The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo Microscopic Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Non-Invasive Glucose Monitoring Invulnerable to Skin Secretion Products
Open accessAbstract
Photoacoustic spectroscopy has been shown to be a promising tool for non-invasive blood glucose monitoring. However, the repeatability of such a method is susceptible to changes in skin condition, which is dependent on hand washing and drying due to the high absorption of infrared excitation light to the skin secretion products or water. In this paper, we present a method to meet the challenges of mid-infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy for non-invasive glucose monitoring. By obtaining the microscopic spatial information of skin during the spectroscopy measurement, the skin region where the infrared spectra is insensitive to skin condition can be locally selected, which enables reliable prediction of the blood glucose level from the photoacoustic spectroscopy signals. Our raster-scan imaging showed that the skin condition for in vivo spectroscopic glucose monitoring had significant inhomogeneities and large variability in the probing area where the signal was acquired. However, the selective localization of the probing led to a reduction in the effects of variability due to the skin secretion product. Looking forward, this technology has broader applications not only in continuous glucose monitoring for diabetic patient care, but in forensic science, the diagnosis of malfunctioning sweat pores, and the discrimination of tumors extracted via biopsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Diabetic Complications
Forbes, J. M., & Cooper, M. E. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00045.2011 · Cited by 2,890
Taylor, N. A., & Machado-Moreira, C. A. (2013) · Extreme Physiology & Medicine · doi:10.1186/2046-7648-2-4 · Cited by 490
Caduff, A., Dewarrat, F., Talary, M., Stalder, G., Heinemann, L., & Feldman, Y. (2006) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2006.01.031 · Cited by 155
Cited by
Villena Gonzales, W., Mobashsher, A., & Abbosh, A. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19040800 · Cited by 772
Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Monitoring Technology: A Review
Tang, L., Chang, S. J., Chen, C.-J., & Liu, J.-T. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20236925 · Cited by 481
Review of Non-Invasive Glucose Sensing Techniques: Optical, Electrical and Breath Acetone
Shokrekhodaei, M., & Quinones, S. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20051251 · Cited by 221
Standardization process of continuous glucose monitoring: Traceability and performance
Freckmann, G., Nichols, J. H., Hinzmann, R., Klonoff, D. C., Ju, Y., Diem, P., Makris, K., & Slingerland, R. J. (2021) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2020.12.025 · Cited by 62
Zheng, Y., Zhan, Z., Chen, Q., Chen, J., Luo, J., Cai, J., Zhou, Y., Chen, K., & Xie, W. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202405681 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Sim, J. Y., Ahn, C.-G., Jeong, E.-J., & Kim, B. K.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2018-01-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1059-1059
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2784302188
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo Microscopic Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Non-Invasive Glucose Monitoring Invulnerable to Skin Secretion Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-018-19340-y
- The paper
- Sim, J. Y., Ahn, C.-G., Jeong, E.-J., & Kim, B. K. (2018). In vivo Microscopic Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Non-Invasive Glucose Monitoring Invulnerable to Skin Secretion Products. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19340-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.