Cited by 29Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Plasma ctDNA response is an early marker of treatment effect in advanced NSCLC

Open access
Cheng, Michael L., Lau, Christie J., Milan, Marina S. D., Supplee, Julianna G., Riess, Jonathan W., Bradbury, Penelope A., Jänne, Pasi A., Oxnard, Geoffrey R. +1 more·2021·JCO Precision Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is routine for genotyping of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, early response assessment using plasma ctDNA has yet to be well characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC across three phase I NCI osimertinib combination trials were analyzed in this study, and an institutional cohort of patients with KRAS-, EGFR-, and BRAF-mutant advanced NSCLC receiving systemic treatment was used for validation. Plasma was collected before treatment initiation and serially before each cycle of therapy, and key driver mutations in ctDNA were characterized by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Timing of plasma versus imaging response was compared in a separate cohort of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib. Across cohorts, we also studied ctDNA variability before treatment start. RESULTS: In the NCI cohort, 14/16 (87.5%) patients exhibited ≥ 90% decrease in mutation abundance by the first on-treatment timepoint (20-28 days from treatment start) with minimal subsequent change. Similarly, 47/56 (83.9%) patients with any decrease in the institutional cohort demonstrated ≥ 90% decrease in mutation abundance by the first follow-up draw (7-30 days from treatment start). All 16 patients in the imaging cohort with radiographic partial response showed best plasma response within one cycle, preceding best radiographic response by a median of 24 weeks (range: 3-147 weeks). Variability in ctDNA levels before treatment start was observed. CONCLUSION: Plasma ctDNA response is an early phenomenon, with the majority of change detectable within the first cycle of therapy. These kinetics may offer an opportunity for early insight into treatment effect before standard imaging timepoints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/po.20.00419

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, M. L., Lau, C. J., Milan, M. S. D., Supplee, J. G., Riess, J. W., Bradbury, P. A., Jänne, P. A., Oxnard, G. R., & Paweletz, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Corresponding author
Cheng, Michael L.
Venue
JCO Precision Oncology
Published
2021-11
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
393-402
ISSN
2473-4284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130023215
Cited by
29
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCO Precision Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA240592, K12CA138464, UM1CA186709, UM1CA186717)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
circulating tumor DNA, liquid biopsy, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, osimertinib, early treatment response, treatment response biomarkers, ctDNA kinetics, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, droplet digital PCR
MeSH terms
Circulating Tumor DNA, Acrylamides, Aniline Compounds, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Indoles, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Staging, Pyrimidines, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review