Cited by 61Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Real-time structure search and structure classification for AlphaFold protein models

Open access
Aderinwale, Tunde, Bharadwaj, Vijay, Christoffer, Charles, Terashi, Genki, Zhang, Zicong, Jahandideh, Rashidedin, Kagaya, Yuki, Kihara, Daisuke·2022·Communications Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Last year saw a breakthrough in protein structure prediction, where the AlphaFold2 method showed a substantial improvement in the modeling accuracy. Following the software release of AlphaFold2, predicted structures by AlphaFold2 for proteins in 21 species were made publicly available via the AlphaFold Database. Here, to facilitate structural analysis and application of AlphaFold2 models, we provide the infrastructure, 3D-AF-Surfer, which allows real-time structure-based search for the AlphaFold2 models. In 3D-AF-Surfer, structures are represented with 3D Zernike descriptors (3DZD), which is a rotationally invariant, mathematical representation of 3D shapes. We developed a neural network that takes 3DZDs of proteins as input and retrieves proteins of the same fold more accurately than direct comparison of 3DZDs. Using 3D-AF-Surfer, we report structure classifications of AlphaFold2 models and discuss the correlation between confidence levels of AlphaFold2 models and intrinsic disordered regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-022-03261-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aderinwale, T., Bharadwaj, V., Christoffer, C., Terashi, G., Zhang, Z., Jahandideh, R., Kagaya, Y., & Kihara, D.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Kihara, Daisuke
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2022-04-05
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
316-316
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226320411
Cited by
61
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM133840, R01GM123055, 3R01GM133840-02S1)
  • NSF | BIO | Division of Biological Infrastructure (DBI2003635)
  • NSF | BIO | Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB1925643)
  • NSF | ENG/OAD | Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI1825941)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, structural classification, neural network retrieval, protein folding
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review