Cited by 121Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Artificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: Emerging technologies and future directions

Open access
Gubatan, John, Levitte, Steven, Patel, Akshar, Balabanis, Tatiana, Wei, Mike T, Sinha, Sidhartha R·2021·World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex and multifaceted disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that is increasing in incidence worldwide and associated with significant morbidity. The rapid accumulation of large datasets from electronic health records, high-definition multi-omics (including genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metagenomics), and imaging modalities (endoscopy and endomicroscopy) have provided powerful tools to unravel novel mechanistic insights and help address unmet clinical needs in IBD. Although the application of artificial intelligence (AI) methods has facilitated the analysis, integration, and interpretation of large datasets in IBD, significant heterogeneity in AI methods, datasets, and clinical outcomes and the need for unbiased prospective validations studies are current barriers to incorporation of AI into clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent advances in the application of AI and machine learning technologies in the diagnosis and risk prediction, assessment of disease severity, and prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with IBD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3748/wjg.v27.i17.1920

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gubatan, J., Levitte, S., Patel, A., Balabanis, T., Wei, M. T., & Sinha, S. R.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
27
Issue
17
Pages
1920-1935
ISSN
1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157079437
Cited by
121
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
inflammatory bowel disease, artificial intelligence, machine learning, diagnosis, risk prediction, disease severity assessment, clinical outcome prediction, multi-omics data, endoscopy, endomicroscopy, electronic health records, clinical validation
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Colitis, Humans, Prospective Studies, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review