Cited by 26Electronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Continuous multimodal data supply chain and expandable clinical decision support for oncology

Open access
Chang, Jee Suk, Kim, Hyunwook, Baek, Eun Sil, Choi, Jeong Eun, Lim, Joon Seok, Kim, Jin Sung, Shin, Sang Joon·2025·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

The study introduces a clinical decision support system (CDSS) developed at a single academic cancer center, integrating real-time clinical, genomic, and imaging data for over 170,000 patients across 11 cancer types. We have developed the Yonsei Cancer Data Library (YCDL) data integration framework to continuously collect and update multimodal datasets comprising over 800 features per case. Quality control measures, using 143 logical comparisons, addressed missing data and outliers, achieving median accuracies of 92.6% for surgical and 98.7% for molecular pathology. An Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) process with natural language processing transformed unstructured data, enabling survival analyses stratified by tumor stage, which revealed significant stage-dependent differences. The CDSS dashboard visualizes patient trajectories and key milestones. User feedback from oncology professionals showed strong acceptance, with satisfaction scores exceeding 4 out of 5. This framework demonstrates the potential of multimodal data integration to enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes, with future research needed to validate its generalizability and scalability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-025-01508-2

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obtaining sufficient paired multimodal data in healthcare is challenging due to linking distinct modality-specific resources to the same patient or clinical encounter and inherent data fragmentation in healthcare systems.

    “In healthcare, obtaining sufficient paired data is challenging due to the complexities associated with linking distinct modality-specific resources to the same patient or clinical encounter26, coupled with inherent data fragmentation in healthcare systems27.”

    From MoMA: a mixture-of-multimodal-agents architecture for enhancing clinical prediction modelling (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Methods (Development of multimodal data supply chain; page unavailable) describe matching source data using patient and encounter identifiers, and the Discussion says manually collating many features is challenging. These passages support the difficulty of assembling linked patient data, but do not establish that obtaining sufficient paired multimodal data is difficult specifically because of that linkage. The fragmentation clause has a separate citation in the citing sentence and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, J. S., Kim, H., Baek, E. S., Choi, J. E., Lim, J. S., Kim, J. S., & Shin, S. J.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Jin Sung
  • Shin, Sang Joon
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-02-27
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
128-128
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408061886
Cited by
26
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14
FWCI
20.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Center (2020-data-we08)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, oncology, multimodal data integration, genomic data, medical imaging data, natural language processing, unstructured clinical data, survival analysis, tumor stage, data pipelines, user acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review