Cited by 24Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Improved enzyme functional annotation prediction using contrastive learning with structural inference

Open access
Yang, Yuxin, Jerger, Abby, Feng, Song, Wang, Zixu, Brasfield, Christina, Cheung, Margaret S., Zucker, Jeremy, Guan, Qiang·2024·Communications Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the remarkable progress of deep learning within the realm of scientific disciplines, yielding a wealth of promising outcomes. A prominent challenge within this domain has been the task of predicting enzyme function, a complex problem that has seen the development of numerous computational methods, particularly those rooted in deep learning techniques. However, the majority of these methods have primarily focused on either amino acid sequence data or protein structure data, neglecting the potential synergy of combining both modalities. To address this gap, we propose a Contrastive Learning framework for Enzyme functional ANnotation prediction combined with protein amino acid sequences and Contact maps (CLEAN-Contact). We rigorously evaluate the performance of our CLEAN-Contact framework against the state-of-the-art enzyme function prediction models using multiple benchmark datasets. Using CLEAN-Contact, we predict previously unknown enzyme functions within the proteome of Prochlorococcus marinus MED4. Our findings convincingly demonstrate the substantial superiority of our CLEAN-Contact framework, marking a significant step forward in enzyme function prediction accuracy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-024-07359-z

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Y., Jerger, A., Feng, S., Wang, Z., Brasfield, C., Cheung, M. S., Zucker, J., & Guan, Q.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zucker, Jeremy
  • Guan, Qiang
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2024-12-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1690-1690
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405702281
Cited by
24
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (#2212465, #2217021, #2217104, #2230111)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (10.46936/expl.proj.2022.60535/60008718, FWP 81832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
enzyme function prediction, contrastive learning, contact maps, protein structure, amino acid sequence, multimodal fusion
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Enzymes, Computational Biology, Proteome, Databases, Protein, Prochlorococcus, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review