Cited by 297Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence Applications

Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology

Open access
Sarwar, Shihab, Dent, Anglin, Faust, Kevin, Richer, Maxime, Djuric, Ugljesa, Van Ommeren, Randy, Diamandis, Phedias·2019·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Advancements in computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) carry the potential to make significant contributions to health care, particularly in diagnostic specialties such as radiology and pathology. The impact of these technologies on physician stakeholders is the subject of significant speculation. There is however a dearth of information regarding the opinions, enthusiasm, and concerns of the pathology community at large. Here, we report results from a survey of 487 pathologist-respondents practicing in 54 countries, conducted to examine perspectives on AI implementation in clinical practice. Despite limitations, including difficulty with quantifying response bias and verifying identity of respondents to this anonymous and voluntary survey, several interesting findings were uncovered. Overall, respondents carried generally positive attitudes towards AI, with nearly 75% reporting interest or excitement in AI as a diagnostic tool to facilitate improvements in workflow efficiency and quality assurance in pathology. Importantly, even within the more optimistic cohort, a significant number of respondents endorsed concerns about AI, including the potential for job displacement and replacement. Overall, around 80% of respondents predicted the introduction of AI technology in the pathology laboratory within the coming decade. Attempts to identify statistically significant demographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex, type/place of practice) predictive of attitudes towards AI using Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) testing revealed several associations. Important themes which were commented on by respondents included the need for increasing efforts towards physician training and resolving medical-legal implications prior to the generalized implementation of AI in pathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-019-0106-0

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies exploring the implementation of these models have focused on surveying clinician perspectives on future rollout.

    “Previous studies exploring the implementation of these models have focused on surveying clinician perspectives on future rollout [42,49-51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Kononenko I Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective Artif. Intell. Med 2001 23 89 109 10.1016/S0933-3657(01)00077-X 11470218 · DOI
  2. [2]Silver D Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search Nature 2016 529 484 489 10.1038/nature16961 26819042 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Silver, D. H. et al. Mastering chess and shogi by self-play with a general reinforcement learning algorithm. arXiv.org arXiv:1712.01815, 1–19 (2017). · arXiv
  4. [4]Raghu, A. K. et al. Reinforcement learning for sepsis treatment. arXiv.org arXiv:1711.09602 (2017). · arXiv
  5. [7]Halicek ML Deep convolutional neural networks for classifying head and neck cancer using hyperspectral imaging J. Biomed. Opt. 2017 22 1 4 10.1117/1.JBO.22.6.060503 PMC5482930 28655055 · DOI
  6. [8]Huynh BL Giger H M. Digital mammographic tumor classification using transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks J. Med. Imaging 2016 3 1 5 PMC4992049 27610399
  7. [9]Fujisawa Y Deep learning-based, computer-aided classifier developed with a small dataset of clinical images surpasses board-certified dermatologists in skin tumor diagnosis Br. J. Dermatol 2018 180 373 381 10.1111/bjd.16924 29953582 · DOI
  8. [11]Gulshan V Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs JAMA 2016 316 2402 2410 10.1001/jama.2016.17216 27898976 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [12]Bychkov D Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer Sci. Rep. 2018 8 3395 10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 29467373 PMC5821847 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Veta M Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images Med. Image Anal. 2015 20 237 248 10.1016/j.media.2014.11.010 25547073 · DOI
  11. [14]Xie QF Deep learning for image analysis: Personalizing medicine closer to the point of care Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2019 56 61 73 10.1080/10408363.2018.1536111 30628494 · DOI
  12. [15]Sirinukunwattana K Locality Sensitive Deep Learning for Detection and Classification of Nuclei in Routine Colon Cancer Histology Images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2016 35 1196 1206 10.1109/TMI.2016.2525803 26863654 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [16]Ciresan DC Giusti A Gambardella LM Schmidhuber J Mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images with deep neural networks Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Inter. 2013 16 411 418 24579167
  14. [17]Faust KX Visualizing histopathologic deep learning classification and anomaly detection using nonlinear feature space dimensionality reduction BMC Bioinforma. 2018 19 1 15 10.1186/s12859-018-2184-4 PMC5956828 29769044 · DOI
  15. [18]Robertson S Azizpour H Smith K Hartman J Digital image analysis in breast pathology-from image processing techniques to artificial intelligence Transl. Res. 2018 194 19 35 10.1016/j.trsl.2017.10.010 29175265 · DOI
  16. [19]Zhou ZH Jiang Y Yang YB Chen SF Lung cancer cell identification based on artificial neural network ensembles Artif. Intell. Med. 2002 24 25 36 10.1016/S0933-3657(01)00094-X 11779683 · DOI
  17. [20]Wang D Khosla A Gargeya R Irshad H Beck AH Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer arXiv 2016 1606 05718
  18. [21]Coudray NO Classification and mutation prediction from non–small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning Nat. Med. 2018 24 1559 1567 10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5 30224757 PMC9847512 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [24]Djuric U Zadeh G Aldape K Diamandis P Precision histology: how deep learning is poised to revitalize histomorphology for personalized cancer care npj Precisi. Oncol. 2017 22 1 5 PMC5871847 29872706
  20. [25]Ching, T. et al. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J R Soc Interface 15, pii: 20170387 (2018). PMC5938574 29618526
  21. [27]Griffin J Treanor D Digital pathology in clinical use: where are we now and what is holding us back? Histopathology 2017 70 134 145 10.1111/his.12993 27960232 · DOI
  22. [29]Kornstein MJ Byrne SP The medicolegal aspect of error in pathology: a search of jury verdicts and settlements Arch. Pathol. Lab Med 2007 131 615 618 17425394

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarwar, S., Dent, A., Faust, K., Richer, M., Djuric, U., Van Ommeren, R., & Diamandis, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Diamandis, Phedias
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2019-04-26
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
28-28
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940900531
Cited by
297
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 7
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Society of Clinical Oncology Conquer Cancer Foundation The Brain Tumour Foundation of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, diagnostic pathology, clinical implementation of AI, workflow efficiency, quality assurance, physician training, medical-legal implications, computer vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review