Cited by 115Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGlobal Health Care Issues

Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century

Open access
Olshansky, S. Jay, Willcox, Bradley J., Demetrius, Lloyd, Beltrán-Sánchez, Hiram·2024·Nature Aging

Abstract

Over the course of the twentieth century, human life expectancy at birth rose in high-income nations by approximately 30 years, largely driven by advances in public health and medicine. Mortality reduction was observed initially at an early age and continued into middle and older ages. However, it was unclear whether this phenomenon and the resulting accelerated rise in life expectancy would continue into the twenty-first century. Here using demographic survivorship metrics from national vital statistics in the eight countries with the longest-lived populations (Australia, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland) and in Hong Kong and the United States from 1990 to 2019, we explored recent trends in death rates and life expectancy. We found that, since 1990, improvements overall in life expectancy have decelerated. Our analysis also revealed that resistance to improvements in life expectancy increased while lifespan inequality declined and mortality compression occurred. Our analysis suggests that survival to age 100 years is unlikely to exceed 15% for females and 5% for males, altogether suggesting that, unless the processes of biological aging can be markedly slowed, radical human life extension is implausible in this century. In the twentieth century, human life expectancy rose dramatically. Based on the past three decades of observed mortality in the eight countries with the longest-lived populations and in Hong Kong and the United States, Olshansky et al. propose that, without medical breakthroughs that slow aging, radical lifespan extension is implausible in this century.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-024-00702-3

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [11]Kurzweil, R. & Grossman, T. Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever (Rodale Books, 2004). 19745481
  2. [37]Gratton, L. & Scott, A. J. The 100-Year Life: Living and Working in an Age of Longevity (Bloomsbury, 2016).
  3. [42]Aging: Geroscience as the New Public Health Frontier 2nd edn (eds Kirkland, J. D. et al.) (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2024).
  4. [45]Keyfitz, N. Applied Mathematical Demography (Wiley, 1977).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olshansky, S. J., Willcox, B. J., Demetrius, L., & Beltrán-Sánchez, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Olshansky, S. Jay
Venue
Nature Aging
Published
2024-10-07
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
1635-1642
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403184891
Cited by
115
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 3
FWCI
98.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (R01AG027060, R01AG052030)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2C-HD041022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Health Care Issues
Keywords
mortality trends, lifespan inequality, biological aging, radical life extension, longevity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Australia, Female, France, Hong Kong, Humans, Japan, Life Expectancy, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United States, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review