Cited by 487Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients treated with pembrolizumab

Bratman, Scott V., Yang, S. Y. Cindy, Iafolla, Marco A. J., Liu, Zhihui, Hansen, Aaron R., Bedard, Philippe L., Lheureux, Stephanie, Spreafico, Anna +18 more·2020·Nature Cancer

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) provides clinical benefit to a subset of patients with cancer. However, existing biomarkers do not reliably predict treatment response across diverse cancer types. Limited data exist to show how serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing may perform as a predictive biomarker in patients receiving ICB. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial to assess ctDNA in five distinct cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumors treated with pembrolizumab (NCT02644369). We applied bespoke ctDNA assays to 316 serial plasma samples obtained at baseline and every three cycles from 94 patients. Baseline ctDNA concentration correlated with progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical response and clinical benefit. This association became stronger when considering ctDNA kinetics during treatment. All 12 patients with ctDNA clearance during treatment were alive with median 25 months follow up. This study demonstrates the potential for broad clinical utility of ctDNA-based surveillance in patients treated with ICB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43018-020-0096-5

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bratman, S. V., Yang, S. Y. C., Iafolla, M. A. J., Liu, Z., Hansen, A. R., Bedard, P. L., Lheureux, S., Spreafico, A., Razak, A. A., Shchegrova, S., Louie, M., Billings, P., Zimmermann, B., Sethi, H., Aleshin, A., Torti, D., Marsh, K., Eagles, J., Cirlan, I., Hanna, Y., Clouthier, D. L., Lien, S. C., Ohashi, P. S., Xu, W., Siu, L. L., & Pugh, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Natera (United States) (US)
  • Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Siu, Lillian L.
  • Pugh, Trevor J.
Venue
Nature Cancer
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
1
Issue
9
Pages
873-881
ISSN
2662-1347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047097799
Cited by
487
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 12
FWCI
23.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation (Gattuso-Slaight Personalized Cancer Medicine Fund, BMO Chair in Precision Cancer Genomics)
  • UofT | Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto (OSOTF Excellence Award)
  • Terry Fox Research Institute
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation (32383)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
circulating tumor DNA, pembrolizumab, immune checkpoint blockade, predictive biomarkers, solid tumors, ctDNA kinetics, ctDNA clearance, liquid biopsy, treatment response, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Circulating Tumor DNA, Humans, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review