Cited by 480Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionIron oxide chemistry and applicationsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Impact of nanoparticle size and lattice oxygen on water oxidation on NiFeOxHy

Open access
Roy, C., Sebok, B., Scott, S. B., Fiordaliso, E. M., Sørensen, J. E., Bodin, A., Trimarco, D. B., Damsgaard, C. D. +5 more·2018·Nature Catalysis

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41929-018-0162-x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The outstanding pore characteristics of NCP2.5 are beneficial to catalytic activity, as they facilitate electron and mass transfer at the catalyst-electrolyte interface.

    “The outstanding pore characteristics of the NCP2.5 are beneficial to the catalytic activity, as they facilitate electron and mass transfer at the catalyst-electrolyte interface [60].”

    From Environment-responsive phase transformation of Ni-modified cobalt phosphate aerogels for durable hydrogen evolution in freshwater and seawater (2026) · cites this paper as [60]

    The supplied passages labeled Abstract (page unavailable) contain bibliographic information, not findings about NCP2.5. Searches for NCP2.5, pore characteristics, and electron and mass transfer found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, C., Sebok, B., Scott, S. B., Fiordaliso, E. M., Sørensen, J. E., Bodin, A., Trimarco, D. B., Damsgaard, C. D., Vesborg, P. C. K., Hansen, O., Stephens, I. E. L., Kibsgaard, J., & Chorkendorff, I.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Chorkendorff, I.
Venue
Nature Catalysis
Published
2018-11-05
Volume
1
Issue
11
Pages
820-829
ISSN
2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899198584
Cited by
480
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
oxygen evolution reaction, water oxidation, alkaline electrocatalysis, lattice oxygen, nanoparticle size, isotopic labeling, turnover frequency, alkaline water electrolysis, electrochemical mass spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review