Cited by 9Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyEnergy and Environment ImpactsHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

Logistic regression analysis of environmental and other variables and incidences of tuberculosis in respiratory patients

Open access
Pathak, Ashutosh K., Sharma, Mukesh, Katiyar, Subodh K., Katiyar, Sandeep, Nagar, Pavan K.·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the association of 14 variables with TB in respiratory patients. The variables included: urban/rural, persons in 1200 sqft area, TB in family, crowding, smoking (family member), gender, age, education, smoking, workplace, kitchen location, cooking fuel, ventilation, and kerosene uses. Eight hundred respiratory patients were tested for sputum positive pulmonary TB; 500 had TB and 300 did not. An analysis of the unadjusted odds ratio (UOR) and adjusted OR (AOR) was undertaken using logistic regression to link the probability of TB incidences with the variables. There was an inconsistency in the significance of variables using UOR and AOR. A subset model of 4 variables (kerosene uses, ventilation, workplace, and gender) based on significant AOR was adjudged acceptable for estimating the probability of TB incidences. Uses of kerosene (AOR 2.62 (1.95, 3.54)) consistently related to incidences of TB. It was estimated that 50% reduction in kerosene uses could reduce the probability of TB by 13.29% in respiratory patients. The major recommendation was to replace kerosene uses from households with a supply of clean fuel like liquid petroleum or natural gas and rural electrification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-79023-5

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [42]Szumilas M Statistical question: odds ratios J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2010 341 3 PMC2938757 20842279
  2. [66]Bates MN Bruce N WHO indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2012 15 396 432 10.1080/10937404.2012.710134 22934567 PMC3664014 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pathak, A. K., Sharma, M., Katiyar, S. K., Katiyar, S., & Nagar, P. K.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Mukesh
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
21843-21843
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112400301
Cited by
9
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, household crowding, residential ventilation, cooking fuel, indoor air pollution, gender, sputum-positive tuberculosis, risk factors, rural electrification, clean cooking fuels
MeSH terms
Adult, Cooking, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Incidence, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review