Cited by 5Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Proteome-wide copy-number estimation from transcriptomics

Open access
Sweatt, Andrew J, Griffiths, Cameron D, Groves, Sarah M, Paudel, B Bishal, Wang, Lixin, Kashatus, David F, Janes, Kevin A·2024·Molecular Systems Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein copy numbers constrain systems-level properties of regulatory networks, but proportional proteomic data remain scarce compared to RNA-seq. We related mRNA to protein statistically using best-available data from quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics for 4366 genes in 369 cell lines. The approach starts with a protein’s median copy number and hierarchically appends mRNA–protein and mRNA–mRNA dependencies to define an optimal gene-specific model linking mRNAs to protein. For dozens of cell lines and primary samples, these protein inferences from mRNA outmatch stringent null models, a count-based protein-abundance repository, empirical mRNA-to-protein ratios, and a proteogenomic DREAM challenge winner. The optimal mRNA-to-protein relationships capture biological processes along with hundreds of known protein-protein complexes, suggesting mechanistic relationships. We use the method to identify a viral-receptor abundance threshold for coxsackievirus B3 susceptibility from 1489 systems-biology infection models parameterized by protein inference. When applied to 796 RNA-seq profiles of breast cancer, inferred copy-number estimates collectively re-classify 26–29% of luminal tumors. By adopting a gene-centered perspective of mRNA–protein covariation across different biological contexts, we achieve accuracies comparable to the technical reproducibility of contemporary proteomics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44320-024-00064-3

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sweatt, A. J., Griffiths, C. D., Groves, S. M., Paudel, B. B., Wang, L., Kashatus, D. F., & Janes, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Janes, Kevin A
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2024-09-27
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1230-1256
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402923124
Cited by
5
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (U54-CA274499, R50-CA265089, T32-HL007284)
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2009-34710)
  • Human Frontier Science Program (LT000469/2021-L)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
transcriptomics, proteomics, cell lines, breast cancer, luminal tumors, protein-protein complex, proteogenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review