Cited by 164Hydrology and Drought AnalysisClimate variability and modelsClimate change impacts on agriculture

Increased climate pressure on the agricultural frontier in the Eastern Amazonia–Cerrado transition zone

Open access
Marengo, José A., Jimenez, Juan C., Espinoza, Jhan-Carlo, Cunha, Ana Paula, Aragão, Luiz E. O.·2022·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Several large-scale drivers of both anthropogenic and natural environmental changes are interacting nonlinearly in the transition zone between eastern Amazonia and the adjacent Cerrado, considered to be another Brazilian agricultural frontier. Land-use change for agrobusiness expansion together with climate change in the transition zone between eastern Amazonia and the adjacent Cerrado may have induced a worsening of severe drought conditions over the last decade. Here we show that the largest warming and drying trends over tropical South America during the last four decades are observed to be precisely in the eastern Amazonia–Cerrado transition region, where they induce delayed wet-season and worsen severe drought conditions over the last decade. Our results evidence an increase in temperature, vapor pressure deficit, subsidence, dry-day frequency, and a decrease in precipitation, humidity, and evaporation, plus a delay in the onset of the wet season, inducing a higher risk of fire during the dry-to-wet transition season. These findings provide observational evidence of the increasing climatic pressure in this area, which is sensitive for global food security, and the need to reconcile agricultural expansion and protection of natural tropical biomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-04241-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parts of the western and eastern Amazon forest are becoming wetter, with annual rainfall increasing by up to 20 mm yr−1.

    “By contrast, parts of the western and eastern Amazon forest are becoming wetter, with annual rainfall increasing by up to 20 mm yr−1.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results sections “Regional scale trends over the MATOPIBA” and “Drought and land cover changes” report declining rainfall in the eastern Amazonia–Cerrado transition region and describe eastern Amazonia’s dry and dry-to-wet seasons as becoming drier. The paper does not report the claimed increase of up to 20 mm yr−1 in annual rainfall in parts of the western and eastern Amazon forest. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dry season mean temperature is now more than 2 °C higher than it was 40 years ago in large parts of the central and southeastern Amazon.

    “Dry season mean temperature is now more than 2 °C higher than it was 40 years ago in large parts of the central and southeastern Amazon.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results section, “Compound changes in hydrological and climate variables” (page unavailable), reports warming over four decades in the Eastern Amazonia–Cerrado transition zone, but its July–October trend of 0.38 °C per decade amounts to about 1.5 °C, not more than 2 °C. “Regional scale trends over the MATOPIBA” reports a 1.2 °C change from 1981 to 2020. The copy does not establish the claimed magnitude across large parts of the central and southeastern Amazon. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Past drier climatic conditions were very different from current climatic conditions, in which observed warming trends may exacerbate drought impacts on the forest by exposing trees to unprecedented levels of water stress.

    “Past drier climatic conditions were therefore very different from the current climatic conditions, in which observed warming trends may exacerbate drought impacts on the forest by exposing trees to unprecedented levels of water stress31,32.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (Drought and land cover changes) report that recent warming and drying suggest increasing water stress on vegetation in the eastern Amazonia–Cerrado transition zone. The paper does not establish that past drier climates were very different from current conditions or that trees face unprecedented levels of water stress. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Satellite observations of climatic variability confirm model projections, showing that since the early 1980s, the Amazonian region has been warming significantly at an average rate of 0.27 °C per decade during the dry season, with the highest rates of up to 0.6 °C per decade in the centre and southeast of the biome.

    “Satellite observations of climatic variability31 confirm model projections2, showing that since the early 1980s, the Amazonian region has been warming significantly at an average rate of 0.27 °C per decade during the dry season, with the highest rates of up to 0.6 °C per decade in the centre and southeast of the biome (Fig. 1a).”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These climatic conditions could expose the forest to unprecedented levels of vapour pressure deficit and consequently water stress.

    “These climatic conditions could expose the forest to unprecedented levels of vapour pressure deficit31 and consequently water stress30.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [4]Bullock EL Woodcock CE Souza C Olofsson P Satellite-based estimates reveal widespread forest degradation in the Amazon Glob. Change Biol. 2020 26 2956 2969 32022338
  2. [5]Leite-Filho AT Deforestation reduces rainfall and agricultural revenues in the Brazilian Amazon Nat. Commun. 2021 12 2591 33972530 PMC8110785
  3. [6]Maeda EE Large-scale commodity agriculture exacerbates the climatic impacts of Amazonian deforestation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021 118 7 e2023787118 33558246 PMC7896336
  4. [7]Nobre CA Land-use and climate change risks in the amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016 113 39 10759 10768 27638214 PMC5047175
  5. [8]Lovejoy TE Nobre C Amazon tipping point Sci. Adv. 2018 4 340 PMC5821491 29492460
  6. [9]Silva., P. S. et al. Drivers of burned area patterns in Cerrado: The case of Matopiba region. In IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference (LAGIRS), 542–547 (2020).
  7. [11]Sales LP Galetti M Pires M Climate and land-use change will lead to a faunal “savannization” on tropical rainforests Glob. Change Biol. 2020 26 12 7036 7044 33006792
  8. [12]Sullivan MJ Long-term thermal sensitivity of Earth’s tropical forests Science 2020 368 869 874 32439789
  9. [14]Strassburg B Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017 1 0099 28812670
  10. [19]Alencar AA Brando PM Asner GP Putz FE Landscape fragmentation, severe drought, and the new Amazon Forest fire regime Ecol. Appl. 2015 25 1493 1505 26552259
  11. [23]Gatti LV Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements Nature 2014 506 76 80 24499918
  12. [24]Gutierrez-Cori O On the hydroclimate-vegetation relationship in the southwestern Amazon during the 2000–2019 period Front. Water. 2021 10.3389/frwa.2021.648499 · DOI
  13. [25]Flores BM Holmgren M White-sand savannas expand at the core of the amazon after forest wildfires Ecosystems 2021 24 1624 10.1007/s10021-021-00607-x · DOI · Paper page
  14. [26]Aragão LEOC 21st century drought-related fires counteract the decline of Amazon deforestation carbon emissions Nat. Commun. 2008 9 536 PMC5811599 29440640
  15. [27]Jiménez-Muñoz JC Record-breaking warming and extreme drought in the Amazon rainforest during the course of El Niño 2015–2016 Sci. Rep. 2016 6 2015 2016 PMC5015046 27604976
  16. [28]Libonati RC DaCamara L Peres LAS Garcia LC Rescue Brazil’s burning Pantanal wetlands Nature 2020 588 217 219 33293715
  17. [33]Gloor M Recent Amazon climate as background for possible ongoing and future changes of Amazon humid forests Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 2015 10.1002/2014GB005080 · DOI
  18. [38]Gatti, L. V. et al. Decrease in Amazonia carbon uptake linked to trends in deforestation and climate. Nature, In Press (2021). 34262208
  19. [40]Marcuzzo FFN Chuvas no Cerrado da região Centro-Oeste do Brasil: análise histórica e tendência futura Ateliê Geogr. J. 2012 6 2 112 130 10.5216/ag.v6i2.15234 · DOI
  20. [44]Spera S Land-use change affects water recycling in Brazil’s last agricultural frontier Glob. Change Biol. 2016 22 10 3405 3413 27028754
  21. [45]Soares-Filho BS Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin Nature 2006 440 7083 520 16554817
  22. [46]Cox PM Increasing risk of Amazonian drought due to decreasing aerosol pollution Nature 2008 453 212 215 18464740
  23. [47]Parsons LA Implications of CMIP6 projected drying trends for 21st century Amazonian drought risk Earth’s Future 2020 8 e2020EF001608 10.1029/2020EF001608 · DOI
  24. [51]Reis L Influence of climate variability on soybean yield in Matopiba, Brazil Atmosphere 2020 11 1130 10.3390/atmos11101130 · DOI
  25. [52]Yuan W Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth Sci. Adv. 2019 10.1126/sciadv.aax1396 31453338 PMC6693914 · DOI
  26. [55]Fu R Increased dry season length over southern Amazonia in recent decades and its implication for future climate projection Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013 110 45 18110 18115 24145443 PMC3831494
  27. [56]Espinoza JC Recent changes in the atmospheric circulation patterns during the dry-to-wet transition season in south tropical South America (1979–2020): Impacts on precipitation and fire season J. Clim. 2021 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0303.1 · DOI
  28. [58]Nepstad D The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures Nature 1994 372 666 669 10.1038/372666a0 · DOI
  29. [60]Zalles V Rapid expansion of human impact on natural land in South America since 1985 Sci. Adv. 2021 10.1126/sciadv.abg1620 33811082 PMC11057777 · DOI
  30. [61]Calmon, D. P. G. Shifting frontiers spatial adaptations of agribusiness to political contestations and the making of Matopiba. In 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies, Brasilia, UnB, 33 (2018).
  31. [62]Song XP Hansen MC Potapov P (2021) Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation Nat. Sustain. 2021 4 784 PMC8350977 34377840
  32. [63]Soterroni AC Expanding the soy moratorium to Brazil’s Cerrado Sci. Adv. 2019 5 7 7336 PMC6636994 31328157
  33. [64]Marengo JA Tomasella J Alves LM Soares WR Rodriguez DA The drought of 2010 in the context of historical droughts in the Amazon region Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011 38 12 12703 10.1029/2011gl047436 · DOI
  34. [66]Funk C The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—A new environmental record for monitoring extremes Sci. Data 2015 2 150066 26646728 PMC4672685
  35. [67]Paca VHDM Variability of trends in precipitation across the Amazon river basin determined from the CHIRPS precipitation product and from station records Water 2020 12 1244 10.3390/w12051244 · DOI
  36. [69]Monteith JL Unsworth MH Principles of Environmental Physics 2013 4 Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marengo, J. A., Jimenez, J. C., Espinoza, J.-C., Cunha, A. P., & Aragão, L. E. O.
Affiliations
  • Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais (BR)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Corresponding author
Marengo, José A.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-01-10
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
457-457
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206360607
Cited by
164
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
FWCI
13.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion)
  • Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
CNPq (465501/2014-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
climate change, agricultural frontier, drought, vapor pressure deficit, subsidence, precipitation decrease, evaporation, fire risk, land use change, food security, tropical biomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review