The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artificial intelligence servers in the USA
Open accessAbstract
The rapidly increasing demand for generative artificial intelligence (AI) models requires extensive server installation with sustainability implications in terms of the compound energy–water–climate impacts. Here we show that the deployment of AI servers across the United States could generate an annual water footprint ranging from 731 to 1,125 million m3 and additional annual carbon emissions from 24 to 44 Mt CO2-equivalent between 2024 and 2030, depending on the scale of expansion. Other factors, such as industry efficiency initiatives, grid decarbonization rates and the spatial distribution of server locations within the United States, drive deep uncertainties in the estimated water and carbon footprints. We show that the AI server industry is unlikely to meet its net-zero aspirations by 2030 without substantial reliance on highly uncertain carbon offset and water restoration mechanisms. Although best practices may reduce emissions and water footprints by up to 73% and 86%, respectively, their effectiveness is constrained by current energy infrastructure limitations. These findings underscore the urgency of accelerating the energy transition and point to the need for AI companies to harness the clean energy potential of Midwestern states. Coordinating efforts of private actors and regulatory interventions would ensure the competitive and sustainable development of the AI sector. The rapid expansion of AI server installations in the United States poses sustainability challenges in terms of water usage and carbon emissions. A study now quantifies these potential impacts and outlines coordinated mitigation strategies for the AI sector to achieve net-zero.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Scenario-based modeling identifies that without coordinated efficiency improvements and regional planning, AI-driven data center growth has the potential to exacerbate water stress in already constrained watersheds [26].”
From Navigating Environmental Concerns Confronting U.S. Data Centers Related to Water Quantity and Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y · Cited by 3,294
Self-citationPower provisioning for a warehouse-sized computer
Fan, X., Weber, W.-D., & Barroso, L. A. (2007) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1145/1250662.1250665 · Cited by 1,813
Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates
Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba3758 · Cited by 1,545
United States Data Center Energy Usage Report
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), B., Shehabi, A., USDOE, Smith, S., Sartor, D., Brown, R., Herrlin, M., Koomey, J., Masanet, E., Horner, N., et al. (2016) · doi:10.2172/1372902 · Cited by 1,040 · cited 1×
“Previous research has developed bottom-up and top-down meth-ods to assess energy–water–carbon outcomes of servers 19–21 , but these approaches face challenges with the rise of AI servers.”
Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations
Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239 · Cited by 970
The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence
de Vries, A. (2023) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004 · Cited by 597
Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation
Kaack, L. H., Donti, P. L., Strubell, E., Kamiya, G., Creutzig, F., & Rolnick, D. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7 · Cited by 570
U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Lopez, A., Roberts, B., Heimiller, D., Blair, N., & Porro, G. (2012) · doi:10.2172/1047328 · Cited by 301
Mytton, D. (2021) · npj Clean Water · doi:10.1038/s41545-021-00101-w · Cited by 297
The environmental footprint of data centers in the United States
Siddik, M. A. B., Shehabi, A., & Marston, L. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abfba1 · Cited by 281
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Luccioni, A. S., Viguier, S. & Ligozat, A.-L. Estimating the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176B parameter language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 24, 11990–12004 (2023).
- Jeon, M. et al. Analysis of large-scale multi-tenant GPU clusters for DNN training workloads. In 2019 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 19), 947–960 (2019). https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/jeon
- Weng, Q. et al. Beware of Fragmentation: scheduling GPU-sharing workloads with fragmentation gradient descent. In 2023 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 23), 995–1008 (2023). https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc23/presentation/weng
- Hu, Q. et al. Characterization of large language model development in the datacenter. In 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24), 709–729 (2024). https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi24/presentation/hu
- Worldwide Quarterly AI Infrastructure Tracker (IDC, 2024); https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=IDC_P37251
- Kung, F. See Generative AI’s Impact on the AI Server Market to 2025 (TrendForce, 2024); https://files.futurememorystorage.com/proceedings/2024/20240808_BMKT-301-1_KUNG.pdf
- Wu, C.-J. et al. Sustainable AI: environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. 4, 795–813 (2022).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chouksey, A., Rajan, A. K., Gurjar, V., Tiwari, R., & Mishra, P. K. (2026) · Global Environmental Change Advances · doi:10.1016/j.gecadv.2025.100029 · Cited by 16
Rare-Earth Exposure and Bottlenecks in AI Data Centers: Cost and Schedule RiskPreprint
He, Q., Shan, R., Qu, C., Tang, Y., & Zou, Y. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6232318 · Cited by 12
Friese, S., Nguyen‐Trung, K., Powell, S., & Morgan, D. L. (2026) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004261429393 · Cited by 11
Xu, X., Wang, Y., Deng, Y., Jiang, M., & Shi, V. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124765 · Cited by 11
From computation to environmental cost the resource burden of artificial intelligence
Falk, S., Corrêa, N. K., Luccioni, A. S., Biber‐Freudenberger, L., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2026) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-026-03537-5 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, T., Nerini, F. F., Matthews, H. D., Tavoni, M., & You, F.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Concordia University (CA)
- RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT)
- Corresponding author
- You, Fengqi
- Venue
- Nature Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1541-1553
- ISSN
- 2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416067151
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 117 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 26.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1643244)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- generative AI, water footprint, CO2 emissions, net-zero pathways, grid decarbonization, carbon offsetting, water restoration, energy transition, United States, AI sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
