Cited by 95Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Recursive patterns in online echo chambers

Open access
Brugnoli, Emanuele, Cinelli, Matteo, Quattrociocchi, Walter, Scala, Antonio·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Despite their entertainment oriented purpose, social media changed the way users access information, debate, and form their opinions. Recent studies, indeed, showed that users online tend to promote their favored narratives and thus to form polarized groups around a common system of beliefs. Confirmation bias helps to account for users’ decisions about whether to spread content, thus creating informational cascades within identifiable communities. At the same time, aggregation of favored information within those communities reinforces selective exposure and group polarization. Along this path, through a thorough quantitative analysis we approach connectivity patterns of 1.2 M Facebook users engaged with two very conflicting narratives: scientific and conspiracy news. Analyzing such data, we quantitatively investigate the effect of two mechanisms (namely challenge avoidance and reinforcement seeking) behind confirmation bias, one of the major drivers of human behavior in social media. We find that challenge avoidance mechanism triggers the emergence of two distinct and polarized groups of users (i.e., echo chambers) who also tend to be surrounded by friends having similar systems of beliefs. Through a network based approach, we show how the reinforcement seeking mechanism limits the influence of neighbors and primarily drives the selection and diffusion of contents even among like-minded users, thus fostering the formation of highly polarized sub-clusters within the same echo chamber. Finally, we show that polarized users reinforce their preexisting beliefs by leveraging the activity of their like-minded neighbors, and this trend grows with the user engagement suggesting how peer influence acts as a support for reinforcement seeking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-56191-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [2]Bessi A Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation PLoS One 2015 10 2 e0118093 10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 25706981 PMC4338055 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Mocanu Delia Rossi Luca Zhang Qian Karsai Marton Quattrociocchi Walter Collective attention in the age of (mis)information Computers in Human Behavior 2015 51 1198 1204 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.024 · DOI
  3. [4]Bessi A Scala A Rossi L Zhang Q Quattrociocchi W The economy of attention in the age of (mis)information Journal of Trust Management 2014 1 12 10.1186/s40493-014-0012-y · DOI
  4. [6]Kuklinski JH Quirk PJ Jerit J Schwieder D Rich RF Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship Journal of Politics 2000 62 790 816 10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]Nyhan B Reifler J When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions Political Behavior 2010 32 303 330 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Nickerson RS Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises Review of General Psychology 1998 2 175 220 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [10]Bakshy E. Messing S. Adamic L. A. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook Science 2015 348 6239 1130 1132 10.1126/science.aaa1160 25953820 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Cinelli, M. et al. Selective exposure shapes the facebook news diet. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1903.00699, 1903.00699 (2019). · arXiv
  9. [13]Sunstein, C. Echo Chambers (Princeton University Press, 2001).
  10. [14]Bastos M Mercea D Baronchelli A The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the brexit campaign PLoS One 2018 13 1 16 10.1371/journal.pone.0206841 PMC6214567 30388169 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [16]Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, 1957).
  12. [17]Garrett RK Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate Journal of Communication 2009 59 676 699 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. [18]Abrams D Wetherell M Cochrane S Hogg MA Turner JC Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization British journal of social psychology 1990 29 97 119 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x 2372667 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [19]Byford J Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction 2011 London Palgrave Macmillan
  15. [20]Fine G Campion-Vincent V Heath C Rumor Mills: The Social Impact of Rumor and Legend 2005 New York Routledge
  16. [21]Hogg MA Blaylock DL Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty 2011 Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons
  17. [22]Betsch C Sachse K Debunking vaccination myths: strong risk negations can increase perceived vaccination risks Health psychology: official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 2013 32 2 146 155 10.1037/a0027387 22409264 · DOI
  18. [23]Bikhchandani S Hirshleifer D Welch I Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1998 12 151 170 10.1257/jep.12.3.151 · DOI
  19. [24]Baddeley M Herding, social influence and expert opinion Journal of Economic Methodology 2013 20 35 44 10.1080/1350178X.2013.774845 · DOI
  20. [25]Kassin SM Dror IE Kukucka J The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2013 2 42 52 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [26]Bessi Alessandro Caldarelli Guido Del Vicario Michela Scala Antonio Quattrociocchi Walter Social Determinants of Content Selection in the Age of (Mis)Information Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2014 Cham Springer International Publishing 259 268
  22. [27]Said SE Dickey DA Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order Biometrika 1984 71 599 607 10.1093/biomet/71.3.599 · DOI
  23. [28]Fuller, W. A. Introduction to Statistical Time Series, Second Edition (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1996).
  24. [29]Dickey DA Fuller WA Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979 74 427 431 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [30]Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., Galbraith, J. & Hendry, D. Co-integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data (Oxford University Press, 1993).
  26. [31]Newman, M. Networks: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2010).
  27. [32]Akaike H Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle 1998 New York, NY Springer New York 199 213
  28. [33]Akaike H A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974 19 716 723 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [34]Sakamoto Y Ishiguro M Kitagawa G Akaike Information Criterion Statistics 1986 Netherlands Springer
  30. [35]Kullback S Leibler RA On information and sufficiency Ann. Math. Statist. 1951 22 79 86 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [36]Granger CWJ Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods Econometrica 1969 37 424 438 10.2307/1912791 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [37]Berndt, D. J. & Clifford, J. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAIWS’94, 359–370, (AAAI Press, 1994).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brugnoli, E., Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., & Scala, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Complex Systems (IT)
  • Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Corresponding author
Brugnoli, Emanuele
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-12-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
20118-20118
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970222193
Cited by
95
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
15.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
echo chambers, confirmation bias, group polarization, selective exposure, social media polarization, Facebook, scientific news, peer influence, information dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review