Cited by 24Gait Recognition and AnalysisBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Quantitative gait analysis and prediction using artificial intelligence for patients with gait disorders

Open access
Ben Chaabane, Nawel, Conze, Pierre-Henri, Lempereur, Mathieu, Quellec, Gwenolé, Rémy-Néris, Olivier, Brochard, Sylvain, Cochener, Béatrice, Lamard, Mathieu·2023·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) is considered as an objective measure of gait performance. In this study, we aim at designing an artificial intelligence that can efficiently predict the progression of gait quality using kinematic data obtained from QGA. For this purpose, a gait database collected from 734 patients with gait disorders is used. As the patient walks, kinematic data is collected during the gait session. This data is processed to generate the Gait Profile Score (GPS) for each gait cycle. Tracking potential GPS variations enables detecting changes in gait quality. In this regard, our work is driven by predicting such future variations. Two approaches were considered: signal-based and image-based. The signal-based one uses raw gait cycles, while the image-based one employs a two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (2D FFT) representation of gait cycles. Several architectures were developed, and the obtained Area Under the Curve (AUC) was above 0.72 for both approaches. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to apply neural networks for gait prediction tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-49883-8

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Ataullah, A. H. M. & De Jesus, O. Gait Disturbances. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2022). 32809445
  2. [20]Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben Chaabane, N., Conze, P.-H., Lempereur, M., Quellec, G., Rémy-Néris, O., Brochard, S., Cochener, B., & Lamard, M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-12-28
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
23099-23099
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390336556
Cited by
24
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Followknee (ANR-17- RHUS-0005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
quantitative gait analysis, gait disturbance, Gait Profile Score, kinematic data, artificial neural networks, two-dimensional fast Fourier transform, gait cycle, gait database
MeSH terms
Gait Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Biomechanical Phenomena, Fourier Analysis, Gait, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review