Cited by 93Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsCognitive Science and Education ResearchCognitive Computing and Networks

Quantum probability in decision making from quantum information representation of neuronal states

Open access
Khrennikov, Andrei, Basieva, Irina, Pothos, Emmanuel M., Yamato, Ichiro·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The recent wave of interest to modeling the process of decision making with the aid of the quantum formalism gives rise to the following question: 'How can neurons generate quantum-like statistical data?' (There is a plenty of such data in cognitive psychology and social science). Our model is based on quantum-like representation of uncertainty in generation of action potentials. This uncertainty is a consequence of complexity of electrochemical processes in the brain; in particular, uncertainty of triggering an action potential by the membrane potential. Quantum information state spaces can be considered as extensions of classical information spaces corresponding to neural codes; e.g., 0/1, quiescent/firing neural code. The key point is that processing of information by the brain involves superpositions of such states. Another key point is that a neuronal group performing some psychological function F is an open quantum system. It interacts with the surrounding electrochemical environment. The process of decision making is described as decoherence in the basis of eigenstates of F. A decision state is a steady state. This is a linear representation of complex nonlinear dynamics of electrochemical states. Linearity guarantees exponentially fast convergence to the decision state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-34531-3

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurons exist in a superposition of states until the collapse of the wave function defines a definite state upon interaction with the soul/spirit particle.

    “These neurons exist in a superposition of states until the CWF defines a definite state upon interaction with the SSP (Khrennikov et al., 2018).”

    From The collapse of the wave function as the mediator of free will in prime neurons (2025) · cites this paper as Khrennikov et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Plotnitsky, A. Quantum atomicity and quantum information: Bohr, Heisenberg, and quantum mechanics as an information theory. In Quantum theory: reconsideration of foundations, 2002, pp. 309–343.
  2. [7]Svozil, K. Quantum logic (Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science), (Springer, Heidelberg-Berlin, 1998)
  3. [29]Penrose, R. The Emperor’s new mind. (Oxford Univ. Press, New-York, 1989)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I., Pothos, E. M., & Yamato, I.
Affiliations
  • ITMO University (RU)
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • Chiba University (JP)
Corresponding author
Khrennikov, Andrei
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
16225-16225
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898390164
Cited by
93
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2015, 696331, RPG-2015-311)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
quantum decision making, quantum-like models, action potential generation, neural code, open quantum systems, decoherence
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Models, Theoretical, Neurons, Quantum Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review