Cited by 97Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Rare DiseasesImbalanced Data Classification Techniques

Imbalance-Aware Machine Learning for Predicting Rare and Common Disease-Associated Non-Coding Variants

Open access
Schubach, Max, Re, Matteo, Robinson, Peter N., Valentini, Giorgio·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Disease and trait-associated variants represent a tiny minority of all known genetic variation, and therefore there is necessarily an imbalance between the small set of available disease-associated and the much larger set of non-deleterious genomic variation, especially in non-coding regulatory regions of human genome. Machine Learning (ML) methods for predicting disease-associated non-coding variants are faced with a chicken and egg problem - such variants cannot be easily found without ML, but ML cannot begin to be effective until a sufficient number of instances have been found. Most of state-of-the-art ML-based methods do not adopt specific imbalance-aware learning techniques to deal with imbalanced data that naturally arise in several genome-wide variant scoring problems, thus resulting in a significant reduction of sensitivity and precision. We present a novel method that adopts imbalance-aware learning strategies based on resampling techniques and a hyper-ensemble approach that outperforms state-of-the-art methods in two different contexts: the prediction of non-coding variants associated with Mendelian and with complex diseases. We show that imbalance-aware ML is a key issue for the design of robust and accurate prediction algorithms and we provide a method and an easy-to-use software tool that can be effectively applied to this challenging prediction task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-03011-5

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medical datasets frequently suffer from imbalances in phenotypes, like rare diseases or serious clinical outcomes, and cohort identification.

    “Medical datasets also frequently suffer from imbalances in phenotypes, like rare diseases or serious clinical outcomes37, and cohort identification7.”

    From Probabilistic medical predictions of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schubach, M., Re, M., Robinson, P. N., & Valentini, G.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Valentini, Giorgio
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-06-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
2959-2959
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620563544
Cited by
97
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (57210259)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EC1402B)
  • Berlin Institute of Health
  • National Institutes of Health (R24OD011883)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Keywords
non-coding variants, class imbalance, resampling, monogenic disorders, complex diseases, regulatory elements, rare variants
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Software, Genetic Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, RNA, Untranslated, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review