Cited by 34Cancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Association of functional dorsal attention network alterations with breast cancer and chemotherapy

Open access
Shen, Chao-Yu, Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung, Yeh, Dah-Cherng, Huang, Shu-Ling, Zhang, Xuan-Ru, Chai, Jyh-Wen, Huang, Yen-Hsun, Chou, Ming-Chih +1 more·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Adjuvant chemotherapy has significantly reduced mortality but increased cognitive impairments, including attention function, making quality of life issues a crucial concern. This study enrolled nineteen breast cancer patients who were treated with standard chemotherapy within 6 months and 20 sex-matched healthy controls to investigate the brain effects of chemotherapy. All participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with mean fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (mfALFF) analysis and were correlated with neuropsychological tests, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R), and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), to explore the possible underlying mechanism of cognitive alternations. We found increased mfALFF over the frontoparietal lobe and decreased mfALFF over the occipital lobe in the cancer patients compared with the healthy controls; the altered brain regions may be associated with the dorsal attention network (DAN) and may be explained by a compensatory mechanism. Both MMSE and CAMS-R scores showed a positive correlation with mfALFF in the occipital lobe but a negative correlation in the frontoparietal lobe. By contrast, IES-R scores showed a positive correlation with mfALFF in the frontoparietal lobe but a negative correlation in the occipital lobe. These alterations are potentially related to the effects of both chemotherapy and psychological distress. Future research involving a larger sample size of patients with breast cancer is recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-36380-6

Cites

67 of 69 references verified2 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [54]Weiss, D. S. & Marmar, C. R. In Assessing psychologicaltrauma and PTSD: A handbook for practitioners. (eds J. P. Wilson & T. M. Keane) 399–411 (Guilford Press, 1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, C.-Y., Chen, V. C.-H., Yeh, D.-C., Huang, S.-L., Zhang, X.-R., Chai, J.-W., Huang, Y.-H., Chou, M.-C., & Weng, J.-C.
Affiliations
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Cheng Ching Hospital (TW)
  • Chung Shan Medical University (TW)
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • Taipei City Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Weng, Jun-Cheng
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-01-14
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
104-104
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908947102
Cited by
34
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • Chang Gung University (MOST107-2221-E-182-054-MY3, BMRPD1G1321, BMRPD1H0101)
  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation (CORPG6G0101)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2221-E182-079, MOST104-2314-B040-001, MOST107-2221-E182-054-MY3, MOST103-2420-H040-002)
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy, chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment, dorsal attention network, resting-state brain activity, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations, occipital lobe, psychological distress, mindfulness, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Brain, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition Disorders, Drug Therapy, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review