Cited by 344Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Digital medicine and the curse of dimensionality

Open access
Berisha, Visar, Krantsevich, Chelsea, Hahn, P. Richard, Hahn, Shira, Dasarathy, Gautam, Turaga, Pavan, Liss, Julie·2021·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Digital health data are multimodal and high-dimensional. A patient’s health state can be characterized by a multitude of signals including medical imaging, clinical variables, genome sequencing, conversations between clinicians and patients, and continuous signals from wearables, among others. This high volume, personalized data stream aggregated over patients’ lives has spurred interest in developing new artificial intelligence (AI) models for higher-precision diagnosis, prognosis, and tracking. While the promise of these algorithms is undeniable, their dissemination and adoption have been slow, owing partially to unpredictable AI model performance once deployed in the real world. We posit that one of the rate-limiting factors in developing algorithms that generalize to real-world scenarios is the very attribute that makes the data exciting—their high-dimensional nature. This paper considers how the large number of features in vast digital health data can challenge the development of robust AI models—a phenomenon known as “the curse of dimensionality” in statistical learning theory. We provide an overview of the curse of dimensionality in the context of digital health, demonstrate how it can negatively impact out-of-sample performance, and highlight important considerations for researchers and algorithm designers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-021-00521-5

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has not been enough publicly available audio or video examples of speech and language disorders to develop AI systems that work well for children or adults with these disorders.

    “First, and perhaps most critically, there has not been enough publicly available audio or video examples of speech and language disorders to develop AI systems that work well for children or adults with these types of disorders (e.g., Benway et al., 2023;Berisha et al., 2021;Shahin et al., 2020).”

    From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Berisha et al., 2021

    The Introduction says clinical speech databases are often small, with tens or hundreds of patients and only a few minutes of speech per person, making speech-based clinical AI challenging. The cited paper does not establish that publicly available audio or video examples of speech and language disorders are insufficient, or specifically assess AI performance for children and adults with those disorders. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The more complex the association between the input and the output, the more data are needed to avoid overfitting and ensure a tool will work well in the future.

    “The more complex the association between the input and the output, the more data are needed to avoid overfitting and ensure a tool will work well in the future (Berisha et al., 2021), which highlights the importance of machine learning experimental design for data-scarce clinical AI (Ghasemzadeh et al., 2024).”
  • High dimensionality of data may be a rate-limiting factor in development of algorithms capable of generalizing to real-world scenarios.

    “The high dimensionality of data that makes it attractive to research may, at the same time, be a rate-limiting factor in the development of algorithms capable of generalizing to real-world scenarios45.”
  • Dataset blind spots can hurt model performance in terms of real-life prediction and should be considered early in the model development and evaluation process.

    “These dataset blind spots can hurt model performance in terms of real-life prediction and should therefore be considered early in the model development and evaluation process 123”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [123]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Koutroumbas, K. & Theodoridis, S. Pattern Recognition (4th Ed.). (Elsevier Inc., Burlington, 2009).
  2. [47]Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J. & Szegedy, C. Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berisha, V., Krantsevich, C., Hahn, P. R., Hahn, S., Dasarathy, G., Turaga, P., & Liss, J.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Berisha, Visar
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2021-10-28
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
153-153
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208504364
Cited by
344
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 30
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (5R01DC006859)
  • United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-1-2826)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
curse of dimensionality, digital health data, high-dimensional data, artificial intelligence models, out-of-sample generalization, model robustness, multimodal health data, clinical decision support, wearable device data, diagnostic imaging, clinical factors, genome sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review