Cited by 570Green IT and SustainabilityClimate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy Efficiency in Computing

Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation

Open access
Kaack, Lynn H., Donti, Priya L., Strubell, Emma, Kamiya, George, Creutzig, Felix, Rolnick, David·2022·Nature Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following traditional hardware development practices alone will not suffice to meet the demands for efficient computing power in AI systems, whether deployed in data centers or at the edge.

    “Overall, these observations suggest that following traditional hardware development practices alone will not suffice to meet the demands for efficient computing power in artificial intelligence (AI) systems [26], whether they are deployed in data centers or at the edge.”
  • Gains in efficiency can spur higher overall consumption, a phenomenon known as rebound effects.

    “Recent work on indirect impacts [63] warns of potential 'rebound effects', whereby gains in efficiency spur higher overall consumption.”
  • Direct economic rebound effects are the most common type of indirect effects discussed in conjunction with many technological innovations.

    “They are also the most common type of indirect effects that are discussed in conjunction with many technological innovations (see [63, 135]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaack, L. H., Donti, P. L., Strubell, E., Kamiya, G., Creutzig, F., & Rolnick, D.
Affiliations
  • Hertie School (DE)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Agence internationale de l'énergie (FR)
  • Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE)
  • Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Kaack, Lynn H.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2022-06
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
518-527
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W4281786142
Cited by
570
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 193 · 2025: 180 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 16
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • For this report, LHK, PLD and DR received funding from the Environmental Law Institute and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FG02-97ER25308)
  • National Science Foundation (SES-00949710)
  • Thomas and Stacey Siebel Foundation
  • Canada CIFAR AI Chairs program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
Keywords
artificial intelligence, machine learning, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation, impact assessment framework, scenario analysis, AI policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review