Cited by 39Gut microbiota and healthCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCancer survivorship and care

Impacts of breast cancer and chemotherapy on gut microbiome, cognitive functioning, and mood relative to healthy controls

Open access
Bilenduke, Emily, Sterrett, John D., Ranby, Krista W., Borges, Virginia F., Grigsby, Jim, Carr, Alaina L., Kilbourn, Kristin, Lowry, Christopher A.·2022·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy experience cognitive impairment, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and physical side effects including disruption in the diversity and community composition of the gut microbiome. To date, there is limited research exploring the associations among these specific challenges. The present cross-sectional study explored the associations of self-reported cognitive functioning, depression, and anxiety symptoms, and gut microbiome diversity and community composition in women who were diagnosed with and undergoing chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer (BC) compared to cancer-free healthy controls (HC). The BC group displayed higher rates of cognitive dysfunction (p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (p < 0.05) relative to HC. There was a significant difference in microbiome community composition between BC and HC, particularly characterized by a decreased relative abundance of the mucin-degrading genus Akkermansia in BC compared to HC (p < 0.05). Association models identified significant associations among group, cognitive, depression, and microbiome variables (p < 0.001). Overall, the study identified that BC participants experienced significant differences in self-reported cognitive functioning, self-reported depression symptoms, microbiome community composition, and mucin-degrading bacteria of the gut-mucosal barrier, relative to HC. The present study is consistent with the hypothesis that gut microbiome community composition impacts a woman's experience with breast cancer and treatment suggesting that microbiome-based interventions have potential for improving quality of life outcomes in individuals with breast cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-23793-7

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy experience disruption in gut microbiota diversity and composition, cognitive impairment, and symptoms of stress such as anxiety and depression.

    “Women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy experience disruption in GM diversity and composition, cognitive impairment, and symptoms of stress, such as anxiety and depression (450).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Lezak MD Howieson DB Loring DW Fischer JS Neuropsychological Assessment 2004 Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bilenduke, E., Sterrett, J. D., Ranby, K. W., Borges, V. F., Grigsby, J., Carr, A. L., Kilbourn, K., & Lowry, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Bilenduke, Emily
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-11-15
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
19547-19547
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309192274
Cited by
39
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Cancer Prevention and Control (CPC) Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
breast cancer, chemotherapy, gut microbiota, cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, Akkermansia, mucin-degrading bacteria, gut mucosal barrier, microbiome diversity, women's health, quality of life
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Mucins, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review