Cited by 37Diabetes Management and ResearchTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and Education

Telemonitoring in fasting individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus during Ramadan: A prospective, randomised controlled study

Open access
Lee, Jun Yang, Wong, Chee Piau, Tan, Christina San San, Nasir, Nazrila Hairizan, Lee, Shaun Wen Huey·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

We determined the impact of a remote blood glucose telemonitoring program with feedback in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients fasting during Ramadan compared to conventional self-monitoring method. A twelve-week cluster randomised study, with 85 participants who wish to fast for at least 15 days during Ramadan was conducted. Self-measurement and transmission of blood glucose results were performed six times daily during Ramadan. Results were transmitted to a secure website for review with feedback from case manager if necessary. The control group received usual care. The main outcome was the number of participants experiencing hypoglycaemia during Ramadan and at the end of the study. During Ramadan, the number of participants reporting hypoglycaemia was significantly lower in the telemonitoring group [Odds ratio (OR): 0.186, 95% confidence interval: 0.04–0.936; p = 0.04]. Similarly, the proportion of participants reporting symptomatic hypoglycaemia at the end of the study was significantly lower in the telemonitoring group (OR: 0.257, 95% CI: 0.07–0.89; p = 0.03). A reduction of 1.07% in glycated haemoglobin levels was observed in the telemonitoring group compared to 0.24% in the control group (p < 0.01). Overall, telemonitoring was a useful adjunct to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia during Ramadan with no deterioration in glycaemic control

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-10564-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Shehadeh N Maor Y the Ramadan Study, G Effect of a new insulin treatment regimen on glycaemic control and quality of life of Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during Ramadan fast – an open label, controlled, multicentre, cluster randomised study International journal of clinical practice 2015 69 1281 1288 10.1111/ijcp.12695 26234442 · DOI
  2. [2]Benaji B Diabetes and Ramadan: review of the literature Diabetes research and clinical practice 2006 73 117 125 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.10.028 16647781 · DOI
  3. [3]Hui, E. et al. Management of people with diabetes wanting to fast during Ramadan. Vol. 340 (2010). 20570867
  4. [4]Beshyah S Benbarka M Sherif I Practical Management of Diabetes during Ramadan Fast The Libyan journal of medicine 2007 2 185 189 10.3402/ljm.v2i4.4731 21503243 PMC3078251 · DOI
  5. [5]Vakili R Niazi Z Rezaie P Type 1 diabetes and Ramadan fasting: A narrative review Journal of Fasting and Health 2016 4 22 24
  6. [6]Hassanein M Ramadan focused diabetes education; a much needed approach J Pak Med Assoc 2015 65 S76 S78 26013796
  7. [7]Salti, I. et al. A population-based study of diabetes and its characteristics during the fasting month of Ramadan in 13 countries: results of the epidemiology of diabetes and Ramadan 1422/2001 (EPIDIAR) study. Diabetes Care27, doi:10.2337/diacare.27.10.2306 (2004). 15451892 · DOI
  8. [8]Roots A Bhalla A Birns J Telemedicine for stroke: a systematic review British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 2011 7 481 489 10.12968/bjnn.2011.7.2.481 · DOI
  9. [9]Farmer A Gibson OJ Tarassenko L Neil A A systematic review of telemedicine interventions to support blood glucose self-monitoring in diabetes Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2005 22 1372 1378 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01627.x 16176199 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]Lee JY Diabetes telemonitoring reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia during Ramadan: a pilot randomized controlled study Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2015 32 1658 1661 10.1111/dme.12836 26103794 · DOI
  11. [12]Paré G Jaana M Sicotte C Systematic Review of Home Telemonitoring for Chronic Diseases: The Evidence Base Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 2007 14 269 277 10.1197/jamia.M2270 17329725 PMC2244878 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Paré G Moqadem K Pineau G St-Hilaire C Clinical Effects of Home Telemonitoring in the Context of Diabetes, Asthma, Heart Failure and Hypertension: A Systematic Review Journal of medical Internet research 2010 12 10.2196/jmir.1357 20554500 PMC2956232 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [14]Lee SW Lee JY Tan CS Wong CP Strategies to Make Ramadan Fasting Safer in Type 2 Diabetics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies Medicine 2016 95 10.1097/MD.0000000000002457 26765440 PMC4718266 · DOI
  14. [16]Brooks R EuroQol: the current state of play Health Policy 1996 37 53 72 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 10158943 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Fitzgerald JT The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test Diabetes Care 1998 21 706 710 10.2337/diacare.21.5.706 9589228 · DOI
  16. [18]Al-Qazaz HK Sulaiman SA Hassali MA Shafie AA Sundram S Diabetes knowledge and control of glycaemia among type 2 diabetes patients in Penang, Malaysia Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research 2012 3 49 55 10.1111/j.1759-8893.2011.00073.x · DOI
  17. [19]Al-Qazaz HK Hassali MA Shafie AA Sulaiman SAS Sundram S The 14-item Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test: translation and validation study of the Malaysian version Practical Diabetes International 2010 27 238 241a 10.1002/pdi.1495 · DOI
  18. [20]Polonsky WH Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale Diabetes Care 2005 28 626 631 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626 15735199 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [21]Lorig K Ritter PL Villa FJ Armas J Community-Based Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management: A Randomized Trial The Diabetes Educator 2009 35 641 651 10.1177/0145721709335006 19407333 · DOI
  20. [23]Mafauzy M Mohammed WB Anum MY Zulkifli A Ruhani AH A study of the fasting diabetic patients during the month of Ramadan The Medical journal of Malaysia 1990 45 14 17 2152063
  21. [24]Lee JY Wong CP San San Tan C Nasir NH Lee SWH Type 2 diabetes patient’s perspective on Ramadan fasting: a qualitative study BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care 2017 5 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000365 28761651 PMC5530234 · DOI
  22. [25]Ko GT Combined use of a fasting plasma glucose concentration and HbA1c or fructosamine predicts the likelihood of having diabetes in high-risk subjects Diabetes Care 1998 21 1221 1225 10.2337/diacare.21.8.1221 9702423 · DOI
  23. [26]Fluckiger R Woodtli T Berger W Evaluation of the fructosamine test for the measurement of plasma protein glycation Diabetologia 1987 30 648 652 10.1007/BF00295888 3653563 · DOI
  24. [27]Tsang MW Improvement in diabetes control with a monitoring system based on a hand-held, touch-screen electronic diary J Telemed Telecare 2001 7 47 50 10.1258/1357633011936138 11265938 · DOI
  25. [29]Reusch, J. B. & Manson, J. E. Management of type 2 diabetes in 2017: Getting to goal. Jama, doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0241 (2017). PMC5894353 28249081 · DOI
  26. [30]Beshyah SA IDF-DAR Practical Guidelines for Management of Diabetes during Ramadan Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences 2016 8 58 60 10.4103/1947-489X.210217 · DOI
  27. [32]Lee JY Intervention for Diabetes with Education, Advancement and Support (IDEAS) study: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial BMC Health Services Research 2016 16 10.1186/s12913-016-1782-y 27683021 PMC5041520 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. Y., Wong, C. P., Tan, C. S. S., Nasir, N. H., & Lee, S. W. H.
Affiliations
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
  • SEGi University (MY)
Corresponding author
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-08-31
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
10119-10119
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2746567353
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Monash University (52140757-314-00)
  • Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi (03-02-10-SF0238)
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
  • Monash University Malaysia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, type 2 diabetes, Ramadan fasting, hypoglycemia, self-monitoring of blood glucose, HbA1c, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Islam, Male, Middle Aged, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review