Cited by 180Spinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryPain Management and Treatment

Motor recovery after activity-based training with spinal cord epidural stimulation in a chronic motor complete paraplegic

Open access
Rejc, Enrico, Angeli, Claudia A., Atkinson, Darryn, Harkema, Susan J.·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The prognosis for recovery of motor function in motor complete spinal cord injured (SCI) individuals is poor. Our research team has demonstrated that lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) and activity-based training can progressively promote the recovery of volitional leg movements and standing in individuals with chronic clinically complete SCI. However, scES was required to perform these motor tasks. Herein, we show the progressive recovery of voluntary leg movement and standing without scES in an individual with chronic, motor complete SCI throughout 3.7 years of activity-based interventions utilizing scES configurations customized for the different motor tasks that were specifically trained (standing, stepping, volitional leg movement). In particular, this report details the ongoing neural adaptations that allowed a functional progression from no volitional muscle activation to a refined, task-specific activation pattern and movement generation during volitional attempts without scES. Similarly, we observed the re-emergence of muscle activation patterns sufficient for standing with independent knee and hip extension. These findings highlight the recovery potential of the human nervous system after chronic clinically motor complete SCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-14003-w

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This recovery has been documented in various independent studies, including in participants with complete sensorimotor paralysis.

    “This recovery has been documented in various independent studies, including in participants with complete sensorimotor paralysis5,6,30–34.”

    From Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion reports motor recovery in this participant and describes recovery reported in other studies. But Materials and Methods (Research participant; no page supplied) classifies this participant as AIS B, with sensation preserved below the injury, not complete sensorimotor paralysis. The Discussion mentions AIS A lesions but does not establish the claimed recovery in participants with those lesions. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The delivery of epidural electrical stimulation over the lumbar spinal cord has enabled many individuals with spinal cord injury to regain adaptive control over the activity of otherwise paralysed muscles.

    “The delivery of epidural electrical stimulation over the lumbar spinal cord has enabled many individuals with spinal cord injury to regain adaptive control over the activity of otherwise paralysed muscles.”

    From Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says the research team had demonstrated recovery of volitional leg movements and standing in individuals with chronic, clinically complete spinal cord injury using lumbosacral epidural stimulation and activity-based training. This paper’s own results concern one participant, however, and do not establish that stimulation enabled this control in “many” individuals or independently of training. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Application of EES during neurorehabilitation (EESREHAB) further improved recovery of walking, even when the stimulation was turned off.

    “Application of EES during neurorehabilitation (EESREHAB) further improved recovery of walking, even when the stimulation was turned off1,21.”

    From The neurons that restore walking after paralysis (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rejc, E., Angeli, C. A., Atkinson, D., & Harkema, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Harkema, Susan J.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-10-26
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
13476-13476
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762911039
Cited by
180
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (R01EB007615)
  • Medtronic
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM103507, GM103507)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007615)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
spinal cord injury, epidural stimulation, activity-based training, motor recovery, standing, neuroplasticity, muscle activation patterns, chronic spinal cord injury
MeSH terms
Neurological Rehabilitation, Adult, Electrodes, Implanted, Epidural Space, Humans, Leg, Male, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Muscle, Skeletal, Spinal Cord Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review