Cited by 168Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

A systematic literature review of automatic Alzheimer’s disease detection from speech and language

Open access
Petti, Ulla, Baker, Simon, Korhonen, Anna·2020·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective: In recent years numerous studies have achieved promising results in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) detection using automatic language processing. We systematically review these articles to understand the effectiveness of this approach, identify any issues and report the main findings that can guide further research. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science for articles published in English between 2013 and 2019. We performed a systematic literature review to answer 5 key questions: (1) What were the characteristics of participant groups? (2) What language data were collected? (3) What features of speech and language were the most informative? (4) What methods were used to classify between groups? (5) What classification performance was achieved? Results and Discussion: We identified 33 eligible studies and 5 main findings: participants’ demographic variables (especially age ) were often unbalanced between AD and control group; spontaneous speech data were collected most often; informative language features were related to word retrieval and semantic, syntactic, and acoustic impairment; neural nets, support vector machines, and decision trees performed well in AD detection, and support vector machines and decision trees performed well in decline detection; and average classification accuracy was 89% in AD and 82% in mild cognitive impairment detection versus healthy control groups. Conclusion: The systematic literature review supported the argument that language and speech could successfully be used to detect dementia automatically. Future studies should aim for larger and more balanced datasets, combine data collection methods and the type of information analyzed, focus on the early stages of the disease, and report performance using standardized metrics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocaa174

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [25]Mitchell TM. Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math; 1997: xv– xvii.
  2. [29]Fang C, Janwattanapong P, Martin H, et al Computerized neuropsychological assessment in mild cognitive impairment based on natural language processing-oriented feature extraction. In: proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine; November 13–17, 2017; Kansas City.
  3. [30]Ammar R, Ayed Y. Speech processing for early Alzheimer disease diagnosis: machine learning based approach. In: proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications; October 28–November 1, 2018; Aqaba, Jordan.
  4. [33]Chien YW, Hong SY, Cheah WT, et al An assessment system for Alzheimer’s disease based on speech using a novel feature sequence design and recurrent neural network. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics; October 7–10, 2018; Miyazaki, Japan.
  5. [36]Gosztolya G, Toth L, Grosz T, et al Detecting mild cognitive impairment from spontaneous speech by correlation-based phonetic feature selection. Interspeech 2016 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307889002_Detecting_Mild_Cognitive_Impairment_from_Spontaneous_Speech_by_Correlation-Based_Phonetic_Feature_Selection Accessed February 2020
  6. [38]Guinn C, Singer B, Habash A. A comparison of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in spoken language among residents with Alzheimer’s disease in managed-care facilities. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and e-Health, Proceedings; December 9–12, 2014; Orlando, FL.
  7. [40]Khodabakhsh A, Kuscuoglu S, Demiroglu C. Detection of Alzheimer’s disease using prosodic cues in conversational speech. In: 22nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference; April 23–25, 2014; Trabzon, Turkey.
  8. [41]Khodabakhsh A, Kusxuoglu S, Demiroglu C. Natural language features for detection of Alzheimer’s disease in conversational speech. In: 2014 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics; June 1–4, 2014; Valencia, Spain.
  9. [51]Rentoumi V, Paliouras G, Danasi E, et al Automatic detection of linguistic indicators as a means of early detection of Alzheimer’s disease and of related dementias: a computational linguistics analysis. In: 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom; September 11–14, 2017; Debrecen, Hungary.
  10. [52]Sadeghian R, Schaffer JD, Zahorian SA. Speech processing approach for diagnosing dementia in an early stage. Interspeech 2017 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319185628_Speech_Processing_Approach_for_Diagnosing_Dementia_in_an_Early_Stage Accessed February 2, 2020
  11. [54]Toth L, Hoffmann I, Gosztolya G, et al A speech recognition-based solution for the automatic detection of mild cognitive impairment from spontaneous speech. Curr Alzheimer’s Res 2018; 15 (2): 130– 8. PMC5815089 29165085

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petti, U., Baker, S., & Korhonen, A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Petti, Ulla
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2020-09-14
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1784-1797
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W3087538850
Cited by
168
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council Cambridge Doctoral Training Partnership (ES/P000738/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease detection, dementia detection, speech analysis, linguistic analysis, spontaneous speech, semantic impairment, syntactic impairment, mild cognitive impairment, disease progression detection, classification performance
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Alzheimer Disease, Artificial Intelligence, Decision Trees, Humans, Language Disorders, Language Tests, Natural Language Processing, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review