Cited by 150Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Single-sequence protein structure prediction using supervised transformer protein language models

Open access
Wang, Wenkai, Peng, Zhenling, Yang, Jianyi·2022·Nature Computational Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in protein structure prediction in recent years. However, it remains challenging for AlphaFold2 and other deep learning-based methods to predict protein structure with single-sequence input. Here we introduce trRosettaX-Single, an automated algorithm for single-sequence protein structure prediction. It incorporates the sequence embedding from a supervised transformer protein language model into a multi-scale network enhanced by knowledge distillation to predict inter-residue two-dimensional geometry, which is then used to reconstruct three-dimensional structures via energy minimization. Benchmark tests show that trRosettaX-Single outperforms AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold on orphan proteins and works well on human-designed proteins (with an average template modeling score (TM-score) of 0.79). An experimental test shows that the full trRosettaX-Single pipeline is two times faster than AlphaFold2, using much fewer computing resources (<10%). On 2,000 designed proteins from network hallucination, trRosettaX-Single generates structure models with high confidence. As a demonstration, trRosettaX-Single is applied to missense mutation analysis. These data suggest that trRosettaX-Single may find potential applications in protein design and related studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43588-022-00373-3

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W., Peng, Z., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • Nankai University (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Jianyi
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Published
2022-12-19
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
804-814
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313430582
Cited by
150
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 8
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (T2222012, 61873185, T2225007, 11871290)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
knowledge distillation, multi-scale network, orphan proteins, protein design
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Language, Electric Power Supplies, Benchmarking, Distillation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review