Cited by 22Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

CombPDX: a unified statistical framework for evaluating drug synergism in patient-derived xenografts

Open access
Huang, Licai, Wang, Jing, Fang, Bingliang, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Roth, Jack A., Ha, Min Jin·2022·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Anticancer combination therapy has been developed to increase efficacy by enhancing synergy. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as reliable preclinical models to develop effective treatments in translational cancer research. However, most PDX combination study designs focus on single dose levels, and dose–response surface models are not appropriate for testing synergism. We propose a comprehensive statistical framework to assess joint action of drug combinations from PDX tumor growth curve data. We provide various metrics and robust statistical inference procedures that locally (at a fixed time) and globally (across time) access combination effects under classical drug interaction models. Integrating genomic and pharmacological profiles in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we have shown the utilities of combPDX in discovering effective therapeutic combinations and relevant biological mechanisms. We provide an interactive web server, combPDX ( https://licaih.shinyapps.io/CombPDX/ ), to analyze PDX tumor growth curve data and perform power analyses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-16933-6

Cites

55 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In CombPDX, TV data at a single day are used to calculate a local CI, and the average of all local CI values is the global CI.

    “TV data at a single day were used to calculate a local CI, the average of all local CI values is the global CI (27).”
  • Huang and colleagues established CombPDX as a statistical framework for Bliss independence, HSA, and response additive models, with Bliss CI equivalent to Wu and colleagues and HSA and RA newly introduced.

    “More recently, Huang and colleagues established CombPDX as a statistical framework for three synergy models: Bliss independence, HSA, and response additive (RA; ref. 27), their definition of Bliss CI is equivalent to that in Wu and colleagues (24), while HSA and RA were newly introduced.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, L., Wang, J., Fang, B., Meric-Bernstam, F., Roth, J. A., & Ha, M. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ha, Min Jin
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-07-29
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
12984-12984
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288694721
Cited by
21
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5U54CA224065-04)
  • National Institutes of Health,United States (2P50CA070907-21A1)
  • Yonsei University College of Medicine (2022-32-0029)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
drug synergy, patient-derived xenografts, combination therapy, tumor growth curves, non-small cell lung cancer, statistical inference, power analysis, anticancer drug combination
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Synergism, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Heterografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review