Cited by 60Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Using telemedicine to support care for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative analysis of patients’ perspectives

Open access
Lee, Jun Yang, Chan, Carina Ka Yee, Chua, Siew Siang, Paraidathathu, Thomas, Lee, Kenneth Kwing-Chin, Tan, Christina San San, Nasir, Nazrila, Lee, Shaun Wen Huey·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: Telemedicine has been promoted as an economical and effective way to enhance patient care, but its acceptance among patients in low-income and middle-income countries is poorly understood. This study is aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus that used telemedicine to manage their condition. Design: In-depth and focus group interviews were conducted with participants who have engaged in telemedicine. Questions included were participants’ perception on the programme being used, satisfaction as well as engagement with the telemedicine programme. All interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a thematic approach. Participants and setting: People with type 2 diabetes (n=48) who participated in a randomised controlled study which examined the use of telemedicine for diabetes management were recruited from 11 primary care clinics located within the Klang Valley. Results: Twelve focus groups and two in-depth interviews were conducted. Four themes emerged from the analysis: (1) generational difference; (2) independence and convenience, (3) sharing of health data and privacy and (4) concerns and challenges. The main obstacles found in patients using the telemedicine systems were related to internet connectivity and difficulties experienced with system interface. Cost was also another significant concern raised by participants. Participants in this study were primarily positive about the benefits of telemedicine, including its ability to provide real-time data and disease monitoring and the reduction in clinic visits. Conclusion: Despite the potential benefits of telemedicine in the long-term care of diabetes, there are several perceived barriers that may limit the effectiveness of this technology. As such, collaboration between educators, healthcare providers, telecommunication service providers and patients are required to stimulate the adoption and the use of telemedicine. NCT0246680.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026575

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. Y., Chan, C. K. Y., Chua, S. S., Paraidathathu, T., Lee, K. K.-C., Tan, C. S. S., Nasir, N., & Lee, S. W. H.
Affiliations
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Taylor's University (MY)
  • HELP International Corporation (Malaysia) (MY)
  • Ministry of Health (MY)
Corresponding author
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
e026575
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981325486
Cited by
60
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi (03-02-10-SF0238)
  • SEGi University (SEGi/2013/SKK/04/1)
  • Monash University (52140757-314-00)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, type 2 diabetes, patient perspectives, diabetes self-management, patient satisfaction, telehealth adoption barriers, internet access, health data privacy, generational differences, cost concerns, primary care, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Internet Access, Age Factors, Attitude to Computers, Confidentiality, Costs and Cost Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Self Care, Computer Security, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Personal Autonomy, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review