Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development
Open accessAbstract
Chromosome conformation capture technologies have revealed important insights into genome folding. Yet, how spatial genome architecture is related to gene expression and cell fate remains unclear. We comprehensively mapped 3D chromatin organization during mouse neural differentiation in vitro and in vivo, generating the highest-resolution Hi-C maps available to date. We found that transcription is correlated with chromatin insulation and long-range interactions, but dCas9-mediated activation is insufficient for creating TAD boundaries de novo. Additionally, we discovered long-range contacts between gene bodies of exon-rich, active genes in all cell types. During neural differentiation, contacts between active TADs become less pronounced while inactive TADs interact more strongly. An extensive Polycomb network in stem cells is disrupted, while dynamic interactions between neural transcription factors appear in vivo. Finally, cell type-specific enhancer-promoter contacts are established concomitant to gene expression. This work shows that multiple factors influence the dynamics of chromatin interactions in development.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Ultra-deep in situ Hi-C across mouse ES cells, neural progenitors, and cortical neurons in vitro and in vivo reveals multiscale 3D genome rewiring during neural differentiation. The study links transcription, CTCF, Polycomb, neural transcription factors, and enhancer-promoter contacts to dynamic chromatin architecture, while showing that transcription alone is not sufficient to create TAD boundaries de novo.
Key findings
- Differentiation involves global compartment reorganization: interactions between active A-type domains decrease, while contacts within inactive B-type domains become stronger; compartment borders decrease with differentiation.
- TADs decrease in number and increase in size; CTCF-less boundaries increase. Developmentally regulated boundaries include 259 ES-specific and 54 neural-specific boundaries. CRISPR-dCas9 activation at Zfp608 and Sox4 caused >10- to 20-fold gene activation but no significant insulation or contact-map change, indicating transcription is correlated with but not sufficient for de novo TAD boundary formation.
- CTCF-mediated loops between convergent CTCF sites increase during differentiation despite decreased CTCF binding; ES-specific CTCF contacts and insulation are lost in NPCs, validated by 3D DNA FISH at the Zfp42 locus.
- Active promoters show CTCF-independent insulation and interact with other active promoters across TAD boundaries; gene bodies of exon-rich, highly expressed genes form long-range contacts in cis and trans, correlating with exon number/splicing. Polycomb-mediated contacts are disrupted during differentiation and correlate with Ring1B rather than H3K27me3. In vivo, neural TFs Pax6, NeuroD2, and Tbr1 organize cell-type-specific contacts, and enhancer-promoter contacts are mostly cell-type specific and generally established concomitantly with gene expression.
Methods
- In situ Hi-C was performed on FACS-purified G0/G1 mouse ES cells, NPCs, and CNs from an in vitro differentiation system, plus NPCs and CNs purified from E14.5 mouse neocortex in vivo. The study reports >40 billion paired-end reads and >17 billion uniquely mapped contacts, with >11 billion uniquely aligned contacts in vitro and ~3 billion per in vivo cell type; maximum resolution reached 750 bp.
- Complementary assays included RNA-seq, ChIP-seq for chromatin marks and factors such as CTCF and Ring1B, 3D DNA FISH, and CRISPR-dCas9-mediated gene activation.
- Hi-C analysis used fragment-end resolution, expected models generated with the Shaman R package, insulation scores, eigenvector-based A/B compartment assignment, aggregate Hi-C maps, and contact enrichment quantification.
Limitations
- The paper states that the in vitro system recapitulates some but not all aspects of cortical development, such as neuronal migration and morphogen signaling; it also notes that whether the observed gene-body contacts are directly linked to co-transcriptional splicing remains to be seen, and whether TF contacts represent true homotypic interactions is unresolved.
- The paper states that clear violations of a simple enhancer-promoter looping model exist, as some enhancer-promoter loops are pre-established.
- Evident from the text: Hi-C is population-averaged and cannot resolve single-cell or allele-specific heterogeneity; FISH validates only selected loci; dCas9 activation was tested at two loci; and in vitro versus in vivo differences may limit generalization.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
dCas9-mediated activation is insufficient for creating TAD boundaries de novo.
“We found that transcription is correlated with chromatin insulation and long-range interactions, but dCas9-mediated activation is insufficient for creating TAD boundaries de novo.”
- Also stated in: § Transcription Is Correlated with but Not Sufficient to Induce Insulation at TAD Boundaries De Novo · hedged
“Therefore, transcriptional activation per se appears insufficient to cause chromatin insulation and create a TAD boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Transcription Is Correlated with but Not Sufficient to Induce Insulation at TAD Boundaries De Novo · hedged
- Findingown data
An extensive Polycomb network in stem cells is disrupted during neural differentiation.
“An extensive Polycomb network in stem cells is disrupted, while dynamic interactions between neural transcription factors appear in vivo.”
- Also stated in: § Polycomb-Mediated Interactions Are Disrupted Independently of H3K27me3 during Neural Differentiation · boosted
“we observed a strong decrease in contact intensity between common H3K27me3 sites, which was especially notable at long distances (Figure S6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Polycomb-Mediated Interactions Are Disrupted Independently of H3K27me3 during Neural Differentiation · boosted
- Findingown data
Cell type-specific enhancer-promoter contacts are established concomitant to gene expression.
“Finally, cell type-specific enhancer-promoter contacts are established concomitant to gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Long-range contacts occur between gene bodies of exon-rich, active genes in all cell types.
“Additionally, we discovered long-range contacts between gene bodies of exon-rich, active genes in all cell types.”
- Also stated in: § Active Gene Promoters and the Bodies of Exon-Rich Genes Interact at Multiple Genomic Scales · plain
“Finally, actively transcribed genes with a large number of exons engage in long-range chromatin loops in clusters both in cis- and in trans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Active Gene Promoters and the Bodies of Exon-Rich Genes Interact at Multiple Genomic Scales · plain
- Findingown data
Transcription is correlated with chromatin insulation and long-range interactions.
“We found that transcription is correlated with chromatin insulation and long-range interactions, but dCas9-mediated activation is insufficient for creating TAD boundaries de novo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Dynamic interactions between neural transcription factors appear in vivo.
“An extensive Polycomb network in stem cells is disrupted, while dynamic interactions between neural transcription factors appear in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes located in close proximity to neural-specific TAD boundaries tend to be upregulated.
“We found that genes located in close proximity to the neural-specific TAD boundaries tend to be upregulated (Figures 2Fi and 2Gi)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
A similar increase in insulation around SOX11 was observed in human cortical development.
“we observed a similar increase in insulation around SOX11 (Figure S3M).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dixon et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Won et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
Highly conserved boundaries in our system were characterized by a small but consistent increase in insulation during differentiation.
“Highly conserved boundaries in our system were characterized by a small but consistent increase in insulation during differentiation (Figures S3D–S3F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
The proportion of CTCF-less TAD borders increased during differentiation.
“Analysis of TAD boundaries revealed that the proportion of the CTCF-less borders increased during differentiation (Figure S3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis of Hi-C data showed a global reorganization in chromatin interactions during differentiation.
“Analysis of these Hi-C data showed a global reorganization in chromatin interactions during differentiation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Sox11, increased CTCF binding at its promoter was observed.
“For Sox11, we also observed increased CTCF binding at its promoter (Figure S3L).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
The existence of three types of boundaries was confirmed in CN cells.
“The existence of three types of boundaries was confirmed in CN cells (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Developmentally regulated TAD boundaries can be classified into ES-specific and neural-specific regions.
“We classified developmentally regulated TAD boundaries into ES-specific and neural-specific regions (Figure 2D)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
Changes in insulation were highly similar to changes in transcription across Zfp608, Sox4, and Sox11.
“Remarkably, the changes in insulation were highly similar to the changes in transcription across all three genes (Figure S3J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
The number of compartment borders decreases with differentiation.
“We observed that the number of compartment borders decreases with differentiation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes located close to ES-specific borders are less active in differentiated cells.
“while genes located close to ES-specific borders are less active in differentiated cells (Figures 2Fii and 2Gii).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
The vast majority of shared Ring1B sites were marked by both Ring1B and H3K27me3.
“Although the vast majority of these shared Ring1B sites were marked by both Ring1B and H3K27me3 (Figure 5C)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Despite more than 10- to 20-fold gene activation comparable to NPC expression levels, there was no significant change in contact maps or insulation score at the examined loci.
“despite more than 10- to 20-fold gene activation, which is comparable to expression levels in NPCs, there was no significant change in the contact maps or the insulation score at the examined loci (Figures 2I and 2J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interactions occur exclusively between the promoters of active genes.
“We observed that interactions occur exclusively between the promoters of active genes (Figures 4E and S5E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The maintenance or enhancement of Polycomb-mediated interactions at a small subset of genes is highly correlated with the levels of Ring1B bound to target loci.
“However, Polycomb-mediated interactions are maintained or even enhanced at a small subset of genes in a manner that is highly correlated with the levels of Ring1B bound to its target loci.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CTCF sites insulated adjacent regions asymmetrically based on their motif orientation.
“In addition, CTCF sites insulated adjacent regions asymmetrically based on their motif orientation (Figure S4C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The proportion of CTCF-less TAD boundaries, located close to or at active gene promoters, increases during neural differentiation.
“The proportion of CTCF-less TAD boundaries, located close to or at active gene promoters, increases during neural differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Findingown data
The strength of pairwise contacts was highly correlated to the level of Ring1B rather than that of H3K27me3, even in ESs.
“the strength of pairwise contacts was highly correlated to the level of Ring1B rather than that of H3K27me3, even in ESs (Figures 5E and 5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ESs, strong contact enrichment between conserved Ring1B sites decreased during differentiation and was evident in both intra- and inter-domain pairs and across long distances.
“In ESs, strong contact enrichment between conserved Ring1B sites, which decreased during differentiation, was evident in both intra- and inter-domain pairs and also across long distances (Figures 5A and 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Polycomb-mediated interactions become progressively disrupted with neuronal differentiation.
“Collectively, these data suggest that Polycomb-mediated interactions are among the strongest in mouse ESs but become progressively disrupted with neuronal differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Active promoters contact the whole transcribed region of the gene.
“Aggregate Hi-C maps of intragenic contacts showed that active promoters contact the whole transcribed region of the gene (Figure S5G)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a strong decrease in contact intensity between common H3K27me3 sites during neural differentiation, especially at long distances.
“we observed a strong decrease in contact intensity between common H3K27me3 sites, which was especially notable at long distances (Figure S6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of exon number on gene body contact enrichment was stronger for genes with more splicing events, even when controlling for gene length.
“this effect was stronger for genes with more splicing events, even when we controlled for gene length (Figure 4L).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This loss of contacts correlated better with Ring1B than with H3K27me3 on these sites.
“This loss of contacts correlated better with Ring1B than with H3K27me3 on these sites (Figures S6B and S6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Polycomb-mediated interactions are among the strongest chromatin interactions in mouse ESs.
“Collectively, these data suggest that Polycomb-mediated interactions are among the strongest in mouse ESs but become progressively disrupted with neuronal differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Polycomb-mediated interactions are maintained or even enhanced at a small subset of genes during neuronal differentiation.
“However, Polycomb-mediated interactions are maintained or even enhanced at a small subset of genes in a manner that is highly correlated with the levels of Ring1B bound to its target loci.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Contacts between Polycomb-bound regions are disrupted during neural differentiation.
“Figure 5 Contacts between Polycomb-Bound Regions Are Disrupted during Neural Differentiation”
- Also stated in: § Polycomb-Mediated Interactions Are Disrupted Independently of H3K27me3 during Neural Differentiation · hedged
“Collectively, these data suggest that Polycomb-mediated interactions are among the strongest in mouse ESs but become progressively disrupted with neuronal differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Polycomb-Mediated Interactions Are Disrupted Independently of H3K27me3 during Neural Differentiation · hedged
- Findingown data
Insulation scaled gradually with gene expression based on insulation score and aggregate Hi-C maps.
“We found that insulation scaled gradually with gene expression based on the insulation score (Figures 4C and S5C) and aggregate Hi-C maps (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average contact enrichment at the loop between two TAD boundaries also increased during differentiation.
“In addition, the average contact enrichment at the loop between two TAD boundaries also increased (Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Contacts between loci bound by distinct transcription factors do not appear to be just a consequence of transcription activation.
“These contacts do not appear to be just a consequence of transcription activation, but it remains to be seen if they truly represent homotypic interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The strength of CTCF site contacts increases during differentiation.
“We show that, consistent with previous findings (Rao et al., 2014), CTCF sites interact predominantly in the convergent orientation; however, the strength of this type of contact increases during differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The change in average expression is highly correlated with the change in average enhancer-promoter interaction score within a cluster.
“To directly address this hypothesis, we clustered highly variable genes based on expression and found that the change in average expression is highly correlated with the change in average E-P interaction score within a cluster (Figures 7C–7E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a decrease in long-range interactions between A-type domains during differentiation.
“The analysis of a well-controlled differentiation system and its in vivo cell counterparts shows that cell differentiation is accompanied by a global chromatin reorganization and a change in compartmentalization with a decrease in long-range interactions between A-type domains concomitant with an increase in contacts between inactive B-type domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the neural lineage, contact strength is increased between loci bound by distinct transcription factors.
“Within the neural lineage, we observed increased contact strength between loci bound by distinct TFs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pairwise enhancer-promoter interactions are constrained primarily inside TADs.
“Importantly, pairwise E-P interactions were constrained primarily inside TADs (Figure S8D), were gradually increased during differentiation in vitro and in vivo for CN-based pairs (Figures 7A and 7B), and were not strongly dependent on CTCF binding (Figure S8E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Expression of cohesin unloading factors such as Wapl and Pds5a is decreased during neural differentiation.
“Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that expression of cohesin unloading factors such as Wapl and Pds5a is decreased during neural differentiation (Figure S4J), and the increase in looping strength and contact frequency upon Wapl removal in human cells (Haarhuis et al., 2017) correlates well with this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NeuroD2 and Tbr1 interactions are mostly constrained inside TADs.
“NeuroD2 and Tbr1 interactions were also mostly constrained inside TADs (Figures 6C, 6D, S7P, and S7Q) but increased during differentiation and were the strongest in CNs in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A loop is formed specifically in NPCs between the Cacna2d1 promoter and another NPC-specific Ring1B site located approximately 500 kb downstream in the gene body.
“Importantly, a loop was formed specifically in NPCs between the Cacna2d1 promoter and another NPC-specific Ring1B site located ∼500 kb downstream in the gene body (Figure S6J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Several neuronal transcription factors (Eomes, Neurog2, Pax6, NeuroD2, and Tbr1) are expressed more strongly in vivo than in vitro in the appropriate cell type.
“Some well-known neuronal TFs such as Eomes (marker for basal progenitors), Neurog2, Pax6, NeuroD2, and Tbr1 were expressed in the appropriate cell type more strongly in vivo than in vitro (Figure S7F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is an increase in contacts between inactive B-type domains during differentiation.
“The analysis of a well-controlled differentiation system and its in vivo cell counterparts shows that cell differentiation is accompanied by a global chromatin reorganization and a change in compartmentalization with a decrease in long-range interactions between A-type domains concomitant with an increase in contacts between inactive B-type domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The contact between the Sox2 promoter and the NPC-specific enhancer increases in NPCs.
“Conversely, the contact between Sox2 promoter and the NPC-specific enhancer (Figure 7G, green arrow) increased in NPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intra-TAD enhancer-promoter interactions are strongest in their respective cell type.
“Furthermore, intra-TAD-E-P interactions were strongest in their respective cell type (Figures S8F and S8G and Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nanog-bound sites interact above background in ESs.
“Using aggregate Hi-C maps, we confirmed that Nanog-bound sites interact above background in ESs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancer-promoter contacts show enrichment only between pairs of enhancers and active promoters, but not when repressed genes are examined.
“Using aggregate Hi-C maps, we observed enrichment only between pairs of enhancers and active promoters, but not when we examined repressed genes (Figure S8D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nanog-bound site interactions are weaker compared to Polycomb interactions in ESs.
“These interactions were weaker compared to Polycomb, and surprisingly, the pattern was more pronounced at longer distances (Figures S7A, S7J, and S7N).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
CTCF sites interact predominantly in the convergent orientation.
“We show that, consistent with previous findings (Rao et al., 2014), CTCF sites interact predominantly in the convergent orientation; however, the strength of this type of contact increases during differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
The absolute levels of CTCF binding decrease during differentiation.
“This is somewhat counterintuitive, as the absolute levels of CTCF binding actually decrease during differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Novel borders can occur at promoters of developmentally regulated genes.
“Therefore, although we confirmed that most TAD boundaries are conserved (Dixon et al., 2012), novel borders can occur at promoters of developmentally regulated genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Activating transcription is not sufficient to cause chromatin insulation.
“However, we show that activating transcription is not sufficient to cause chromatin insulation, and thus, other factors such as E-P interactions and specific TFs likely contribute to creating insulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancer-promoter interactions are not strongly dependent on CTCF binding.
“Importantly, pairwise E-P interactions were constrained primarily inside TADs (Figure S8D), were gradually increased during differentiation in vitro and in vivo for CN-based pairs (Figures 7A and 7B), and were not strongly dependent on CTCF binding (Figure S8E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancer-promoter interactions gradually increase during differentiation in vitro and in vivo for CN-based pairs.
“Importantly, pairwise E-P interactions were constrained primarily inside TADs (Figure S8D), were gradually increased during differentiation in vitro and in vivo for CN-based pairs (Figures 7A and 7B), and were not strongly dependent on CTCF binding (Figure S8E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Transcription is highly correlated with local chromatin insulation.
“We found transcription to be highly correlated with local chromatin insulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Contact enrichment is highest between a distal site and a Tss when both are bound by the same transcription factor.
“We found that the contact enrichment is highest between a distal site and a Tss when they are both bound by the same TF (Figures 6E and S7H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pax6 contacts are mostly confined within TAD boundaries.
“Interestingly, in contrast to Nanog or Polycomb-mediated interactions, Pax6 contacts were mostly confined within TAD boundaries (Figures 6C, 6D, and S7O).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The bodies of highly expressed genes interact strongly both in cis and in trans to form clusters of loops.
“Surprisingly, we find that the bodies of highly expressed genes interact strongly both in cis and in trans to form clusters of loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In NPCs, Skap2 acquires strong interactions with the HoxA cluster.
“In NPCs, Skap2 became repressed (Figure S6L), bound by Ring1B and H3K27me3, and acquired strong interactions with the HoxA cluster (Figure 5I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Multiple factors influence the dynamics of chromatin interactions in development.
“This work shows that multiple factors influence the dynamics of chromatin interactions in development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The authors purified NPCs and CNs directly from developing mouse embryonic neocortex in vivo using transgenic mouse lines.
“using transgenic mouse lines, we purified NPCs and CNs directly from the developing mouse embryonic neocortex in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The major effect of the cell cycle on chromosome architecture is rarely accounted for in 3D genome mapping studies.
“the major effect of the cell cycle on chromosome architecture (Nagano et al., 2017, Naumova et al., 2013) is rarely accounted for in 3D genome mapping studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The third set of boundaries appears to represent repeats.
“The third set of boundaries appear to represent repeats (Figure 2B), consistent with previous findings (Dixon et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dixon et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The study reached a maximum Hi-C resolution of 750 bp, the highest to date.
“We reached a maximum resolution of 750 bp—the highest to date (Figure S1F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The transgenic cell lines yielded highly pure populations corresponding to ES, NPC, or CN.
“We used transgenic cell lines expressing GFP either from the Oct4, Sox1 (Ying et al., 2003), or Tau (Mapt) (Bibel et al., 2004) loci to obtain highly pure populations corresponding to the respective cell type: ES, NPC, or CN”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Polycomb-mediated chromatin contacts are not exclusive to bivalent gene promoters.
“Based on these results, we concluded that Polycomb-mediated chromatin contacts are not exclusive to bivalent gene promoters and that they are unlikely to be a consequence of paused Pol II at bivalent Tss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Contacts with the promoter are maintained throughout the act of transcription, and not just at the time of transcription termination.
“suggesting that the contacts with the promoter are maintained throughout the act of transcription, and not just at the time of transcription termination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Actively transcribed genes with a large number of exons engage in long-range chromatin loops in clusters both in cis- and in trans.
“Finally, actively transcribed genes with a large number of exons engage in long-range chromatin loops in clusters both in cis- and in trans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
CRISPR-dCas9 activation at Zfp608 and Sox4 did not cause precocious neural differentiation.
“which did not cause precocious neural differentiation (Figure S3N).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Transcription is correlated to chromatin insulation in a manner that can be independent from CTCF binding.
“In summary, transcription is correlated to chromatin insulation in a manner that can be independent from CTCF binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Interpretationown data
Transcriptional activation per se appears insufficient to cause chromatin insulation and create a TAD boundary.
“Therefore, transcriptional activation per se appears insufficient to cause chromatin insulation and create a TAD boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Transcription is not sufficient to cause chromatin insulation at these loci.
“However, transcription is not sufficient to cause chromatin insulation at these loci.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
- Interpretationown data
Dynamic chromatin interactions are much more prevalent than previously anticipated.
“Collectively, these data show that dynamic chromatin interactions are much more prevalent than previously anticipated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Polycomb-mediated chromatin contacts are unlikely to be a consequence of paused Pol II at bivalent Tss.
“Based on these results, we concluded that Polycomb-mediated chromatin contacts are not exclusive to bivalent gene promoters and that they are unlikely to be a consequence of paused Pol II at bivalent Tss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TADs constrain the interactions between some, but not all, transcription factors.
“TADs appear to constrain the interactions between some, but not all, TFs, and even inside a TAD, contacts are preferentially established between a distal site and a Tss, both bound by the same TF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Enhancer-promoter interactions are primarily intra-TAD.
“Collectively, the data show that E-P interactions are primarily intra-TAD and are dynamically regulated during development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Regulating the contact probability between an enhancer and a promoter may represent an important mechanism in the control of gene expression and cell fate.
“This suggests that regulating the contact probability between an enhancer and a promoter may represent an important mechanism in the control of gene expression and cell fate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Observations support a model where dynamic chromatin looping from enhancer regions triggers gene activation.
“Our observations support a model where dynamic chromatin looping from enhancer regions triggers gene activation (Deng et al., 2014), although clear violations of this principle exist, as previously seen in Drosophila, where many E-P loops are pre-established (Ghavi-Helm et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deng et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Different regulatory factors establish preferential contacts at different scales, ranging from close cis interactions to long-range TAD-delimited contacts to very long-range contacts.
“It shows that different regulatory factors establish preferential contacts at different scales. These range from close cis interactions such as promoter-gene body; to long-range TAD-delimited contacts such as those between enhancers and promoters and TF binding sites; and finally, to very long-range contacts involving promoters, Polycomb, heterochromatin regions, and a subset of TF binding sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 53
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring neural differentiation, contacts between active TADs become less pronounced while inactive TADs interact more strongly.
“During neural differentiation, contacts between active TADs become less pronounced while inactive TADs interact more strongly.”
- Also stated in: § Global Reorganization of the 3D Genome during Neural Differentiation · plain
“Surprisingly, the interaction strength between A-type domains decreased, whereas contacts within the B compartment became stronger between NPCs and CNs (Figures 1E and S1L).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Global Reorganization of the 3D Genome during Neural Differentiation · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe dataset comprises over 40 billion paired-end reads and more than 17 billion uniquely mapped contacts.
“In total, we sequenced over 40 billion paired-end reads that resulted in more than 17 billion uniquely mapped contacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Sox4, CTCF was bound to the promoter already in ESs, yet insulation dramatically increased only when the gene became expressed at the NPC stage.
“CTCF was bound to the Sox4 promoter already in ESs, yet insulation dramatically increased only when the gene became expressed at the NPC stage (Figures S3K and S3J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTAD number decreased during differentiation, with a corresponding increase in size.
“We then examined TADs and found that their number decreased during differentiation (Figure S3A), with a corresponding increase in size (Figure S3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe correlation between signal enrichment and eigenvector value for active histone marks decreased during differentiation, while the anti-correlation between H3K9me3 and the eigenvector value became stronger.
“the correlation between signal enrichment and eigenvector value for active histone marks decreased during differentiation, while the anti-correlation between H3K9me3 and the eigenvector value became stronger”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA novel TAD boundary was formed at the Tss of Zfp608 during differentiation, concomitant with activation of the gene but in the absence of CTCF binding.
“a novel TAD boundary was formed at the transcriptional start site (Tss) of Zfp608 during differentiation (Figure 2H), concomitant with the activation of the gene (Figure S3J) but in the absence of CTCF binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTAD boundaries fall into three classes: CTCF-positive boundaries, CTCF-negative boundaries close to active gene promoters, and boundaries without enrichment of active marks.
“We observed three classes of boundaries: CTCF-positive boundaries, CTCF-negative boundaries close to active gene promoters, and a set of boundaries without enrichment of active marks (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCohesin is found both at CTCF-positive boundaries, where it colocalizes with CTCF, and on CTCF-negative borders marked by active transcription.
“cohesin was found both at CTCF-positive boundaries, where it colocalized with CTCF, and on CTCF-negative borders marked by active transcription (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAbsolute levels of Ring1B decreased during differentiation, with only a mild effect on gene expression, while H3K27me3 levels did not decrease.
“the absolute levels of Ring1B decreased during differentiation (with only a mild effect on gene expression [Figure S6D]), while H3K27me3 levels did not (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth the contact enrichment and the insulation between ES-specific CTCF regions were decreased in NPCs.
“In contrast, both the contact enrichment and the insulation between ES-specific CTCF regions were decreased in NPCs (Figures 3E, 3F and S4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrong enrichment occurs between convergent CTCF sites, and loops are constrained primarily inside TADs and rarely cross TAD boundaries.
“We observed strong enrichment as expected (Guo et al., 2015, Rao et al., 2014), and the loops were constrained primarily inside TADs and rarely crossed TAD boundaries (Figures 3B and 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConserved CTCF sites were characterized by strong interactions in the convergent orientation and by strong insulation both in ESs and NPCs.
“Conserved CTCF were characterized by strong interactions in the convergent orientation (Figures 3E and 3F) and by strong insulation both in ESs and NPCs (Figure S4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClusters of very long-range (>30 Mb) chromatin contacts occur between bodies of expressed genes in cis and also in trans.
“we also identified clusters of very long-range (> 30 Mb) chromatin contacts between bodies of expressed genes in cis (Figures 4I and S5K) and also in trans (Figure S5L).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost of these promoter interactions were not mediated by CTCF and were readily identified in all three cell types.
“most of these interactions were not mediated by CTCF (Figure 4F) and were readily identified in all three cell types (Figure 4G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFISH confirmed that only the 3D distance between the pair of probes containing the forward and reverse CTCF site increased during differentiation, while the other probe pairs displayed the opposite effect.
“only the 3D FISH distance between the pair of probes containing the forward and the reverse CTCF site increased during differentiation, while the other probe pairs displayed the opposite effect (Figures 3H, S4H, and S4I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataContact enrichment between gene bodies is highly correlated not only with expression levels, but also with the number of exons per gene, and is evident across a large range of genomic distances in all three cell types.
“the contact enrichment between gene bodies was highly correlated not only with expression levels, but also with the number of exons per gene (Figures 4J, 4K, and 4M), and was evident across a large range of genomic distances (Figure S5M) in all three cell types (Figure 4N).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe overall enrichment of CTCF-mediated contacts increased with neural differentiation, and even inter-domain contacts became apparent.
“However, the overall enrichment of CTCF-mediated contacts increased with neural differentiation, and even inter-domain contacts became apparent (Figures 3B–3D and S4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring differentiation, only the forward CTCF site became inaccessible to CTCF, and the chromatin loop disappeared.
“During differentiation, only the forward CTCF site became inaccessible to CTCF, and the chromatin loop disappeared (Figure 3G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationGeneral TFs such as Taf3 appear to enhance interaction between promoters but had little effect on insulation.
“general TFs such as Taf3 (Liu et al., 2011) appear to enhance interaction between promoters but had little effect on insulation (Figure S5D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is a strong preference for insulation centered on active Tss, but not on inactive ones, and this phenomenon is not dependent on CTCF binding.
“we identified a strong preference for insulation centered on active Tss, but not on inactive ones, a phenomenon that was not dependent on CTCF binding (Figures 4A, 4B, S5A, and S5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAverage intra-TAD contacts become stronger, while inter-TAD contacts appear to be depleted during differentiation.
“We observed that average intra-TAD contacts become stronger, while inter-TAD contacts appear to be depleted during differentiation (Figures 3A and S4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo central enrichment was observed when using 3′ gene ends, showing that these interactions were specific to promoters and correlated with expression level.
“we observed no central enrichment when we performed the same analysis using instead 3′ gene ends (Figure S5F), showing that these interactions were specific to promoters and were correlated with the level of expression (Figures 4H and S5J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataActive chromatin loops span across domains and can be observed even at long distances, in contrast with CTCF-mediated contacts.
“active chromatin loops span across domains and can be observed even at long distances (Figure 4E), in contrast with CTCF-mediated contacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationMost TAD boundaries are conserved.
“Therefore, although we confirmed that most TAD boundaries are conserved (Dixon et al., 2012), novel borders can occur at promoters of developmentally regulated genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dixon et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRegions switch compartments between the in vitro and in vivo systems, accompanied by corresponding changes in gene expression.
“Moreover, we identified regions that switch compartments between the in vitro and the in vivo systems, which were accompanied with corresponding changes in gene expression (Figures S8B and S8C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe interaction between the Sox2 promoter and the ES-specific enhancer strongly decreases during differentiation, coinciding with a decrease in both CTCF binding and the H3K27ac mark on the enhancer.
“We observed a strong decrease in the interactions between Sox2 promoter and the ES-specific enhancer (Figure 7G, blue arrow) during differentiation, which coincides with a decrease in both CTCF binding and the H3K27ac mark on the enhancer (Figure 7Gi).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeuroD2 and Tbr1 interactions increase during differentiation and are strongest in CNs in vivo.
“NeuroD2 and Tbr1 interactions were also mostly constrained inside TADs (Figures 6C, 6D, S7P, and S7Q) but increased during differentiation and were the strongest in CNs in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese interactions are strongly correlated with the number of splicing events per gene, with the strongest contacts occurring between genes that undergo most splicing.
“These interactions are strongly correlated with the number of splicing events per gene with the strongest contacts occurring between genes that undergo most splicing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCell differentiation is accompanied by a global chromatin reorganization and a change in compartmentalization.
“The analysis of a well-controlled differentiation system and its in vivo cell counterparts shows that cell differentiation is accompanied by a global chromatin reorganization and a change in compartmentalization with a decrease in long-range interactions between A-type domains concomitant with an increase in contacts between inactive B-type domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn ESs, strong long-range interactions involve Polycomb-bound genes and, to a lesser extent, genes bound by pluripotency transcription factors.
“In ESs, the strong long-range interactions also involve Polycomb-bound genes and, to a lesser extent, genes bound by pluripotency TFs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese networks are reorganized in neuronal differentiation, which in the case of Polycomb appears to correlate with PRC1 binding levels.
“These networks are reorganized in neuronal differentiation, which in the case of Polycomb appears to correlate with PRC1 binding levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn NPC-specific enhancer interacted strongly with the promoter of the neuronal transcription factor Brn2 gene only in NPCs, and this interaction was disrupted in CNs when the enhancer was inactive.
“We identified a NPC-specific enhancer, which interacted strongly with the promoter of the neuronal TF Brn2 gene only in NPCs, and this interaction was disrupted in CNs when the enhancer was inactive (Figure 7F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNPC populations, either in vitro or in vivo, are highly similar to each other and are distinct from CNs and vice versa.
“Principal component analysis (PCA) also confirmed that NPC populations, either in vitro or in vivo, are highly similar to each other and are distinct from CNs and vice versa (Figure S8A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataShuffling the position of the enhancer region within the same TAD strongly decreases average Hi-C scores and the correlation between expression and chromatin contacts.
“Furthermore, the average Hi-C scores and the correlation between expression and chromatin contacts were strongly decreased when we randomly shuffled the position of the enhancer region within the same TAD (Figures 7D, 7E, and S8H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataContact enrichment between Pax6-bound sites is cell-type specific and strongest in ncx NPC, where Pax6 is highly expressed.
“We observed a cell-type specific contact enrichment between Pax6-bound sites strongest in ncx NPC where Pax6 is highly expressed (Figures 6C and 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of enhancer-promoter interactions appear to be established concomitantly with gene expression and are disrupted when the genes become repressed.
“Although we did identify instances of pre-set chromatin interactions between enhancers and their cognate target genes that precede transcriptional activation (Figures 7C, S8N, and S8O), the majority of those interactions appear to be established concomitantly to gene expression and are also disrupted when the genes become repressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean nuclear radius was 1.73 ± 0.28 μm for ES cells, 1.39 ± 0.24 μm for NPCs, and 1.43 ± 0.20 μm for CNs.
“mean nuclear radius of the ES, NPC and CNs population were calculated (ES = 1.73 ± 0.28; NPC = 1.39 ± 0.24; CN = 1.43 ± 0.20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTADs in the two k-means clusters exhibit distinct signatures based on enrichment of chromatin marks, replication timing, and Lamin B1 DamID enrichment, leading to assignment of cluster 1 to the B (inactive) compartment and cluster 2 to the A (active) compartment.
“Domains in each cluster exhibit distinct signature based on the enrichment of chromatin marks, replication timing and Lamin B1 DamID enrichment where available (Figure S1I), prompting us to assign cluster 1 to the B-, inactive compartment and cluster 2 to the A-, active compartment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTopologically associating domains (TADs) exist at intermediate scales (100 kb to 1 Mb).
“At intermediate scales (100 kb to 1 Mb), a major discovery is the existence of topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012, Nora et al., 2012, Sexton et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors comprehensively mapped 3D chromatin organization during mouse neural differentiation in vitro and in vivo, generating the highest-resolution Hi-C maps available to date.
“We comprehensively mapped 3D chromatin organization during mouse neural differentiation in vitro and in vivo, generating the highest-resolution Hi-C maps available to date.”
- Also stated in: § Global Reorganization of the 3D Genome during Neural Differentiation · plain
“We reached a maximum resolution of 750 bp—the highest to date (Figure S1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Our understanding of the interaction dynamics at the smallest scales during developmental processes is currently limited.
- Rests on an assumption: The relation between loop extrusion models and transcription remains unclear.
- Also stated in: § Global Reorganization of the 3D Genome during Neural Differentiation · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCellular differentiation involves changes at all scales of folding, including CTCF-dependent processes and major changes in Polycomb and TF interaction networks.
“Our data demonstrate that cellular differentiation involves changes at all scales of folding, and in addition to CTCF-dependent processes, it includes major changes in Polycomb and in transcription factor (TF) interaction networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Our understanding of the interaction dynamics at the smallest scales during developmental processes is currently limited.
- Rests on an assumption: The relation between loop extrusion models and transcription remains unclear.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInteractions between domains give rise to two main types of spatial compartments referred to as A and B.
“At larger scales, interactions between domains are thought to give rise to two main types of spatial compartments referred to as “A” and “B” (Lieberman-Aiden et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lieberman-Aiden et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThese borders represent a genuine loss or gain of insulation, respectively.
“verified that these borders represent a genuine loss or gain of insulation, respectively, using aggregate Hi-C maps (Figure 2E), insulation score (Figures S3G and S3H), and directionality index (DI) (Figure S3I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDomains and compartment formation can be at least partially uncoupled and may result from different biological phenomena.
“recent evidence indicates that domains and compartment formation can be at least partially uncoupled and may result from different biological phenomena (Nora et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nora et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDomain insulation is important for gene expression and physiology.
“Domain insulation has been shown to be important for gene expression and physiology (Flavahan et al., 2016, Lupiáñez et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA/B compartments are functionally related to gene expression and can switch extensively during differentiation.
“which are functionally related to gene expression and can switch extensively during differentiation (Dixon et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dixon et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationVery few studies using mostly in vitro cultured cells have achieved high resolution in Hi-C.
“very few studies using mostly in vitro cultured cells have achieved high resolution (Rao et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFACS allowed purification of G0G1 cells based on DNA content.
“we employed a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) approach, which allowed us to purify G0G1 cells based on DNA content”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors controlled for cell type heterogeneity and cell-cycle variation in their 3D chromatin mapping.
“we controlled for cell type heterogeneity and cell-cycle variation.”
- Also stated in: § Global Reorganization of the 3D Genome during Neural Differentiation · plain
“we employed a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) approach, which allowed us to purify G0G1 cells based on DNA content”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Global Reorganization of the 3D Genome during Neural Differentiation · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationArchitectural proteins such as CTCF and cohesin play a role in domain formation.
“It is known that architectural proteins such as CTCF and cohesin play a role (Haarhuis et al., 2017, Nora et al., 2017, Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBiological replicates were highly correlated at all resolutions and for each cell type.
“Biological replicates were highly correlated at all resolutions (Figure S1D) and for each different cell type (Figures S1E and S2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA major genome-folding reprogramming occurs during neural differentiation with a progressive increase in compartment size, decreased interactions within the A compartment, and a concomitant increase in interactions between B-type domains.
“In conclusion, a major genome-folding reprogramming occurs during neural differentiation with a progressive increase in compartment size, decreased interactions within the A compartment, and a concomitant increase in interactions between B-type domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Our understanding of the interaction dynamics at the smallest scales during developmental processes is currently limited.
- Rests on an assumption: The relation between loop extrusion models and transcription remains unclear.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeposition of chromatin marks is thought to contribute to compartment switching.
“The deposition of chromatin marks is thought to contribute to this process (Dixon et al., 2015, Nora et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPromoters of active genes are characterized by strong insulation, which is correlated with transcriptional activity, but is mostly CTCF independent.
“In summary, promoters of active genes are characterized by strong insulation, which is correlated with transcriptional activity, but is mostly CTCF independent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPolycomb-mediated interactions have been previously reported in mouse ESs using a Capture-C approach and are a prominent feature in Drosophila.
“Polycomb-mediated interactions have been previously reported in mouse ESs using a Capture-C approach (Schoenfelder et al., 2015b) and are a prominent feature in Drosophila (Bantignies et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schoenfelder et al., 2015b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bantignies et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataActive Tss maintain contacts with the gene body and can interact with other transcribed Tss across TAD boundaries.
“Active Tss maintain contacts with the gene body and, contrary to CTCF interactions, can interact with other transcribed Tss across TAD boundaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs many as 40-50% of CTCF sites may change in different cell types.
“As many as 40–50% of the CTCF sites may change in different cell types (Chen et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChromatin insulation occurs at multiple levels and leads to a hierarchical 3D nuclear organization, whereby smaller, less insulated regions (sub-TADs/contact domains) are nested inside TADs.
“Chromatin insulation occurs at multiple levels and leads to a hierarchical 3D nuclear organization, whereby smaller, less insulated regions (called also sub-TADs [Flavahan et al., 2016, Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013] or contact domains [Rao et al., 2014]) are nested inside TADs, which are usually bigger and more strongly insulated (Dixon et al., 2012, Nora et al., 2012, Sexton et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFew public ChIP-seq profiles exist for neural-specific transcription factors, and most of those have been performed in the developing mouse neocortex.
“However, very few public chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) profiles exist, and most of those have been performed in the developing mouse neocortex (Bayam et al., 2015, Notwell et al., 2016, Sun et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe purified NPC and CN populations were verified using known markers Nestin and Dcx.
“We performed RNA-seq and verified our approach using known markers for neural progenitors (Nestin) and differentiating neurons (Dcx) (Figure S7D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Hi-C data are high quality and samples group together based on cell type.
“Pearson correlation coefficient (Figure S7E), comparison of the eigenvector values, insulation score, and contact probability (Figures S7G and S8A) confirmed the high quality of the data and that, importantly, samples group together based on cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPax6 is one of the few master regulator neural transcription factors with a well-known role in cortical development.
“Pax6 is one of the few “master regulator” neural TFs with a well-known role in cortical development (Manuel et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Manuel et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEnhancer-promoter interactions are highly dynamic and cell-type specific.
“These results suggest that E-P interactions are highly dynamic and cell-type specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEnhancer-promoter interactions are highly dynamic and are usually established concomitantly with gene expression.
“Finally, E-P interactions are highly dynamic and are usually established concomitantly with gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenTAD boundaries were retained only if they were detected in at least three biological replicates.
“Boundaries within 10Kb of each other were merged and only boundaries, which were detected in at least 3 biological replicates, were retained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Our understanding of the interaction dynamics at the smallest scales during developmental processes is currently limited.
“However, our understanding of the interaction dynamics at the smallest scales during developmental processes is currently limited.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relation between loop extrusion models and transcription remains unclear.
“However, the relation between such models and transcription remains unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated TAD borders remain poorly understood.
“yet the mechanisms contributing to developmentally regulated borders remain poorly understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The majority of strong Polycomb-bound regions are on gene promoters.
“As the majority of strong Polycomb-bound regions are on gene promoters, we examined whether their interaction might depend on paused Pol II that is located at bivalent gene promoters (Min et al., 2011).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Enhancer-promoter contacts have been difficult to observe in Hi-C, and their strength relative to surrounding regions is unclear.
“Enhancer-promoter (E-P) contacts have been difficult to observe in Hi-C, and it is unclear how strong they are compared to the surrounding regions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The in vitro differentiation system recapitulates some aspects of cortical development but not others such as neuronal migration and morphogen signaling.
“Furthermore, although the in vitro system we employed recapitulates some aspects of cortical development, other features, such as neuronal migration and morphogen signaling, are not.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The vast majority of ultra-close cis Hi-C contacts (separated by less than 1 kb) originate from non-digested DNA.
“Contacts separated by less than 1kb were not considered for subsequent analysis, as the vast majority of this ultra-close cis contacts originate from non-digested DNA.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Sox2 gene has an essential enhancer, the Sox2 Control Region (SCR), which was found by 3C-derived techniques to loop to the Sox2 promoter.
“The Sox2 gene has an essential enhancer, the Sox2 Control Region (SCR), which was found by 3C-derived techniques to loop to the Sox2 promoter (for example, [379, 401]).”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [401]
The Results section (Figure 7G; page not provided) reports Hi-C contacts between the Sox2 promoter and an embryonic-stem-cell-specific enhancer. It does not identify that enhancer as the Sox2 Control Region (SCR) or establish in this paper that it is essential. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredActive promoters and enhancers can likely give rise to TAD boundaries even in the absence of convergent CTCF sites.
“active promoters and enhancers can likely give rise to TAD boundaries even in the absence of convergent CTCF sites [401].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [401]
In Results, “Transcription Is Correlated with but Not Sufficient to Induce Insulation at TAD Boundaries De Novo” (page not provided), the paper identifies CTCF-negative TAD boundaries near active promoters. It does not establish that active enhancers give rise to boundaries, and its gene-activation experiment found that transcriptional activation alone was insufficient to create one. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHi-C data from differentiated mouse neurons detected chromatin interactions between HAR202 and the Npas3 promoter.
“Interestingly, Hi-C data obtained using differentiated mouse neurons led us to detect chromatin interactions between HAR202 and the Npas3 promoter (Bonev et al. 2017; supplementary fig. S8, Supplementary Material online).”
From The Human Accelerated Region HAR202 Controls <i>NPAS3</i> Expression in the Developing Forebrain Displaying Differential Enhancer Activity Between Modern and Archaic Human Sequences (2024) · cites this paper as Bonev et al. 2017
The majority of specific enhancer-promoter loops are highly enriched within, compared with across, TAD boundaries.
“The majority of specific enhancer–promoter loops follow this pattern and are highly enriched within, compared with across, TAD boundaries [277, 401, 405].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [401]
The 3D genome plays an important role in neuronal gene expression and function.
“The 3D genome plays an important role in neuronal gene expression and function”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [96]
5C maps from mature primary cortical neurons are highly correlated with and exhibit similar loops as published Hi-C maps from ES cell-derived cortical neurons.
“5C maps from our mature primary cortical neurons were highly correlated with and exhibited similar loops as published Hi-C maps from ES cell-derived cortical neurons”
From Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Genome-wide Hi-C maps in primary cortical neurons identify 24,937 loops.
“We applied published methods17 to identify 24,937 loops in cortical neurons”
From Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Guide RNA is labeled for a different gene than the reported activation target
MinorThe experiment is described as activating Zfp608 and Sox4, but the methods label one of the guide RNAs "Zfp604." As written, the stated guide target does not match the gene used for the reported Zfp608 activation result.
“We used the CRISPR-dCas9 system (Konermann et al., 2015) to activate gene expression at the endogenous Zfp608 and Sox4 loci”
“Guide RNAs (Zfp604 – AGAAAGCGGAATGAGAAGTT and Sox4 - TTGCTCTGTAAATTGGAATG) were designed and cloned”
Deposited-data table labels the CN RNA sample as NPC
MinorThe table lists both complementary sorted populations as ncx_NPC, whereas the paper identifies Hes5-GFP−/Dcx-mRFP+ cells as ncx CN.
“| Strand specific total RNA from sorted Hes5-GFP-/Dcx-mRFP+ ncx_NPC cells | This study | GEO: GSE96107 |”
“GFP-/RFP+ (“ncx CN”) populations from the same embryonic brains”
In vivo sorting methods list the NPC population twice
MinorThe figure identifies GFP+/RFP− cells as NPCs and GFP−/RFP+ cells as CNs. The isolation methods instead list GFP+/RFP− and RFP−/GFP+-the same population in reversed notation-rather than the CN population.
“The appropriate gates to isolate GFP+/RFP- and RFP-/GFP+ cells were set as described in Figure S7B.”
“GFP+/RFP- (referred to as “ncx NPC” henceafter) and GFP-/RFP+ (“ncx CN”) populations from the same embryonic brains”
Cacna2d1 contact distance exceeds the stated map region
MinorThe text places the interacting Ring1B site approximately 500 kb downstream of the Cacna2d1 promoter, but the Figure S6J caption says its map shows an approximately 150-kb region around that promoter containing the interaction. A 150-kb region cannot contain both sites as described.
“a loop was formed specifically in NPCs between the Cacna2d1 promoter and another NPC-specific Ring1B site located ∼500 kb downstream in the gene body (Figure S6J).”
“(J) HiC contact maps showing ∼150Kb region around Cacna2d1 promoter. Note the appearance of NPC-specific Ring1B/H3K27me3 site inside Cacna2d1 gene body, which coincides with an interaction between this region and the Cacna2d1 promoter.”
Cites
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212 · see citing works
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898 · see citing works
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829 · see citing works
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895 · see citing works
Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex
Konermann, S., Brigham, M. D., Trevino, A. E., Joung, J., Abudayyeh, O. O., Barcena, C., Hsu, P. D., Habib, N., Gootenberg, J. S., Nishimasu, H., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14136 · Cited by 2,825 · see citing works
Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions
Lupiáñez, D. G., Kraft, K., Heinrich, V., Krawitz, P., Brancati, F., Klopocki, E., Horn, D., Kayserili, H., Opitz, J. M., Laxova, R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 · Cited by 2,132 · see citing works
Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion
Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Lu, C., Goloborodko, A., Abdennur, N., & Mirny, L. A. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome
Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., Bantignies, F., Leblanc, B., Hoichman, M., Parrinello, H., Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,983 · see citing works
Self-citationMediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture
Kagey, M. H., Newman, J. J., Bilodeau, S., Zhan, Y., Orlando, D. A., van Berkum, N. L., Ebmeier, C. C., Goossens, J., Rahl, P. B., Levine, S. S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09380 · Cited by 1,939 · see citing works
Sanborn, A. L., Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Durand, N. C., Huntley, M. H., Jewett, A. I., Bochkov, I. D., Chinnappan, D., Cutkosky, A., Li, J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518552112 · Cited by 1,730 · see citing works
Nora, E. P., Goloborodko, A., Valton, A.-L., Gibcus, J. H., Uebersohn, A., Abdennur, N., Dekker, J., Mirny, L. A., & Bruneau, B. G. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.004 · Cited by 1,709 · see citing works
Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation
Dixon, J. R., Jung, I., Selvaraj, S., Shen, Y., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. E., Lee, A. Y., Ye, Z., Kim, A., Rajagopal, N., Xie, W., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14222 · Cited by 1,646 · see citing works
Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture
Ying, Q.-L., Stavridis, M., Griffiths, D., Li, M., & Smith, A. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt780 · Cited by 1,504 · see citing works
Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas
Flavahan, W. A., Drier, Y., Liau, B. B., Gillespie, S. M., Venteicher, A. S., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Suvà, M. L., & Bernstein, B. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16490 · Cited by 1,288 · see citing works
Li, G., Ruan, X., Auerbach, R. K., Sandhu, K. S., Zheng, M., Wang, P., Poh, H. M., Goh, Y., Lim, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.014 · Cited by 1,232 · see citing works
Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment
Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Sauria, M. E. G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T. I., Lajoie, B. R., Bell, J. S. K., Ong, C.-T., Hookway, T. A., Guo, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 · Cited by 1,187 · see citing works
Organization and function of the 3D genome
Bonev, B., & Cavalli, G. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.112 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular Maps of the Reorganization of Genome-Nuclear Lamina Interactions during Differentiation
Peric-Hupkes, D., Meuleman, W., Pagie, L., Bruggeman, S. W. M., Solovei, I., Brugman, W., Gräf, S., Flicek, P., Kerkhoven, R. M., van Lohuizen, M., et al. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Javierre, B. M., Burren, O. S., Wilder, S. P., Kreuzhuber, R., Hill, S. M., Sewitz, S., Cairns, J., Wingett, S. W., Várnai, C., Thiecke, M. J., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.037 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription
Tang, Z., Luo, O. J., Li, X., Zheng, M., Zhu, J. J., Szalaj, P., Trzaskoma, P., Magalska, A., Wlodarczyk, J., Ruszczycki, B., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
Organization of the mitotic chromosome
Naumova, N., Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., Zhan, Y., Lajoie, B. R., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236083 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function
Guo, Y., Xu, Q., Canzio, D., Shou, J., Li, J., Gorkin, D. U., Jung, I., Wu, H., Zhai, Y., Tang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
The 3D Genome as Moderator of Chromosomal Communication
Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.007 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Chromatin Domains: The Unit of Chromosome Organization
Dixon, J. R., Gorkin, D. U., & Ren, B. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.018 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Solovei, I., Wang, A. S., Thanisch, K., Schmidt, C. S., Krebs, S., Zwerger, M., Cohen, T. V., Devys, D., Foisner, R., Peichl, L., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.009 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution
Nagano, T., Lubling, Y., Várnai, C., Dudley, C., Leung, W., Baran, Y., Mendelson Cohen, N., Wingett, S., Fraser, P., & Tanay, A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23001 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
Self-citationThe cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension
Haarhuis, J. H. I., van der Weide, R. H., Blomen, V. A., Yáñez-Cuna, J. O., Amendola, M., van Ruiten, M. S., Krijger, P. H. L., Teunissen, H., Medema, R. H., van Steensel, B., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.013 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
An intrinsic mechanism of corticogenesis from embryonic stem cells
Gaspard, N., Bouschet, T., Hourez, R., Dimidschstein, J., Naeije, G., van den Ameele, J., Espuny-Camacho, I., Herpoel, A., Passante, L., Schiffmann, S. N., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07287 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19847 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase
Ghavi-Helm, Y., Klein, F. A., Pakozdi, T., Ciglar, L., Noordermeer, D., Huber, W., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13417 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Chromatin Architecture Emerges during Zygotic Genome Activation Independent of Transcription
Hug, C. B., Grimaldi, A. G., Kruse, K., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.024 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements
Schoenfelder, S., Furlan-Magaril, M., Mifsud, B., Tavares-Cadete, F., Sugar, R., Javierre, B.-M., Nagano, T., Katsman, Y., Sakthidevi, M., Wingett, S. W., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.185272.114 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into a defined neuronal lineage
Bibel, M., Richter, J., Schrenk, K., Tucker, K. L., Staiger, V., Korte, M., Goetz, M., & Barde, Y.-A. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1301 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping
Deng, W., Rupon, J. W., Krivega, I., Breda, L., Motta, I., Jahn, K. S., Reik, A., Gregory, P. D., Rivella, S., Dean, A., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.050 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila
Bantignies, F., Roure, V., Comet, I., Leblanc, B., Schuettengruber, B., Bonnet, J., Tixier, V., Mas, A., & Cavalli, G. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Self-citationPolycomb repressive complex PRC1 spatially constrains the mouse embryonic stem cell genome
Schoenfelder, S., Sugar, R., Dimond, A., Javierre, B.-M., Armstrong, H., Mifsud, B., Dimitrova, E., Matheson, L., Tavares-Cadete, F., Furlan-Magaril, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3393 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Nuclear Aggregation of Olfactory Receptor Genes Governs Their Monogenic Expression
Clowney, E. J., LeGros, M., Mosley, C., Clowney, F., Markenscoff-Papadimitriou, E., Myllys, M., Barnea, G., Larabell, C. A., & Lomvardas, S. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.043 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesisPreprint
Hiratani, I., Ryba, T., Itoh, M., Rathjen, J., Kulik, M. J., Papp, B., Fussner, E., Bazett‐Jones, D. P., Plath, K., Dalton, S., et al. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.099796.109 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Regulating RNA polymerase pausing and transcription elongation in embryonic stem cellsPreprint
Min, I. M., Waterfall, J. J., Core, L. J., Munroe, R. J., Schimenti, J. C., & Lis, J. T. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2005511 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors
de Wit, E., Bouwman, B. A. M., Zhu, Y. K., Klous, P., Splinter, E., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Krijger, P. H. L., Festuccia, N., Nora, E. P., Welling, M., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12420 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Gene Loops Enhance Transcriptional Directionality
Tan‐Wong, S. M., Zaugg, J. B., Camblong, J., Xu, Z., Zhang, D. W., Mischo, H. E., Ansari, A. Z., Luscombe, N. M., Steinmetz, L. M., & Proudfoot, N. J. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224350 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
CRISPR Reveals a Distal Super-Enhancer Required for Sox2 Expression in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
Li, Y., Rivera, C. M., Ishii, H., Jin, F., Selvaraj, S., Lee, A. Y., Dixon, J. R., & Ren, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114485 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Ninkovic, J., Steiner-Mezzadri, A., Jawerka, M., Akinci, U., Masserdotti, G., Petricca, S., Fischer, J., von Holst, A., Beckers, J., Lie, D. C., et al. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.002 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Control of embryonic stem cell lineage commitment by core promoter factor, TAF3
Liu, Z., Scannell, D. R., Eisen, M. B., & Tjian, R. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.005 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Chen, H., Tian, Y., Shu, W., Bo, X., & Wang, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041374 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Regulation of cerebral cortical neurogenesis by the Pax6 transcription factor
Manuel, M. N., Mi, D., Mason, J. O., & Price, D. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00070 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Başak, O., & Taylor, V. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05370.x · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Capturing pairwise and multi-way chromosomal conformations using chromosomal walks
Olivares‐Chauvet, P., Mukamel, Z., Lifshitz, A., Schwartzman, O., Elkayam, N. O., Lubling, Y., Deikus, G. Y., Sebra, R., & Tanay, A. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20158 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationSun, J., Rockowitz, S., Xie, Q., Ashery-Padan, R., Zheng, D., & Cvekl, A. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv589 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
TBR1 regulates autism risk genes in the developing neocortex
Notwell, J. H., Heavner, W. E., Darbandi, S. F., Katzman, S., McKenna, W. L., Ortiz-Londono, C. F., Tastad, D., Eckler, M. J., Rubenstein, J. L. R., McConnell, S. K., et al. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.203612.115 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A Stochastic View of Spliceosome Assembly and Recycling in the Nucleus
Rino, J., Carvalho, T., Braga, J., Desterro, J. M. P., Lührmann, R., & Carmo‐Fonseca, M. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030201 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Bayam, E., Sahin, G. S., Guzelsoy, G., Guner, G., Kabakcioglu, A., & Ince-Dunn, G. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1882-9 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 · Cited by 2,057 · see citing works
Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture
Rowley, M. J., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0060-8 · Cited by 1,171 · see citing works
Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control
Schoenfelder, S., & Fraser, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation
Zheng, H., & Xie, W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0132-4 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
The Self-Organizing Genome: Principles of Genome Architecture and Function
Misteli, T. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.014 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
“…features and by interaction mapping in numerous differentiation and development processes, including hematopoiesis, cardiogenesis, ESC differentiation, mouse development and senescence (Bertero et al., 2019; Bonev et al., 2017; Paulsen et al., 2019; Rajapakse et al., 2009; Sati et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialResolving the 3D Landscape of Transcription-Linked Mammalian Chromatin Folding
Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Slobodyanyuk, E., Hansen, A. S., Rando, O. J., Tjian, R., & Darzacq, X. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.002 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology
Furlong, E. E. M., & Levine, M. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0320 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Ultrastructural Details of Mammalian Chromosome Architecture
Krietenstein, N., Abraham, S., Venev, S. V., Abdennur, N., Gibcus, J., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Parsi, K. M., Yang, L., Maehr, R., Mirny, L. A., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.003 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Principles of genome folding into topologically associating domains
Szabo, Q., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw1668 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Self-citationIntrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration
Mahar, M., & Cavalli, V. (2018) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0001-8 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Song, F., Zhang, B., Zhang, L., Xu, J., Kuang, D., Li, D., Choudhary, M. N. K., Li, Y., Hu, M., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1519-9 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Transcription factors and 3D genome conformation in cell-fate decisions
Stadhouders, R., Filion, G. J. P., & Graf, T. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1182-7 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging
Gabriele, M., Brandão, H. B., Grosse-Holz, S., Jha, A., Dailey, G. M., Cattoglio, C., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Mirny, L., Zechner, C., & Hansen, A. S. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn6583 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture
Kempfer, R., & Pombo, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0195-2 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
The molecular principles of gene regulation by Polycomb repressive complexes
Blackledge, N. P., & Klose, R. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00398-y · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues
Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M., & Castelo-Branco, G. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00869-9 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Visualizing DNA folding and RNA in embryos at single-cell resolution
Mateo, L. J., Murphy, S. E., Hafner, A., Cinquini, I. S., Walker, C. A., & Boettiger, A. N. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1035-4 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei
Takei, Y., Yun, J., Zheng, S., Ollikainen, N., Pierson, N. G., White, J. A., Shah, S., Thomassie, J., Suo, S., Eng, C.-H. L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03126-2 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Slobodyanyuk, E., Hansen, A. S., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01223-8 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods
Jerković, I., & Cavalli, G. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00362-w · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, Y., Li, T., Preißl, S., Amaral, M. L., Grinstein, J. D., Farah, E. N., Destici, E., Qiu, Y., Hu, R., Lee, A. Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0479-7 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity
Alexander, J. M., Guan, J., Li, B., Maliskova, L., Song, M., Shen, Y., Huang, B., Lomvardas, S., & Weiner, O. D. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41769 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Epigenetic silencing by SETDB1 suppresses tumour intrinsic immunogenicity
Griffin, G. K., Wu, J., Iracheta-Vellve, A., Patti, J. C., Hsu, J., Davis, T., Dele-Oni, D., Du, P. P., Halawi, A. G., Ishizuka, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03520-4 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains
Beagan, J. A., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0561-1 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Organization of Chromosomal DNA by SMC Complexes
Yatskevich, S., Rhodes, J., & Nasmyth, K. (2019) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043633 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Simultaneous profiling of 3D genome structure and DNA methylation in single human cells
Lee, D.-S., Luo, C., Zhou, J., Chandran, S., Rivkin, A., Bartlett, A., Nery, J. R., Fitzpatrick, C., O’Connor, C., Dixon, J. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0547-z · Cited by 340 · see citing works
MCM2 promotes symmetric inheritance of modified histones during DNA replication
Petryk, N., Dalby, M., Wenger, A., Stromme, C. B., Strandsby, A., Andersson, R., & Groth, A. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0294 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Lhx2/Ldb1-mediated trans interactions regulate olfactory receptor choice
Monahan, K., Horta, A., & Lomvardas, S. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0845-0 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
“Pooled data from publicly available data sets is shown for ES cells 72 , B cells 15 , and cortical neurons 73 . f , same as e, but showing the median fraction of HiC contacts made to trans OR clusters for OR cluster regions divided into 50 Kb bins. g , Machine learning Hidden Markov Model (HMM)…”
Cai, Y., Zhang, Y., Loh, Y. P., Tng, J. Q., Lim, M. C., Cao, Z., Raju, A., Lieberman Aiden, E., Li, S., Manikandan, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20940-y · Cited by 321 · see citing works
The relationship between genome structure and function
Oudelaar, A. M., & Higgs, D. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00303-x · Cited by 304 · see citing works
The epigenetic basis of cellular heterogeneity
Carter, B. C., & Zhao, K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00300-0 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation
Kubo, N., Ishii, H., Xiong, X., Bianco, S., Meitinger, F., Hu, R., Hocker, J. D., Conte, M., Gorkin, D., Yu, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-00539-5 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Emerging Evidence of Chromosome Folding by Loop ExtrusionPreprint
Fudenberg, G., Abdennur, N. A., Imakaev, M., Goloborodko, A. A., & Mirny, L. A. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034710 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome
Marchal, C., Sima, J., & Gilbert, D. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0162-y · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Predicting 3D genome folding from DNA sequence with Akita
Fudenberg, G., Kelley, D. R., & Pollard, K. S. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0958-x · Cited by 292 · see citing works
TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila
Szabo, Q., Jost, D., Chang, J., Cattoni, D. I., Papadopoulos, G. L., Bonev, B., Sexton, T., Gurgo, J., Jacquier, C., Nöllmann, M., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar8082 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
“Finally, the fact that TAD identity and architecture depend on cell fate regulation (15, 37) calls for further analysis in different cell types and species to generalize these findings and”
BackgroundSelf-citationDistinct Classes of Chromatin Loops Revealed by Deletion of an RNA-Binding Region in CTCF
Hansen, A. S., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Pustova, I., Saldaña-Meyer, R., Reinberg, D., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.039 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Wolff, J., Bhardwaj, V., Nothjunge, S., Richard, G., Renschler, G., Gilsbach, R., Manke, T., Backofen, R., Ramírez, F., & Grüning, B. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gky504 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
“Furthermore, HiC has allowed identification of chromatin loops (4,5), as well as enhancer–promoter interactions (6,7) and their influence on gene expression (8,9).”
BackgroundMechanisms and Functions of Chromosome Compartmentalization
Hildebrand, E. M., & Dekker, J. (2020) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.01.002 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
“In addition, cells derived from different tissues have been shown to have very different compartment strengths, providing a natural set of conditions to analyze the quantitative effects of compartment formation on gene activity [46, 66].”
BackgroundRoayaei Ardakany, A., Gezer, H. T., Lonardi, S., & Ay, F. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02167-0 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Synergy between Variant PRC1 Complexes Defines Polycomb-Mediated Gene Repression
Fursova, N. A., Blackledge, N. P., Nakayama, M., Ito, S., Koseki, Y., Farcas, A. M., King, H. W., Koseki, H., & Klose, R. J. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.024 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“This raises an interesting question: why are canonical PRC1 complexes recruited to sites where variant PRC1 complexes predominate in gene repression? One explanation may be that canonical PRC1 complexes canmediate long-range interactions between Polycomb repressed genes (Boettiger et al., 2016; Bonev et al., 2017; Eag…”
BackgroundRegion Capture Micro-C reveals coalescence of enhancers and promoters into nested microcompartments
Goel, V. Y., Huseyin, M. K., & Hansen, A. S. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01391-1 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Kruse, K., Hug, C., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02215-9 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome
van Steensel, B., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0114-6 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
X-Chromosome Inactivation: A Crossroads Between Chromosome Architecture and Gene Regulation
Galupa, R., & Heard, É. (2018) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024611 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Transcription shapes 3D chromatin organization by interacting with loop extrusion
Banigan, E. J., Tang, W., van den Berg, A. A., Stocsits, R. R., Wutz, G., Brandão, H. B., Busslinger, G. A., Peters, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2210480120 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
“3A and (20, 74)) or between sites of convergent transcription in both yeast (32, 75) and mammalian cells (Fig.”
BackgroundTwo major mechanisms of chromosome organization
Mirny, L. A., Imakaev, M., & Abdennur, N. A. (2019) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2019.05.001 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains
Zufferey, M., Tavernari, D., Oricchio, E., & Ciriello, G. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1596-9 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Evaluating Enhancer Function and Transcription
Field, A. R., & Adelman, K. (2020) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-011420-095916 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin landscapes in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Kloetgen, A., Thandapani, P., Ntziachristos, P., Ghebrechristos, Y. E., Nomikou, S., Lazaris, C., Chen, X., Hu, H., Bakogianni, S., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0602-9 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“…expression, recent studies tracking 3D chromatin modifications during developmental processes such as embryonic stem cell differentiation and neural development identified significant changes in interactions within (sub-)TADs that correlated with transcriptional levels and epigenetic states 53,54 .”
DeepC: predicting 3D genome folding using megabase-scale transfer learning
Schwessinger, R., Gosden, M., Downes, D., Brown, R. C., Oudelaar, A. M., Telenius, J., Teh, Y., Lunter, G., & Hughes, J. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0960-3 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
“Four replicates of mouse ES cell data 21 were retrieved as raw fastqs from (GSE96107).”
BackgroundMethodChromatin plasticity: A versatile landscape that underlies cell fate and identity
Yadav, T., Quivy, J., & Almouzni, G. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8950 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Coolpup.py: versatile pile-up analysis of Hi-C data
Flyamer, I. M., Illingworth, R. S., & Bickmore, W. A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa073 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
“py to publicly available Hi-C data (Bonev et al., 2017; Nora et al., 2017) using distiller (https://github.com/mirnylab/distiller-nf) to obtain .cool files filtered with a map quality (mapq) of 30. We used these data at 5 kb resolution. In addition .cool files for single-nucleus Hi-C (snHi-C), together with coordinate…”
MethodInfluentialNeuron-specific signatures in the chromosomal connectome associated with schizophrenia risk
Rajarajan, P., Borrman, T., Liao, W., Schrode, N., Flaherty, E., Casiño, C., Powell, S., Yashaswini, C., LaMarca, E. A., Kassim, B., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat4311 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“In addition, we reanalyzed Hi-C datasets generated from a mouse model of neural differentiation, consisting of mouse embryonic stem cell (mESCs), mESCderived NPCs (mNPC), and cortical neurons (mCN) differentiated from the mNPCs via inhibition of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway (21).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Bivalent Genome: Characterization, Structure, and Regulation
Blanco, E., González-Ramírez, M., Alcaine-Colet, A., Aranda, S., & Croce, L. D. (2019) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2019.11.004 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Gatchalian, J., Malik, S., Ho, J., Lee, D.-S., Kelso, T. W. R., Shokhirev, M. N., Dixon, J. R., & Hargreaves, D. C. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07528-9 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Molecular basis of CTCF binding polarity in genome folding
Nora, E. P., Caccianini, L., Fudenberg, G., So, K., Kameswaran, V., Nagle, A., Uebersohn, A., Hajj, B., Saux, A. L., Coulon, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19283-x · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Cell-type specialization is encoded by specific chromatin topologies
Winick‐Ng, W., Kukalev, A., Harabula, I., Zea-Redondo, L., Szabó, D., Meijer, M., Serebreni, L., Zhang, Y., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04081-2 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“We have shown that Hi-C derived loops from mESCs and cortical PGNs (Bonev et al. 2017) are also strong contacts in GAM data from mESC and hippocampal PGNs (see below Rev.1 point 16).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMcCord, R. P., Kaplan, N., & Giorgetti, L. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.021 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“Above-background interactions are certainly significant with respect to a null model where only random collisions occur (Figure 6B), and very often correlate with CTCF loops, interactions between active genes, or interactions between genes and their potential regulatory sequences (Bonev et al. 2017; Hsieh et al. 2019;…”
BackgroundInfluentialRobust single-cell Hi-C clustering by convolution- and random-walk-based imputation
Zhou, J., Ma, J., Chen, Y., Cheng, C., Bao, B., Peng, J., Sejnowski, T. J., Dixon, J. R., & Ecker, J. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1901423116 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“(30) examined three mouse cell types [embryonic stem cells (ESCs), neural progenitor cells (NPCs), and cortical neurons (CNs)].”
BackgroundInfluentialMechanisms of Interplay between Transcription Factors and the 3D Genome
Kim, S., & Shendure, J. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.010 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“Toward assessing whether this is a universal phenomenon, recent technical advances have enabled increasingly comprehensive and high-resolution views of chromosome conformation (Bonev et al., 2017; Lieberman-Aiden et al., 2009; Rao et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMcArthur, E., & Capra, J. A. (2021) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.01.001 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Miron, E., Oldenkamp, R., Brown, J. M., Pinto, D. M. S., Xu, C. S., Faria, A. R., Shaban, H. A., Rhodes, J. D. P., Innocent, C., de Ornellas, S., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba8811 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
“(A) Hi-C heatmap from mouse ESCs (67) showing the interaction frequency around the 700kb TAD probe (probe H, red bars), (19) used in this study for RASER-FISH experiments.”
Tan, L., Ma, W., Wu, H., Zheng, Y., Xing, D., Chen, R., Li, X., Daley, N., Deisseroth, K. A., & Xie, X. S. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.032 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Regulatory Landscaping: How Enhancer-Promoter Communication Is Sculpted in 3D
Robson, M. I., Ringel, A. R., & Mundlos, S. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.032 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Regulation of single-cell genome organization into TADs and chromatin nanodomains
Szabo, Q., Donjon, A., Jerković, I., Papadopoulos, G. L., Cheutin, T., Bonev, B., Nora, E. P., Bruneau, B. G., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00716-8 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
“Publicly available ESC and NPC ChIP-seq data for H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H3K27me3 marks, ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2 27,49,50 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationHistone H3.3G34-Mutant Interneuron Progenitors Co-opt PDGFRA for Gliomagenesis
Chen, C. C. L., Deshmukh, S., Jessa, S., Hadjadj, D., Lisi, V., Andrade, A. F., Faury, D., Jawhar, W., Dali, R., Suzuki, H., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.012 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“Publicly available Hi-C datasets on murine embryonic stem cells were downloaded from GEO (GSE96107)(Bonev et al., 2017), and processed as described above.”
MethodDynamic 3D chromatin architecture contributes to enhancer specificity and limb morphogenesis
Kragesteen, B. K., Spielmann, M., Paliou, C., Heinrich, V., Schöpflin, R., Esposito, A., Annunziatella, C., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., Jerković, I., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0221-x · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Carballo, E., Lopez‐Delisle, L., Zhan, Y., Fabre, P. J., Beccari, L. L., El-Idrissi, I., Huynh, T. H. N., Özadam, H., Dekker, J., & Duboule, D. (2017) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.307769.117 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
“Active versus inactive TADs and loop extrusion Upon TAD functional activation, specific changes were observed in the interaction profiles, reflecting several states of configurations in chromatin architecture as reported earlier (Li et al. 2012; Sanyal et al. 2012; Berlivet et al. 2013; Rao et al. 2014; Dixon et al. 2…”
MethodKey role for CTCF in establishing chromatin structure in human embryos
Chen, X., Ke, Y., Wu, K., Zhao, H., Sun, Y., Gao, L., Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Tao, W., Hou, Z., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1812-0 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Cohesin Disrupts Polycomb-Dependent Chromosome Interactions in Embryonic Stem Cells
Rhodes, J. D. P., Feldmann, A., Hernández-Rodríguez, B., Díaz, N., Brown, J. M., Fursova, N. A., Blackledge, N. P., Prathapan, P., Dobrinic, P., Huseyin, M. K., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.057 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
“Polycomb Mediates Interactions that Persist in the Absence of Cohesin In ESCs, it is known that polycomb chromatin domains can associate with each other, even over very long distances (Bonev et al., 2017; Denholtz et al., 2013; Joshi et al., 2015; Schoenfelder et al., 2015).”
BackgroundIdentifying cis elements for spatio-temporal control of mammalian DNA replication
Sima, J., Chakraborty, A., Dileep, V., Michalski, M., Klein, K. N., Holcomb, N. P., Turner, J. L., Paulsen, M., Rivera-Mulia, J., Trevilla-García, C., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.036 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
“The Dppa2/4 domain corresponds to a TAD whose boundaries contain CTCF and cohesin binding sites (Nora et al., 2017; Yue et al., 2014; Dowen et al., 2014; Mumbach et al., 2016) and also align with compartment boundaries (Bonev et al., 2017).”
InfluentialGiammartino, D. C. D., Kloetgen, A., Polyzos, A., Liu, Y., Kim, D., Murphy, D., Abuhashem, A., Cavaliere, P., Aronson, B. E., Shah, V., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0390-6 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Paliou, C., Guckelberger, P., Schöpflin, R., Heinrich, V., Esposito, A., Chiariello, A. M., Bianco, S., Annunziatella, C., Helmuth, J., Haas, S., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900672116 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
“Transcriptionally active gene promoters have been shown to interact over a large distance independently of CTCF and thereby suggested to be drivers of genome architecture (5).”
BackgroundDistinct roles of cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in 3D chromosome organization
Kojic, A., Cuadrado, A., Koninck, M. D., Giménez-Llorente, D., Rodríguez-Corsino, M., Goméz-López, G., Dily, F. L., Martı́-Renom, M. A., & Losada, A. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0070-4 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Thiecke, M. J., Wutz, G., Muhar, M., Tang, W., Bevan, S., Malysheva, V., Stocsits, R., Neumann, T., Zuber, J., Fraser, P., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107929 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Linking genome structures to functions by simultaneous single-cell Hi-C and RNA-seq
Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Xia, Q., Liu, M., Xu, H., Chi, Y., Deng, Y., & Xing, D. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg3797 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Single-cell DNA methylation and 3D genome architecture in the human brain
Tian, W., Zhou, J., Bartlett, A., Zeng, Q., Liu, H., Castanon, R. G., Kenworthy, M., Altshul, J., Valadon, C., Aldridge, A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf5357 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
4D Genome Rewiring during Oncogene-Induced and Replicative Senescence
Sati, S., Bonev, B., Szabo, Q., Jost, D., Bensadoun, P., Serra, F., Loubiere, V., Papadopoulos, G. L., Rivera-Mulia, J.-C., Fritsch, L., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.007 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
“Identification of A and B Compartments TADs were assigned to either the A or the B compartment as described (Bonev et al., 2017; Nagano et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationReprogramming of Meiotic Chromatin Architecture during Spermatogenesis.
Wang, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Du, Z., Si, W., Fan, S.-X., Qin, D., Wang, M., Duan, Y., Li, L., et al. (2019) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.019 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Bertero, A., Fields, P., Ramani, V., Bonora, G., Yardımcı, G., Reinecke, H., Pabon, L., Noble, W. S., Shendure, J., & Murry, C. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09483-5 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
WAPL maintains a cohesin loading cycle to preserve cell-type-specific distal gene regulation
Liu, N. Q., Maresca, M., van den Brand, T., Braccioli, L., Schijns, M. M. G. A., Teunissen, H., Bruneau, B. G., Nora, E. P., & de Wit, E. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00744-4 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning
Ing-Simmons, E., Vaid, R., Bing, X. Y., Levine, M., Mannervik, M., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00799-x · Cited by 159 · see citing works
A supervised learning framework for chromatin loop detection in genome-wide contact maps
Salameh, T. J., Wang, X., Song, F., Zhang, B., Wright, S. M., Khunsriraksakul, C., Ruan, Y., & Yue, F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17239-9 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action at the Shh locus
Kane, L., Williamson, I., Flyamer, I. M., Kumar, Y., Hill, R. E., Lettice, L. A., & Bickmore, W. A. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00821-8 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Bonetti, A., Agostini, F., Suzuki, A. M., Hashimoto, K., Pascarella, G., Gimenez, J., Roos, L., Nash, A. J., Ghilotti, M., Cameron, C. J. F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14337-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Rinzema, N. J., Sofiadis, K., Tjalsma, S. J. D., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Oz, Y., Valdes-Quezada, C., Felder, A.-K., Filipovska, T., van der Elst, S., de Andrade dos Ramos, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00787-7 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Polycomb Group Proteins Regulate Chromatin Architecture in Mouse Oocytes and Early Embryos.
Du, Z., Zheng, H., Kawamura, Y. K., Zhang, K., Gassler, J., Powell, S. T., Xu, Q.-H., Lin, Z.-L., Xu, K., Zhou, Q., et al. (2019) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.11.011 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Topologically associating domain boundaries are required for normal genome function
Rajderkar, S., Barozzi, I., Zhu, Y., Hu, R., Zhang, Y., Li, B., Alcaina‐Caro, A., Fukuda-Yuzawa, Y., Kelman, G., Akeza, A., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04819-w · Cited by 170 · see citing works
“Both CTCF-mediated mechanisms and transcription can affect the formation and function of TADs, but neither seems to be individually suf fi cient nor universally required 7,11,23,24 .”
Kaaij, L. J. T., Mohn, F., van der Weide, R. H., de Wit, E., & Bühler, M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.007 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Zhao, P. A., Sasaki, T., & Gilbert, D. M. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-01983-8 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Immediate and deferred epigenomic signatures of in vivo neuronal activation in mouse hippocampus
Fernandez-Albert, J., Lipinski, M., Lopez-Cascales, M. T., Rowley, M. J., Martin-Gonzalez, A. M., del Blanco, B., Corces, V. G., & Barco, A. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0476-2 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Hi-C analyses with GENOVA: a case study with cohesin variants
van der Weide, R. H., van den Brand, T., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Teunissen, H., Rowland, B. D., & de Wit, E. (2021) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqab040 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“To visualise the changes in the compartment strength we generated saddle-plots, in which the amount of self-interaction of A- and B-compartments is quantified (34,50).”
MethodMarco, A., Meharena, H. S., Dileep, V., Raju, R. M., Davila-Velderrain, J., Zhang, A. L., Adaikkan, C., Young, J. Z., Gao, F., Kellis, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00717-0 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Phase separation of OCT4 controls TAD reorganization to promote cell fate transitions.
Wang, J., Yu, H.-P., Ma, Q., Zeng, P., Wu, D., Hou, Y., Liu, X.-Y., Jia, L., Sun, J., Chen, Y.-L., et al. (2021) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.023 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
The spatial organization of transcriptional control
Hafner, A., & Boettiger, A. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00526-0 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Polycomb group protein function in cancer
Parreno, V., Martinez, A., & Cavalli, G. (2022) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00606-6 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationGreenwald, W. W. Y., Li, H., Benaglio, P., Jakubosky, D. A., Matsui, H., Schmitt, A. D., Selvaraj, S., D’Antonio, M., D’Antonio‐Chronowska, A., Smith, E. N., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08940-5 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Paulsen, J., Ali, T. M. L., Nekrasov, M., Delbarre, E., Baudement, M.-O., Kurscheid, S., Tremethick, D. J., & Collas, P. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0392-0 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Chromosome organization by one-sided and two-sided loop extrusion
Banigan, E. J., van den Berg, A. A., Brandão, H. B., Marko, J. F., & Mirny, L. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53558 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“(a) A TAD in Hi-C of cortical neurons (Bonev et al., 2017), visualized by HiGlass (Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) at a resolution of 8 kb.”
Method
- Authors
- Bonev, B., Mendelson Cohen, N., Szabo, Q., Fritsch, L., Papadopoulos, G. L., Lubling, Y., Xu, X., Lv, X., Hugnot, J.-P., Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- BGI Group (China) (CN)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Bonev, Boyan
- Cavalli, Giacomo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 557-572.e24
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5651218
- OpenAlex
- W2765567136
- Semantic Scholar
- 0728437b5553338297a6cc1bad9f15766a1e1c43
- Cited by
- 1,338
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 166 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 52.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Research Council (232947)
- Israeli Science Foundation
- CNRS
- FP7 European Network of Excellence EpiGeneSys (676556)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE12-006-01)
- Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (144186)
- INSERM and ITMO Cancer (PLBIO16-22)
- Laboratory of Excellence (ANR-10-LABX-12-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- 3D genome organization, chromatin conformation, neuronal differentiation, topologically associating domains, long-range chromatin interactions, chromatin insulation, enhancer-promoter interactions
- MeSH terms
- CCCTC-Binding Factor, Animals, Chromatin, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Exons, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression, Genome, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Embryonic Stem Cells, Neurogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review