Cited by 8Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Effectiveness of telemonitoring intervention on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Cai, Jinxuan, Xu, Huaying, Jiang, Stephen, Sung, Jerry, Sawhney, Rakshat, Broadley, Simon, Sun, Jing·2023·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a rising global health concern that requires long-term treatment and close monitoring. Telemonitoring has been shown to be a promising tool to facilitate patient-physician interaction and improve glycaemic control.Method Randomised controlled trials (RCT) of telemonitoring in T2DM published between 1990 and 2021 were searched through multiple electronic databases. The primary outcome variables included HbA1c and fasting blood glucose (FBG), and BMI was a secondary outcome variable.Results Thirty RCT with a total of 4,678 participants were included in this study. Twenty-six studies reported on HbA1c, which was shown to be significantly lower in participants on telemonitoring when compared to conventional care. Ten studies investigated FBG which collectively showed no statistically significant difference. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the effect of telemonitoring on glycaemic control is influenced by a range of factors concerning system practicality, user engagement, patient characteristics and disease education.Conclusion Telemonitoring exhibited a great potential to improve T2DM management. Several technical features and patient factors may influence the effectiveness of telemonitoring. Further studies are needed to verify the findings and address limitations before its implementation into routine practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110727

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glucometers and CGMs demonstrated a symmetrical distribution between workflow and literacy challenges, illustrating the dual burden of learning invasive or semi-invasive peripheral operation alongside data-logging routines.

    “Glucometers and CGMs demonstrated a symmetrical distribution between workflow and literacy challenges [2,4], illustrating the dual burden of learning invasive or semi-invasive peripheral operation alongside data-logging routines.”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Patient Adherence Hurdles of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Frameworks in Managing Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    Section 2.6 (page unavailable) describes manual data input and education in self-measurement skills, which relate to the claimed data-logging and learning tasks. Neither that section nor the Discussion (page unavailable) reports a symmetrical distribution of workflow and literacy challenges for glucometers and CGMs, or characterizes device operation and logging as a dual burden. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The clinical value proposition of RPM systems is well-documented; systematically tracking physiological metrics allows for early detection of clinical deterioration, optimization of pharmacological regimens, and reduction of emergency department utilization.

    “The clinical value proposition of these systems is well-documented; systematically tracking physiological metrics allows for the early detection of clinical deterioration, optimization of pharmacological regimens, and reduction of emergency department utilization [2,4].”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Patient Adherence Hurdles of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Frameworks in Managing Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lack of seamless architectural interoperability between hardware modalities and proprietary cloud infrastructure often forces reliance on fragmented data synchronization models, compounding operational inefficiencies.

    “the lack of seamless architectural interoperability between hardware modalities and proprietary cloud infrastructure often forces reliance on fragmented data synchronization models, compounding operational inefficiencies [4,11].”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Patient Adherence Hurdles of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Frameworks in Managing Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    Section 2.6 (page unavailable) describes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular transmission to a cloud server, while Section 4.2 notes variation in telemonitoring systems’ technical features. Neither passage addresses lack of interoperability, proprietary infrastructure, fragmented synchronization, or resulting operational inefficiencies; searches for those terms and related integration barriers found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Afshin A, Forouzanfar M, Reitsma M, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13-27.
  2. Lee JY, Chan CKY, Chua SS, et al. Telemonitoring and Team-Based Management of Glycemic Control on People with Type 2 Diabetes: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. Jan 2020;35(1):87-94. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05316-9 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Cai, J., Xu, H., Jiang, S., Sung, J., Sawhney, R., Broadley, S., & Sun, J.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Cai, Jinxuan
  • Xu, Huaying
  • Jiang, Stephen
  • Sung, Jerry
  • Sawhney, Rakshat
  • Broadley, Simon
  • Sun, Jing
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
201
Pages
110727
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4377141862
Cited by
8
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, body mass index, patient engagement, disease education
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review