Proteome-wide copy-number estimation from transcriptomics
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein copy numbers constrain systems-level properties of regulatory networks, but proportional proteomic data remain scarce compared to RNA-seq. We related mRNA to protein statistically using best-available data from quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics for 4366 genes in 369 cell lines. The approach starts with a protein’s median copy number and hierarchically appends mRNA–protein and mRNA–mRNA dependencies to define an optimal gene-specific model linking mRNAs to protein. For dozens of cell lines and primary samples, these protein inferences from mRNA outmatch stringent null models, a count-based protein-abundance repository, empirical mRNA-to-protein ratios, and a proteogenomic DREAM challenge winner. The optimal mRNA-to-protein relationships capture biological processes along with hundreds of known protein-protein complexes, suggesting mechanistic relationships. We use the method to identify a viral-receptor abundance threshold for coxsackievirus B3 susceptibility from 1489 systems-biology infection models parameterized by protein inference. When applied to 796 RNA-seq profiles of breast cancer, inferred copy-number estimates collectively re-classify 26–29% of luminal tumors. By adopting a gene-centered perspective of mRNA–protein covariation across different biological contexts, we achieve accuracies comparable to the technical reproducibility of contemporary proteomics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control
Buccitelli, C., & Selbach, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0258-4 · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
Statistical data analysis in the computer age
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5018.390 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
A joint NCBI and EMBL-EBI transcript set for clinical genomics and research
Morales, J., Pujar, S., Loveland, J. E., Astashyn, A., Bennett, R., Berry, A., Cox, E., Davidson, C., Ermolaeva, O., Farrell, C. M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04558-8 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
A public genome-scale lentiviral expression library of human ORFs
Yang, X., Boehm, J. S., Yang, X., Salehi-Ashtiani, K., Hao, T., Shen, Y., Lubonja, R., Thomas, S. R., Alkan, O., Bhimdi, T., et al. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1638 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Neff, R. A., Wang, M., Vatansever, S., Guo, L., Ming, C., Wang, Q., Wang, E., Horgusluoglu-Moloch, E., Song, W.-M., Li, A., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb5398 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics
Pappireddi, N., Martin, L., & Wühr, M. (2019) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201800650 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome
Liu, Y., Gonzàlez-Porta, M., Santos, S., Brazma, A., Marioni, J. C., Aebersold, R., Venkitaraman, A. R., & Wickramasinghe, V. O. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.025 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
A combined approach for single-cell mRNA and intracellular protein expression analysis
Reimegård, J., Tarbier, M., Danielsson, M., Schuster, J., Baskaran, S., Panagiotou, S., Dahl, N., Friedländer, M. R., & Gallant, C. J. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02142-w · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Sweatt, A. J., Griffiths, C. D., Groves, S. M., Paudel, B. B., Wang, L., Kashatus, D. F., & Janes, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Janes, Kevin A
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1230-1256
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11535397
- OpenAlex
- W4402923124
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (U54-CA274499, R50-CA265089, T32-HL007284)
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2009-34710)
- Human Frontier Science Program (LT000469/2021-L)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- transcriptomics, proteomics, cell lines, breast cancer, luminal tumors, protein-protein complex, proteogenomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review