Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physics-driven coarse-grained model for biomolecular phase separation with near-quantitative accuracy

Open access
Joseph, Jerelle A., Reinhardt, Aleks, Aguirre, Anne, Chew, Pin Yu, Russell, Kieran O., Espinosa, Jorge R., Garaizar, Adiran, Collepardo-Guevara, Rosana·2021·Nature Computational Science

Abstract

Various physics- and data-driven sequence-dependent protein coarse-grained models have been developed to study biomolecular phase separation and elucidate the dominant physicochemical driving forces. Here we present Mpipi, a multiscale coarse-grained model that describes almost quantitatively the change in protein critical temperatures as a function of amino acid sequence. The model is parameterized from both atomistic simulations and bioinformatics data and accounts for the dominant role of π–π and hybrid cation–π/π–π interactions and the much stronger attractive contacts established by arginines than lysines. We provide a comprehensive set of benchmarks for Mpipi and seven other residue-level coarse-grained models against experimental radii of gyration and quantitative in vitro phase diagrams, demonstrating that Mpipi predictions agree well with experiments on both fronts. Moreover, Mpipi can account for protein–RNA interactions, correctly predicts the multiphase behavior of a charge-matched poly-arginine/poly-lysine/RNA system, and recapitulates experimental liquid–liquid phase separation trends for sequence mutations on FUS, DDX4 and LAF-1 proteins. Combining bioinformatics data and atomistic simulations, this study develops a sequence-dependent coarse-grained model for biomolecular phase separation. This model achieves a quantitative agreement with experimental observations. Extensive benchmarks exemplify its performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43588-021-00155-3

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Joseph, J. A., Reinhardt, A., Aguirre, A., Chew, P. Y., Russell, K. O., Espinosa, J. R., Garaizar, A., & Collepardo-Guevara, R.
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Published
2021-11-22
Volume
1
Issue
11
Pages
732-743
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215858345
Cited by
382
References
86
FWCI
11.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics-driven coarse-grained model for biomolecular phase separation with near-quantitative accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s43588-021-00155-3
The paper
Joseph, J. A., Reinhardt, A., Aguirre, A., Chew, P. Y., Russell, K. O., Espinosa, J. R., Garaizar, A., & Collepardo-Guevara, R. (2021). Physics-driven coarse-grained model for biomolecular phase separation with near-quantitative accuracy. Nature Computational Science. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00155-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.