclear compartmentalization.
“Our data are in correspondence with this report, and we would suggest that high levels of cohesin stably associated with DNA actually counteract compartmentalization, and WAPL-mediated cohesin turnover provides the necessary chromosomal flexibility for nuclear compartmentalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is unlikely that WAPL deficiency affects the boundaries themselves.
“This makes it unlikely that WAPL deficiency affects the boundaries themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Chromatin loops only affect the expression of certain genes.
“Chromatin loops, therefore, only affect the expression of certain genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 37
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataΔWAPL cells display the vermicelli cohesin-staining phenotype, but these thread-like structures are absent in ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells.
“We then studied cohesin staining patterns and found that whereas ΔWAPL cells clearly displayed the vermicelli cohesin-staining phenotype, these thread-like structures were absent in ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells (Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataΔWAPL cells tolerate gene-trap insertions in the genes encoding both subunits of the SCC2/SCC4 cohesin loader complex, whereas in wild-type cells SCC2 and SCC4 display strong essentiality for fitness.
“To our surprise, we found that ΔWAPL cells tolerated gene-trap insertions in the genes encoding both subunits of the SCC2/SCC4 cohesin loader complex (Figure 3B), while in wild-type cells, SCC2 and SCC4 displayed strong essentiality for fitness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWild-type HAP1 cells almost exclusively loop together convergent CTCF sites, whereas ΔWAPL cells contain many loops that violate the CTCF orientation rule and show an increase in tandem CTCF orientations.
“Based on the CTCF ChIP data, we assigned an orientation to the loop anchors and found that wild-type HAP1 cells almost exclusively looped together convergent CTCF sites (Figures 2C–2E). However, when we characterized the chromatin loops in ΔWAPL cells, we found many examples of loops that violated the CTCF orientation rule (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataΔSCC4 cells have a reduced amount of chromatin-associated cohesin and a more than 3-fold reduction in detected cohesin binding sites (from 18,462 peaks in wild-type to 5,974 in ΔSCC4).
“Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found a reduced amount of chromatin-associated cohesin (Figure 3F), and ChIP-seq analysis showed a more than 3-fold reduction in the amount of detected cohesin binding sites (from 18,462 peaks in wild-type to 5,974 in ΔSCC4) (Figure 3G).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationDisrupting the SCC2 reading frame after its ATG led to loss of full-length SCC2 and yielded a shorter SCC2 product lacking the SCC4 binding domain.
“This led to loss of expression of full length SCC2 and yielded a shorter SCC2 product that lacked the SCC4 binding domain (Braunholz et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Braunholz et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWAPL deficiency severely impairs cohesin's turnover on chromatin, increases cohesin's association at DNA, and yields cells with vermicelli thread-like cohesin staining.
“As expected, WAPL deficiency severely impaired cohesin’s turnover on chromatin, led to a marked increase of cohesin’s association at DNA, and yielded cells that displayed the vermicelli thread-like cohesin staining pattern (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SCC2 mutation led to a reduction of SCC1 binding to chromatin in wild-type and ΔWAPL backgrounds, loss of vermicelli cohesin staining in ΔWAPL cells, and no sister chromatid cohesion defect.
“Notably, the SCC2 mutation led to the same phenotype as did SCC4 deletion, namely a reduction of SCC1 binding to chromatin, both in wild-type and in a ΔWAPL background, to a loss of the vermicelli cohesin staining pattern of ΔWAPL cells, and these cells did not display a sister chromatid cohesion defect (Figures 4E–4G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWAPL deficiency leads to extension of chromatin loops and strongly increases interaction frequencies between nearby TADs.
“Intriguingly, WAPL deficiency led to the extension of chromatin loops and strongly increased interaction frequencies between nearby TADs (Figures 1A–1C and S2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeleting the SCC2 coding sequence up to exon 11 yielded a truncated SCC2 protein lacking a large N-terminal region including its SCC4-binding domain and led to reduced SCC4 levels.
“This yielded a truncated SCC2 protein that lacked a large N-terminal region including its SCC4-binding domain and again led to reduced SCC4 levels (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSCC2-truncated cells, despite reduced SCC4 levels, harbored normal SCC1 levels on chromatin, displayed robust sister chromatid cohesion, and displayed vermicelli cohesin stainings in a ΔWAPL background.
“We found that these SCC2-truncated cells, despite their reduced SCC4 levels, harbored normal SCC1 levels on chromatin, displayed robust sister chromatid cohesion, and importantly, also displayed vermicelli cohesin stainings in a ΔWAPL background (Figures 4E–4G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe increase in signal at TAD corners in ΔWAPL cells is a global effect and is accompanied by a decrease in intra-TAD contact frequency.
“When we calculated the average contact profile of the TADs that we identified in wild-type cells, we observed that this was a global effect (Figures 2B and S2C). The increase in signal at the corners of TADs was accompanied by a decrease in the intra-TAD contact frequency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SCC2 truncation was considerably less abundant than full-length SCC2 and led to a decrease in SCC4 levels.
“This truncation was considerably less abundant than full length SCC2 was in the parental cells, and it also led to a decrease in SCC4 levels (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA B to A switch often coincided with an increase in gene expression, whereas gene expression was not evidently affected for regions switching from A to B.
“Interestingly, we found that a B to A switch often coincided with an increase in gene expression, whereas gene expression was not evidently affected for regions switching from A to B (Figure S4E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe more diffuse TAD boundaries in ΔSCC4 cells were a global effect, and this defect was rescued in ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells.
“To quantify this on a genome-wide level, we aligned the DI for all TAD boundaries, which revealed that the more diffuse boundaries in ΔSCC4 cells were a global effect, and this defect was rescued in ΔWAPL/ΔSCC4 cells (Figures 5E, 5F, and S6D ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMore regions switched from B to A than from A to B in ΔWAPL cells (46.0 Mb B to A versus 22.8 Mb A to B), and compartment switches were strongly linked to a concomitant change in association with the nuclear periphery.
“When we quantified the regions that switched from A to B or vice versa, we found that more regions switched from B to A (46.0 Mb B to A versus 22.8 Mb A to B), and the compartment switches were strongly linked to a concomitant change in the association with the nuclear periphery (Figure 6E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOur data correspond with the report that cohesin depletion does not disrupt nuclear compartmentalization.
“Our data are in correspondence with this report, and we would suggest that high levels of cohesin stably associated with DNA actually counteract compartmentalization, and WAPL-mediated cohesin turnover provides the necessary chromosomal flexibility for nuclear compartmentalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTADs in ΔSCC4 cells displayed more diffuse boundaries, and ΔSCC4 cells displayed severely decreased directionality index (DI) scores.
“Our Hi-C data also revealed that TADs in ΔSCC4 cells displayed more diffuse boundaries (Figure 5D, left). We then calculated the directionality index (DI), which is a measure for TAD partition, and found that ΔSCC4 cells indeed displayed severely decreased DI scores (Figure 5D, right).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn ΔWAPL cells, A and B compartments are less clearly defined and the segregation between A and B compartments is less strict than in wild-type.
“Although they are less clearly defined in ΔWAPL cells, we can to some degree identify A and B nuclear compartments and they generally overlap with those found in wild-type, but the distribution of the scores is not as strongly bimodal as in the wild-type. This indicates that the segregation between A and B compartments is less strict in ΔWAPL cells (Figures 6C and S4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtended loops are formed more frequently in ΔWAPL cells and are mostly formed between existing loop anchors rather than between de novo anchors.
“The APA confirmed our observation that extended loops are formed more frequently in ΔWAPL cells and showed that extended loops are mostly formed between existing loop anchors, rather than being formed between de novo anchors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataΔWAPL cells show a striking decrease in the number of far-cis (>10 Mb) contacts, whereas ΔSCC4 cells display an increase in far-cis contacts compared to wild-type.
“When we compared the whole-chromosome contact maps for wild-type and ΔWAPL cells, we saw a striking decrease in the number of far-cis (>10 Mb) contacts in the ΔWAPL cells. (Figure 6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSCC4 loss in ΔWAPL cells led to a reduction in extended loops, resulting in an overall loop length that strongly resembled that found in wild-type cells.
“SCC4 loss in ΔWAPL cells also led to a reduction in extended loops, resulting in an overall loop length that strongly resembled those found in wild-type cells (Figure 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSCC4 loss led to shorter loops in a wild-type background and also reduced loop length in ΔWAPL cells.
“We found that SCC4 loss led to shorter loops in a wild-type background and also reduced loop length in ΔWAPL cells (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBoth vermicelli and mitotic chromosomes harbor virtually no far-cis interactions.
“Both types of chromosomes harbor virtually no far-cis interactions, which presumably in both cases reflects the rigidity of these chromosomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo exonic moderate- or high-impact mutations were found.
“Using these annotations, we found no exonic moderate- or high-impact mutations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBoth vermicelli and mitotic chromosomes display an axis of SMC complexes at the heart of each chromosome that spans its entire length.
“Another crucial shared feature of vermicelli and mitotic chromosomes is that both display an axis of SMC complexes at the heart of each chromosome that spans its entire length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn vermicelli chromosomes, the axis consists of cohesin complexes; in mitotic chromosomes, condensin has this axial localization.
“In vermicelli chromosomes, this axis consists of cohesin complexes, while in mitotic chromosomes condensin has this axial localization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo ΔWAPL-specific mutations were found.
“We found no ΔWAPL-specific mutations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the absence of WAPL, cohesin is loaded onto DNA but does not turn over.
“In the absence of WAPL, cohesin is loaded onto DNA, but does not turn over (Kueng et al., 2006, Tedeschi et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCohesin is loaded onto DNA by the SCC2/SCC4 complex.
“Cohesin is loaded onto DNA by the SCC2/SCC4 complex (also known as NIPBL and MAU2, respectively), and DNA release is driven by cohesin’s antagonist WAPL (Ciosk et al., 2000, Gandhi et al., 2006, Kueng et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHuman SCC4 aids cohesin in the loading reaction, but cohesin can to some degree load onto DNA without SCC4.
“It implies that human SCC4 aids cohesin in the loading reaction, but cohesin can, to some degree, load onto DNA without SCC4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe specific convergent orientation of CTCF sites is required for the looping together of CTCF sites.
“and this specific orientation is required for the looping together of CTCF sites (de Wit et al., 2015, Guo et al., 2015, Sanborn et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCohesin turnover is not required for the formation of TADs and loops, but rather restricts the length of loops and intra-TAD interactions.
“These results show that cohesin turnover is not required for the formation of TADs and loops, but rather restricts the length of loops and intra-TAD interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWAPL not only limits the extension of DNA loops per se but also counteracts the formation or maintenance of certain DNA loops.
“Therefore, WAPL not only limits the extension of DNA loops per se but also counteracts the formation or maintenance of certain DNA loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChromatin loops are formed almost exclusively between convergent CTCF sites.
“Recent work has shown that chromatin loops are formed almost exclusively between “convergent” CTCF sites (i.e., sites with consensus CTCF motifs pointing toward each other) (Rao et al., 2014, Vietri Rudan et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe size of chromatin loops is under control of cohesin, and the dynamics of cohesin's DNA entrapment state determines the length of these loops.
“We find that the size of chromatin loops is under control of cohesin, and the dynamics of cohesin’s DNA entrapment state determines the length of these loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany regulatory interactions are pre-formed.
“Stimulation with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) does not drastically influence chromosome topology, despite substantial changes in gene expression (Jin et al., 2013), suggesting that many regulatory interactions are pre-formed (de Laat and Duboule, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Laat and Duboule, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNuclear compartmentalization requires a certain degree of flexibility of chromosomes, and WAPL is required to limit the amount of cohesin on chromatin to provide this flexibility.
“We propose that nuclear compartmentalization requires a certain degree of flexibility of chromosomes, and WAPL is required to limit the amount of cohesin on chromatin to provide this flexibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStimulation with TNF-α does not drastically influence chromosome topology, despite substantial changes in gene expression.
“Stimulation with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) does not drastically influence chromosome topology, despite substantial changes in gene expression (Jin et al., 2013), suggesting that many regulatory interactions are pre-formed (de Laat and Duboule, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCohesin depletion does not evidently disrupt nuclear compartmentalization.
“For example, cohesin depletion does not evidently disrupt nuclear compartmentalization (Seitan et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seitan et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationChromosome topology can be remarkably refractory to changes.
“Earlier studies have found that chromosome topology can be remarkably refractory to changes (Lin et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lin et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCohesin can slide along chromatin in vitro, and this requires the topological entrapment of DNA inside cohesin's lumen.
“Indeed, cohesin can slide along chromatin in vitro, and this requires the topological entrapment of DNA inside cohesin’s lumen (Davidson et al., 2016, Kanke et al., 2016, Stigler et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLocal and temporal protection against WAPL plays an important role during mitosis and allows WAPL-dependent removal of most cohesin complexes from chromosome arms but not centromeres, leading to the classical X-shape of mitotic human chromosomes.
“The local and temporal protection against WAPL also plays an important role during mitosis and allows the WAPL-dependent removal of most cohesin complexes from chromosome arms but not centromeres that leads to the classical X-shape of mitotic human chromosomes (Haarhuis et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haarhuis et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe contribution of the SCC2/SCC4 complex to loop extension and its requirement for defined TAD boundaries are presumably functionally linked.
“Considering that the SCC2/SCC4 complex contributes to the extension of chromatin loops, and it is also required for the formation of defined TAD boundaries, these two phenotypes are presumably functionally linked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SMC complex in B. subtilis slides along DNA, and this movement coincides with the tethering together of DNA elements at the sites that it passes.
“Recent work in B. subtilis indicates that the SMC complex found in this species slides along DNA, and this movement coincides with the tethering together of DNA elements at the sites that it passes (Wang et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFundamentally different chromosome topologies have so far primarily been observed when comparing different developmental lineages.
“Fundamentally different chromosome topologies have so far primarily been observed when comparing different developmental lineages (Dixon et al., 2015, Krijger et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWAPL not only restricts chromatin loop extension, but also enforces the "CTCF directionality looping rule."
“Our finding that WAPL deficiency also leads to the formation or maintenance of loops between incorrectly oriented CTCF sites indicates that WAPL not only restricts chromatin loop extension, but also enforces the “CTCF directionality looping rule.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTwo templates were created for wild-type and the three mutant cell lines to control for differences in template generation.
“We created two templates for wild-type and the three mutant cell lines to control for differences in template generation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationp53 depletion allows proliferation of WAPL deficient cells.
“As we previously showed that p53 depletion allows proliferation of WAPL deficient cells (Haarhuis et al., 2013), we could efficiently generate ΔWAPL HAP1 clones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haarhuis et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCondensed mitotic chromosome arms are almost completely devoid of cohesin.
“A fundamental difference, however, is that condensed mitotic chromosome arms are almost completely devoid of cohesin (Haarhuis et al., 2014), and mitotic condensation is, to a large degree, dependent on the condensin complex (Hirano, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haarhuis et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe processive loop enlargement model was originally proposed as an explanation for how condensin drives mitotic condensation, and it was suggested that cohesin may act in a similar manner.
“The processive loop enlargement model was originally proposed as an explanation for how condensin drives mitotic condensation, and at the time, it was suggested that cohesin may act in a similar manner (Nasmyth, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nasmyth, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe lack of far-cis interactions in both vermicelli and mitotic chromosomes presumably reflects the rigidity of these chromosomes.
“Both types of chromosomes harbor virtually no far-cis interactions, which presumably in both cases reflects the rigidity of these chromosomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningSorting fixed cells for haploid cells in G1 phase by DAPI staining minimizes confounding from diploid cells carrying heterozygous mutations in the synthetic viability screens.
“In order to minimize confounding from diploid cells carrying heterozygous mutations, the fixed cells were stained using DAPI for DNA content and sorted for haploid cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle on an Astrios Moflo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCohesin and condensin are highly related SMC complexes that can entrap DNA inside their lumens.
“Cohesin and condensin are highly related SMC complexes that can entrap DNA inside their lumens (Cuylen et al., 2011, Haering et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningGene regions overlapping on opposite strands were disregarded in the analysis because orientation bias in those regions is not readily interpretable.
“Overlapping gene regions on opposite strands were disregarded (since orientation bias in that region is not readily interpretable)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenConcatenating GATC fragments into 50Kb windows, each starting and finishing at a GATC motif, reduces noise in DamID profile analyses.
“To reduce noise, we concatenated GATC fragments in 50Kb windows, with each 50Kb-extended GATC fragment starting and finishing in a GATC motif.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMitotic condensation is, to a large degree, dependent on the condensin complex.
“A fundamental difference, however, is that condensed mitotic chromosome arms are almost completely devoid of cohesin (Haarhuis et al., 2014), and mitotic condensation is, to a large degree, dependent on the condensin complex (Hirano, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hirano, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is a likely scenario that cohesin and condensin act in fundamentally the same manner.
“Considering the large degree of conservation between these complexes and their similar distribution at chromosome axes, it is a likely scenario that they act in fundamentally the same manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe distributions of R and Δ do not follow a normal distribution.
“A non-parametric analysis is appropriate since the distributions of R and Δ do not follow a normal distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Looping factors are important for cellular viability, and in the absence of WAPL, factors that promote looping may become less important.
“We reasoned that looping factors are important for cellular viability, and that in the absence of WAPL, factors that promote looping may become less important.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Any defect in loop formation may be compensated for by WAPL deficiency.
“Any defect in loop formation may thereby be compensated for by WAPL deficiency.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There must be a linear scanning mechanism that, by tracing the DNA, can communicate the orientation of the contacting CTCF sites.
“One would therefore assume that there must be a linear scanning mechanism that, by tracing the DNA, can communicate the orientation of the contacting CTCF sites.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The looped DNA passes through cohesin during loop formation.
“In this model, the looped DNA does, in fact, pass through cohesin during loop formation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the 4C analysis, contact frequency decreases monotonically with distance.
“The main assumption in our 4C analysis is that the contact frequency decreases monotonically with the distance.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The data are consistent with the observation that genome compartmentalization is weakened in cells where WAPL is knocked out, leading to larger loop domains.
“Our data is consistent with the observation that genome compartmentalization is weakened in cells where the cohesin-antagonist WAPL is knocked out, leading to larger loop domains (Haarhuis et al., 2017).”
From Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains (2017) · cites this paper as Haarhuis et al., 2017
WAPL deletion seems to raise Xcom processivity, enlarging loops.
“Similarly, deletion of WAPL appears to increase the processivity of the Xcom, and thus increases the size of loops (Haarhuis et al., 2017).”
From Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains (2017) · cites this paper as Haarhuis et al., 2017
Deletion of WAPL results in formation of thousands of new loops and loop domains, which are larger than those found when WAPL is intact.
“Finally, an exciting recent experiment demonstrated that deletion of WAPL, a cohesin antagonist that removes cohesin from chromatin, results in the formation of thousands of new loops and loop domains, which are larger than those found when WAPL is intact (Haarhuis et al., 2017).”
From Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains (2017) · cites this paper as Haarhuis et al., 2017
Bigger loops show widespread mixing that blurs long-range compartment patterns.
“Consistent with our observations, these larger loops are associated with extensive mixing, which obscures long-range compartment patterns.”
From Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains (2017) · cites this paper as Haarhuis et al., 2017
Architectural proteins such as CTCF and cohesin play a role in domain formation.
“It is known that architectural proteins such as CTCF and cohesin play a role (Haarhuis et al., 2017, Nora et al., 2017, Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013)”
From Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development (2017) · cites this paper as Haarhuis et al., 2017
Polymer simulation studies and Hi-C studies employing acute depletion of CTCF and cohesin support a dynamic model of TADs and chromatin loops.
“complementary polymer simulation studies and Hi-C studies employing acute depletion of CTCF and cohesin, which also support such a dynamic model.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Recent studies employing induced CTCF and cohesin degradation now strongly support a model where cohesin forms TADs and CTCF establishes TAD boundaries.
“In conclusion, recent studies10–15 employing induced CTCF and cohesin degradation now strongly support a model where cohesin forms TADs and CTCF establishes TAD boundaries.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
CTCF and cohesin are required for chromatin looping, form a biochemically stable protein complex, and both bind chromatin at loop anchors.
“In summary, CTCF and cohesin are required for chromatin looping,10–15 form a biochemically stable protein-complex and both bind chromatin at loop anchors.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Cohesin's residence time is prolonged in ΔWAPL cells.
“cohesin's residence time is prolonged in ΔWAPL cells,12,14”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
The average TAD size increased substantially in ΔWAPL cells and the median loop size increased from 370 kb to 575 kb.
“the average TAD size increased substantially in ΔWAPL cells12,14,15 and the median loop size increased from 370 kb to 575 kb.12”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
The ΔWAPL Hi-C studies support our conclusion that CTCF binds more dynamically than cohesin.
“Thus, the ΔWAPL Hi-C studies12,14,15 support our conclusion that CTCF binds more dynamically than cohesin.7”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Wapl removes cohesin from chromatin.
“Wapl removes cohesin from chromatin.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Dynamic loop extrusion models can explain recent perturbation experiments where CTCF binding sites have been added or deleted and also explain the loss of either CTCF or cohesin.
“Notably, a key advantage of dynamic loop extrusion models is that they can explain recent perturbation experiments where CTCF binding sites have been added or deleted9,49-51 and also explain the loss of either CTCF or cohesin.10-15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
CTCF and cohesin both appear absolutely required for the formation of most TADs.
“although CTCF and cohesin both appear absolutely required for the formation of most TADs10-15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607 · see citing works
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889 · see citing works
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110 · Cited by 27,895 · see citing works
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437 · see citing works
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · see citing works
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464 · see citing works
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668 · see citing works
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063 · see citing works
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
DePristo, M. A., Banks, E., Poplin, R. E., Garimella, K. V., Maguire, J., Hartl, C., Philippakis, A., del Angel, G., Rivas, M. A., Hanna, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.806 · Cited by 11,216 · see citing works
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212 · see citing works
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898 · see citing works
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829 · see citing works
FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L., & Noble, W. S. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 · Cited by 4,247 · see citing works
Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments
Durand, N. C., Shamim, M. S., Machol, I., Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Lander, E. S., & Aiden, E. L. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002 · Cited by 3,724 · see citing works
HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing.
Servant, N., Varoquaux, N., Lajoie, B. R., Viara, E., Chen, C.-J., Vert, J.-P., Heard, E., Dekker, J., & Barillot, E. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0831-x · Cited by 2,565 · see citing works
Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion
Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Lu, C., Goloborodko, A., Abdennur, N., & Mirny, L. A. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions
Guelen, L., Pagie, L., Brasset, É., Meuleman, W. R. A., Faza, M. B., Talhout, W., Eussen, B. H. J., de Klein, A., Wessels, L. F. A., de Laat, W. L., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06947 · Cited by 1,959 · see citing works
Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS
Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y., & Liu, X. S. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.101 · Cited by 1,805 · see citing works
Sanborn, A. L., Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Durand, N. C., Huntley, M. H., Jewett, A. I., Bochkov, I. D., Chinnappan, D., Cutkosky, A., Li, J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518552112 · Cited by 1,730 · see citing works
Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation
Dixon, J. R., Jung, I., Selvaraj, S., Shen, Y., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. E., Lee, A. Y., Ye, Z., Kim, A., Rajagopal, N., Xie, W., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14222 · Cited by 1,646 · see citing works
Rainer Breitling, A., Armengaud, P., Anna Amtmann, A., & Herzyk, P. (2004) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.055 · Cited by 1,478 · see citing works
Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann–Pick C1
Carette, J. E., Raaben, M., Wong, A., Herbert, A. S., Obernosterer, G., Mulherkar, N., Kuehne, A. I., Kranzusch, P. J., Griffin, A. M., Ruthel, G. T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10348 · Cited by 1,309 · see citing works
Self-citationInsulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas
Flavahan, W. A., Drier, Y., Liau, B. B., Gillespie, S. M., Venteicher, A. S., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Suvà, M. L., & Bernstein, B. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16490 · Cited by 1,288 · see citing works
A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells
Jin, F., Li, Y., Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Ye, Z., Lee, A. Y., Yen, C.-A., Schmitt, A. D., Espinoza, C. A., & Ren, B. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12644 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor
Wendt, K. S., Yoshida, K., Itoh, T., Bando, M., Koch, B., Schirghuber, E., Tsutsumi, S., Nagae, G., Ishihara, K., Mishiro, T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06634 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
Mathelier, A., Zhao, X., Zhang, A. W., Parcy, F., Worsley-Hunt, R., Arenillas, D. J., Buchman, S., Chen, C., Chou, A., Ienasescu, H., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt997 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Organization of the mitotic chromosome
Naumova, N., Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., Zhan, Y., Lajoie, B. R., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236083 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function
Guo, Y., Xu, Q., Canzio, D., Shou, J., Li, J., Gorkin, D. U., Jung, I., Wu, H., Zhai, Y., Tang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
Cohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms
Parelho, V., Hadjur, S., Spivakov, M., Leleu, M., Sauer, S., Gregson, H. C., Jarmuz, A., Canzonetta, C., Webster, Z., Nesterova, T., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.011 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells
Blomen, V. A., Májek, P., Jae, L. T., Bigenzahn, J. W., Nieuwenhuis, J., Staring, J., Sacco, R., van Diemen, F. R., Olk, N., Stukalov, A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac7557 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Self-citationGoing the Distance: A Current View of Enhancer Action
Blackwood, E. M., & Kadonaga, J. T. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5373.60 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Nasmyth, K. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091334 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins
Ciosk, R., Shirayama, M., Shevchenko, A., Tanaka, T., Toth, A., Shevchenko, A., & Nasmyth, K. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80420-7 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture
Vietri Rudan, M., Barrington, C., Henderson, S., Ernst, C., Odom, D. T., Tanay, A., & Hadjur, S. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
CTCF Binding Polarity Determines Chromatin Looping
de Wit, E., Vos, E. S. M., Holwerda, S. J. B., Valdes-Quezada, C., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Teunissen, H., Splinter, E., Wijchers, P. J., Krijger, P. H. L., & de Laat, W. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.023 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Self-citationSomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data
Larson, D. E., Harris, C. C., Chen, K., Koboldt, D. C., Abbott, T. E., Dooling, D. J., Ley, T. J., Mardis, E. R., Wilson, R. K., & Ding, L. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr665 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Wapl controls the dynamic association of cohesin with chromatin
Kueng, S., Hegemann, B., Peters, B. H., Lipp, J. J., Schleiffer, A., Mechtler, K., & Peters, J.-M. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.040 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Self-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes
Alipour, E., & Marko, J. F. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks925 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Narendra, V., Rocha, P. P., An, D., Raviram, R., Skok, J. A., Mazzoni, E. O., & Reinberg, D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1262088 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes
de Laat, W., & Duboule, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12753 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
ChIP-seq: Using high-throughput sequencing to discover protein–DNA interactions
Schmidt, D., Wilson, M. D., Spyrou, C., Brown, G. D., Hadfield, J., & Odom, D. T. (2009) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.001 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
CTCF and Cohesin in Genome Folding and Transcriptional Gene Regulation
Merkenschlager, M., & Nora, E. P. (2016) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022339 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules
Haering, C. H., Farcas, A.-M., Arumugam, P., Metson, J., & Nasmyth, K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07098 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Gandhi, R., Gillespie, P. J., & Hirano, T. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.061 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
seqMINER: an integrated ChIP-seq data interpretation platform
Ye, T., Krebs, A. R., Choukrallah, M.-A., Keime, C., Plewniak, F., Davidson, I., & Tora, L. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1287 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse
Giorgetti, L., Lajoie, B. R., Carter, A. C., Attia, M., Zhan, Y., Xu, J., Chen, C. J., Kaplan, N., Chang, H. Y., Heard, É., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18589 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The Dynamic Architecture of Hox Gene Clusters
Noordermeer, D., Leleu, M., Splinter, E., Rougemont, J., de Laat, W. L., & Duboule, D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207194 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Condensin-based chromosome organization from bacteria to vertebrates
Hirano, T. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.033 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Robust 4C-seq data analysis to screen for regulatory DNA interactions
van de Werken, H. J. G., Landan, G., Holwerda, S. J. B., Hoichman, M., Klous, P., Chachik, R., Splinter, E., Valdes‐Quezada, C., Öz, Y., Bouwman, B. A. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2173 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Gerlich, D., Koch, B., Dupeux, F., Peters, J., & Ellenberg, J. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.068 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Wapl is an essential regulator of chromatin structure and chromosome segregation
Tedeschi, A., Wutz, G., Huet, S., Jaritz, M., Wuensche, A., Schirghuber, E., Davidson, I. F., Tang, W., Cisneros, D. A., Bhaskara, V., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12471 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Seitan, V. C., Faure, A. J., Zhan, Y., McCord, R. P., Lajoie, B. R., Ing-Simmons, E., Lenhard, B., Giorgetti, L., Heard, E., Fisher, A. G., et al. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.161620.113 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Biochemical reconstitution of topological DNA binding by the cohesin ring
Murayama, Y., & Uhlmann, F. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12867 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Wang, X., Brandão, H. B., Le, T. B. K., Laub, M. T., & Rudner, D. Z. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aai8982 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Lin, Y. C., Benner, C., Mansson, R., Heinz, S., Miyazaki, K., Miyazaki, M., Chandra, V., Bossen, C., Glass, C. K., & Murre, C. (2012) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2432 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Deciphering the Glycosylome of Dystroglycanopathies Using Haploid Screens for Lassa Virus Entry
Jae, L. T., Raaben, M., Riemersma, M., van Beusekom, E., Blomen, V. A., Velds, A., Kerkhoven, R. M., Carette, J. E., Topaloğlu, H., Meinecke, P., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1233675 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Self-citationWatrin, E., Schleiffer, A., Tanaka, K., Eisenhaber, F., Nasmyth, K., & Peters, J.-M. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.049 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
DNA Entry into and Exit out of the Cohesin Ring by an Interlocking Gate Mechanism
Murayama, Y., & Uhlmann, F. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.030 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Rapid movement and transcriptional re-localization of human cohesin on DNA
Davidson, I. F., Goetz, D., Zaczek, M. P., Molodtsov, M. I., Huis in 't Veld, P. J., Weissmann, F., Litos, G., Cisneros, D. A., Ocampo‐Hafalla, M., Ladurner, R., et al. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201695402 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Single-molecule imaging reveals a collapsed conformational state for DNA-bound cohesin
Stigler, J., Çamdere, G. Ö., Koshland, D. E., & Greene, E. C. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.003 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Cell-of-origin-specific 3D genome structure acquired during somatic cell reprogramming
Krijger, P. H. L., Di Stefano, B., de Wit, E., Limone, F., van Oevelen, C., de Laat, W., & Graf, T. (2016) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.01.007 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Self-citationCondensin structures chromosomal DNA through topological links
Cuylen, S., Metz, J., & Haering, C. H. (2011) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2087 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Two-dimensional segmentation for analyzing Hi-C data
Lévy‐Leduc, C., Delattre, M., Mary‐Huard, T., & Robin, S. S. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu443 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Cohesin and its regulation: on the logic of X-shaped chromosomes
Haarhuis, J. H. I., Elbatsh, A. M. O., & Rowland, B. D. (2014) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.09.010 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationHeidinger-Pauli, J. M., Mert, O., Davenport, C., Guacci, V., & Koshland, D. E. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.018 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Cohesin acetylation and Wapl-Pds5 oppositely regulate translocation of cohesin along DNA
Kanke, M., Tahara, E., Huis in't Veld, P. J., & Nishiyama, T. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201695756 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Releasing Activity Disengages Cohesin’s Smc3/Scc1 Interface in a Process Blocked by Acetylation
Beckouët, F., Srinivasan, M., Roig, M. B., Chan, K.-L., Scheinost, J. C., Batty, P., Hu, B., Petela, N., Gligoris, T., Smith, A. C., et al. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.026 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationCohesin Releases DNA through Asymmetric ATPase-Driven Ring Opening
Elbatsh, A. M. O., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Petela, N. J., Chapard, C., Fish, A., Celie, P. H. N., Stadnik, M., Ristić, D., Wyman, C., Medema, R. H., et al. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.025 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationWAPL-mediated removal of cohesin protects against segregation errors and aneuploidy
Haarhuis, J. H. I., Elbatsh, A. M. O., van den Broek, B., Camps, D., Erkan, H., Jalink, K., Medema, R. H., & Rowland, B. D. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.003 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural evidence for Scc4-dependent localization of cohesin loading
Hinshaw, S. M., Makrantoni, V., Kerr, A., Marston, A. L., & Harrison, S. C. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.06057 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Inducible DamID systems for genomic mapping of chromatin proteins inDrosophila
Pindyurin, A. V., Pagie, L., Kozhevnikova, E. N., van Arensbergen, J., & van Steensel, B. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw176 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The exact probability distribution of the rank product statistics for replicated experiments
Eisinga, R., Breitling, R., & Heskes, T. (2013) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.037 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Isolated NIBPL missense mutations that cause Cornelia de Lange syndrome alter MAU2 interaction
Braunholz, D., Hullings, M., Gil-Rodríguez, M. C., Fincher, C. T., Mallozzi, M. B., Loy, E., Albrecht, M., Kaur, M., Limon, J., Rampuria, A., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.175 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The rank product method with two samples
Koziol, J. A. (2010) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.012 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains
Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Glenn St Hilaire, B., Engreitz, J. M., Perez, E. M., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Sanborn, A. L., Johnstone, S. E., Bascom, G. D., Bochkov, I. D., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.026 · Cited by 1,883 · see citing works
Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development
Bonev, B., Mendelson Cohen, N., Szabo, Q., Fritsch, L., Papadopoulos, G. L., Lubling, Y., Xu, X., Lv, X., Hugnot, J.-P., Tanay, A., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.043 · Cited by 1,338 · see citing works
Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture
Rowley, M. J., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0060-8 · Cited by 1,171 · see citing works
Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal
Schwarzer, W., Abdennur, N., Goloborodko, A., Pekowska, A., Fudenberg, G., Loe-Mie, Y., Fonseca, N. A., Huber, W., Haering, C. H., Mirny, L., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24281 · Cited by 1,196 · see citing works
Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control
Schoenfelder, S., & Fraser, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells
Bintu, B., Mateo, L. J., Su, J.-H., Sinnott-Armstrong, N. A., Parker, M., Kinrot, S., Yamaya, K., Boettiger, A. N., & Zhuang, X. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau1783 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
Wutz, G., Várnai, C., Nagasaka, K., Cisneros, D. A., Stocsits, R. R., Tang, W., Schoenfelder, S., Jessberger, G., Muhar, M., Hossain, M. J., et al. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798004 · Cited by 864 · see citing works
DNA loop extrusion by human cohesin
Davidson, I. F., Bauer, B., Goetz, D., Tang, W., Wutz, G., & Peters, J.-M. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz3418 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation
Zheng, H., & Xie, W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0132-4 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Human cohesin compacts DNA by loop extrusion
Kim, Y., Shi, Z., Zhang, H., Finkelstein, I. J., & Yu, H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz4475 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation
Nuebler, J., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Abdennur, N. A., & Mirny, L. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717730115 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Principles of genome folding into topologically associating domains
Szabo, Q., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw1668 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Transcription factors and 3D genome conformation in cell-fate decisions
Stadhouders, R., Filion, G. J. P., & Graf, T. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1182-7 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes
Davidson, I. F., & Peters, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00349-7 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
The structural basis for cohesin–CTCF-anchored loops
Li, Y., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Sedeño Cacciatore, Á., Oldenkamp, R., van Ruiten, M. S., Willems, L., Teunissen, H., Muir, K. W., de Wit, E., Rowland, B. D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1910-z · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging
Gabriele, M., Brandão, H. B., Grosse-Holz, S., Jha, A., Dailey, G. M., Cattoglio, C., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Mirny, L., Zechner, C., & Hansen, A. S. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn6583 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Transcription Elongation Can Affect Genome 3D Structure
Heinz, S., Texari, L., Hayes, M. G. B., Urbanowski, M., Chang, M. W., Givarkes, N., Rialdi, A., White, K. M., Albrecht, R. A., Pache, L., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.047 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Extensive Heterogeneity and Intrinsic Variation in Spatial Genome Organization
Finn, E. H., Pegoraro, G., Brandão, H. B., Valton, A.-L., Oomen, M. E., Dekker, J., Mirny, L., & Misteli, T. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.020 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Slobodyanyuk, E., Hansen, A. S., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01223-8 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Formation of Chromatin Subcompartments by Phase Separation
Erdel, F., & Rippe, K. (2018) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.011 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods
Jerković, I., & Cavalli, G. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00362-w · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Genome Organization Drives Chromosome Fragility
Canela, A., Maman, Y., Jung, S., Wong, N., Callen, E., Day, A., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Pekowska, A., Zhang, H., Rao, S. S. P., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.034 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
A mechanism of cohesin‐dependent loop extrusion organizes zygotic genome architecture
Gassler, J., Brandão, H. B., Imakaev, M., Flyamer, I. M., Ladstätter, S., Bickmore, W. A., Peters, J., Mirny, L. A., & Tachibana, K.-E. K. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798083 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains
Beagan, J. A., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0561-1 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Organization of Chromosomal DNA by SMC Complexes
Yatskevich, S., Rhodes, J., & Nasmyth, K. (2019) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043633 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Loop extrusion as a mechanism for formation of DNA damage repair foci
Arnould, C., Rocher, V., Finoux, A.-L., Clouaire, T., Li, K., Zhou, F., Caron, P., Mangeot, P. E., Ricci, E. P., Mourad, R., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03193-z · Cited by 341 · see citing works
The relationship between genome structure and function
Oudelaar, A. M., & Higgs, D. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00303-x · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Static and Dynamic DNA Loops form AP-1-Bound Activation Hubs during Macrophage Development
Phanstiel, D. H., Van Bortle, K., Spacek, D., Hess, G. T., Shamim, M. S., Machol, I., Love, M. I., Aiden, E. L., Bassik, M. C., & Snyder, M. P. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.006 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Emerging Evidence of Chromosome Folding by Loop ExtrusionPreprint
Fudenberg, G., Abdennur, N. A., Imakaev, M., Goloborodko, A. A., & Mirny, L. A. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034710 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Deciphering the multi-scale, quantitative cis-regulatory code
Kim, S., & Wysocka, J. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.12.032 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila
Szabo, Q., Jost, D., Chang, J., Cattoni, D. I., Papadopoulos, G. L., Bonev, B., Sexton, T., Gurgo, J., Jacquier, C., Nöllmann, M., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar8082 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensin II as a determinant of architecture type
Hoencamp, C., Dudchenko, O., Elbatsh, A. M. O., Brahmachari, S., Raaijmakers, J. A., van Schaik, T., Cacciatore, Á. S., Contessoto, V. G., van Heesbeen, R. G. H. P., van den Broek, B., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe2218 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanisms and Functions of Chromosome Compartmentalization
Hildebrand, E. M., & Dekker, J. (2020) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.01.002 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures
Hansen, A. S., Cattoglio, C., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2018) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2017.1389365 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Region Capture Micro-C reveals coalescence of enhancers and promoters into nested microcompartments
Goel, V. Y., Huseyin, M. K., & Hansen, A. S. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01391-1 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Kruse, K., Hug, C. B., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02215-9 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome
van Steensel, B., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0114-6 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
X-Chromosome Inactivation: A Crossroads Between Chromosome Architecture and Gene Regulation
Galupa, R., & Heard, É. (2018) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024611 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Transcription shapes 3D chromatin organization by interacting with loop extrusion
Banigan, E. J., Tang, W., van den Berg, A. A., Stocsits, R. R., Wutz, G., Brandão, H. B., Busslinger, G. A., Peters, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2210480120 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Two major mechanisms of chromosome organization
Mirny, L. A., Imakaev, M., & Abdennur, N. A. (2019) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2019.05.001 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Enhancer hubs and loop collisions identified from single-allele topologies
Allahyar, A., Vermeulen, C., Bouwman, B. A. M., Krijger, P. H. L., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Geeven, G., van Kranenburg, M., Pieterse, M., Straver, R., Haarhuis, J. H. I., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0161-5 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Self-citationCryo-EM structure of the human cohesin-NIPBL-DNA complex
Shi, Z.-B., Gao, H.-S., Bai, X.-C., & Yu, H.-T. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb0981 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Homotypic clustering of L1 and B1/Alu repeats compartmentalizes the 3D genome
Lu, J. Y., Chang, L., Li, T., Wang, T., Yin, Y., Zhan, G., Han, X., Zhang, K., Tao, Y., Percharde, M., et al. (2021) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-020-00466-6 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Molecular basis of CTCF binding polarity in genome folding
Nora, E. P., Caccianini, L., Fudenberg, G., So, K., Kameswaran, V., Nagle, A., Uebersohn, A., Hajj, B., Saux, A. L., Coulon, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19283-x · Cited by 206 · see citing works
4C-seq from beginning to end: A detailed protocol for sample preparation and data analysis
Krijger, P. H. L., Geeven, G., Bianchi, V., Hilvering, C. R. E., & de Laat, W. L. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.014 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationCatarino, R. R., & Stark, A. (2018) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.310367.117 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
McCord, R. P., Kaplan, N., & Giorgetti, L. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.021 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Interplay between Transcription Factors and the 3D Genome
Kim, S., & Shendure, J. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.010 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Canela, A., Maman, Y., Huang, S.-Y. N., Wutz, G., Tang, W., Zagnoli-Vieira, G., Callén, E., Wong, N., Day, A., Peters, J., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.030 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Regulatory Landscaping: How Enhancer-Promoter Communication Is Sculpted in 3D
Robson, M. I., Ringel, A. R., & Mundlos, S. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.032 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Regulation of single-cell genome organization into TADs and chromatin nanodomains
Szabo, Q., Donjon, A., Jerković, I., Papadopoulos, G. L., Cheutin, T., Bonev, B., Nora, E. P., Bruneau, B. G., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00716-8 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
CTCF is a DNA-tension-dependent barrier to cohesin-mediated loop extrusion
Davidson, I. F., Barth, R., Zaczek, M., van der Torre, J., Tang, W., Nagasaka, K., Janissen, R., Kerssemakers, J. W. J., Wutz, G., Dekker, C., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05961-5 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Carballo, E., Lopez‐Delisle, L., Zhan, Y., Fabre, P. J., Beccari, L. L., El-Idrissi, I., Huynh, T. H. N., Özadam, H., Dekker, J., & Duboule, D. (2017) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.307769.117 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Cohesin Disrupts Polycomb-Dependent Chromosome Interactions in Embryonic Stem Cells
Rhodes, J. D. P., Feldmann, A., Hernández-Rodríguez, B., Díaz, N., Brown, J. M., Fursova, N. A., Blackledge, N. P., Prathapan, P., Dobrinic, P., Huseyin, M. K., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.057 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Huang, H., Zhu, Q., Jussila, A., Han, Y., Bintu, B., Kern, C., Conte, M., Zhang, Y., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00863-6 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
ESCO1 and CTCF enable formation of long chromatin loops by protecting cohesinSTAG1 from WAPL
Wutz, G., Ladurner, R., Hilaire, B. G. S., Stocsits, R. R., Nagasaka, K., Pignard, B., Sanborn, A. L., Tang, W., Várnai, C., Ivanov, M. P., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52091 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Distinct roles of cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in 3D chromosome organization
Kojic, A., Cuadrado, A., Koninck, M. D., Giménez-Llorente, D., Rodríguez-Corsino, M., Goméz-López, G., Dily, F. L., Martı́-Renom, M. A., & Losada, A. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0070-4 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Thiecke, M. J., Wutz, G., Muhar, M., Tang, W., Bevan, S., Malysheva, V., Stocsits, R., Neumann, T., Zuber, J., Fraser, P., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107929 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
SMCHD1 Merges Chromosome Compartments and Assists Formation of Super-Structures on the Inactive X
Wang, C., Jégu, T., Chu, H.-P. C., Oh, H. J., & Lee, J. T. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.007 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Enhancer–promoter contact formation requires RNAPII and antagonizes loop extrusion
Zhang, S., Übelmesser, N., Barbieri, M., & Papantonis, A. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01364-4 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
WAPL maintains a cohesin loading cycle to preserve cell-type-specific distal gene regulation
Liu, N. Q., Maresca, M., van den Brand, T., Braccioli, L., Schijns, M. M. G. A., Teunissen, H., Bruneau, B. G., Nora, E. P., & de Wit, E. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00744-4 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationRinzema, N. J., Sofiadis, K., Tjalsma, S. J. D., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Oz, Y., Valdes-Quezada, C., Felder, A.-K., Filipovska, T., van der Elst, S., de Andrade dos Ramos, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00787-7 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationPolycomb Group Proteins Regulate Chromatin Architecture in Mouse Oocytes and Early Embryos
Du, Z., Zheng, H., Kawamura, Y., Zhang, K., Gassler, J., Powell, S. T., Xu, Q., Lin, Z., Xu, K., Zhou, Q., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.11.011 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Topologically associating domain boundaries are required for normal genome function
Rajderkar, S., Barozzi, I., Zhu, Y., Hu, R., Zhang, Y., Li, B., Alcaina‐Caro, A., Fukuda-Yuzawa, Y., Kelman, G., Akeza, A., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04819-w · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Cattoni, D. I., Gizzi, A. M. C., Georgieva, M., Stefano, M. D., Valeri, A., Chamousset, D., Houbron, C., Déjardin, S., Fiche, J.-B., González, I., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01962-x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Kaaij, L. J. T., Mohn, F., van der Weide, R. H., de Wit, E., & Bühler, M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.007 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Loop extrusion: theory meets single-molecule experiments
Banigan, E. J., & Mirny, L. A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.04.011 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Hi-C analyses with GENOVA: a case study with cohesin variants
van der Weide, R. H., van den Brand, T., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Teunissen, H., Rowland, B. D., & de Wit, E. (2021) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqab040 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationSystemic Loss and Gain of Chromatin Architecture throughout Zebrafish Development
Kaaij, L. J. T., van der Weide, R. H., Ketting, R. F., & de Wit, E. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.003 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Viny, A. D., Bowman, R. L., Liu, Y., Lavallée, V., Eisman, S. E., Xiao, W., Durham, B. H., Navitski, A., Park, J., Braunstein, S., et al. (2019) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.003 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action at the Shh locus
Kane, L., Williamson, I., Flyamer, I. M., Kumar, Y., Hill, R. E., Lettice, L. A., & Bickmore, W. A. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00821-8 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Genome‐wide Hi‐C analysis reveals extensive hierarchical chromatin interactions in rice
Dong, Q., Li, N., Li, X., Yuan, Z., Xie, D., Wang, X., Li, J., Yu, Y., Wang, J., Ding, B., et al. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13925 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
MCM complexes are barriers that restrict cohesin-mediated loop extrusion
Dequeker, B. J. H., Scherr, M. J., Brandão, H. B., Gassler, J., Powell, S. T., Gáspár, I., Flyamer, I. M., Lalic, A., Tang, W., Stocsits, R. R., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04730-0 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Chromosome organization by one-sided and two-sided loop extrusion
Banigan, E. J., van den Berg, A. A., Brandão, H. B., Marko, J. F., & Mirny, L. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53558 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Stik, G., Vidal, E., Barrero, M., Cuartero, S., Vila-Casadesús, M., Mendieta-Esteban, J., Tian, T. V., Choi, J., Berenguer, C., Abad, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0643-0 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Genome control by SMC complexes
Hoencamp, C., & Rowland, B. D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00609-8 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationDiverse silent chromatin states modulate genome compartmentalization and loop extrusion barriers
Spracklin, G., Abdennur, N. A., Imakaev, M., Chowdhury, N., Pradhan, S., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00892-7 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
RNA polymerases as moving barriers to condensin loop extrusion
Brandão, H. B., Paul, P., van den Berg, A. A., Rudner, D. Z., Wang, X., & Mirny, L. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1907009116 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Fundamental roles of chromatin loop extrusion in antibody class switching
Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Ba, Z., Kyritsis, N., Casellas, R. C., & Alt, F. W. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1723-0 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Wapl repression by Pax5 promotes V gene recombination by Igh loop extrusion
Hill, L., Ebert, A., Jaritz, M., Wutz, G., Nagasaka, K., Tagoh, H., Kostanova‐Poliakova, D., Schindler, K., Sun, Q., Bönelt, P., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2454-y · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Liquid chromatin Hi-C characterizes compartment-dependent chromatin interaction dynamics
Belaghzal, H., Borrman, T. M., Stephens, A. D., Lafontaine, D. L. J., Venev, S. V., Weng, Z., Marko, J. F., & Dekker, J. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00784-4 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Developing in 3D: the role of CTCF in cell differentiation
Arzate‐Mejía, R. G., Targa, F. R., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.137729 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin packing and positioning of plant genomes
Doğan, E. S., & Liu, C. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0199-5 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations
Williamson, I., Kane, L., Devenney, P. S., Flyamer, I. M., Anderson, E., Kilanowski, F. M., Hill, R. E., Bickmore, W. A., & Lettice, L. A. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.179523 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Determining cellular CTCF and cohesin abundances to constrain 3D genome models
Cattoglio, C., Pustova, I., Walther, N., Ho, J. J., Hantsche-Grininger, M., Inouye, C. J., Hossain, M. J., Dailey, G. M., Ellenberg, J., Darzacq, X., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40164 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Ursu, O., Boley, N. P., Taranova, M., Wang, Y. X. R., Yardımcı, G. G., Noble, W. S., & Kundaje, A. B. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty164 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Principles of meiotic chromosome assembly revealed in S. cerevisiae
Schalbetter, S. A., Fudenberg, G., Baxter, J., Pollard, K. S., & Neale, M. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12629-0 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
BRD4 interacts with NIPBL and BRD4 is mutated in a Cornelia de Lange–like syndrome
Study, D. D. D., Olley, G., Ansari, M., Bengani, H., Grimes, G. R., Rhodes, J., von Kriegsheim, A., Blatnik, A., Stewart, F. J., Wakeling, E. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0042-y · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Attenuated chromatin compartmentalization in meiosis and its maturation in sperm development
Alavattam, K. G., Maezawa, S., Sakashita, A., Khoury, H., Barski, A., Kaplan, N., & Namekawa, S. H. (2019) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-019-0189-y · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The three-dimensional genome: regulating gene expression during pluripotency and development
Andrey, G., & Mundlos, S. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.148304 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Cohesin-mediated loop anchors confine the locations of human replication origins
Emerson, D. J., Zhao, P. A., Cook, A. L., Barnett, R. J., Klein, K. N., Saulebekova, D., Ge, C., Zhou, L., Simándi, Z., Minsk, M. K., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04803-0 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
CTCF shapes chromatin structure and gene expression in health and disease
Dehingia, B., Milewska, M., Janowski, M., & Pękowska, A. (2022) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202255146 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Luppino, J. M., Park, D. S., Nguyen, S. C., Lan, Y., Xu, Z., Yunker, R., & Joyce, E. F. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0647-9 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Cell cycle dynamics of lamina‐associated DNA
van Schaik, T., Vos, M., Peric‐Hupkes, D., Celie, P. H. N., & van Steensel, B. (2020) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202050636 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
MyoD is a 3D genome structure organizer for muscle cell identity
Wang, R., Chen, F., Chen, Q., Wan, X., Shi, M., Chen, A. K., Ma, Z., Li, G., Wang, M., Ying, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27865-6 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Mitotic Chromosome Mechanics: How Cells Segregate Their Genome
Batty, P., & Gerlich, D. W. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.05.007 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Lee, R., Kang, M.-K., Kim, Y.-J., Yang, B., Shim, H., Kim, S., Kim, K., Yang, C. M., Min, B.-G., Jung, W.-J., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1242 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
BET inhibition disrupts transcription but retains enhancer-promoter contact
Crump, N. T., Ballabio, E., Godfrey, L., Thorne, R., Repapi, E., Kerry, J., Tapia, M., Hua, P., Lagerholm, C., Filippakopoulos, P., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20400-z · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Principles of Chromosome Architecture Revealed by Hi-C
Eagen, K. P. (2018) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.03.006 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
CTCF orchestrates long-range cohesin-driven V(D)J recombinational scanning
Ba, Z., Lou, J., Ye, A. Y., Dai, H., Dring, E. W., Lin, S. G., Jain, S., Kyritsis, N., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Casellas, R. C., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2578-0 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haarhuis, J. H. I., van der Weide, R. H., Blomen, V. A., Yáñez-Cuna, J. O., Amendola, M., van Ruiten, M. S., Krijger, P. H. L., Teunissen, H., Medema, R. H., van Steensel, B., Brummelkamp, T. R., de Wit, E., & Rowland, B. D.
- Affiliations
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rowland, Benjamin D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 693-707.e14
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5422210
- OpenAlex
- W2610160407
- Semantic Scholar
- ccf9ed3bd806d283989c2c5795aebea3f20dbe1e
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 36
- FWCI
- 34.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2010-4706, NKI 2011-5103, NKI 2015-7657)
- European Research Council (ERC Starting Grant 637587 HAP-PHEN, ERC Advanced Grant 293662)
- Cancer Genomics Center (CGC.nl)
- EMBO (Long Term Fellowship)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Keywords
- cohesin, WAPL, CTCF, topologically associating domains, 3D genome organization, chromatin looping, nuclear compartmentalization
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CCCTC-Binding Factor, Fatty Acid Elongases, Cohesins, Acetyltransferases, Carrier Proteins, Cell Nucleus, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review