The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of palliative care but heterogeneity amongst existing systematic reviews presents a challenge for evidence synthesis. This meta-review applied a structured search of ten databases from 2006 to 2020, revealing 21 relevant systematic reviews, encompassing 332 publications. Interventions delivered via videoconferencing (17%), electronic healthcare records (16%) and phone (13%) were most frequently described in studies within reviews. DHIs were typically used in palliative care for education (20%), symptom management (15%), decision-making (13%), information provision or management (13%) and communication (9%). Across all reviews, mostly positive impacts were reported on education, information sharing, decision-making, communication and costs. Impacts on quality of life and physical and psychological symptoms were inconclusive. Applying AMSTAR 2 criteria, most reviews were judged as low quality as they lacked a protocol or did not consider risk of bias, so findings need to be interpreted with caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was already evidence for the utility of digital health interventions for education and training, with online learning and video-conferencing playing a critical role.”
From Feasibility of RESTORE: An online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention to improve palliative care staff wellbeing. (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008 · Cited by 10,636
Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions
Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16 · Cited by 3,053
The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview
Black, A. D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Anandan, C., Cresswell, K., Bokun, T., McKinstry, B., Procter, R., Majeed, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationEffectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews
Ekeland, A. G., Bowes, A., & Flottorp, S. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,162
Ross, J., Stevenson, F., Lau, R., & Murray, E. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7 · Cited by 1,011
Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift
Greenhalgh, T., & Papoutsi, C. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1089-4 · Cited by 962
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Avati, A. et al. Improving palliative care with deep learning. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 18, 55–64 (2018). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whitehead, L., Talevski, J., Fatehi, F., & Beauchamp, A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42719 · Cited by 305
Palliative care to support the needs of adults with neurological disease
Kluger, B. M., Hudson, P., Hanson, L. C., Bužgová, R., Creutzfeldt, C. J., Gursahani, R., Sumrall, M., White, C. M., Oliver, D., Pantilat, S. Z., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00129-1 · Cited by 110
Steindal, S. A., Nes, A. A. G., Godskesen, T., Holmen, H., Winger, A., Österlind, J., Dihle, A., & Klarare, A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/43684 · Cited by 118
Identification of Digital Health Priorities for Palliative Care Research: Modified Delphi Study
Nwosu, A. C., McGlinchey, T., Sanders, J. J., Stanley, S., Palfrey, J., Lubbers, P., Chapman, L., Finucane, A., & Mason, S. R. (2021) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/32075 · Cited by 68
Self-citationMay, S., Bruch, D., Gehlhaar, A., Linderkamp, F., Stahlhut, K., Heinze, M., Allsop, M. J., & Muehlensiepen, F. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08802-9 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Finucane, A. M., O’Donnell, H., Lugton, J., Gibson-Watt, T., Swenson, C., & Pagliari, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Finucane, Anne M.
- Venue
- npj Digital Medicine
- Published
- 2021-04-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-64
- ISSN
- 2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8024379
- OpenAlex
- W3140442677
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Marie Curie
- University of Edinburgh
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- digital health interventions, palliative care, videoconferencing, electronic health records, telephone-delivered intervention, symptom management, patient education, shared decision-making, information sharing, quality of life, review quality, AMSTAR 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
