Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attenuation of replication by a 29 nucleotide deletion in SARS-coronavirus acquired during the early stages of human-to-human transmission

Open access
Muth, Doreen, Corman, Victor Max, Roth, Hanna, Binger, Tabea, Dijkman, Ronald, Gottula, Lina Theresa, Gloza-Rausch, Florian, Balboni, Andrea, Battilani, Mara, Rihtarič, Danijela, Toplak, Ivan, Ameneiros, Ramón Seage, Pfeifer, Alexander, Thiel, Volker, Drexler, Jan Felix, Müller, Marcel Alexander, Drosten, Christian·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

A 29 nucleotide deletion in open reading frame 8 (ORF8) is the most obvious genetic change in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) during its emergence in humans. In spite of intense study, it remains unclear whether the deletion actually reflects adaptation to humans. Here we engineered full, partially deleted (−29 nt), and fully deleted ORF8 into a SARS-CoV infectious cDNA clone, strain Frankfurt-1. Replication of the resulting viruses was compared in primate cell cultures as well as Rhinolophus bat cells made permissive for SARS-CoV replication by lentiviral transduction of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. Cells from cotton rat, goat, and sheep provided control scenarios that represent host systems in which SARS-CoV is neither endemic nor epidemic. Independent of the cell system, the truncation of ORF8 (29 nt deletion) decreased replication up to 23-fold. The effect was independent of the type I interferon response. The 29 nt deletion in SARS-CoV is a deleterious mutation acquired along the initial human-to-human transmission chain. The resulting loss of fitness may be due to a founder effect, which has rarely been documented in processes of viral emergence. These results have important implications for the retrospective assessment of the threat posed by SARS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-33487-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Muth, D., Corman, V. M., Roth, H., Binger, T., Dijkman, R., Gottula, L. T., Gloza-Rausch, F., Balboni, A., Battilani, M., Rihtarič, D., Toplak, I., Ameneiros, R. S., Pfeifer, A., Thiel, V., Drexler, J. F., Müller, M. A., & Drosten, C.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-10-11
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
15177-15177
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894950287
Cited by
197
References
5
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attenuation of replication by a 29 nucleotide deletion in SARS-coronavirus acquired during the early stages of human-to-human transmission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-018-33487-8
The paper
Muth, D., Corman, V. M., Roth, H., Binger, T., Dijkman, R., Gottula, L. T., Gloza-Rausch, F., Balboni, A., Battilani, M., Rihtarič, D., Toplak, I., Ameneiros, R. S., Pfeifer, A., Thiel, V., Drexler, J. F., Müller, M. A., & Drosten, C. (2018). Attenuation of replication by a 29 nucleotide deletion in SARS-coronavirus acquired during the early stages of human-to-human transmission. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33487-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.