The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of cognitive impairment following chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer survival rates have markedly improved. Consequently, survivorship issues have received increased attention. One common sequel of treatment is chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI). CICI causes a range of impairments that can have a significant negative impact on quality of life. Knowledge of the prevalence of this condition is required to inform survivorship plans, and ensure adequate resource allocation and support is available for sufferers, hence a systematic review of prevalence data was performed. Medline, Scopus, CINAHL and PSYCHInfo were searched for eligible studies which included prevalence data on CICI, as ascertained though the use of self-report, or neuropsychological tests. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed. Findings were synthesised narratively, with meta-analyses being used to calculate pooled prevalence when impairment was assessed by neuropsychological tests. The review included 52 studies. Time-points considered ranged from the chemotherapy treatment period to greater than 10 years after treatment cessation. Summary prevalence figures (across time-points) using self-report, short cognitive screening tools and neuropsychological test batteries were 44%, 16% and 21–34% respectively (very low GRADE evidence). Synthesised findings demonstrate that 1 in 3 breast cancer survivors may have clinically significant cognitive impairment. Prevalence is higher when self-report based on patient experience is considered. This review highlights a number of study design issues that may have contributed to the low certainty rating of the evidence. Future studies should take a more consistent approach to the criteria used to assess impairment. Larger studies are urgently needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177
Munn, Z., Moola, S., Lisy, K., Riitano, D., & Tufanaru, C. (2015) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000054 · Cited by 3,131
Hunter, J. P., Saratzis, A., Sutton, A. J., Boucher, R. H., Sayers, R. D., & Bown, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.003 · Cited by 786
Breast Cancer Survivorship, Quality of Life, and Late Toxicities
Nardin, S., Mora, E., Varughese, F. M., D'Avanzo, F., Vachanaram, A. R., Rossi, V., Saggia, C., Rubinelli, S., & Gennari, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00864 · Cited by 330
Buwalda, B., & Schagen, S. B. (2013) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2012.12.012 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Haller, O. J., Semendric, I., George, R. P., Collins-Praino, L. E., & Whittaker, A. L. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105120 · Cited by 13
Self-citationKuil, L. E., Varkevisser, T. M. C. K., Huisman, M. H., Jansen, M., Bunt, J., Compter, A., Ket, H., Schagen, S. B., Meeteren, A. Y. N. S.-V., & Partanen, M. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105514 · Cited by 4
Hoad, K. L., Ton, C., Williamson, D., Subar, D. A., Nuttall, H. E., & Gaffney, C. J. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0341996
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittaker, A. L., George, R. P., & O’Malley, L.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2022-02-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2135-2135
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220752235
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of cognitive impairment following chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-022-05682-1
- The paper
- Whittaker, A. L., George, R. P., & O’Malley, L. (2022). Prevalence of cognitive impairment following chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05682-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.