Cited by 202Biomedical Ethics and RegulationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAging and Gerontology Research

Position Statement on Human Aging

Olshansky, S. J., Hayflick, L., Carnes, B. A.·2002·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

A large number of products are currently being sold by antiaging entrepreneurs who claim that it is now possible to slow, stop, or reverse human aging. The business of what has become known as antiaging medicine has grown in recent years in the United States and abroad into a multimillion-dollar industry. The products being sold have no scientifically demonstrated efficacy, in some cases they may be harmful, and those selling them often misrepresent the science upon which they are based. In the position statement that follows, 52 researchers in the field of aging have collaborated to inform the public of the distinction between the pseudoscientific antiaging industry, and the genuine science of aging that has progressed rapidly in recent years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/57.8.b292

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olshansky, S. J., Hayflick, L., & Carnes, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
B292-B297
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W1994903896
Cited by
202
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Chung-Hsing University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-00894-01, R55AG013968, AG13968-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
human aging, pseudoscience, scientific evidence, consumer health claims, aging research
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Forecasting, Geriatrics, Humans, Life Expectancy, Life Style, Longevity, Male, Primary Prevention, Quality of Life, Research, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review