The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Dysbiosis for a Cluster of Chronic Diseases
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of many chronic diseases has increased over the last decades. It has been postulated that dysbiosis driven by environmental factors such as antibiotic use is shifting the microbiome in ways that increase inflammation and the onset of chronic disease. Dysbiosis can be defined through the loss or gain of bacteria that either promote health or disease, respectively. Here we use multiple independent datasets to determine the nature of dysbiosis for a cluster of chronic diseases that includes urinary stone disease (USD), obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease, which often exist as co-morbidities. For all disease states, individuals exhibited a statistically significant association with antibiotics in the last year compared to healthy counterparts. There was also a statistically significant association between antibiotic use and gut microbiota composition. Furthermore, each disease state was associated with a loss of microbial diversity in the gut. Three genera,Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Ruminococcus, were the most common dysbiotic taxa in terms of being enriched or depleted in disease populations and was driven in part by the diversity of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) within these genera. Results of the cross-sectional analysis suggest that antibiotic-driven loss of microbial diversity may increase the risk for chronic disease. However, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the causative effect of diversity loss for chronic disease risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
Origin and physiological roles of inflammation
Medzhitov, R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07201 · Cited by 6,618
Ng, S. C., Shi, H. Y., Hamidi, N., Underwood, F. E., Tang, W., Benchimol, E. I., Panaccione, R., Ghosh, S., Wu, J. C. Y., Chan, F. K. L., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32448-0 · Cited by 6,087
Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease
Wang, Z., Klipfell, E., Bennett, B. J., Koeth, R., Levison, B. S., DuGar, B., Feldstein, A. E., Britt, E. B., Fu, X., Chung, Y.-M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09922 · Cited by 5,597
Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K., & Knight, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11550 · Cited by 5,533
The Human Intestinal Microbiome in Health and Disease
Lynch, S. V., & Pedersen, O. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1600266 · Cited by 3,637
Schnabel, R. B., Yin, X., Gona, P., Larson, M. G., Beiser, A. S., McManus, D. D., Newton-Cheh, C., Lubitz, S. A., Magnani, J. W., Ellinor, P. T., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61774-8 · Cited by 1,746
Immunity, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease
Frostegård, J. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-117 · Cited by 1,040
Cited by
Cullin, N., Azevedo Antunes, C., Straussman, R., Stein-Thoeringer, C. K., & Elinav, E. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.006 · Cited by 578
Functions of Gut Microbiota Metabolites, Current Status and Future Perspectives
Liu, J., Tan, Y., Cheng, H., Zhang, D., Feng, W., & Peng, C. (2022) · Aging and disease · doi:10.14336/ad.2022.0104 · Cited by 529
Polyphenol-Mediated Gut Microbiota Modulation: Toward Prebiotics and Further
Rodríguez-Daza, M. C., Pulido-Mateos, E. C., Lupien-Meilleur, J., Guyonnet, D., Desjardins, Y., & Roy, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.689456 · Cited by 474
Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Pinart, M., Dötsch, A., Schlicht, K., Laudes, M., Bouwman, J., Forslund, S. K., Pischon, T., & Nimptsch, K. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14010012 · Cited by 398
Mechanisms of the intestinal and urinary microbiome in kidney stone disease
Miller, A. W., Penniston, K. L., Fitzpatrick, K., Agudelo, J., Tasian, G., & Lange, D. (2022) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/s41585-022-00647-5 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkins, L. J., Monga, M., & Miller, A. W.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2019-09-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12918-12918
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972558607
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Dysbiosis for a Cluster of Chronic Diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-49452-y
- The paper
- Wilkins, L. J., Monga, M., & Miller, A. W. (2019). Defining Dysbiosis for a Cluster of Chronic Diseases. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49452-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
