Cited by 34Digital Mental Health InterventionsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effectiveness of a Stand-Alone, Smartphone-Based Virtual Reality Exposure App to Reduce Fear of Heights in Real-Life: A Randomized Trial

Open access
Bentz, Dorothée, Wang, Nan, Ibach, Merle K., Schicktanz, Nathalie S., Zimmer, Anja, Papassotiropoulos, Andreas, de Quervain, Dominique J. F.·2021·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Smartphone-based virtual reality (VR) applications (apps) might help to counter low utilization rates of available treatments for fear of heights. Demonstration of effectiveness in real-life situations of such apps is crucial, but lacking so far. Objective of this study was to develop a stand-alone, smartphone-based VR exposure app-Easy Heights-and to test its effectiveness in a real-life situation. We performed a single-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. We recruited 70 participants with fear of heights, aged 18-60 years. Primary outcome was performance in a real-life Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT) on a lookout tower after a single 1-h app use (phase 1) and after additional repeated (6 × 30 min) app use at home (phase 2). After phase 2, but not phase 1, participants in the Easy Heights condition showed significantly higher BAT scores compared to participants in the control condition (Cohen's d = 1.3, p = 0.0001). Repeated use of our stand-alone, smartphone-based VR exposure app reduces avoidance behavior and fear, providing a low-threshold treatment for fear of heights.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-021-00387-7

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, freely available dedicated VRET applications for acrophobia or claustrophobia treatment are either not scientifically validated or developed for clinical use, or share a technological bias of being delivered through a smartphone-powered interface, such as the Easy Heights application.

    “Currently, freely available dedicated VRET applications for acrophobia or claustrophobia treatment are either not scientifically validated or developed for clinical use [37,44], or share a technological bias of being delivered through a smartphone-powered interface, such as the Easy Heights application [45].”

    From SAFEvR MentalVeRse.app: Development of a Free Immersive Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia and Claustrophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Bandelow, B. et al. Deutsche S-3 Leitlinie zur Behandlung von Angststörungen (Springer, 2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bentz, D., Wang, N., Ibach, M. K., Schicktanz, N. S., Zimmer, A., Papassotiropoulos, A., & de Quervain, D. J. F.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
16-16
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126186173
Cited by
34
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
Universität Basel
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fear of heights, acrophobia, virtual reality exposure therapy, behavioral avoidance, avoidance behavior, low-threshold treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review