Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network

Open access
Krabbenhoft, Corey A., Allen, George H., Lin, Peirong, Godsey, Sarah E., Allen, Daniel C., Burrows, Ryan M., DelVecchia, Amanda G., Fritz, Ken M., Shanafield, Margaret, Burgin, Amy J., Zimmer, Margaret A., Datry, Thibault, Dodds, Walter K., Jones, C. Nathan, Mims, Meryl C., Franklin, Catherin, Hammond, John C., Zipper, Sam, Ward, Adam S., Costigan, Katie H., Beck, Hylke E., Olden, Julian D.·2022·Nature Sustainability
DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Ruhi, A., Messager, M. L. & Olden, J. D. Tracking the pulse of the Earth’s fresh waters. Nat. Sustain. 1, 198–203 (2018). · DOI
  2. Pearson, C. Short- and medium-term climate information for water management. World Meteorol. Organ. Bull. 57, 173–177 (2008).
  3. Tetzlaff, D., Carey, S. K., McNamara, J. P., Laudon, H. & Soulsby, C. The essential value of long-term experimental data for hydrology and water management. Water Resour. Res. 53, 2598–2604 (2017). · DOI
  4. Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M. & Meador, M. R. Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 264–270 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Shrestha, S., Kazama, F. & Newham, L. T. H. A framework for estimating pollutant export coefficients from long-term in-stream water quality monitoring data. Environ. Model. Softw. 23, 182–194 (2008). · DOI
  6. Lepistö, A., Futter, M. N. & Kortelainen, P. Almost 50 years of monitoring shows that climate, not forestry, controls long-term organic carbon fluxes in a large boreal watershed. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1225–1237 (2014). · DOI
  7. Xu, H., Xu, C.-Y., Chen, H., Zhang, Z. & Li, L. Assessing the influence of rain gauge density and distribution on hydrological model performance in a humid region of China. J. Hydrol. 505, 1–12 (2013). · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.004
  8. Kiang, J. E., Stewart, D. W., Archfield, S. A., Osborne, E. B. & Eng, K. A National Streamflow Network Gap Analysis (USGS, 2013). · doi:10.3133/sir20135013
  9. Deweber, J. T. et al. Importance of understanding landscape biases in USGS gage locations: implications and solutions for managers. Fisheries 39, 155–163 (2014). · DOI
  10. Olden, J. D. et al. Hydrologic classification of Tanzanian rivers to support national water resource policy. Ecohydrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2282 (2021). · DOI
  11. Lin, P. et al. Global reconstruction of naturalized river flows at 2.94 million reaches. Water Resour. Res. 55, 6499–6516 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Yamazaki, D. et al. MERIT Hydro: a high-resolution global hydrography map based on latest topography dataset. Water Resour. Res. 55, 5053–5073 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Beck, H. E. et al. Bias correction of global high-resolution precipitation climatologies using streamflow observations from 9,372 catchments. J. Clim. 33, 1299–1315 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Do, H. X., Gudmundsson, L., Leonard, M. & Westra, S. The Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM)—part 1: the production of a daily streamflow archive and metadata. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 765–785 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Linke, S. et al. Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution. Sci. Data 6, 283 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dobrushin, R. L. Prescribing a system of random variables by conditional distributions. Theory Probab. Appl. 15, 458–486 (1970). · DOI
  17. Schefzik, R., Flesch, J. & Goncalves, A. Fast identification of differential distributions in single-cell RNA-sequencing data with waddR. Bioinformatics 37, 3204–3211 (2021). · DOI
  18. Reid, A. J. et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 94, 849–873 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Colvin, S. A. R. et al. Headwater streams and wetlands are critical for sustaining fish, fisheries, and ecosystem Services. Fisheries 44, 73–91 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chen, K. & Olden, J. D. Threshold responses of riverine fish communities to land use conversion across regions of the world. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4952–4965 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Pardo, I. et al. The European reference condition concept: a scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 420, 33–42 (2012). · DOI
  22. Sauquet, E. et al. Classification and trends in intermittent river flow regimes in Australia, northwestern Europe and USA: a global perspective. J. Hydrol. 597, 126170 (2021). · DOI
  23. Wilhite, D. A. in Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture and Water Supply Systems: Drought Management and Policy Development in the Mediterranean, Vol. 26 (eds. Iglesias, A. et al.) 3–19 (Springer Science and Business Media, 2009).
  24. Seyfried, M. S. & Wilcox, B. P. Scale and the nature of spatial variability: field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling. Water Resour. Res. 31, 173–184 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hammond, J. C. et al. Spatial patterns and drivers of nonperennial flow regimes in the contiguous United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL090794 (2021). · DOI
  26. Messager, M. L. et al. Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams. Nature 594, 391–397 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Busch, M. H. et al. What’s in a name? Patterns, trends, and suggestions for defining non-perennial rivers and streams. Water 12, 1980 (2020). · DOI
  28. Zipper, S. C. et al. Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 084033 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Jaeger, K. L., Olden, J. D. & Pelland, N. A. Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13894–13899 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Beaufort, A., Lamouroux, N., Pella, H., Datry, T. & Sauquet, E. Extrapolating regional probability of drying of headwater streams using discrete observations and gauging networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 3033–3051 (2018). · DOI
  31. Argerich, A. et al. Comprehensive multiyear carbon budget of a temperate headwater stream: carbon budget of a headwater stream. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 1306–1315 (2016). · DOI
  32. Molden, D. J., Shrestha, A. B., Nepal, S. & Immerzeel, W. W. in Water Security, Climate Change and Sustainable Development (eds. Biswas, A. K. & Tortajada, C.) 65–82 (Springer, 2016). · DOI
  33. Kaletová, T. et al. Relevance of intermittent rivers and streams in agricultural landscape and their impact on provided ecosystem services—a Mediterranean case study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 2693 (2019). · DOI
  34. Zimmer, M. A. et al. Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings. WIREs Water 7, e1436 (2020). · DOI
  35. Wine, M. L. Toward strong science to support equitable water sharing in securitized transboundary watersheds. Biologia 9, 907–915 (2020). · DOI
  36. Alsdorf, D. E. GEOPHYSICS: tracking fresh water from space. Science 301, 1491–1494 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Benstead, J. P. & Leigh, D. S. An expanded role for river networks. Nat. Geosci. 5, 678–679 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Allen, D. C. et al. Citizen scientists document long-term streamflow declines in intermittent rivers of the desert southwest, USA. Freshw. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1086/701483 (2019). · DOI
  39. Joo, H. et al. Optimal stream gauge network design using entropy theory and importance of stream gauge stations. Entropy 21, 991 (2019). · doi:10.3390/e21100991
  40. Vörösmarty, C. et al. Global water data: a newly endangered species. Eos 82, 54–58 (2001). · doi:10.1029/01eo00031
  41. Lin, P., Pan, M., Wood, E. F., Yamazaki, D. & Allen, G. H. A new vector-based global river network dataset accounting for variable drainage density. Sci. Data 8, 28 (2021). · DOI
  42. Yu, S. et al. Evaluating a landscape-scale daily water balance model to support spatially continuous representation of flow intermittency throughout stream networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 5279–5295 (2020). · DOI
  43. Kennard, M. J. et al. Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshw. Biol. 55, 171–193 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 41, 103–116 (1985). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Krabbenhoft, C. A., Allen, G. H., Lin, P., Godsey, S. E., Allen, D. C., Burrows, R. M., DelVecchia, A. G., Fritz, K. M., Shanafield, M., Burgin, A. J., Zimmer, M. A., Datry, T., Dodds, W. K., Jones, C. N., Mims, M. C., Franklin, C., Hammond, J. C., Zipper, S., Ward, A. S., Costigan, K. H., Beck, H. E., & Olden, J. D.
Venue
Nature Sustainability
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-04-25
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
586-592
ISSN
2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0
OpenAlex
W4224442013
Cited by
217
References
7
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0
The paper
Krabbenhoft, C. A., Allen, G. H., Lin, P., Godsey, S. E., Allen, D. C., Burrows, R. M., DelVecchia, A. G., Fritz, K. M., Shanafield, M., Burgin, A. J., Zimmer, M. A., Datry, T., Dodds, W. K., Jones, C. N., Mims, M. C., Franklin, C., Hammond, J. C., Zipper, S., Ward, A. S., . . . Olden, J. D. (2022). Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.