Cited by 133Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

An RNA-Seq atlas of gene expression in mouse and rat normal tissues

Open access
Söllner, Julia F., Leparc, German, Hildebrandt, Tobias, Klein, Holger, Thomas, Leo, Stupka, Elia, Simon, Eric·2017·Scientific Data

Abstract

Gene functionality is closely connected to its expression specificity across tissues and cell types. RNA-Seq is a powerful quantitative tool to explore genome wide expression. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive RNA-Seq dataset across the same 13 tissues for mouse and rat, two of the most relevant species for biomedical research. The dataset provides the transcriptome across tissues from three male C57BL6 mice and three male Han Wistar rats. We also describe our bioinformatics pipeline to process and technically validate the data. Principal component analysis shows that tissue samples from both species cluster similarly. We show by comparative genomics that many genes with high sequence identity with respect to their human orthologues also have a highly correlated tissue distribution profile and are in agreement with manually curated literature data for human. In summary, the present study provides a unique resource for comparative genomics and will facilitate the analysis of tissue specificity and cross-species conservation in higher organisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sdata.2017.185

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mardia K. V., Kent J. T. & Bibby J. M. Multivariate Analysis. xv, 518 pp., (Academic Press, London-New York-Toronto-Sydney-San Francisco, 1979).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Söllner, J. F., Leparc, G., Hildebrandt, T., Klein, H., Thomas, L., Stupka, E., & Simon, E.
Affiliations
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Simon, Eric
Venue
Scientific Data
Published
2017-12-12
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
170185-170185
ISSN
2052-4463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773852483
Cited by
133
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
tissue-specific gene expression, transcriptome, mice, rats, comparative genomics, human orthologs, cross-species conservation, C57BL/6 mice, Wistar rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Organ Specificity, RNA, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Genomics, Mice, Rats, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review