Cited by 148Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Intention to treat analysis in clinical trials when there are missing data

Open access
Streiner, David, Geddes, John·2001·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

Intention to treat analysis in clinical trials when there are missing data

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmh.4.3.70

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An intention-to-treat approach was used with imputation of missing data by last value carried forward.

    “An intention-to-treat approach was used with imputation of missing data by last value carried forward (Streiner & Geddes, 2001).”

    From Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors. (2019) · cites this paper as Streiner & Geddes, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Streiner, D., & Geddes, J.
Affiliations
Editors, Evidence-Based Mental Health
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
70-71
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W2150091817
Cited by
148
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
intention-to-treat analysis, missing data, clinical trials, missing data mechanisms, bias in treatment effect estimation
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review