Cited by 16Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Lessons learned from RadiologyNET foundation models for transfer learning in medical radiology

Open access
Napravnik, Mateja, Hržić, Franko, Urschler, Martin, Miletić, Damir, Štajduhar, Ivan·2025·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Deep learning models require large amounts of annotated data, which are hard to obtain in the medical field, as the annotation process is laborious and depends on expert knowledge. This data scarcity hinders a model's ability to generalise effectively on unseen data, and recently, foundation models pretrained on large datasets have been proposed as a promising solution. RadiologyNET is a custom medical dataset that comprises 1,902,414 medical images covering various body parts and modalities of image acquisition. We used the RadiologyNET dataset to pretrain several popular architectures (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, VGG16, EfficientNetB3, EfficientNetB4, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, MobileNetV3Small and MobileNetV3Large). We compared the performance of ImageNet and RadiologyNET foundation models against training from randomly initialiased weights on several publicly available medical datasets: (i) Segmentation-LUng Nodule Analysis Challenge, (ii) Regression-RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge, (iii) Binary classification-GRAZPEDWRI-DX and COVID-19 datasets, and (iv) Multiclass classification-Brain Tumor MRI dataset. Our results indicate that RadiologyNET-pretrained models generally perform similarly to ImageNet models, with some advantages in resource-limited settings. However, ImageNet-pretrained models showed competitive performance when fine-tuned on sufficient data. The impact of modality diversity on model performance was tested, with the results varying across tasks, highlighting the importance of aligning pretraining data with downstream applications. Based on our findings, we provide guidelines for using foundation models in medical applications and publicly release our RadiologyNET-pretrained models to support further research and development in the field. The models are available at https://github.com/AIlab-RITEH/RadiologyNET-TL-models .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-05009-w

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [6]Woerner, S. & Baumgartner, C. F. Navigating data scarcity using foundation models: A benchmark of few-shot and zero-shot learning approaches in medical imaging. In Foundation Models for General Medical AI (Deng, Z. et al., eds), 30–39. 10.1007/978-3-031-73471-74 (Springer, 2025). · DOI
  2. [14]Silva-Rodríguez, J., Dolz, J. & Ayed, I.B. Towards foundation models and few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning for volumetric organ segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention: MICCAI 2023 Workshops, 213–224. 10.1007/978-3-031-47401-921 (Springer, 2023). 40347917 · DOI
  3. [15]Zhou, H.-Y. et al. Comparing to Learn: Surpassing ImageNet pretraining on radiographs by comparing image representations. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention: MICCAI 2020, 398–407. 10.1007/978-3-030-59710-839 (Springer, 2020). · DOI
  4. [22]Cheplygina, V., de Bruijne, M. & Pluim, J. P. W. Not-so-supervised: A survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 54, 280–296 (2019). 30959445 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [25]Tan, M. & Le, Q. EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 6105–6114 (PMLR, 2019).
  6. [39]Siragusa, I., Contino, S., Ciura, M.L., Alicata, R. & Pirrone, R. Medpix 2.0: A comprehensive multimodal biomedical data set for advanced ai applications with retrieval augmented generation and knowledge graphs (2025). http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02994. · arXiv
  7. [42]Glorot, X. & Bengio, Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 9, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 249–256 (PMLR, 2010).
  8. [60]Saunshi, N., Plevrakis, O., Arora, S., Khodak, M. & Khandeparkar, H. A theoretical analysis of contrastive unsupervised representation learning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97, (Chaudhuri, K. & Salakhutdinov, R., eds) Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 5628–5637 (PMLR, 2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Napravnik, M., Hržić, F., Urschler, M., Miletić, D., & Štajduhar, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Rijeka (HR)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Hržić, Franko
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
21622-21622
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411864741
Cited by
15
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (IP-2020-02-3770)
  • University of Rijeka (uniri-mladi- tehnic-23-19 3070)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
foundation models, transfer learning, data scarcity, medical image classification, medical image segmentation, ImageNet pre-trained models, resource-limited settings, lung nodule segmentation, bone age assessment, COVID-19 detection
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review