The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 29 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare. In surgery, AI applications hold promise as tools to predict surgical outcomes, assess technical skills, or guide surgeons intraoperatively via computer vision. On the other hand, AI systems can also suffer from bias, compounding existing inequities in socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, religion, gender, disability, or sexual orientation. Bias particularly impacts disadvantaged populations, which can be subject to algorithmic predictions that are less accurate or underestimate the need for care. Thus, strategies for detecting and mitigating bias are pivotal for creating AI technology that is generalizable and fair. Here, we discuss a recent study that developed a new strategy to mitigate bias in surgical AI systems.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This commentary discusses bias in AI-based medical applications, focusing on surgical AI systems (SAIS) that assess surgeon skill from robotic surgery videos. It highlights the TWIX add-on strategy developed by Kiyasseh et al., which mitigated SAIS bias, and surveys future challenges and regulatory efforts around bias detection and mitigation.
Key findings
- Kiyasseh et al. deployed SAIS on videos of robotic surgeries from three hospitals to assess surgeon skill (e.g., needle handling, needle driving); the model reliably assessed performance but exhibited bias, showing underskilling (erroneously downgrading performance) and overskilling (erroneously upgrading performance) at different rates across surgeon sub-cohorts, measured via negative and positive predictive values respectively.
- The TWIX add-on taught SAIS to predict the importance of video clips used for skill assessment, hypothesizing that bias arose from the system latching onto unreliable frames; TWIX mitigated SAIS bias, improving performance both for disadvantaged surgeon sub-cohorts and for surgical skill assessments overall.
- Bias is generally defined as a difference in performance between subgroups for a predictive task, and can arise across data collection/preparation, model development, evaluation, and clinical deployment.
- The paper notes open questions: what level of bias is acceptable, whether models should be more generalizable (larger, more diverse datasets) or more localized, and the risk that continuously learning/adaptive models may increase or add new bias if new data are biased.
Methods
- This is a commentary/perspective article, not a primary study; it discusses a recent study (Kiyasseh et al.) that developed TWIX to mitigate bias in surgical AI systems.
- It reviews bias mitigation categories (pre-processing via sampling, in-processing via mathematical approaches, post-processing, and "keeping the human in the loop") and regulatory developments, including the STANDING Together initiative (launched September 2022) and the FDA's AI/ML-Based SaMD Action Plan (January 2021) and draft guidance on predetermined change control plans.
- No primary data, sample, or statistical analysis are reported by this paper.
Limitations
- The paper does not state formal limitations for itself; it is a commentary without primary data or quantitative results of its own.
- Evident from the text: all empirical claims about SAIS and TWIX are attributed to the Kiyasseh et al. study rather than independently tested here, and the discussion of acceptable bias thresholds, generalizability versus localization, and adaptive-model risks is framed as unresolved questions rather than settled findings.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
19 Not checked yet · 3 Own interpretation · 1 Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Bias can be generated across AI model development steps, including data collection/preparation, model development, model evaluation, and deployment in clinical settings9.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Vokinger, K. N., Feuerriegel, S. & Kesselheim, A. S. Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine. Commun. Med. 1, 25 (2021). source
The Conclusion states that bias can occur across the listed steps, from data collection and preparation through post-authorization deployment in clinical practice. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
In the paper
“Further, to meet regulatory challenges that come with continuously adopting AI models, the FDA recently released a draft guidance to develop a less burdensome regulatory approach supporting the iterative improvement of, e.g., AI models while continuing to assure their safety and effectiveness20.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > A look into the future—challenges with continuously learning AI models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] FDA. Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Enabled Device Software Functions. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/marketing-submission-recommendations-predetermined-change-control-plan-artificial (2023).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, there are likely underlying social inequalities in healthcare access and expenditures that impact how a model might be trained to predict risk6,10.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y. & Ghassemi, M. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nat. Med. 27, 2176–2182 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Panch, T., Mattie, H. & Atun, R. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: implications for health systems. J. Glob. Health 9, 010318 (2019). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On the other hand, AI systems can also suffer from bias, compounding existing inequities in socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, religion, gender, disability, or sexual orientation.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y. & Ghassemi, M. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nat. Med. 27, 2176–2182 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Yang, J., Soltan, A. A. S., Eyre, D. W., Yang, Y. & Clifton, D. A. An adversarial training framework for mitigating algorithmic biases in clinical machine learning. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 55 (2023). source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 447–453 (2019). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: AI systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare.
- Rests on an assumption: The issue of bias being exhibited, perpetuated, or even amplified by AI algorithms is an increasing concern within healthcare.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bias particularly impacts disadvantaged populations, which can be subject to algorithmic predictions that are less accurate or underestimate the need for care.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y. & Ghassemi, M. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nat. Med. 27, 2176–2182 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Yang, J., Soltan, A. A. S., Eyre, D. W., Yang, Y. & Clifton, D. A. An adversarial training framework for mitigating algorithmic biases in clinical machine learning. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 55 (2023). source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 447–453 (2019). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: AI systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare.
In the paper
“TWIX is an add-on application that taught the SAIS model to add a prediction of the importance of video clips that was used to assess surgical skill.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kiyasseh, D. et al. Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 54 (2023). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Currently, there is significant heterogeneity in terms of the datasets AI algorithms are trained with within algorithm types themselves13,14.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > A look into the future—challenges with continuously learning AI models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Gubatan, J. et al. Artificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: emerging technologies and future directions. World J. Gastroenterol. 27, 1920–1935 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Moglia, A., Georgiou, K., Georgiou, E., Satava, R. M. & Cuschieri, A. A systematic review on artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery. Int. J. Surg. 95, 106151 (2021). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kiyasseh et al.4 highlight this potential application in their work deploying surgical AI systems (SAIS) on videos of robotic surgeries from three hospitals.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Bias in medical AI algorithms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kiyasseh, D. et al. Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 54 (2023). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“With their SAIS model, Kiyasseh et al.4 developed a strategy called TWIX to mitigate bias.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kiyasseh, D. et al. Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 54 (2023). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The SAIS model showed an underskilling or overskilling bias at different rates across surgeon sub-cohort.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Bias in medical AI algorithms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kiyasseh, D. et al. Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 54 (2023). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 6
- It may state two separate claims as one. 6
In the paper
“Similar cases have already been seen in healthcare systems8.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 447–453 (2019). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In applying this AI model, Kiyasseh et al.4 found that it could reliably assess surgical performance but exhibited bias.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Bias in medical AI algorithms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kiyasseh, D. et al. Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 54 (2023). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Regardless of the cause, the impact of an algorithm disproportionately assigning false negatives would include fewer follow-up scans, and potentially more undiagnosed/untreated cancer cases, worsening health inequity for an already disadvantaged population.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This accomplishment is beneficial not only for this particular use case but also implies that this type of bias mitigation strategy could be used to continue to improve AI applications in the future.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“The STANDING Together initiative (standards for data diversity, inclusivity, and generalizability), launched in September 2022, aims to develop recommendations for the composition (who is represented) and reporting (how they are represented) of datasets underpinning medical AI systems18.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > A look into the future—challenges with continuously learning AI models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Ganapathi, S. et al. Tackling bias in AI health datasets through the STANDING Together initiative. Nat. Med. 28, 2232–2233 (2022). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Bias mitigation strategies may involve interventions such as pre-processing data through sampling before a model is built, in-processing by implementing mathematical approaches to incentivize a model to learn balanced predictions, and post-processing11.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Xu, J. et al. Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine. EBioMedicine 84, 104250 (2022). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In surgery, AI applications hold promise as tools to predict surgical outcomes, assess technical skills, or guide surgeons intraoperatively via computer vision.”
- Also stated in: § Bias in medical AI algorithms · plain
“Specifically, within the field of surgery, AI applications hold promise as tools to predict surgical outcomes1, aid surgeons via computer vision for intraoperative surgical navigation2, and even as algorithms to assess technical skills and surgical performance1,3–5.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Ma, R. et al. Surgical gestures as a method to quantify surgical performance and predict patient outcomes. NPJ Digital Med. 5, 187 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Chadebecq, F., Vasconcelos, F., Mazomenos, E. & Stoyanov, D. Computer vision in the surgical operating room. Visc. Med. 36, 456–462 (2020). source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Kiyasseh, D. et al. A multi-institutional study using artificial intelligence to provide reliable and fair feedback to surgeons. Commun. Med. 3, 42 (2023). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: AI systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare.
- Also stated in: § Bias in medical AI algorithms · plain
In the paper
“As part of the FDA Action Plan, the FDA intends to support the piloting of real-world performance monitoring19, allowing for the detection of bias after deployment.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > A look into the future—challenges with continuously learning AI models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] FDA. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan. www.fda.gov/media/145022/download (2021).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Kiyasseh et al.4 found that TWIX mitigated SAIS model bias, improving model performance both for the disadvantaged surgeon sub-cohorts and for surgical skill assessments overall.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Kiyasseh, D. et al. Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 54 (2023). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, the FDA has recognized challenges due to bias in AI and ML algorithms and released an action plan (“Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan”) in January 20219,19, emphasizing the importance of identifying and mitigating bias in AI systems9.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > A look into the future—challenges with continuously learning AI models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Vokinger, K. N., Feuerriegel, S. & Kesselheim, A. S. Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine. Commun. Med. 1, 25 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [19] FDA. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan. www.fda.gov/media/145022/download (2021).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Previous groups suggested that any performance discrepancy is indicative of algorithmic bias, but expecting completely bias-free systems before implementation is unrealistic12.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > A look into the future—challenges with continuously learning AI models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Townson, S. Manage AI Bias Instead of Trying to Eliminate It. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/manage-ai-bias-instead-of-trying-to-eliminate-it/2023 (MIT Sloan Management Review, 2023).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TWIX requiring model predictions of video clip importance served a similar role to human assessors explaining the rationale for assessments.”
§ Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies > Strategies to mitigate bias
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
AI systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare.
“Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare.”
“Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is increasingly applied to healthcare, from AI-augmented clinical research to algorithms for image analysis or disease prediction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The integration of AI into medical technology and healthcare systems is only going to increase in the coming years.
“The integration of AI into medical technology and healthcare systems is only going to increase in the coming years.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Performance discrepancy may differ based on the data and population an AI algorithm is trained on and then subsequently applied to.
“Performance discrepancy may also differ based on the data and population an AI algorithm is trained on and then subsequently applied to.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The issue of bias being exhibited, perpetuated, or even amplified by AI algorithms is an increasing concern within healthcare.
“The issue of bias being exhibited, perpetuated, or even amplified by AI algorithms is an increasing concern within healthcare.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that racial and ethnic biases impact the use of AI/ML in medical imaging, diagnosis, and prognosis due to biases in healthcare databases [78, 154].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, scientists can (and should) take steps to understand sources of bias and control them, especially those that can lead to discrimination, stigmatization, harm, or injustice [89, 154, 188].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“These systems can amplify and perpetuate biases present in the training data, leading to skewed predictions and potentially harmful implications for patient care.6,7”
From Balancing innovation and integrity: the role of AI in research and scientific writing (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“This is concerning, as biases in AI models can emerge during various stages, from data collection to model evaluation.7”
From Balancing innovation and integrity: the role of AI in research and scientific writing (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · cited 1×
“Similar cases have already been seen in healthcare systems 8 .”
Benjamens, S., Dhunnoo, P., & Meskó, B. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0 · Cited by 1,215 · cited 1×
“An AI algorithm can either be locked — once the algorithm is trained, the model provides the same result when the same input is applied — or adaptive 16 .”
Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01595-0 · Cited by 928 · cited 2×
“Bias is usually de fi ned as a difference in performance between sub-groups for a predictive task 6,7 .”
Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: implications for health systems
Panch, T., Mattie, H., & Atun, R. (2019) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.09.020318 · Cited by 533 · cited 1×
“Additionally, there are likely underlying social inequalities in healthcare access and expenditures that impact how a model might be trained to predict risk 6,10 .”
Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine
Vokinger, K. N., Feuerriegel, S., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2021) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-021-00028-w · Cited by 269 · cited 2×
“…challenges due to bias in AI and ML algorithms and released an action plan ( “ Arti fi cial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)- Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan ” ) in January 2021 9,19 , emphasizing the importance of identifying and mitigating bias in AI systems 9 .”
A systematic review on artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery
Moglia, A., Georgiou, K., Georgiou, E., Satava, R. M., & Cuschieri, A. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106151 · Cited by 236
Latent bias and the implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine
DeCamp, M., & Lindvall, C. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa094 · Cited by 198 · cited 1×
“However, continuous learning also possesses the risk of increasing or adding new bias if the new data are biased 17 .”
Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine
Xu, J., Xiao, Y., Wang, W. H., Ning, Y., Shenkman, E. A., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2022) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104250 · Cited by 170 · cited 1×
“Bias mitigation strategies may involve interventions such as pre-processing data through sampling before a model is built, in-processing by implementing mathematical approaches to incentivize a model to learn balanced predictions, and post-processing 11 .”
An adversarial training framework for mitigating algorithmic biases in clinical machine learning
Yang, J., Soltan, A. A. S., Eyre, D. W., Yang, Y., & Clifton, D. A. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00805-y · Cited by 159 · cited 1×
“Bias is usually de fi ned as a difference in performance between sub-groups for a predictive task 6,7 .”
A vision transformer for decoding surgeon activity from surgical videos
Kiyasseh, D., Ma, R., Haque, T. F., Miles, B. J., Wagner, C., Donoho, D. A., Anandkumar, A., & Hung, A. J. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01010-8 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 376
Onah, C. O., Chukwuemeka, O. A., Yusuff, T. A., Abraham, E. E., Mounange-Badimi, M. S., Oladosu, T. A., & Okpalanwaka, I. F. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.95928 · Cited by 3
Garcia, E., Adam, M. K., Dow, E. R., Minaker, S. A., Scarboro, S. D., Storey, P. P., Wood, E. H., Abousy, M., Wykoff, C. C., & Al-khersan, H. (2025) · Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases · doi:10.1177/24741264251381990 · Cited by 3
Lai, C., Yin, M., Kholmovski, E. G., Sani, M. M., Gilotra, N. A., Chrispin, J., & Trayanova, N. A. (2025) · JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2025.10.009 · Cited by 2
Bias-Mitigated AI as a Foundation for Resilient and Effective Health Systems
Júnior, J. B. D. S., Birminghamm, M., Rivière-Cinnamond, A., Boisson, E., Valdez, M. L., García-Saisó, S., Souza, J. P., Martí, M., Richards, L.-M. L.-M., Guzman, J., et al. (2025) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/88457 · Cited by 4
Khalique, N., Nasir, M., Ahmed, S. I., & Siddiqui, K. (2026) · Indian Journal of Community Medicine · doi:10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_7_25 · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing in Healthcare
Manokaran, S., Vyshnavi, T., Maiya, U. C., Shashidhara, A., Reddy, A. H. M., & Basori, A. H. (2026) · Signals and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03554-7_5 · Cited by 2
Wenderott, K., Krups, J., & Weigl, M. (2026) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003639 · Cited by 5
Huang, T., Kirk, B., Close, J., Lim, J.-Y., Duque, G., Ebeling, P. R., Yang, M., Tian, M., Chui, C. S., Liu, C., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging · doi:10.3389/fragi.2026.1712785 · Cited by 2
Sarin, A., Seffren, C. M., Shwaib, H., Matos, M. C., Eisenstein, S. G., Ferrara, M., Patel, N. M., & Langenfeld, S. J. (2026) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000004138 · Cited by 2
Bias Patterns in the Application of LLMs for Clinical Decision Support
Poulain, R., Adiba, F. I., Fayyaz, H., & Beheshti, R. (2026) · Delaware Journal of Public Health · doi:10.32481/djph.2026.03.10 · Cited by 32
Tracing the Pen: Electronic Health Records Amid the Rise of Generative AI
Nargesi, A. A., You, J. G.-T., Bitterman, D. S., Succi, M. D., Mishuris, R. G., Poon, E. G., & Landman, A. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02508-6 · Cited by 3
Extending the Fundamental Theorem of Biomedical Informatics for the AI era
Payne, P., Chen, J. H., & Longhurst, C. (2026) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocag065 · Cited by 2
Sadozai, S. K., & Soylak, M. (2026) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2026.119029 · Cited by 2
The Precariousness of Academic Publishing in a Digital World
Saugmann, P. M. (2024) · European Review · doi:10.1017/s1062798723000613 · Cited by 3
Simmons, Z., Bruce, C., Thomas, S. M., Lacey, P., Marsh, W., Rosenberg, S., & Duval, D. (2025) · IFLA Journal · doi:10.1177/03400352251342513 · Cited by 2
Albanna, H., Tamang, M. T., Patel, C., & Sharif, M. S. (2025) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2025.101664 · Cited by 3
RetractedIdakwo, V. O. (2025) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-025-00187-z · Cited by 3
Li, W., Ahmed, S. B., Park, Y., & Duc, K. D. (2025) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf134 · Cited by 3
von Gerich, H., Chomutare, T., Kytö, V., Lundberg, P., Siggaard, T., & Peltonen, L.-M. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251395536 · Cited by 3
Are ChatGPT and Copilot Reliable for Health Education on Statistical Testing?Preprint
Rovetta, A., & Mansournia, M. A. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.03.08.24304007 · Cited by 2
Kim, Y. J., Hahn, S., Kim, K. J., Yang, E., Kim, J., Lee, S., Han, C. H., Won, J.-Y., Ahn, B. E., Mun, Y., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.20.25334022 · Cited by 2
The illusion of diagnostic agreement: Institutional bias as a hidden force in modern medicine
Fogt, F. (2025) · Medicinski pregled · doi:10.2298/mpns2508127f · Cited by 3
Ethical Considerations in AI-Enabled Healthcare
Mishra, V., Lurie, Y., & Mark, S. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80813-5_18 · Cited by 1
Goldberg, D. G., Soylu, T. G., Hoffman, C. F., Kishton, R. E., & Cronholm, P. F. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251334043 · Cited by 1
Feedback and Assessment Methods in Microsurgery Education: A Scoping Review
Abbas, M. Y., Haas, J., Huang, E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · doi:10.1055/a-2616-4370 · Cited by 1
Xiong, Y., Zeng, Y.-M., Liu, H.-N., Sun, Y., Tang, W., & Liu, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1582377 · Cited by 1
Magyary, Á., Mészáros, N. Z., Szondy, M., Demetrovics, Z., & Zsila, Á. (2025) · Springer series on cultural computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86551-0_16 · Cited by 1
Maity, D., Satish, R., Dharmaraju, R., Chandru, V., Sundaresan, R., Singh, H., & Pal, D. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03092-7 · Cited by 2
van Dorsten, R. T., & Breiman, R. F. (2025) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1625818 · Cited by 1
Microbes and artificial intelligence
Akinsemolu, A. A., & Onyeaka, H. N. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-24040-9.00008-2 · Cited by 1
Singh, R., Kassis, G., Sbaih, O. I., Li, H., Shahrestani, S., Lawton, M. T., Gottfried, O. N., Bydon, M., & Stone, J. J. (2025) · Operative Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000001751 · Cited by 1
A comprehensive survey of AI trust frameworks in healthcare: current state and future directions
Eke, C. I., Shuib, L. M., & Phiri, M. (2025) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1007/s10742-025-00351-y · Cited by 2
Sociodemographic drivers of care disparity among patients with inborn errors of immunity
Neary, C. M., Ong, M.-S., & Farmer, J. R. (2025) · Current Opinion in Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/mop.0000000000001506 · Cited by 1
Minian, N., Mehra, K., Rose, J., Veldhuizen, S., Zawertailo, L. A., Ratto, M., Ting‐A‐Kee, R. A., Melamed, O. C., Tang, V. M., & Selby, P. L. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251380324 · Cited by 1
Health Care for All: Combating Bias in Generative AI for Fair Medical Outcomes
ELKarazle, K., Raman, V., Chua, C., & Then, P. (2025) · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96518-0_2 · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence in endoscopy: navigating risk, responsibility and ethical challenges
Olabintan, O., Fearnley, L., Iniesta, R., Mori, Y., Gulati, S., Haji, A., Habli, I., & Hayee, B. (2025) · Frontline Gastroenterology · doi:10.1136/flgastro-2025-103107 · Cited by 1
Applications of AI and machine learning in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment
Handa, S., Chatterjee, M., Jan, N., & Mir, M. A. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-27801-3.00008-9 · Cited by 1
Maximizing impact of explainable artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: a critical review
Heising, L. M., Wolfs, C. J. A., Ou, C. X. J., Hoebers, F. J. P., van Limbergen, E. J., Verhaegen, F., & Jacobs, M. J. G. (2026) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ae25b2 · Cited by 2
Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence-powered patient counseling
Patne, A. Y., & Suryawanshic, M. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-43823-3.00011-x · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence in UK Hospital Medicine: From Innovation to Implementation
Carroll, D., Boodhoo, V., Lowe, D. J., & Carlin, C. M. (2025) · British Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12968/hmed.2025.0468 · Cited by 1
AI-guided wound closure: complementing surgical judgment
Khizar, M., Zaib, M. S., Nisa, N.-U., Karimi, H., & Aminpoor, H. (2026) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1097/ms9.0000000000004724 · Cited by 1
Hubel, N. J., van der Heijden, T. G. W., Murauer, B., de Rooij, B. H., de Ligt, K. M., Verkooijen, H. M., Gernaat, S. A. M., Hoedjes, M., Arndt, V., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/81424 · Cited by 2
Falelakis, T., Dimara, A., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17040326 · Cited by 2
KI-Algorithmen – intraoperatives hämodynamisches Monitoring von morgen?
Dehbozorgi, M., Zental, N., Larmann, J., & Grüßer, L. (2026) · AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie · doi:10.1055/a-2617-6321 · Cited by 1
Shi, H., Wang, H., Zheng, S., Xiao, W., Ju, M., Zhao, Q., & Huang, H. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261450812 · Cited by 2
Clinical Evidence and FDA Recalls of Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Medical Devices
Ren, Y., Zheng, Y., Windecker, D., Fraser, A. G., Siontis, G. C. M., & Caiani, E. G. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.17920 · Cited by 3
Yang, Y., Qi, J., & Ji, X. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2683905 · Cited by 2
Jeong, I. H., Kim, H., & Hwang, H. (2026) · Kosin Medical Journal · doi:10.7180/kmj.26.173 · Cited by 1
Misuse of Generative AI in Academic and Research Publishing
Tang, B. L. (2026) · Publishing Research Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s12109-026-10074-8 · Cited by 1
Subphenotypes in critical illness: a priori biological rationale is key. Author’s reply
Yang, J., Huang, J., Hong, Y., et al. (2024) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-023-07316-0 · Cited by 1
Analysis of Security Methods for Medical Data in Cloud Systems
Pîrnău, M., Priescu, I., Joița, D., et al. (2024) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62502-2_61 · Cited by 1
Mitigating Sex Bias in Audio Data-Driven COPD and COVID-19 Breathing Pattern Detection Models
Pfeifer, R., Vhaduri, S., & Dietz, J. E. (2024) · Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks · doi:10.1109/bsn63547.2024.10780524 · Cited by 1
The need for ethical guidelines in mathematical research in the time of generative AI
Pantsar, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00660-5 · Cited by 1
Senel, B. (2025) · International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy · doi:10.33457/ijhsrp.1649066 · Cited by 1
Toward Robust Clinical AI in Clinical Imaging
Corso, G. D., Colantonio, S., Mirsky, Y., Fotopoulos, D. T., & Papanikolaou, N. K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89963-8_9 · Cited by 1
Representation and Bias in Artificial Intelligence Models for Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review
Ramchandani, R., Guo, E., Biglou, S. G., Sabbah, S. G., Mostowy, M., Mahiny, D., Hurtubise, C., Anicho‐Okereke, G., Shorr, R., Caulley, L., et al. (2025) · Thyroid · doi:10.1177/10507256251372175 · Cited by 1
Kılınç, S. (2025) · Future education and learning spaces · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9251-4_2 · Cited by 2
Rotteveel, A., Lee, W., Kountouri, Z., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.19.624273 · Cited by 1
Maheshwari, A., Motta, M., & Lui, K. (2025) · Newborn · doi:10.5005/newborn-4-1-iv · Cited by 1
PREFER-IT: A transdisciplinary co-created framework to realise inclusive medical AIPreprint
Ferreira, P. P., Longarón, S. S., Bouisaghouane, W., Goris, J., Hoekman, A. H., Markos, B., Maus, B., Pozzi, G., Hasan, H., Kalinauskaitė, I., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.11.03.25339443 · Cited by 1
Whose Knowledge Counts? Co-Designing Community-Centered AI Auditing Tools with Educators in Hawai'i
Zhao, D., Cha, H., Ryan, M. J., Wang, A., Baker-Ramos, R., Helekahi-Kaiwi, E.-B., Diego, R., Hester, J. D., & Yang, D. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790958 · Cited by 1
Li, M., Xiong, X., Xu, B., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.53918
Pfisterer, K. J., Saha, S., Fossat, Y., Grossman, M. R., Wong, A. M., Yadollahi, A., Wang, B., Garg, A., Dinu, L. M., Kale, D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.54559
Parmanto, B., Aryoyudanta, B., Soekinto, T. W., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.54633
Catalyzing Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Ai Advancements in Mammography
Haider, S. (2023) · Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology · doi:10.14744/ejmo.2023.93033
Santana, G. O., Couto, R. D. M., Loureiro, R. M., Silva, B. C. R., de Paula, L. G. N., Rother, E. T., de Paiva, J. P. Q., & Correia, L. R. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.56240
Li, W., Ahmed, S., Park, Y., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.03.27.24304781
Dunlap, P. A. B., & Michalowski, M. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.62678
Strategic Overhaul: Reframing Data Integration for Optimal AI UtilizationPreprint
Mariyono, D., & Hidayatullah, A. N. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4892176
Namireddy, S. R., Gill, S. S., Peerbhai, A., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4643800/v1
Advancing Equitable AI in Radiology through Contrastive Learning
Johnson, P. M. (2024) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.240530
Navigating the Future of Healthcare
Musunuri, R. L., & Bhatt, A. (2024) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8552-4.ch003
EQUISCALE: Equitable Scaling for Abstention Learning
Chaudhari, T. B., & Manwani, N. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0116-5_2
Preiksaitis, C. M., Nash, C. J., Gottlieb, M. A., Chan, T. M., Alvarez, A., & Landry, A. I. (2024) · doi:10.32920/27922152.v1
Preiksaitis, C. M., Nash, C. J., Gottlieb, M. A., Chan, T. M., Alvarez, A., & Landry, A. I. (2024) · doi:10.32920/27922152
Transforming Healthcare Data: How OpenEHR is Revolutionizing AI-Driven Business Analytics
Cunha, J., Duarte, R., Lopes, J., et al. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.170
Toward Mitigating Sex Bias in Pilot Trainees' Stress and Fatigue Modeling
Pfeifer, R., Vhaduri, S., Wilson, M. D., & Keller, J. C. (2024) · Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks · doi:10.1109/bsn63547.2024.10780736
Ángulo-Bazán, Y. (2024) · ACTA MEDICA PERUANA · doi:10.35663/amp.2024.413.3328 · Cited by 2
Advances in AI-Enhanced Biomedical Imaging for Cancer Immunology
Yim, W. W., Wee, F. Y. T., Ho, Z. Y., Feng, X., Zhang, M., Lee, S., Zlobec, I., Yeong, J. P.-S., & Lau, M. C. (2024) · World Scientific Annual Review of Cancer Immunology · doi:10.1142/s2972389224300044 · Cited by 1
Wayne, M. T., Pilli, S., Choi, H. J., Moulton, N. G., Chenna, P., Burks, A. C., & Chen, A. J. (2025) · Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1177/17534666251314724
Learn from AI: The pursuit of objectivity
Wang, F., Marouli, A., Charoenwongwatthana, P., & Chang, C. (2025) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1093/lambio/ovaf021 · Cited by 1
Alves, B., Alhussein, G., Riggare, S. S., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.73710
AI and public health: Charting a path to smarter decision-making
Kapoor, M. (2025) · Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances · doi:10.30574/gjeta.2025.23.1.0132 · Cited by 1
Multimorbidity Measurement Strategies for Predicting Hospital Visits
Neves, B., Moreira, J. M., Gonçalves, S., Cerejo, J., Mota, I., Silva, N. A., Leite, F., & Silva, M. J. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6515465/v1
Traffic Light Coding System for Engaging With AI in Surgery
Mukherjee, P., Beheshti, A., Kumar, S. A., Wallace, G. G., Merrett, N. D., Clark, J. R., Kos, S., Rawstron, E., Yang, J. Y., Grieve, S. M., et al. (2025) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.70172
Judijanto, L. (2025) · Science of law. · doi:10.55284/4r3qs710 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Bangla: LLM Approaches to Gender Based Medical Specialty Prediction
Hemel, R. I., Asef, M., & Tamiti, T. I. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11022612
Lundholm, M. K. (2025) · Sociologisk Forskning · doi:10.37062/sf.62.27832
Assuring Intelligent Medical Devices: AI Assurance Cases
Khadka, A., Epiphaniou, G., & Maple, C. R. (2025) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti250679
Investigating the utility of large language models for image-based rare disease phenotyping
Yoon, J. G. (2025) · Journal of genetic medicine · doi:10.5734/jgm.2025.22.1.7
CNN–WPT model for the efficient heartbeat classification
Saxena, S., Tahilramani, N., Paunwala, C. N., & Rizvi, A. Z. (2025) · Iran Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42044-025-00292-2
AI Project Facilitation Guidance for Research Computing and Data (RCD) Professionals
Alber, A., Briggs, L., Brunk, P., Joshi, M., Kamble, A., Kefi, A., Middelkoop, T., Sarajlic, S., Sokovic, A. M., Valdez, J. N., et al. (2025) · Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing · doi:10.1145/3708035.3736061
Luise, D. L. D., & Cippitelli, S. (2025) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95044-5_1
Gu, W., Xu, H., Gu, T., Li, X., Zhang, P., Liu, B., Li, X., & Yu, Z. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.81058
Data Privacy and Ethical Challenges in AI‐Driven Cancer Care
Jawed, F., Aziz, R., Ansari, S., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1002/9781394270613.ch12
Künstliche Intelligenz in der Diagnostik und Behandlung des kolorektalen Karzinoms
Kather, J. N. (2025) · Die Onkologie · doi:10.1007/s00761-025-01832-y
Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Family Medicine
Shahin, D., Sostorecz, S., Shariff, A., Ng-Pellegrino, A., & Goodbred, A. (2025) · Artificial intelligence · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1012619
Roadmap for Representative Artificial Intelligence Models for Thyroid Cancer
Ramchandani, R., Guo, E., Biglou, S. G., Sabbah, S. G., Mostowy, M., Mahiny, D., Hurtubise, C., Anicho‐Okereke, G., Shorr, R., Caulley, L., et al. (2025) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.70169
Between Trust and Tension: Psychosocial Impact of AI Integration on Health Professionals' Wellbeing
Huma, Z. E., Sania, A., Doolittle, B. R., & Sohail, M. M. (2025) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.1177/00912174251387812 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mittermaier, M., Raza, M. M., & Kvedar, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mittermaier, Mirja
- Venue
- npj Digital Medicine
- Published
- 2023-06-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-113
- ISSN
- 2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10264403
- OpenAlex
- W4380538374
- Semantic Scholar
- 3e2fd4f099046ad3b61d8cad107d5883dc52370a
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Berlin Institute of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, bias mitigation, health care equity, algorithmic fairness, surgical outcome prediction, generalizability, disadvantaged groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
